Browse Topic: Injuries
Youth bicycle helmet manufacturers often add shell protrusions to make helmets more attractive or fun for children, yet the safety implications of these features are not well understood. While prior work suggests protrusions may affect head impact kinematics, no study has evaluated their effectiveness in location-matched impacts between helmets with and without protrusions. Twelve youth bicycle helmet models, with protrusions intact and removed, underwent matched oblique impacts at three locations and 4.2 m/s to capture resulting peak linear acceleration (PLA) and peak rotational acceleration (PRA). A linear mixed model was used to quantify the effect of protrusion presence on PLA, PRA, and impact duration. The youth bicycle helmet models produced a wide range of kinematics. Protrusion presence had a strong effect on PLA, PRA, and impact duration. PLA averaged 103.0 ± 22.8 g for helmets with protrusions compared to 143.9 ± 21.4 g for helmets without protrusions, while PRA averaged 4432 ± 1570 rad/s2 for helmets with protrusions and 5177 ± 2110 rad/s2 for helmets without protrusions. These findings suggest that helmet protrusions can reduce peak head accelerations in youth bicycle helmet impacts.
Letter from the Guest Editors
Modern combat helmets improve wearer survivability through preventing ballistic penetration via delamination or deformation of the shell material. However, this deformation may impinge upon the skull and present a risk of behind-helmet blunt trauma (BHBT). While legacy aramid helmets from the late 1970s–1980s inform current NIJ testing standards, the advent of lower areal density ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and modern suspensions may incur unknown changes that present an unknown effect on BHBT risk. This study investigates whether current standards relying on a peak acceleration threshold and residual clay deformation may not reflect changes in deformation geometry seen in newer shell materials and suspension designs. Thirty-eight helmets categorized into three groups, older aramid, newer aramid (with new suspension), and prototype UHMWPE (with old suspension), were mounted on Hybrid III ATD head-necks and impacted on the temporal surface with 9 mm NATO projectiles at velocities between 388 and 482 m/s. Flash x-ray imaging captured deformation geometry. Deformations were digitized to measure maximum depth, volume, and surface area recruited. Multiple linear regression identified the influence of shell material and suspension on geometry. Results indicated that shell material significantly affected deformation volume and area (p < 0.05). Notably, UHMWPE exhibited a qualitatively more “pointed” deformation profile compared to aramid, recruiting material differently as depth increased. In contrast, suspension type and helmet design did not significantly influence deformation geometry. These findings suggest that the BHBT geometry in UHMWPE helmets differs fundamentally from aramid helmets. As UHMWPE helmets encounter higher-energy threats, current acceleration threshold or depth-based standards may not fully capture the risk of skull fracture. To future-proof helmet validation, testing standards should evolve beyond current standards to include area recruitment and other geometric measures.
The persistent rate of accidents and fatalities involving legacy tactical military vehicles underscores a critical need for Enhanced Situational Awareness (ESA) technologies. However, the prohibitive cost and lengthy development cycles associated with full MIL-STD ruggedization often prevent these safety systems from reaching the in-service non-combat vehicles with limited driver visibility. This paper suggests a strategic shift in procurement policy: The adoption of relaxed ruggedization standards for vehicles operating in non-combat, administrative, and training roles. By deriving requirements from high-stress commercial sectors— such as heavy mining, steel production, and NASCAR racing—the military can utilize electronics designed for "extreme industrial" rather than "battlefield" environments. The principal objectives of this relaxation is cost reduction, lowering the barrier to entry and increasing the likelihood of ESA deployment across the legacy fleet. Furthermore, this approach aligns with Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) principles by enabling the integration of non-proprietary commercial devices. Utilizing these accessible technologies on legacy platforms creates a real-world testbed to evaluate technological advances rapidly. These insights can then inform and accelerate the development of future MIL-STD systems for combat vehicles, effectively shortening the traditional development life cycle while prioritizing the immediate enhanced protection of service member lives.
Since 2019, sex equity in traffic crashes has been a highly debated topic in vehicle safety, especially following the 2019 study by Forman et al. (1) claiming that female occupants face a 73 percent greater risk of serious injury in frontal crashes compared to male occupants. This was soon followed by a Consumer Reports Article by Keith Barry (2), which attempted to identify underlying factors contributing to the higher risk. These have been embraced by several parties since 2019. Firstly, it was alleged that vehicle design practice over the last four decades considered safety for the male population only and ignored that of the female as evidenced by the exclusive use of the mid-sized male Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) in Regulatory and Safety Ratings tests and not with an average sized female ATD. The absence of such an ATD for testing of vehicles “set the course for four decades’ worth of car safety design, with deadly consequences” (2). Secondly, although there is a recognition of the fact that Regulatory testing with a Small Female ATD, the Hybrid III-05F, was introduced in the FMVSS208 in 2003, this ATD was only a scaled version of the average male ATD of the 1970’s implying that this ATD is incapable of driving the design of restraint systems for females due to “They’re put together differently. Their material properties—their structure—is different” (2). Thirdly, according to a quote “These same trends have been observed in many, many studies in the past.” We assume that the trends refer to the apparent disparity in safety of females when compared to those of males. This document aims to outline historical activities, associated research and the development of countermeasures addressing crashworthiness concerns related to vehicle safety for females, as well as factors affecting both males and females, such as age-related impacts. This paper deals mainly with the frontal crash modes, mentions side impacts briefly as it affected designs of inflatable restraints for side impact to protect the smaller portion of the population from inflation induced injuries but the history behind the use of female ATDs by IIHS and NHTSA in full scale testing is not covered. Where ever possible, the time periods of reported activities related to female safety have been divided to pre-1997 corresponding to a change in US frontal crash regulation to address serious-to-fatal injuries to females and children, between 1997 to 2003 corresponding to the proposal by Canada for its frontal impact standard, and between 2003 and 2006 when the Advanced Restraint Regulation in the US FMVSS 208 was promulgated. This was followed by activities between 2007 and 2019, and post 2019 period.
Researchers recently helped Skydio, the leading U.S. drone manufacturer, demonstrate compliance to the Federal Aviation Administration's rules for safe flights over people and vehicles. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA Operators using a drone from the leading manufacturer in the U.S. can now conduct missions over people and vehicles much easier and with even greater confidence in their safety. In January, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) accepted a declaration of compliance for such flights for the parachute-equipped Skydio X10 drone from Skydio, a San Mateo, California-based company that supplies its drones to customers in public safety, utilities, and national security. The acceptance came as the result of working with Virginia Tech's Mid-Atlantic Aviation Partnership (MAAP) and Center for Injury Biomechanics to complete their FAA-approved means of compliance testing.
Pilots, drivers, and automated safety systems in cars and airplanes could be alerted to icy hazards by a pair of sensors developed at the University of Michigan. Ice on roads causes around 20 percent of weather-related car crashes each year, and ice build-up on planes causes roughly 10 percent of all fatal air carrier crashes by interfering with aerodynamics and controls. For instance, a flight from Brazilian airliner Voepass Linhas Aéreas crashed near São Paulo on August 9, 2024, after the plane’s de-icing systems failed, according to a report in the Aviation Safety Network. An Air France flight also crashed in the Atlantic Ocean on June 1, 2009, after ice blocked the probes that measure the plane’s speed. In both cases, all occupants died.
Industries are following a tedious product development cycle for developing their product. In product development major steps includes design ideas, Drawings, CAD, CAE, Testing and design improvement cycle. This is a monotonous process and takes time which impacts on its time to deliver product and cost on development. Now a days industries are fast growing and targeting to reduce development cycle time and cost. AI&ML is impacting almost all areas in the industry and significantly reducing efforts time and cost. To make use of AI&ML in CAE, Altair Physics AI is an effective tool. To ensure the design of product traditional way is to develop a CAD of the product, develop, perform CAE and analyze performance. If we consider CAE procedure it is time consuming process which includes FEA model build, applying boundary conditions, running simulation and analyzing results which could take minutes to hours. By using ML with Physics AI we can make predictions on new design of the product in seconds and significantly save time and cost. To demonstrate the CAE acceleration process with physic AI we have solved two case studies. The first case study is head impact on hood where ML tool will predict deformation contour of the hood, acceleration and displacement curve of the impactor. The second case study is Tube crush analysis where prediction of tube deformation pattern, force and energy curve for different tube length and impact velocity is carried out. For both Case studies we have used TCS inhouse data to train test and prediction of the ML model. For Head impact case study, it gives lower training loss with more than 90 percent prediction accuracy. Similarly for tube crush study it gives good accuracy and predicts comparable behavior patten with CAE results. Physic AI ML tool accelerates the design and development cycle and can be utilized in different product development. Implementation of ML accelerates the CAE process in design and development of products. It saves a lot of time in multiple design iteration study. Similar method can be implemented for different CAE cases.
Despite remarkable advances in vehicle technology - enhancing comfort, safety, and automation – productivity of transportation over the road continues to decline. Stop-and-go driving remains one of the most persistent inefficiencies in modern mobility systems, leading to greater travel delays, energy waste, emissions, and accident risk. As vehicle volumes rise, these effects compound into systemic challenges, including driver frustration, unstable flow dynamics, and elevated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To address these issues, an extensive data-driven evaluation was performed characterizing the underlying causes of traffic instability and uncovering hidden behavioral parameters influencing traffic flow. This research led to the identification of a previously unrecognized metric - the Driver Comfort Index (DCI) - which quantifies an inter-vehicle spacing behavior that reflects intrinsic human driving behavior. Building on this discovery, mixed traffic is explored to identify its phenomena, where human-driven and machine-controlled vehicles coexist and share the road. It appears that adaptive cruise control (ACC) and connected autonomous vehicles (CAV) are controlled by a non-intrinsic parameter so that traffic mix suffers from a mismatch of vehicle dynamics. This mismatch is explored, and it is proposed to harmonize traffic dynamics by adopting the natural DCI parameter as the single control mechanism. Analytical studies demonstrate that DCI-based traffic flow orchestration, applied integrally to human- and machine-controlled vehicles, enhances traffic flow stability, mitigates stop-and-go oscillations, and significantly improves network efficiency, safety, and environmental performance.
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 2935