Browse Topic: Accreditation

Items (195)
Celebrating its 35th year, the National Aerospace Defense Contractors Accreditation Program (Nadcap) continues to advance quality assurance and regulatory compliance for aviation, defense, and space OEMs and suppliers. This article summarizes how Nadcap accreditation works, its benefits for manufacturers, and its role in expanding additive manufacturing through industry-wide consensus. The Nadcap program was first established in 1990 by a small group of aerospace and defense OEMs. Their goal was to create an accreditation initiative that provides a common approach to auditing the manufacturing and production processes used by companies supplying parts, components, structures, and services to major aerospace and defense OEMs. This foundation set the stage for Nadcap's continued focus on quality assurance and regulatory compliance in the industry.
Ever-increasing modeling and simulation capabilities and the desire to use simulations in support of system qualification, regulatory compliance, and other critical decision-making roles, raises the bar on the need for rigorous V&V of all aspects of the models used to create the simulation data. US Department of Defense Directives and Instructions, and emerging regulatory and industry standards on Modeling and Simulation in a Digital Engineering context require rigorous M&S Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (M&S VV&A). These specifications aim to create trusted and credible simulation data that can be used in critical decision-making roles on complex systems. Implementing a well-defined, structured, model-based and standards-based M&S VV&A Process early in the program lifecycle facilitates collaboration and documented buy-in on M&S VV&A for program with customers and/or regulatory agencies. This collaboration increases acceptance throughout the program and product lifecycles. This paper describes how Model-Based Systems Engineering tools and Digital Engineering ecosystems can support the M&S VV&A Process. The model-based construct facilitates creating metrics dashboards, leveraging model-based artifacts for improved communication of M&S VV&A status, quality, maturity, and completeness.
Hill, James
On December 13, 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notified the Medical Device Innovation Consortium (MDIC) of their final approval of the MDIC Report on the MedAccred Accreditation and Audit Program for Contract Sterilizers (Final Report). FDA inspections of firms, such as contract sterilizers, are pursuant to Title 21-Food and Drugs, Chapter 9 – Federal Food, Drug, and Devices, Part A-Drugs and Devices, Section 21 USC 360: Registration of producers of drugs or devices, Subsection (h) Inspections.1 The FDA notification is the culmination of a pilot study initiated by the Performance Review Institute (PRI) in 2023 in collaboration with MDIC and the FDA to evaluate PRI’s MedAccred Sterilization Audit and Accreditation Program of contract sterilizers. The agency confirmed that MedAccred is as an acceptable audit approach that may be leveraged for regulatory purposes as well as supplier oversight.
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) establishes standard requirements for aerospace sealants and adhesion promoters, which may be incorporated as part of SAE Aerospace Material Specifications (AMS) for such products. This document provides for commonality of methods and procedures for responsibility for inspection, source inspection, classification of tests, establishment of/and qualification to qualified products lists, approval, reports, resampling and retesting, packaging, and marking.
AMS G9 Aerospace Sealing Committee
This standard defines the industry-accepted requirements for the ICOP scheme, which provides confidence to ASD customers, that organizations with certification of their QMS, issued by accredited CBs, meet applicable AQMS standard requirements. The requirements in this standard are applicable to all participants in the ICOP scheme. If there is a conflict between the requirements of this standard, and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter shall take precedence.
G-14 Americas Aerospace Quality Standards Committee (AAQSC)
Carbon Neutrality, Reduction and Offset � Aviation Solutions in the 21st Century (SAE Paper 2021-01-0039)130043/16/2021
Begun in 2016, the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) was developed and agreed by International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) 191 Member States. The aviation industry has its own offsetting scheme to measure aviation emissions and carbon offsetting and it has become the first industry sector which leads the world making commitments to reduce emissions. CORSIA and the Airport Carbon Accreditation are programs that impose carbon management obligations on the aviation industry. The training product to be presented, will clarify for the first time how to go beyond mere compliance and exceed the carbon reduction requirements of these instruments by achieving carbon neutrality in operations, to decrease costs, boost revenue, productivity and customer experience for airlines, airports and ground service providers. The methodology that will be explained for achieving carbon neutrality involves gains in operational efficiency and the use of sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) to reduce carbon in operations, and investment in reforestation and conservation projects (forest carbon credits) to offset emissions. Innovative practices and benefits of communicating with customers and the public about carbon neutral goals, milestones and achievements will be shared and explained. This training will describe how carbon neutrality when done right decreases operational costs, reduces health and safety risks, lowers environmental risks, and generates new revenue and sales through brand trust, customer loyalty and revenue science. For the very first time, tools, technologies and solutions on how to transition to a low-cost, high-revenue producing carbon neutral operations model for airlines, airports and ground service providers will be presented.
Stoica, Andrei
Begun in 2016, the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) was developed and agreed by International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) 191 Member States, while the Airport Carbon Accreditation was developed by the Airports, Council International Europe as a carbon management system and certification. The aviation industry has its own offsetting scheme to measure aviation emissions and carbon offsetting and it has become the first industry sector which leads the world making commitments to reduce emissions. CORSIA and the Airport Carbon Accreditation are programs that impose carbon management obligations on the aviation industry. The training product to be presented, will clarify for the first time how to go beyond mere compliance and exceed the carbon reduction requirements of these instruments by achieving carbon neutrality in operations, to decrease costs, boost revenue, productivity and customer experience for airlines, airports and ground service providers. The methodology that will be explained for achieving carbon neutrality involves gains in operational efficiency and the use of sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) to reduce carbon in operations, and investment in reforestation and conservation projects (forest carbon credits) to offset emissions. Innovative practices and benefits of communicating with customers and the public about carbon neutral goals, milestones and achievements will be shared and explained. This training will describe how carbon neutrality when done right decreases operational costs, reduces health and safety risks, lowers environmental risks, and generates new revenue and sales through brand trust, customer loyalty and revenue science. For the very first time, tools, technologies and solutions on how to transition to a low-cost, high-revenue producing carbon neutral operations model for airlines, airports and ground service providers will be presented.
Nyamdorj, BolormaaAnaka, WayneStoica, AndreiSushant, SushantOrtega, JoshuaHelm, BrittneyMoreira, Paula
This document provides interpretation of ISO/IEC 17025 and establishes additional requirements for accreditation of testing laboratories for evaluating organic coatings.
AMS G8 Aerospace Organic Coatings Committee
The criteria defined herein shall be utilized by an ISO/IEC 17025 Accreditation Body (AB) to establish conformance with AS6171 Test Methods Standard; General Requirements, Suspect/Counterfeit, Electrical, Electronic, and Electromechanical Parts and associated AS6171 Test Methods requested/included on the scope of accreditation.
G-19A Test Laboratory Standards Development Committee
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) establishes the requirements for fluid fittings that combine both beaded hose connections and 37 degree flared connections for use in all types of fluid systems.
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) establishes the requirements for fluid fittings that combine both beaded hose connections and pipe threaded connections for use in all types of fluid systems.
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) establishes the requirements for fluid fittings that combine both flanged fitting ends and beaded hose connections for use in all types of fluid systems.
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) establishes the requirements for fluid fittings that combine both 37 degree flared and pipe threaded connections for use in all types of fluid systems.
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
This Assessment Guide is applicable to any assessment technique that wishes to embrace the principles and concepts presented in the EIA-599 National Electronic Process Certification Standard.
Systems Management Council
Very strong role models who have a marked enthusiasm for their subject are needed at every point along an employee's education and work career. THERE HAS PROBABLY NEVER BEEN SUCH A DEMAND for professionally qualified engineers, and yet both the number and diversity of people entering the profession continue to decline. Worldwide, there are very many and diverse initiatives to improve the situation-some generally encouraging interest in the profession, and others targeting specific audiences. There have been some local successes, but the overall picture remains discouraging. For a long time, there has been a growing awareness of a diminishing of interest in the engineering profession on the part of potential students. The principal hypothesis is that the image of the profession is poor, requiring hard work to qualify but delivering only a modest reward. Other hypotheses include a lack of flair in the management of young engineers that limits their experience rather than creating a vision.
It is recognized that the structural integrity of repaired composite structures depends upon the capabilities of the individuals who are responsible for performing the repairs. This document is intended to address repairs of composite structure regardless of the type of structure such as marine, wind turbine, automotive, aircraft, or other applications. This certification standard establishes the minimum requirements for training, examining, and certifying composite structure repair personnel. It establishes criteria for the certification of personnel requiring appropriate knowledge of the technical principles underlying the composite structural repairs they perform. Persons certified under this document may be eligible for licensing or certification/ qualification by an appropriate authority, in addition to this industry accepted basic composite repair technician certification. Persons who successfully complete the requirements of this certification standard are considered to be able to perform basic composite repairs to composite structures in compliance with the manufacturers’ repair documentation or other acceptable repair methods. This document is not intended to include structure specific repairs that are in manufacturer’s maintenance or repair manuals. Additional specific training may be required by the maintenance organization.
AMS CACRC Commercial Aircraft Composite Repair Committee
This set of criteria is intended for use by accredited Certification Bodies (CBs) to establish compliance, and grant certification to AS6081, Aerospace Standard; Fraudulent/Counterfeit Electronic Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition-Distributors: It may also be used by others to assess compliance to AS6081 requirements.
G-19 Counterfeit Electronic Parts Committee
An Overview of Models, Methods and Tools for Verification, Validation and Accreditation of Real Time Critical Software2013-36-053010/7/2013
Real-time critical systems are those whose failures may cause loss of transactions/data, missions/batches, vehicles/properties, or even people/human life. Accordingly, some regulations prescribe their maximum acceptable probability of failures to range from about 10−4 to 10−10 failures per hour. Examples of such systems are the ones involving nuclear plants, aircrafts, satellites, automobiles, or traffic controls. They are becoming increasingly complex and/or highly integrated as prescribed by the SAE-ARP-4754A Standard. Those systems include, most of the time, real time critical software that must be specified, designed, implemented, validated, verified and accredited (VVA). To do that, models, specially the V-Model, are frequently adopted, together with methods and tools which perform software VVA to ensure compliance (of correctness, reliability, robustness, etc.) of software to several specific standards such as DO178-B/DO-178C (aviation) or IEC 26262 (automotive) among others. This paper presents an overview of models, methods and tools for verification, validation and accreditation of real time critical software. To do that, it: 1) discusses how models, specially the V-Model, are used to develop the software life cycle; 2) reviews several methods and tools for VVA of real time critical software available in the literature; and 3) compares such methods and tools according to compliance of software to several specific standards. It is expected to show that: 1) an early analysis at system-level of the models, methods and tools to be used to along the software life cycle is advantageous; and 2) the overview presented here promote a better understanding of what role such models, methods and tools should play to provide better and safer systems considering social-technical objectives as a whole.
Peña, Lorena Gayarrede Oliveira e Souza, Marcelo LopesRocha, Guilherme Conceição
When qualifying prototype samples in terms of vibration response and dynamic characteristics, an accredited laboratory is required to implement monitoring procedures to assure the validity of the test results. According to ISO17025, such monitoring may include inter-laboratory comparison or proficiency testing. This paper presents a mechanical structure which has been designed specifically to be used as a generic reference sample during such a comparative study in which resonant frequencies of a structure need to be quantified. This paper elaborates on the analysis and design issues, which encompass theoretical analysis, both purely mathematical and by FEM (Finite Element Modeling). In addition, to allow statistical analysis of test data resulting from measurements performed by different test laboratories, the uncertainty budget [1] of the reference value of this sample is determined. As a first step towards a European project, a limited group of accredited test laboratories in Belgium have participated in a first Round Robin proficiency analysis. The results and interpretation of this exercise conclude this paper.
Nauwelaerts, FilipMoens, DavidHarri, Kristof
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
G-3, Aerospace Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing Assemblies
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 195