Browse Topic: Driving automation
This document is intended to establish a procedure to certify AD fallback test driver skill levels as an endorsement to SAE J3300 foundational level certification. The SAE J3300/3 endorsement can be used by the individual driver to qualify their skills as a test driver of vehicles with automated driving features. The SAE J3300/3 endorsement levels may also be used by test facilities or other organizations when seeking test or professional drivers with these skills. This document provides directions for obtaining the endorsement, including associated AD fallback test driving skill examination requirements, through SAE J3300-certified Examiners (refer to SAE J3300 for definition). Endorsement registration and associated records are administered through Probitas Authentication®. Probitas Authentication® is the current Independent Program Administrator for the SAE J3300 series. This document is a supplement to SAE J3300, providing information specific to the AD fallback test driver skill endorsement and clarifying the application of the rules set forth in SAE J3300 to the AD fallback test driver endorsement. While the references, definitions, rules, and guidelines presented in SAE J3300 Sections 1 through 5 apply to the AD fallback test driver endorsement, they are not repeated in this document.
Electrical/Electronic Architectures (EEAs) are continuously evolving to meet newly emerging demands. In recent years, major drivers of this evolution have been the increasing software-defined nature of vehicles and the push toward automated driving. Key technologies such as edge-enhanced functions, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, and service-oriented architectures are therefore the focus of current research efforts. This paper presents a vision of how these technologies can be used to enable cooperation between vehicles, illustrated by using parked vehicles as edge nodes. These are typically seen as obstructions, as they significantly increase the risk of missing or misinterpreting vulnerable road users such as pedestrians or cyclists. Our proposed approach to counteract this problem is the use of the parked vehicles themselves as edge nodes that support object detection or even trajectory planning. Current research primarily considers smart traffic infrastructure, roadside units, and other vehicles as potential edge nodes. Including parked vehicles as edge nodes means that, instead of acting solely as obstacles, we leverage their built-in sensors to contribute to cooperative awareness. While such cooperation will enhance the safety of automated vehicles in urban areas, several challenges arise. In this paper, we discuss how data traceability, decision-making in the presence of conflicting information, and incentive mechanisms for owners of parked vehicles can be addressed. Based on these challenges, the paper outlines requirements for future cooperative architecture and highlights the role of edge-enhanced functions, Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication, and service-oriented architectures in enabling fully automated driving.
Rigorous validation of SAE Levels 3 and 4 autonomous systems increasingly relies on simulation. However, the simulation-reality gap remains a challenge for human-in-the-loop assessments. This study empirically quantifies the behavioral fidelity of the Car-Learning-to-Act (CARLA) simulator by recreating specific real-world traffic scenarios using the high-precision exiD drone dataset. Twenty-five participants performed a series of maneuvers, including lane changes and time-critical cut-ins. Their performance was analyzed using Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), driver profiling, and Time-to-Collision (TTC) metrics. The findings reveal a clear distinction between relative and absolute behavioral validity. In strategic decision-making tasks, the simulation demonstrated remarkably high temporal fidelity. DTW analysis explained 94% of the trajectory variance. Participants initiated lane changes with an average lag of -9 frames (0.36 s) compared to naturalistic references. These results indicate that, despite the absence of peripheral optical flow, the simulator successfully elicits temporally correlated decision-making patterns suitable for assessing strategic driver intent. However, physical execution in reactive scenarios revealed significant absolute discrepancies. Although the high Pearson correlation (r ≈ 0.89) in velocity profiles proves that drivers recognize and react to hazards with realistic timing, their physical inputs were exaggerated. Participants displayed digital, over-modulated braking responses and maintained a negative safety bias of -11.26 m, a deviation attributed to the lack of vestibular g-force feedback and geometric minification. Furthermore, distinct driver profiles emerged. Risk-oriented participants exhibited a gaming effect by neglecting safety margins. In conclusion, while CARLA is highly valid for testing the temporal logic of driver interactions, absolute dynamics require calibration functions, such as force-feedback (pedal) tuning and visual deceleration cues like camera shake, to compensate for sensory limitations before it can be used for safety-critical validation.
1Systems level and integration testing are an integral part of the design and development of Automated Vehicles (AVs). Measurement science plays a pivotal role in testing to ensure the safe and efficient operation of AVs. This science establishes a common understanding of the units of measurement, crucial in linking human activities. This article describes the significance of measurement in studying interactions between key system technologies in AVs, including AI for perception, sensing, communications, and cybersecurity. To address the complexities of these interactions, a novel, adaptable, and interactive framework called the System Technology Interaction Model (STIM) is introduced. STIM considers both designed and emergent interactions between these system technologies, allowing AV developers to explore tailored experiments with the flexibility of filtering for focused testing. The framework currently models system interactions statically, not in real-time, to define potential relationships and influences during the design phase. The novelty of this framework comes from providing a holistic evaluation that captures testing of interactions between modules in addition to component-level testing, while other frameworks focus on testing individual component behaviors. It also assesses the equality of two interactions, meaning it ensures that two interactions behave the same way for consistent results. Moreover, the framework serves as a valuable tool for AV designers and safety regulators to aid in establishing robust design and assessment approaches. This work highlights the need for a common framework to thoroughly test AVs and gain a holistic understanding of system interactions. Finally, the framework aims to understand how to mitigate potential influences leading to AV malfunctions to advance the development and deployment of safe and reliable Automated Vehicles. The work focuses on level 1 and level 4 automated driving features to simplify the work, although it can be from level 1 to level 5. Although framework performance is inherently difficult to quantify, this framework’s performance can be reflected through its ability to accurately capture system interactions for improved AV design and support a broader usability among AV stakeholders. In the future, the framework can be expanded to include additional elements, such as infrastructure or other vehicles, to analyze information provided to AVs, allowing experts from various domains to collaborate, create similar models, integrate them when feasible, and model the interactions in real-time.
Precision control in Level 4 Automated Vehicles is essential for enhancing operational efficiency, accuracy, and safety. This work, conducted as part of ARPA-E’s NEXTCAR program, focuses on developing a robust hardware and software control solution to enable drive-by-wire functionality. A previous publication by the authors presented the hardware solutions for overtaking stock vehicle controls. This paper focuses on a model-based and data-driven control algorithm to enable drive-by-wire functionality for longitudinal and lateral motion control for a 2021 Honda Clarity Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle. This vehicle was equipped with a set of sensors and an onboard processing unit to enable Level 4 automation. For lateral controls, an algorithm was developed to command steering torque to the electronic power steering module, ensuring the vehicle could attain the desired steering angle position at varying speeds. The system leveraged feedforward and feedback mechanisms. Feedback controller gains were identified through frequency response analysis of the steering torque assist electric motor and were further refined during track testing. To optimize the controller’s response time, a feedforward function was developed using a physics-aware model of the vehicle's steering system. The independent feature selection for the model was guided by using the physics of the system. For longitudinal control, the control inputs included the positions of the brake and accelerator pedals sent to the stock ECU, with the desired speed as the setpoint. The setup used a combination of feedforward and feedback control to achieve the target acceleration or deceleration. These algorithms underwent extensive dynamometer and track testing to perform various maneuvers in conjunction with the automated driving system.
The concept of the vehicle has changed as a result of many innovations over the last decade in the fields of connected, autonomous/automated, shared, and electric (CASE) technologies. At the same time, labor shortages in Japan are becoming more serious due to a decline in the working population. To help resolve these issues, a remote-controlled autonomous vehicle driving system called Telemotion has been developed that automates the movement of vehicles in production plants. This system is an autonomous driving and transportation system in which the recognition, judgment, and operation functions of driving are handled by a control system outside the vehicle that communicates wirelessly with the vehicle. This system utilizes artificial intelligence (AI) and other advanced technologies to realize safe unmanned autonomous driving, and is already in operation in production plants. Currently, efforts are under way to build a digital twin environment and conduct AI learning using computer graphics (CG) to configure the system and improve the accuracy of the AI models with the aim of expanding its use to other factories. Within this digital twin environment, it is possible to examine previous tasks by reproducing the vehicles, processes, cameras, and vehicle movements present at a production site. Utilizing this digital twin enabled a significant reduction in the labor required to implement the system.
Avoiding and mitigating any potential collision is dependent on (1) road user ability to avoid entering into a conflict (conflict avoidance effect) and (2) road user response should a conflict be entered (collision avoidance effect). This study examined the collision avoidance effect of the Waymo Driver, a currently deployed SAE level 4 automated driving system (ADS), using a human behavior reference model, designed to be representative of a human driver that is non-impaired, with eyes on the conflict (NIEON). Reliable performance benchmarking methodologies for assessing ADS performance are an essential component of determining system readiness. This consistently performing, always-attentive driver does not exist in the human population. Counterfactual simulations were run on responder collision scenarios based on reconstructions from a 10-year period of human fatal crashes from the Operational Design Domain of the Waymo ADS in Chandler, Arizona. Of 16 simulated conflicts entered, 12 (75%) were prevented by the Waymo Driver, and 10 (62.5%) were prevented by the NIEON model. The NIEON Model mitigated an additional 5 collisions and did not mitigate 1 collision. In these 16 conflicts entered, 93% of serious injury risk was reduced by the Waymo Driver, whereas 84% of serious injury risk was reduced by the NIEON model. Further, in a case-by-case evaluation, the Waymo Driver’s collision avoidance led to reduced serious injury risk when compared to the NIEON model in every simulated event. The results of this paper demonstrate that a reference model like NIEON can be used to benchmark ADS responder performance in response to high-risk initiating behaviors performed by the current driving population.
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 767