Browse Topic: Frontal collisions
Since 2019, sex equity in traffic crashes has been a highly debated topic in vehicle safety, especially following the 2019 study by Forman et al. (1) claiming that female occupants face a 73 percent greater risk of serious injury in frontal crashes compared to male occupants. This was soon followed by a Consumer Reports Article by Keith Barry (2), which attempted to identify underlying factors contributing to the higher risk. These have been embraced by several parties since 2019. Firstly, it was alleged that vehicle design practice over the last four decades considered safety for the male population only and ignored that of the female as evidenced by the exclusive use of the mid-sized male Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) in Regulatory and Safety Ratings tests and not with an average sized female ATD. The absence of such an ATD for testing of vehicles “set the course for four decades’ worth of car safety design, with deadly consequences” (2). Secondly, although there is a recognition of the fact that Regulatory testing with a Small Female ATD, the Hybrid III-05F, was introduced in the FMVSS208 in 2003, this ATD was only a scaled version of the average male ATD of the 1970’s implying that this ATD is incapable of driving the design of restraint systems for females due to “They’re put together differently. Their material properties—their structure—is different” (2). Thirdly, according to a quote “These same trends have been observed in many, many studies in the past.” We assume that the trends refer to the apparent disparity in safety of females when compared to those of males. This document aims to outline historical activities, associated research and the development of countermeasures addressing crashworthiness concerns related to vehicle safety for females, as well as factors affecting both males and females, such as age-related impacts. This paper deals mainly with the frontal crash modes, mentions side impacts briefly as it affected designs of inflatable restraints for side impact to protect the smaller portion of the population from inflation induced injuries but the history behind the use of female ATDs by IIHS and NHTSA in full scale testing is not covered. Where ever possible, the time periods of reported activities related to female safety have been divided to pre-1997 corresponding to a change in US frontal crash regulation to address serious-to-fatal injuries to females and children, between 1997 to 2003 corresponding to the proposal by Canada for its frontal impact standard, and between 2003 and 2006 when the Advanced Restraint Regulation in the US FMVSS 208 was promulgated. This was followed by activities between 2007 and 2019, and post 2019 period.
With the rapid development of automated driving and the increasing adoption of “zero-gravity” seats, the crash safety of highly reclined occupants has become a critical issue. The current THOR dummy, designed for frontal impacts in the standard upright posture, exhibits limitations when directly applied to reclined seating configurations, including insufficient spinal flexion capability and excessive posterior pelvic rotation. In this study, the thoracolumbar spine kinematics of the THUMS human body model, reconstructed against post-mortem human subject (PMHS) tests, were analyzed. A two-segment linear fitting was employed to characterize a “dummy-like” spinal flexion response, yielding a virtual rotational hinge located near the thoracolumbar joint of the original THOR model. The characteristic rotation angle obtained from THUMS showed a strong linear correlation with the flexion moment of the T12–L1 vertebrae. Based on this relationship, the rotational joint of the THOR dummy was unlocked during impact and assigned a torsional stiffness of 600 Nm/rad. Additional modifications were implemented in the hip region to enhance model applicability. Comparative simulations demonstrated that the modified THOR model achieved closer agreement with PMHS responses than both the Hybrid III and the baseline open-source THOR models. In particular, the posterior pelvic tilt was reduced from approximately 20° in the baseline THOR to about 10° in the modified version. These results indicate that incorporating PMHS-based thoracolumbar flexion characteristics together with targeted hip modifications significantly improves the biofidelity of the THOR dummy for reclined-occupant crash scenarios, providing a solid foundation for future dummy development and safety assessment.
Indian passenger car accident data indicates that approximately 44% of crashes are frontal impacts (Refer fig 1). Among the injuries sustained in these crashes, lower leg injuries are notably critical, contributing to nearly 25% of driver occupant injuries (Refer fig 2). To evaluate such injuries, the Bharat New Car Assessment Program (BNCAP) includes lower leg injury metrics as part of the Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB64) test. While the overall injury performance is assessed at the vehicle level, BNCAP also monitors vehicle interior intrusions—particularly pedal intrusions—as key contributors to lower limb injury severity. A major challenge in frontal crashes is the intrusion of the vehicle's front-end structure into the occupant compartment. Rigid components, particularly the brake pedal assembly, can be displaced rearward during a crash, significantly increasing the risk of lower leg injuries. Therefore, minimizing pedal intrusions into the driver foot-well is critical for enhancing lower leg protection. As part of an innovative safety initiative, Tata Motors has developed a collapsible brake pedal mechanism designed to mitigate lower leg injuries during frontal crashes. This patented system incorporates a series of levers and linkages that disengage upon impact, allowing the brake pedal to collapse and thereby reducing the risk of intrusion-related injuries to the driver lower legs. The mechanism is engineered to be robust, ensuring that normal braking performance and pedal operation remain unaffected during everyday vehicle use, while providing effective injury mitigation in crash scenarios.
Commercial vehicle sector (especially trucks) has a major role in economic growth of a nation. With improving infrastructure, increasing number of trucks on roads, accidents are also increasing. As per RASSI (Road Accident Sampling System India) FY2016-23 database, commercial vehicles are involved in 42% of total accidents on Indian roads. Involvement of trucks (N2 & N3) is over 25% of total accidents. Amongst all accident scenarios of N2 &N3, frontal impacts are the most frequent (26%) and causing severe occupant injuries. Today, truck safety development for frontal impact is based on passive safety regulations (viz. front pendulum – AIS029) and basic safety features like seatbelts. In any truck accident, it is challenging rather impossible to manage comprehensive safety only with passive safety systems due to size and weight. Accident prevention becomes imperative in truck safety development due to extremely high energy involved in front impact scenarios. The paper presents a unique safety development approach (for frontal impact safety development for N2 and N3 trucks) which enables smart synthesis of active and passive safety systems to comprehensively address real world safety. Four major areas are identified for truck safety development viz. structural crashworthiness, compatibility, occupant safety and ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance System). The innovation lies in smart mix of these areas during product safety development. The study presents the safety development of light commercial vehicle (truck) with this approach. Structural crashworthiness & occupant safety are developed with extensive number of CAE simulations. Design is physically validated with frontal impact test. In addition, extensive mileage accumulation is generated across Indian roads to validate ADAS system performance.
Occupant Safety systems are usually developed using anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs), such as the Hybrid III, THOR-50M, ES-2, and WorldSID. However, in compliance with NCAP and regulatory guidelines, these ATDs are designed for specific crash scenarios, typically frontal and side impacts involving upright occupants. As vehicles evolve (e.g., autonomous layouts, diverse occupant populations), ATDs are proving increasingly inadequate for capturing real-world injury mechanisms. This has led to the adoption of computational Human Body Models (HBMs), such as the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) and Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS), which offer superior anatomical fidelity, variable anthropometry, active muscle behaviour modelling, and improved postural flexibility. HBMs can predict internal injuries that ATDs cannot, making them valuable tools for future vehicle safety development. This study uses a sled CAE simulation environment to analyze the kinematics of the HBMs model in a frontal crash scenario. The methodology includes the initial correlation of Hybrid III CAE simulation results with physical sled test data, followed by a comparative analysis with GHBMC M50-O v6-2 based simulations. A significant difference was observed in pelvic forward displacement between the Hybrid III and GHBMC M50-O v6-2. The difference in interaction originates from the difference in the construction of the pelvis between the Hybrid III and GHBMC. In the GHBMC, reduced displacement occurs because the pelvis locks in the seat. This interaction is absent in ATDs, resulting in increased torso rotation and a potential rise in upper extremity injury risk for HBMs. The study examines the various reasons for pelvic locking and increased upper body rotation. These evaluations aim to raise the negative consequences of pelvic locking on upper extremity injuries. The probable solutions that can reduce pelvis locking while preserving occupant stability is also discussed. The study highlights the significance of HBMs in understanding occupant interactions and supports their use in the development of next-generation restraint systems.
A passenger vehicle's front-end structure's structural integrity and crashworthiness are crucial to ensure compliance with various frontal impact safety standards (such as those set by Euro NCAP & IIHS). For a new front-end architecture, design targets must be defined at a component level for crush cans, longitudinal, bumper beam, subframe, suspension tower and backup structure. The traditional process of defining these targets involves multiple sensitivity studies in CAE. This paper explores the implementation of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) in component-level target setting. PINNs integrate the governing equations into neural network training, enabling data-driven models to adhere to fundamental mechanical principles. The underlying physics in our model is based upon a force scheme of a full-frontal impact. A force scheme is a one-dimensional representation of the front-end structure components that simplifies a crash event's complex physics. It uses the dimensional and positional parameters of the components, along with their force-displacement curves, to estimate the vehicle's crash pulse. In this work, we have implemented PINNs to generate an optimized force scheme using the historical CAE test data. Using this approach promises to cut short the time and cost that goes into the conventional process of target setting.
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 849