Browse Topic: Restraint systems
Since 2019, sex equity in traffic crashes has been a highly debated topic in vehicle safety, especially following the 2019 study by Forman et al. (1) claiming that female occupants face a 73 percent greater risk of serious injury in frontal crashes compared to male occupants. This was soon followed by a Consumer Reports Article by Keith Barry (2), which attempted to identify underlying factors contributing to the higher risk. These have been embraced by several parties since 2019. Firstly, it was alleged that vehicle design practice over the last four decades considered safety for the male population only and ignored that of the female as evidenced by the exclusive use of the mid-sized male Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) in Regulatory and Safety Ratings tests and not with an average sized female ATD. The absence of such an ATD for testing of vehicles “set the course for four decades’ worth of car safety design, with deadly consequences” (2). Secondly, although there is a recognition of the fact that Regulatory testing with a Small Female ATD, the Hybrid III-05F, was introduced in the FMVSS208 in 2003, this ATD was only a scaled version of the average male ATD of the 1970’s implying that this ATD is incapable of driving the design of restraint systems for females due to “They’re put together differently. Their material properties—their structure—is different” (2). Thirdly, according to a quote “These same trends have been observed in many, many studies in the past.” We assume that the trends refer to the apparent disparity in safety of females when compared to those of males. This document aims to outline historical activities, associated research and the development of countermeasures addressing crashworthiness concerns related to vehicle safety for females, as well as factors affecting both males and females, such as age-related impacts. This paper deals mainly with the frontal crash modes, mentions side impacts briefly as it affected designs of inflatable restraints for side impact to protect the smaller portion of the population from inflation induced injuries but the history behind the use of female ATDs by IIHS and NHTSA in full scale testing is not covered. Where ever possible, the time periods of reported activities related to female safety have been divided to pre-1997 corresponding to a change in US frontal crash regulation to address serious-to-fatal injuries to females and children, between 1997 to 2003 corresponding to the proposal by Canada for its frontal impact standard, and between 2003 and 2006 when the Advanced Restraint Regulation in the US FMVSS 208 was promulgated. This was followed by activities between 2007 and 2019, and post 2019 period.
This paper presents an integrated simulation workflow for aircraft seat development that combines (i) structural dynamics and certification load cases, (ii) occupant comfort and living-space assessment using finite-element digital humans, and (iii) airbag folding, deployment, and calibration using a coupled gas-dynamics solver suited to early-time transients. The workflow is built around a single manufacturing-aware, as-built seat model that is reused across comfort, certification, and restraint-system studies, allowing design iterations to move upstream before design freeze. Each stage is paired with validation or industrial case examples, and the airbag-calibration process is accelerated through reduced-order modeling (ROM) of parameter identification. The result is a practical virtual-seat-development methodology that is sufficiently predictive to de-risk physical testing while remaining fast enough for concept iteration and late-stage compliance support.
This paper contains Part 2 of a two-part paper series proposing potential regulatory approaches for occupant safety in Automated / Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) with unique seating configurations (stagecoach and campfire seating). Part 2 focuses on interior safety sensing, associated messaging, and ride control approaches both prior to and during a ride. Assessments are also proposed after significant vehicle braking and crash events. The proposed conditions are to be assessed in a static vehicle environment with humans segmented by occupant size and an infant dummy. On the vehicle seat and on the vehicle floor occupant detection conditions are proposed along with restraint usage detection conditions for vehicle seat belt usage, Child Restraint Seat (CRS) usage, CRS seat belt usage, and Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children (LATCH) system usage. These conditions may be detected by sensors / computer algorithms and human monitoring and thus are technology agnostic. The topics of animal detection and cargo detection are also discussed. Part 1 of this paper series (SAE paper 2026-01-0578) proposed using interior safety sensing as an alternative / a replacement for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 208 (FMVSS-208) Occupant Crash Protection unbelted in-position occupant compliance conditions. This paper proposes conditions involving occupant and seat belt restraint usage detection. This evaluation approach strives to prevent unbelted occupants and is an improvement over restraint countermeasures for unbelted occupants. This paper also discusses and proposes visual and audible safety messaging for prior to the ride occupant education and for occupant and restraint usage detection outcomes. Vehicle level ride control actions are suggested such as preventing a ride when improperly restrained occupants are detected. These approaches can be used in industry-wide regulatory next step contemplation for unique interior seating arrangement AVs. When adopted, these approaches would likely reside in an expanded version of FMVSS-208.
Side crashes are generally hazardous because there is no room for large deformation to protect an occupant from the crash forces. A crucial point in side impacts is the rapid intrusion of the side structure into the passenger compartment which need sufficient space between occupants and door trim to enable a proper unfolding of the side airbag. This problem can be alleviated by using the rising air pressure inside the door as an additional input for crash sensing. With improvements in the crash sensor technology, pressure sensors that detect pressure changes in door cavities have been developed recently for vehicle crash safety applications. The crash pulses recorded by the acceleration based crash sensors usually exhibit high frequency and noisy responses. The data obtained from the pressure sensors exhibit lower frequency and less noisy responses. Due to its ability to discriminate crash severities and allow the restraint devices to deploy earlier, the pressure sensor technology has gained its popularity for side crash applications. CAE based calibration approach reduces cost of multiple physical tests required for side airbag algorithm development to deploy the airbags. With a goal to achieve CAE based calibration such that side airbag deployment algorithms can be enhanced with the help of pressure sensors, Corpuscular Particle Method (CPM) was adopted to predict the pressure responses of side crash pressure sensors. The major challenge was to capture the change in pressure accurately in side door cavity during an event of side crashes in digital environment. In addition, the challenge was to develop robust CAE methodology that can predict sensible pressure responses during event of high speed as well as low speed side crashes. This paper describes the innovative CPM airbag based methodology developed to predict the pressure response and its correlation with side impact physical tests.
Traditionally, occupant safety research has centered on passive safety systems such as seatbelts, airbags, and energy-absorbing vehicle structures, all designed under the assumption of a nominal occupant posture at the moment of impact. However, with increasing deployment of active safety technologies such as Forward Collision Warning (FCW) and Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB), vehicle occupants are exposed to pre-crash decelerations that alter their seated position before the crash. Although AEB mitigates the crash severity, the induced occupant movement leads to out-of-position behavior (OOP), compromising the available survival space phase and effectiveness of passive restraint systems during the crash. Despite these evolving real-world conditions, global regulatory bodies and NCAP programs continue to evaluate pre-crash and crash phases independently, with limited integration. Moreover, traditional Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) such as Hybrid III dummies, although highly repeatable, lack the bio-fidelity necessary to capture human-like kinematics during pre-crash braking events involving low g. ATDs do not simulate the spinal articulation, posture adjustments and active muscle contraction that occur during emergency maneuvers or pre-crash scenarios. To overcome these limitations, researchers have increasingly turned to Human Body Models (HBMs) such as Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) and Global Human Body Model Consortium (GHBMC). These models enable high-fidelity finite element (FE) simulations with anatomical realism, allowing for the inclusion of active musculature and posture changes. This study aims to quantify the occupant forward excursion under pre-crash phase (due to AEB) and explore the possibility of an integrated simulation framework that evaluates occupant safety across both pre-crash and crash events. For this, the approach was to carry out full vehicle braking tests (1g braking pulse) with adult male (AM50) volunteers at different speeds to measure forward head excursion during pre-crash. These scenarios were replicated in LS-Dyna using THUMS HBM, showing strong agreement with experimental data. The resulting excursed postures were then used in crash simulations with ATDs to evaluate the effect on injury outcomes. Overall, the findings demonstrate effect of forward excursion on occupant injuries and the effectiveness of HBMs in capturing occupant kinematics, during pre-crash events.
Commercial vehicle sector (especially trucks) has a major role in economic growth of a nation. With improving infrastructure, increasing number of trucks on roads, accidents are also increasing. As per RASSI (Road Accident Sampling System India) FY2016-23 database, commercial vehicles are involved in 42% of total accidents on Indian roads. Involvement of trucks (N2 & N3) is over 25% of total accidents. Amongst all accident scenarios of N2 &N3, frontal impacts are the most frequent (26%) and causing severe occupant injuries. Today, truck safety development for frontal impact is based on passive safety regulations (viz. front pendulum – AIS029) and basic safety features like seatbelts. In any truck accident, it is challenging rather impossible to manage comprehensive safety only with passive safety systems due to size and weight. Accident prevention becomes imperative in truck safety development due to extremely high energy involved in front impact scenarios. The paper presents a unique safety development approach (for frontal impact safety development for N2 and N3 trucks) which enables smart synthesis of active and passive safety systems to comprehensively address real world safety. Four major areas are identified for truck safety development viz. structural crashworthiness, compatibility, occupant safety and ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance System). The innovation lies in smart mix of these areas during product safety development. The study presents the safety development of light commercial vehicle (truck) with this approach. Structural crashworthiness & occupant safety are developed with extensive number of CAE simulations. Design is physically validated with frontal impact test. In addition, extensive mileage accumulation is generated across Indian roads to validate ADAS system performance.
Occupant Safety systems are usually developed using anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs), such as the Hybrid III, THOR-50M, ES-2, and WorldSID. However, in compliance with NCAP and regulatory guidelines, these ATDs are designed for specific crash scenarios, typically frontal and side impacts involving upright occupants. As vehicles evolve (e.g., autonomous layouts, diverse occupant populations), ATDs are proving increasingly inadequate for capturing real-world injury mechanisms. This has led to the adoption of computational Human Body Models (HBMs), such as the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) and Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS), which offer superior anatomical fidelity, variable anthropometry, active muscle behaviour modelling, and improved postural flexibility. HBMs can predict internal injuries that ATDs cannot, making them valuable tools for future vehicle safety development. This study uses a sled CAE simulation environment to analyze the kinematics of the HBMs model in a frontal crash scenario. The methodology includes the initial correlation of Hybrid III CAE simulation results with physical sled test data, followed by a comparative analysis with GHBMC M50-O v6-2 based simulations. A significant difference was observed in pelvic forward displacement between the Hybrid III and GHBMC M50-O v6-2. The difference in interaction originates from the difference in the construction of the pelvis between the Hybrid III and GHBMC. In the GHBMC, reduced displacement occurs because the pelvis locks in the seat. This interaction is absent in ATDs, resulting in increased torso rotation and a potential rise in upper extremity injury risk for HBMs. The study examines the various reasons for pelvic locking and increased upper body rotation. These evaluations aim to raise the negative consequences of pelvic locking on upper extremity injuries. The probable solutions that can reduce pelvis locking while preserving occupant stability is also discussed. The study highlights the significance of HBMs in understanding occupant interactions and supports their use in the development of next-generation restraint systems.
Tippers transporting loose bulk cargo during prolonged descents are subject to two critical operational challenges: cargo displacement and rear axle lifting. Uncontrolled cargo movement, often involving loose aggregates or soil, arises due to gravitational forces and insufficient restraint systems. This phenomenon can lead to cabin damage, loss of control, and hazardous discharge of materials onto roadways. Simultaneously, load imbalances during descent can cause rear axle lift, increasing stress on the front steering axle, resulting in tire slippage and compromised maneuverability. This study proposes a dynamic control strategy that adjusts the tipper lift angle in real time to align with the descent angle of the road. By synchronizing the trailer bed angle with the slope of the terrain, the system minimizes cargo instability, maintains rear axle contact, and enhances braking performance, including engine and exhaust braking systems. Computational modelling is employed to assess the performance of this approach across varying road gradients, vehicle speeds, and terrain characteristics. The paper further outlines the development of an automated control system for real-time angle adjustment and its integration into the vehicle’s existing electrical architecture.
When it comes to plastics applications, cars are rarely the first products that come to mind. However, with modern vehicles containing 1,000 to 1,500 plastic parts — including dashboards, control elements, clips, trim parts, brackets, door panels, bumpers, and radiator grilles — the material is more important for mobility than we might assume. Some of these plastic parts are relevant for the drivers’ safety: for instance, airbag covers must open correctly in an accident and seat belt guides and retractors could cause severe injuries if they break or deform under load. Their quality is vital. At the same time however, cost pressure and new regulations — for instance regarding an increased use of recycled materials that is under way in the European Union — pose new challenges, especially in plastic injection molding. Digital solutions for measurement technology help control and stabilize the complex process and may even lead to increased product quality despite tougher conditions.
The Crashworthy and Escape Systems Branch at NAWCAD has been developing an integrated restraint harness concept for several years, with the intent of developing a novel method of providing improved occupant protection in a crash scenario. A series of tests was conducted on the Horizontal Accelerator at NAS Patuxent River to evaluate the performance of the prototype integrated-restraint system under MIL-STD-58095 conditions with the 50th percentile male Hybrid III Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD). While occupant flail was the primary metric being analyzed in this effort, ATD instrumentation was also captured, showing that the integrated restraint system demonstrated a significant reduction in head flail compared to five-point restraints while maintaining injury criteria within acceptable levels.
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 2660