Browse Topic: Passive restraint systems
In this study, an optimized structure for opening the headlining considering the deployment of the face-to-face roof airbag was studied. It was confirmed that the deployment performance differs depending on the skin of the headlining, and a standardized structure with mass production was proposed. Non-woven fabric and Tricot skin, which are economical and high-end specifications, satisfy the performance of PVC fusion application specifications after cutting 80% of the skin. The structure that satisfies the entire body including the knit specifications is a type that separates the roof airbag area piece, the corresponding soft piece is separated, and the deployment performance is satisfied with safety. Therefore, the structure is proposed as a standardized structure. This structure is expected to be applicable to roof DAB (Driver Airbag), PAB (Passenger Airbag), and Sunroof Airbag, which will be necessary technologies to secure indoor space. Regardless of which area the airbag will be
Airbags are crucial elements of passive safety in vehicles that help minimizing occupant injuries during various crash scenarios such as frontal, side, and oblique impacts. Airbags in cars are now mandatory in many countries, and their performance depends on how well the system is designed. A well-tuned airbag deployment algorithm is necessary to score superior NCAP safety ratings. Tuning of airbag deployment algorithms requires several data points which are obtained through actual crash testing. This is a cumbersome and expensive process as it involves crash tests for each scenario (e.g., full front barrier, offset deformable barrier, angled impact, etc.) at multiple test speeds. These tests are destructive and render the vehicles only worthy of scrap. The data gathered from various sensors (acceleration, pressure, etc.) is used to develop robust vehicle model specific algorithms that must correctly identify the crash scenario and send airbag firing signal at the optimal pre-decided
This specification establishes the performance and validation requirements for the inflator assembly used in airbag modules
This document establishes recommended practices to validate acceptable corrosion performance of metallic components and assemblies used in medium truck, heavy truck, and bus and trailer applications. The focus of the document is methods of accelerated testing and evaluation of results. A variety of test procedures are provided that are appropriate for testing components at various locations on the vehicle. The procedures incorporate cyclic conditions including corrosive chemicals, drying, humidity, and abrasive exposure. These procedures are intended to be effective in evaluating a variety of corrosion mechanisms as listed in Table 1. Test duration may be adjusted to achieve any desired level of exposure. Aggravating conditions such as joint rotation, mechanical stress, and temperature extremes are also considered. This document does not address the chemistry of corrosion or methods of corrosion prevention. For information in these areas, refer to SAE J447 or similar standard
Premium instrument panels (IPs) contain passenger airbag (PAB) systems that are typically comprised of a stiff plastic substrate and a soft ‘skin’ material which are adhesively bonded. During airbag deployment, the skin tears along the scored edges of the door holding the PAB system, the door opens, and the airbag inflates to protect the occupant. To accurately simulate the PAB deployment dynamics during a crash event all components of the instrument panel and the PAB system, including the skin, must be included in the model. It has been recognized that the material characterization and modeling of the skin tearing behavior are critical for predicting the timing and inflation kinematics of the airbag. Even so, limited data exists in the literature for skin material properties at hot and cold temperatures and at the strain rates created during the airbag deployment. This paper presents tensile test results of one typical skin material conducted at four different strain rates of 0.01/s
This SAE Recommended Practice describes common definitions and operational elements of Event Data Recorders. The SAE J1698 series of documents consists of the following: SAE J1698-1 - Event Data Recorder - Output Data Definition: Provides common data output formats and definitions for a variety of data elements that may be useful for analyzing vehicle crash and crash-like events that meet specified trigger criteria. SAE J1698-2 - Event Data Recorder - Retrieval Tool Protocol: Utilizes existing industry standards to identify a common physical interface and define the protocols necessary to retrieve records stored by light duty vehicle Event Data Recorders (EDRs). SAE J1698-3 - Event Data Recorder - Compliance Assessment: Defines procedures that may be used to validate that relevant EDR output records conform with the reporting requirements specified in Part 563, Table 1 during the course of FMVSS-208, FMVSS-214, and other applicable vehicle level crash testing
An automobile airbag deploys thanks to an accelerometer — a sensor that detects sudden changes in velocity. Accelerometers keep rockets and airplanes on the correct flight path, provide navigation for self-driving cars, and rotate images so that they stay right-side up on cellphones and tablets, among other essential tasks
This SAE Recommended Practice provides a Glossary of Terms commonly used to describe Seat Belt Restraint Systems Hardware and their function. These terms are currently defined in various SAE Recommended Practices but are sometimes inconsistent. It is intended for this document to supersede the definitions found in separate SAE Recommended Practices
This specification covers performance testing at all phases of development, production, and field analysis of electrical terminals, connectors, and components that constitute the electrical connection systems in road vehicle applications that are: low voltage (0 to 20 VDC) or Coaxial. Incomplete (mechanical) specifications for jacketed twisted pair connectors are also provided. These procedures are only applicable to terminals used for In-Line, Header, and Device Connector systems. They are not applicable to Edge Board connector systems, twist-lock connector systems, >20 VAC or DC, or to eyelet terminals. No electrical connector, terminal, or related component may be represented as having met USCAR specifications unless conformance to all applicable requirements of this specification have been verified and documented. All required verification and documentation must be done by the supplier of the part or parts. If testing is performed by another source, it does not relieve the primary
The preeminent obligation of the automotive engineers, while designing a car, is to assure the driver’s well-being during any kind of impact by suppressing intrusions into the cockpit or minacious deceleration levels. Technologists and designers are advancing various modern active and passive safety systems to augment vehicle occupants’ safety. To mitigate the research and development expenditure in time and money, it is recommended to utilize computational crash simulations for the early evaluation of safety behavior under vehicle impact tests. Therefore, in this research study, an attempt is made to simulate crashworthiness and design the impact attenuator utilized in Formula SAE (FSAE) vehicles to absorb the kinetic energy of a car during a frontal collision. Closed-cell aluminum foam is selected as its material because of its less density than solid metals and ability to undergo large deformations at almost constant load. CAE software is used to carry out explicit dynamic impact
Autonomous Driving is the next big thing in the Automotive future. With growing automation, there is also growing need for In-cabin and Occupant monitoring. Impaired driving as a cause constitute a statistically major portion of the total accidents in the world. Additionally, the aging society of road users add to health concerns of possible drivers behind the wheel which might lead to severe accidents. Since the accident and the associated damage would have been occurred due to incapacitated drivers in the first place, there arises a need to know the state of drivers while driving to ensure the safety of him and other road users. Therefore, the monitoring of the driver's state and detection of any deviation from the suitable driving condition is significant to reduce the number of accidents on the road. One of the efficient ways to know the drivers’ state is to monitor the health - physical, mental and emotional, of the drivers essentially. Understanding the impact of age and health
Current numerical simulation practice does not capture the seat mounted Side Airbag (SAB) breaking out through the seat tear seam and its correct early deployment characteristics. A late SAB breakout negatively impacts full SAB deployment and occupant coverage. An early breakout enhances timely SAB positioning and coverage, providing early cushioning to the occupant from the intruding barrier. This paper presents a numerical modeling process capable of predicting and enhancing seat tear seam breakout time and early SAB deployment kinematics. The critical phases used in the development of SAB breakout modeling process are as follows: Phase 1: Physical Tear Seam and Seat Trim coupon tests to characterize physical material properties for the numerical material model development; Phase 2: Numerical Modeling of the Tear Seam and Seat Trim breakout and, Phase 3: Numerical prediction of SAB breakout through a candidate seat tear seam. In the last phase of the study, the validated material
The objective of this document is to enhance the test procedure that is used for ejection mitigation testing per the NHTSA guidelines as mentioned in the FMVSS226 Final Rule document (NHTSA Docket No. NHTSA-2011-0004). The countermeasure for occupant ejection testing is to be tested with an 18kg mass on a guided linear impactor using the featureless headform specifically designed for ejection mitigation testing. SAE does not endorse any particular countermeasure for ejection mitigation testing. However, the document reflects guidelines that should be followed to maintain consistency in the test results. Examples of currently used countermeasures include the Inflatable Curtain airbags and Laminated Glass. The testing procedure is as follows: 1 Determine the daylight opening 2 Identify target locations per the FMVSS226 Final Rule §5.2 a Target locations for all windows and daylight openings b Perform the target elimination process c Reconstitute the targets 3 Determine the zero-plane 4
Seatbelt along with airbag plays a vital role in protecting the lives of occupants in vehicle during a crash. Seat Belt Reminder (SBR) is an audio-visual indicator which alerts the occupant with a lamp on the cluster as well as an audio chime to fasten their seatbelt. To avoid the chime, Occupant often attempt to do pseudo buckling in different ways as buckling the seatbelt behind the occupant or by wrapping the seatbelt at back side of the seat. The current system is not capable of detecting it as the SBR is driven by seatbelt buckle status. To overcome the above limitation, this paper presents a technique which detects pseudo buckling. The proposal in this paper is to enhance the existing system by including magnets and a reed switch. Here the magnet is attached to the seatbelt and a reed switch is placed inside the seatback. The reed switch detects the presence of magnetic field thereby closing/opening the circuit. If the occupant has pseudo buckled, the magnets in the seatbelt will
This glossary was written to provide a consistent and uniform definition of terms used in describing an automatic belt tensioner as it applies to an automotive accessory drive system
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 1142