Browse Topic: Cooperative driving automation
We present DISRUPT, a research project to develop a cooperative traffic perception and prediction system based on networked infrastructure and vehicle sensors. Decentralized tracking and prediction algorithms are used to estimate the dynamic state of road users and predict their state in the near future. Compared to centralized approaches, which currently dominate traffic perception, decentralized algorithms offer advantages such as greater flexibility, robustness and scalability. Mobile sensor boxes are used as infrastructure sensors and the locally calculated state estimates are communicated in such a way that they can augment local estimates from other sensor boxes and/or vehicles. In addition, the information is transferred to a cloud that collects the local estimates and provides traffic visualization functionalities. The prediction module then calculates the future dynamic state based on neurocognitive behavior models and a measure of a road user's risk of being involved in
This document describes machine-to-machine (M2M)1 communication to enable cooperation between two or more traffic participants or CDA devices hosted or controlled by said traffic participants. The cooperation supports or enables performance of the dynamic driving task (DDT) for a subject vehicle equipped with an engaged driving automation system feature and a CDA device. Other participants may include other vehicles with driving automation feature(s) engaged, shared road users (e.g., drivers of conventional vehicles or pedestrians or cyclists carrying compatible personal devices), or compatible road operator devices (e.g., those used by personnel who maintain or operate traffic signals or work zones). Cooperative driving automation (CDA) aims to improve the safety and flow of traffic and/or facilitate road operations by supporting the safer and more efficient movement of multiple vehicles in proximity to one another. This is accomplished, for example, by sharing information that can be
This standard provides the guideline for enhancements to adaptive cruise control (ACC) by the addition of wireless communication from relevant vehicles (V2V) and/or the infrastructure (I2V) to augment the ACC active sensing capability. The CACC system operates under driver responsibility and supervision and is limited to the following: Does only longitudinal control of the vehicle. Uses time gap control strategy similar to ACC. Motor vehicles covered in the scope of this document include light and heavy vehicles. The message elements to realize CACC and platooning are part of the scope. The initial release covers definitions for CACC and platooning and requirements for CACC, while a subsequent release will cover the platooning requirements.
This document describes machine-to-machine (M2M) communication to enable cooperation between two or more participating entities or communication devices possessed or controlled by those entities. The cooperation supports or enables performance of the dynamic driving task (DDT) for a subject vehicle with driving automation feature(s) engaged. Other participants may include other vehicles with driving automation feature(s) engaged, shared road users (e.g., drivers of manually operated vehicles or pedestrians or cyclists carrying personal devices), or road operators (e.g., those who maintain or operate traffic signals or workzones). Cooperative driving automation (CDA) aims to improve the safety and flow of traffic and/or facilitate road operations by supporting the movement of multiple vehicles in proximity to one another. This is accomplished, for example, by sharing information that can be used to influence (directly or indirectly) DDT performance by one or more nearby road users
Presently, a main mobility sector objective is to reduce its impact on the global greenhouse gas emissions. While there are many techniques being explored, a promising approach to improve fuel economy is to reduce the required energy by using slipstream effects. This study analyzes the demanded engine power and mechanical energy used by heavy-duty trucks during platooning and non-platooning operation to determine the aerodynamic benefits of the slipstream. A series of platooning tests utilizing class 8 semi-trucks platooning via Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) are performed. Comparing the demanded engine power and mechanical energy used reveals the benefits of platooning on the aerodynamic drag while disregarding any potential negative side effects on the engine. However, energy savings were lower than expected in some cases. It was hypothesized that the CACC may have amplified transient platooning events relative to the individual truck baseline results, hampering the
This document describes machine-to-machine (M2M) communication to enable cooperation between two or more participating entities or communication devices possessed or controlled by those entities. The cooperation supports or enables performance of the dynamic driving task (DDT) for a subject vehicle with driving automation feature(s) engaged. Other participants may include other vehicles with driving automation feature(s) engaged, shared road users (e.g., drivers of manually operated vehicles or pedestrians or cyclists carrying personal devices), or road operators (e.g., those who maintain or operate traffic signals or workzones). Cooperative driving automation (CDA) aims to improve the safety and flow of traffic and/or facilitate road operations by supporting the movement of multiple vehicles in proximity to one another. This is accomplished, for example, by sharing information that can be used to influence (directly or indirectly) DDT performance by one or more nearby road users
A Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) platooning system was developed and implemented on Class 8 heavy duty trucks. The system allows for longitudinal, or gap spacing, control of the vehicle, while lateral control is maintained by the driver. Many previous aerodynamic studies have shown a reduction in drag force from vehicles traveling in close proximity to each other. This “drafting” effect leads to potential fuel savings for all vehicles in the platoon. Several automated driving and CACC systems have been tested in simulation or closed track settings to evaluate these fuel savings. However, there are only a few examples of potential fuel savings in real on-road or highway environments. This paper provides control performance, fuel economy, lateral offset, and number of neighboring vehicle results of an on-road platoon. The CACC system was implemented on two Peterbilt 579 commercial trucks with unloaded 53’ box trailers. Testing occurred on highways around Montreal, Quebec with
ABSTRACT The transportation industry annually travels more than 6 times as many miles as passenger vehicles [1]. The fuel cost associated with this represents 38% of the total marginal operating cost for this industry [8]. As a result, industry’s interest in applications of autonomy have grown. One application of this technology is Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) using Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC). Auburn University outfitted four class 8 vehicles, two Peterbilt 579’s and two M915’s, with a basic hardware suite, and software library to enable level 1 autonomy. These algorithms were tested in controlled environments, such as the American Center for Mobility (ACM), and on public roads, such as highway 280 in Alabama, and Interstates 275/696 in Michigan. This paper reviews the results of these real-world tests and discusses the anomalies and failures that occurred during testing. Citation: Jacob Ward, Patrick Smith, Dan Pierce, David Bevly, Paul Richardson
Items per page:
50
1 – 39 of 39