Browse Topic: Head-up displays

Items (265)
Passive fatigue can cause accidents with automated and regular vehicles. A proof-of-concept prototype [made with light-emitting diode (LED) matrices and white LED (WLED)] and a preliminary comparative usability test (N = 7) are used to study whether the active manipulation of simulated weather cues can be a potential countermeasure to passive fatigue. Participants rated system suitability, system impression, and their fatigue level similarly when they viewed a weather windshield heads-up display (HUD) versus a speedometer windshield HUD [no significant differences found and relatively small 95% confidence interval (CI) ranges around 0]. Qualitative analysis of interviews found that participants saw the potential value of the weather display and that display placement, dynamic graphics, and user activation were commonly mentioned themes. These results suggest the concept is theoretically possible, though further work is needed to prove the concept in practice.
Ensafjoo, MohsenLi, Jamy
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) provides criteria for the design, installation, operation, and training aspects of head-up display (HUD) systems in transport category aircraft, with emphasis on pilot interface and operational requirements. The recommendations apply to permanently installed (including stowable) HUDs that display primary flight information, including those integrating enhanced flight vision system (EFVS) imagery. The intent is to ensure HUDs are designed and used in a manner that improves pilot situational awareness and flight technical performance across all phases of flight, up to and including low-visibility operations. While technical design standards (optical performance, hardware specs, etc.) are defined in documents like ARP5288 and AS8055, this document focuses on pilot usage considerations and human factors. HUD systems addressed here are typically designed to support a fail-passive operational concept applicable to Category III instrument approach operations, where approved, though many recommendations also apply to HUD usage for Category I and II operations and other phases of flight. Devices such as head-worn displays are not specifically covered, though future provisions may consider “through-display” wearable systems as technology matures.
S-7 Flight Deck Handling Qualities Stds for Trans Aircraft
Integrating intelligent and connected technologies in vehicles has significantly enriched the information environment for drivers, aiding them in making comprehensive driving decisions. However, inadequate information display may lead drivers to miss crucial information or increase their cognitive load, thereby affecting driving safety and user experience. It is essential to study drivers’ preferences for in-vehicle information display, the factors influencing these preferences, and to present information through appropriate modalities and carriers. Drawing on 695 valid questionnaire responses, this study investigates drivers’ preferences for recommendatory, explanatory, alerting, and warning information across three display modalities and six display carriers. A multivariate ordered probability model was further developed to examine the influence of user characteristics on these preferences. The results showed that drivers preferred visual cues over auditory ones, with a selection frequency that was 5.253 times higher (p < 0.001). Additionally, auditory cues were preferred 3.265 times more than tactile cues (p < 0.001). In terms of the interface, drivers favored the center console, which was preferred 1.058 times more than dashboard (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the HUD was found to be significantly better than steering wheel vibrations, being preferred 2.899 times more (p < 0.001). The study found that the choice of message type influences user preferences. Warning messages had a visual choice preference that was 1.669% higher than that for alert messages (p = 0.042). Additionally, auditory choices for alert messages were significantly enhanced, being 11.079% higher than regular messages (p < 0.001). User characteristics also played a significant role in these preferences. Women showed a lower preference for visual messages compared to men, with a ratio of 0.62 (p < 0.05). Senior drivers were less likely to choose visual dashboards, with the likelihood decreasing to 0.82 for each age group (p = 0.017). Furthermore, individuals with higher levels of education showed a preference for auditory messages, with the preference increasing to 1.23 for each education stratum (p < 0.05). The findings provide theoretical support for selecting appropriate modalities and carriers in in-vehicle information displays, particularly for tailoring displays to various information types and user groups.
He, GangDiao, KaiLuo, LongfeiXie, BingjunZhong, YixinQi, Jianping
Automotive displays have become an essential part of modern vehicles, not just for aesthetics but also for improving safety and user interaction. As cars get smarter, the industry is leaning heavily into advanced display technologies to provide drivers and passengers with clearer, more responsive visuals. Technologies like Active Matrix LCDs (AMLCDs) and AMOLEDs are now common in dashboards, infotainment systems, digital clusters, and even head-up displays. These display types are popular because they offer great brightness, vibrant color, and wide viewing angles — all of which are important in a car, where lighting conditions can change constantly. But to make these displays work effectively, a solid backplane is critical. That’s where technologies like amorphous silicon (a-Si) and low-temperature polysilicon (LTPS) come in. Among these, LTPS has gained popularity due to its ability to support high-resolution, high-refresh-rate screens, thanks to its higher carrier mobility. Still, LTPS isn’t perfect. It struggles with things like threshold voltage (VTH) shifts, uneven brightness, and flickering — issues that can shorten the display’s life and reduce performance over time. Traditionally, a simple pixel circuit called the 2T1C (two thin-film transistors and one capacitor) has been used, but it doesn’t handle voltage shifts very well. As a result, newer and more complex designs have emerged — including 4T1C, 5T2C, 7T2C, and even 9T2C circuits. These advanced pixel circuits add more components to help regulate voltage and current more precisely. Better compensation for VTH variations, improved image uniformity, reduced flicker, and longer display life. This paper takes a closer look at these different pixel circuit designs, especially how they perform in LTPS-based displays for automotive use. We provide a side-by-side comparison that breaks down the pros and cons of each approach. Understanding how these circuits work — and where each one excels — is key to pushing forward the quality and reliability of displays in next-generation vehicles.
Sinha Roy, DebarghyaDuggal, AnanyaSingh, Ujjwal Kumar
Ambient light reflecting off internal components of the car, specifically the Head-Up Display (HUD), creates unwanted reflections on the Windshield. These reflections can obscure the driver's field of view, potentially compromising safety and reducing visual comfort. The extent of this obscuration is influenced by geometrical factors such as the angle of the HUD and the curvature of the Windshield, which need to be analyzed and managed. The primary motivation is to improve driver safety and visual comfort. This is driven by the need to address the negative impact of ambient light reflecting off Head-Up Displays (HUDs), which can impair visibility through the Windshield. There is a need for tools and methods to address this issue proactively during the vehicle design phase. This study employs a tool-based modeling method to trace the pathways of ambient light from its source, reflecting off the HUD, and onto the Windshield using a dimensional modeling tool. It focuses on: Geometrical surfaces (specifically HUD angle and Windshield curvature) Modeling the pathways of ambient light from its source, reflecting off the HUD, and onto the Windshield using the dimensional modeling tool Measuring and analyzing the resulting areas of reflection caused within the driver's field of view. The method aims to evaluate the extent of disruption or obscuration within the driver's field of view caused by the reflections in millions of vehicles.
Muchchandi, VinodAkula, Satya JayanthMahindrakar, PramodG S, Sharath
A more recent focus on driver comfort and the increasing demand for wide range of information availability make automotive Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) provide advanced features such as Head Up Display (HUD) system. Even though HUD projects vital information onto the windshield/glass, its structural integration comes with significant vibration challenges, leading to display instability and haziness. This paper discusses the significant design parameters influencing the functional effectiveness of HUD system. The structure considered for analysis is the HUD assembly and its integration in vehicle. Cross Car Beam (CCB) turns out to be the critical component of the vehicle structure susceptible to road excitations. Although it’s mass dampens the vibrations inherently, due to the low mass of the HUD, relative oscillation between its projector, mirror, and either the windshield or display causes image distortion This paper investigates in detail the role of HUD structural stiffness, eccentric design and material of the display glass and its shaft in achieving optimal HUD functional performance of high definition display. Based on this analysis, the system natural frequency has to be above a particular frequency called Critical Flickering Frequency (CFF) to avoid fuzzy image perception to human eyes . CFF for the HUD discussed is calculated using a structured and controlled subjective study taking care of all the significant parameters affecting it with individuals from all ages and gender. This data is used to build a robust design criteria for the HUD structure for a highly stable display. This research including the novel approach of integrating the concept of CFF in display system vibration development in particular is of significant value to automotive engineers in designing robust functional HUD systems. Addressing the above critical design parameters, this paper paves the way for a seamless in display experience in modern connected vehicles.
Vardhanan K, Aravindha VishnuNaidu, SudhakaraTitave, Uttam
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) contains methods used to measure the optical performance of airborne electronic flat panel display (FPD) systems. The methods described are specific to the direct view, liquid crystal matrix (x-y addressable) display technology used on aircraft flight decks. The focus of this document is on active matrix, liquid crystal displays (LCD). The majority of the procedures can be applied to other display technologies, however, it is cautioned that some techniques need to be tailored to different display technologies. The document covers monochrome and color LCD operation in the transmissive mode within the visual spectrum (the wavelength range of 380 to 780 nm). These procedures are adaptable to reflective and transflective displays paying special attention to the source illumination geometry. Photometric and colorimetric measurement procedures for airborne direct view CRT (cathode ray tube) displays are found in ARP1782. Optical measurement procedures for airborne head up displays (HUDs) can be found in ARP5287. Generally, the procedures describe manual single point measurements. The individual procedures may be readily incorporated into automated testing equipment (ATE) or other automated environments. This also includes, but is not limited to Fourier scopes and video imaging devices. This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this Technical Report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user.
A-20A Crew Station Lighting
This document recommends design and performance criteria for aircraft lighting systems used to illuminate flight deck controls, luminous visual displays used for transfer of information, and flight deck background and instrument surfaces that form the flight deck visual environment. This document is for aircraft, except for applications requiring night vision compatibility.
A-20A Crew Station Lighting
We present the flight testing and integration of the Microsoft HoloLens 2 as a head-worn display (HWD) in DLR's research helicopter. Building on its successful use in a helicopter simulator, initial flight tests confirmed its feasibility in a real helicopter. Current tests focused on system optimization, with head tracking identified as the critical component for hologram stability. Since the HoloLens' inside-out tracking fails in moving vehicles, it was fused with an external infrared tracker, automatically calibrated via an optimization approach adaptable to various trackers and mounting positions. A test pilot with HWD experience rated the system as fully functional, enabling the first successful experiments with holographic Mission Task Elements. Beyond the helicopter, the HoloLens was tested in a car and on a high-speed boat, where holograms remained spatially stable despite high-frequency movements, with a maximum low-frequency error of 0.6° in heading. Static errors depended solely on the external tracker's quality. These results demonstrate the HoloLens 2's potential for operational use in dynamic vehicle environments, enhancing immersion. Its mixed-reality features and adaptability proved particularly valuable for rapid research and development across platforms.
Walko, ChristianJusko, TimMaibach, Malte-Jörn
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) specifies minimum performance standards for airborne head-worn display (HWD) to be used as a head-up display (HUD) equivalent in fixed wing (14 CFR Parts 23 and 25) aircraft. While this document may be applied to rotorcraft using an HWD for piloting functions (14 CFR Parts 27 and 29), additional performance standards may be required. This AS covers basic display requirements but does not include specific application requirements. Specific applications can include flight instrumentation, navigation, engine and system status, alerting, surveillance, communication, terrain awareness, weather, enhanced vision, synthetic vision, and other formats. This document covers criteria for conformal HWD systems that are intended for use in the flight deck by the pilot or copilot. Display minimum performance characteristics are specified for standard and other environmental conditions for the purpose of product qualification. Figure 1 defines the HWD System Scope for use within this document. This document does not address sensor imaging systems, imagery, symbology, installation, or integration. This document is intended to be used in combination with other guidance material contained in current system specific, Technical Standard Orders (TSOs), Advisory Circulars (ACs), and other FAA-approved guidance material. This AS is applicable to HWDs used across multiple aircraft types.
A-4HUD Head-up Display Subcommittee
ADAS (Advanced Driver Assistance Systems) is a growing technology in automotive industry, intended to provide safety and comfort to the passengers with the help of variety of sensors like radar, camera, LIDAR etc. Though ADAS improved safety of passengers comparing to conventional non-ADAS vehicles, still it has some grey areas for safety enhancement and easy assistance to drivers. BSW (Blind Spot Warning) and LCA (Lane Change Assist) are ADAS function which assists the driver for lane changing. BSW alerts the driver about the vehicles which are in blind zone in adjacent lanes and LCA alerts the driver about approaching vehicles at a high velocity in adjacent lanes. In current ADAS systems, BSW and LCA alerts are given as optical and acoustic warnings which is placed in vehicle side mirrors. During lane change the driver must see the side mirrors to take a decision. Due to this, there is a reaction time for taking a decision since driver must divert attention from windshield to side mirrors and back to windshield & this reaction time can be one of the causes of accident in many cases. So, there is a scope to improve safety by eliminating this driver reaction time. This paper presents an idea about using heads-up display for BSW and LCA warnings to eliminate this driver reaction time. The Head-Up Display (HUD) gives warning information in the windshield itself instead of side mirrors in the existing system so the driver need not to look at side mirrors during lane change. This driver interface feature can be implemented to other ADAS function warnings also to enhance the safety performance. This paper also covers ADAS vehicle and HUD mounting architecture along with different types of HUD’s information.
R, ManjunathSaddaladinne, Jagadeesh BabuD, Gopinath
Mercury Systems, Inc. Andover, MA 978-256-1300
Autorotation maneuvers in helicopters are generally performed in an emergency following some form of catastrophic mechanical or system failure. It is a complex maneuver to perform because the pilot is required to perform several tasks simultaneously and the timing of each of them needs to be precise. Workload can be high and the consequences of getting things wrong can be fatal. Following on from a series of studies that investigated the use of symbology presented on a Head-Up Display to try to assist a helicopter pilot to fly the autorotation maneuver more safely and accurately, this paper presents a pilot-in-the-loop flight simulation study to explore the use of haptic cueing to help the pilot maintain indicated air- and main rotor speeds. Various entry conditions to autorotation maneuver are assess via simulated flight trial at Liverpool's HELIFLIGHT-R full motion flight simulator. Subjective evaluation of the results show that the haptic cues are useful to pilots in terms of reducing the workload to perform a successful autorotation landing.
Alam, MushfiqulJump, MichaelRogers, Jonathan
At CES 2022 Panasonic Automotive Systems Company of America unveiled AR HUD 2.0 (Augmented Reality Head-Up Display 2.0), the first system to include a new, patented eye-tracking system (ETS). If you've ever thought about what exists beyond the limits of a HUD and the small rectangular box it displays on the windshield, welcome to the world of AR. And note that AR is not VR, Virtual Reality; VR is a space in which headsets or special glasses allow the wearer to experience a 3D world that doesn't exist except in this technology. It's increasingly used in automotive interior design.
Dinkel, John
Researchers have developed a LiDAR-based augmented reality head-up display for use in vehicles. Tests on a prototype version of the technology suggest that it could improve road safety by “seeing through” objects to alert of potential hazards without distracting the driver.
ABSTRACT
Fasiello, SimoneJump,  MikeMasarati, Pierangelo
Integration of a driver monitor system (DMS) in a head-up display (HUD) gives the monitor camera a continuous view of the driver’s face, since the driver always faces the road ahead. However, with both infrared (IR) illuminator and IR camera packaged in the HUD, reflectivity of the windshield is important at IR wavelengths used by the camera. Not only is windshield IR reflectivity important for a clear camera image of the driver’s face, but increasing windshield reflectivity also decreases the effect of ambient sunlight on the camera image of the driver’s face. We describe a method to measure windshield reflectivity, both for the 940 nm band used by a DMS, and for visible light for the HUD. The measurement method uses a fiber-optic spectrometer, two collimating lenses, and a method to compensate for sample tilt. The lenses are mounted on a stage that adjusts the height above the sample. As an example, this method was used to characterize an IR reflecting windshield, prepared for a prototype automotive HUD. At 940 nm, and 45° angle of incidence, the measured reflectivity is > 85% for unpolarized incident light. For visible light at 550 nm, and 62° angle of incidence, the measured reflectivity is 13.9% for both an IR reflecting windshield and for a reference windshield, for unpolarized incident light. The prototype windshield gives a good reflected image for the DMS IR camera and a good HUD image as seen by the driver. The method used to prepare this prototype windshield is suitable for high-volume production.
Lambert, David K.Itsede, FidelisTomura, KazuhiroNohara, AtsushiChou, KinryoCarty, Dylan
This report identifies the reasons for, and results associated with, the conduct of a flight simulation research project evaluating the effect of low powered laser beam illumination of pilot crewmembers operating in the navigable airspace. This evaluation was primarily concerned with the possible degradation of pilot performance when illuminated by a laser while operating in an airport terminal area where pilot workloads are normally at their maximum.
G-10OL Operational Laser Committee
This document recommends criteria and requirements for a flight management system (FMS) for transport aircraft. The FMS shall provide the functions of lateral navigation, vertical navigation, and performance management and may include time of arrival control. The FMS design shall take human factors considerations into account to produce a fault tolerant system.
S-7 Flight Deck Handling Qualities Stds for Trans Aircraft
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) sets forth design and operational recommendations concerning the human factors/crew interface considerations and criteria for vertical situation awareness displays. This is the first of two recommended practice documents that will address vertical situation awareness displays (VSAD). This document will focus on the performance/planning types of display (e.g., the map display) and will be limited to providing recommendations concerning human factored crew interfaces and will not address architecture issues. This document focuses on two types of VSAD displays: a coplanar implementation of a profile display (side projection) and a conventional horizontal map display; and a 3D map display (geometric projection). It is intended for head down display applications. However, other formats or presentation methods, such as HUDs, HMDs and 3D audio presentations may become more feasible in the future. Even though the relationship of the vertical information and the horizontal map display will be addressed, it is not within the scope of this document to cover Raster Aeronautical Charting displays, or the presentation of vertical status information in horizontal map displays (e.g., altitude errors; altitude range arcs). A second ARP document will be developed to provide recommended practices for the control types of display (e.g., primary flight display) one of which will be a perspective primary flight display. In this document, the display and control characteristics are covered for displays that contain vertical situation components as well as the alerting depiction associated with the VSAD. It is assumed that the vertical situation awareness may be provided by one or more crew interface component(s). Although the system functionality assumed for this document exemplifies fixed-wing aircraft implementation, the recommendations do not preclude other aircraft types. The recommendations contained in this document address currently envisioned functionality for a vertical situation awareness display, namely: stabilization of flight path; aircraft energy management; vertical navigation, as well as external hazards such as weather, traffic, and terrain. Since this document provides recommendations, the guidance is provided in the form of “should” statements as opposed to the “shall” statements that appear in standards and regulations. When “shall” statements are used, the regulation or standard is referenced (where applicable). The assumptions about the system that guided and bounded the recommendations contained in this document include: the system is an on-board (flight deck based) system displaying vertical situation information to the flight crew; multiple sources of vertical position data will be used and some of the data may be transmitted to the airplane from the ground or satellite no changes to the existing airspace infrastructure should be required there will be pilot-in-the-loop/manual or automatic involvement in all flight path adjustments information provided should be accessible by all pilots the system will address fixed wing airplane types the system will be based on the English language, but other languages may have to be considered the system may be operated during all phases of flight the system may be operated under different metric conventions (e.g., QFE/QNH or feet/meters) the VSAD is not intended to replace any of the alerting system components (EICAS, TAWS, TCAS, GPWS, Altitude Alert, etc.). There will, however, be a close relationship between the VSAD and TAWS since both use some of the same sensors, data bases, and address some of the same issues human centered design principles will be applied to the system design “lessons learned” from past implementations will be applied to the design the display function may be stand-alone or part of a multi-function display the display will meet harmonized certification requirements and it will be designed with the understanding that if it is in the flight deck the flight crew will use it.
G-10EAB Executive Advisory Group
The recommendations of this document apply to such aircraft as are able to perform both normal angle and steep IMC approaches, the latter being defined as those approaches having a final approach segment angle greater than 4°. Such aircraft can include both conventional and STOL fixed-wing aircraft, commercial air transport and/or utility and normal category helicopters, compound helicopters and powered lift vehicles (tiltrotors, tiltfans, tiltwings, etc.).
G-10EAB Executive Advisory Group
The function of a multifunctional display (MFD) system is to provide the crew access to a variety of data, or combinations of data, used to fly the aircraft, to navigate, to communicate, and to manage aircraft systems. MFDs may also display primary flight information (PFI) as needed to insure continuity of operations. This document sets forth design and operational recommendations concerning the human factors considerations for MFD systems. The MFD system may contain one or more electronic display devices capable of presenting data in several possible formats. MFDs are designed to depict PFI, navigation, communication, aircraft state, aircraft system management, weather, traffic, and/or other information used by the flight crew for command and control of the aircraft. The information displayed may be combined to make an integrated display or one set of data may simply replace another. The information contained in this document can be applied to the design of all MFDs, including electronic flight bags (EFB), regardless of aircraft type. This document makes extensive use of “lessons learned” and information developed and currently in use by systems and airframe manufacturers through the evolutionary development of today’s advanced systems. Some assumptions used in developing this document include: MFDs will incorporate a human-centered design using knowledge gained from previous work and research. This document is intended to apply to new systems or modifications to existing systems. Each function of a MFD is capable of providing accurate and timely information appropriate to the tasks of the flight crew for certain aircraft operations throughout all phases of flight. MFD systems will be based on the aeronautical English language, but other languages may have to be considered. MFD systems will meet international harmonized certification requirements. Use of the information in this document is subject to the certification requirements for a given airplane. The design process should include operator training considerations throughout its development. PFI will be available on the flight deck at all times.
G-10EAB Executive Advisory Group
This document sets forth general, functional, procedural, and design criteria and recommendations concerning human engineering of data link systems. The recommendations are based on limited evidence from empirical and analytic studies of simulated data link communication, and on experience from operational tests and actual use of data link. However, because data are not yet available to support recommendations on all potentially critical human engineering issues these recommendations necessarily go beyond the data link research and include requirements based on related research and human factors engineering practice. It is also recognized that evolution of these recommendations will be appropriate as experience with data link accumulates and new applications are implemented. This document focuses primarily on recommendations for data link communications between an air traffic specialist and a pilot, i.e., air traffic services communications, although some recommendations address use of data link for flight information services. Unless otherwise specified within the text, all recommendations apply to both flight deck and ground-based data link systems. This document is intended as a guide for development and evaluation of data link systems. Human engineering considerations are an important element of data link system performance. As illustrated in Figure 1, human engineering recommendations address many component functions required for effective data link communication services in the operational environment. For presentation purposes, the recommendations are divided into five sections: General, functional, procedures, flight deck/air traffic service (ATS) workstation integration, and human-computer interface. To facilitate understanding and use of this document appropriate cross-references to interrelated recommendations appear in parentheses throughout the text.
G-10EAB Executive Advisory Group
This paper presents preliminary results of a pilot-in-the-loop (PIL) study of different cueing designs to reduce pilot workload in rotorcraft shipboard landings. The participants were tasked with flying an approach to touchdown on the deck of an Arleigh Burke Flight IIA class Destroyer under both day visual flight rules (VFR) and night-unaided, zeroillumination conditions. For each condition, the participants were presented with three different cue types. For the day iterations these were a generic military standard heads up display (HUD), a ship fixed tunnel in the sky (tunnel), and a virtual flight lead cueing system (FLCS). The zero-illumination night condition was deemed impossible to land with only the HUD, so it was replaced with a combination of the tunnel and FLCS for the purpose of gaining initial feedback on combining elements of different systems. Terminal landing constraints (location, heading, and impact velocity) were used as measures of pilot performance, the NASA Task Load Index (TLX) survey was used to evaluate perceived pilot workload, and the System Usability Scale (SUS) was used to rate interface and cueing usability. Initial findings showed that pilots viewed the tunnel cueing as having the lowest perceived workload while the FLCS provided the best terminal performance. All types of 3D cueing improved performance when compared to the HUD baseline. The use of 3D cueing also expanded the operational envelope to include zero-illumination conditions. For completeness, the study requires additional subjects, specifically those that have prior shipboard landing experience, as COVID-19 safety precautions paused in-person simulator testing early in the testing period. This body of work represents the next iteration of FLCS research, initially published in Ref. 1.
Walters, RobertFeigh, Dr.McCandless, Joseph
This Aerospace Standard (AS), establishes minimum performance standards for those sensors, computers, transponders, and airplane flight deck controls/displays which together comprise a Takeoff Performance Monitor (TOPM) System. This standard also defines functional capabilities, design requirements, and test procedures. A TOPM system is intended to monitor the progress of the takeoff and to provide advisory information which the crew may use in conjunction with other available cues to decide to continue or abort the takeoff. See Appendix A for supplementary information relating to NTSB, CAA, and ad hoc committee concerns and background information.
S-7 Flight Deck Handling Qualities Stds for Trans Aircraft
The head-up display system can overlay the real object with the projected image to assist the driver in driving. However, when road conditions are bad, the continuous vibration of the vehicle will cause the vehicle to tilt and shift. At this time, the projected image and the real object do not overlap well. This paper presents a correction algorithm for a head-up display system. The algorithm corrects the position of the projected image by inputting the tilt state of the vehicle. In this paper, the coordinate axis with the driver's eye as the origin is first established. Then the tilt state of the vehicle is decomposed into the rotation angle in three directions and the displacement in the vertical direction. Finally, the position of the projected image is corrected by inputting the tilt state of the vehicle so that the projected image can remain on the real object at all times. The simulation model is established in Unity3D. The effectiveness of the correction algorithm is verified by inputting the tilt state of the vehicle. The results show that the projected image can be correctly displayed on the real object under different tilt situations when the initial position of the real object is constant. When the initial position of the real object changes, the projection can also be correctly displayed on the real object in the same tilt state.
Kuang, JianjieGuo, XuexunTan, GangfengLiu, ZhiQiangTian, ZhongpengSun, Meng
This document presents criteria for flight deck controls and displays for Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems.
S-7 Flight Deck Handling Qualities Stds for Trans Aircraft
This SAE Recommended Practice defines the various types of information required by the collision repair industry to properly restore light-duty, highway vehicles to their pre-accident condition. Procedures and specifications are defined for damage-related repairs to body, mechanical, electrical, steering, suspension, and safety systems. The distribution method and publication timeliness are also considered.
Motor Vehicle Council
This document recommends design and performance criteria for aircraft lighting systems used to illuminate flight deck controls, luminous visual displays used for transfer of information, and flight deck background and instrument surfaces that form the flight deck visual environment. This document is for commercial transport aircraft except for applications requiring night vision compatibility.
A-20A Crew Station Lighting
Hazard Cuing Systems for Teen Drivers: A Test-Track Evaluation on Mcity2019-01-03994/2/2019
There is a strong evidence that the overrepresentation of teen drivers in motor vehicle crashes is mainly due to their poor hazard perception skills, i.e., they are unskilled at appropriately detecting and responding to roadway hazards. This study evaluates two cuing systems designed to help teens better understand their driving environment. Both systems use directional color-coding to represent different levels of proximity between one’s vehicle and outside agents. The first system provides an overview of the location of adjacent objects in a head-up display in front of the driver and relies on drivers’ focal vision (focal cuing system). The second system presents similar information, but in the drivers’ peripheral vision, by using ambient lights (peripheral cuing system). Both systems were retrofitted into a test vehicle (2014 Toyota Camry). A within-subject experiment was conducted at the University of Michigan Mcity test-track facility. The study collected data from seventeen teen participants. Each participant experienced three cuing conditions (focal cuing, peripheral cuing and dual system cuing conditions) as well as three no cuing system conditions (two practice, a baseline and a post-treatment drive). The order of cuing system exposure was balanced among participants. All drives were approximately six minutes long and contained seven distinct visual hazard obstruction scenarios. Each scenario had a pre-defined critical point. The dependent variables were (a) the minimum clearances between the critical points and the participant’s vehicle, and (b) vehicle speed at the minimum clearance points. Results show that teens drove more slowly and maintained greater distances at critical points when cuing systems were present. These behaviors were more evident with the peripheral cuing system compared to the focal cuing system. These findings suggest that such cuing systems have the potential to address the hazard perception skill deficiency in teenage drivers.
Zhang, YuKang, Te-PingFlannagan, MichaelBao, ShanPradhan, AnujSullivan, John
This SAE Standard provides measurement methods to determine HUD optical performance in typical automotive ambient lighting conditions. It covers indoor measurements with simulated outdoor lighting for the measurement of HUD virtual images. HUD types addressed by this standard includes w-HUD (windshield HUD) and c-HUD (combiner HUD) with references to Augmented Reality (AR) HUD as needed. It is not the scope of this document to set threshold values for automotive compliance; however, some recommended values are presented for reference.
Vehicular Flat Panel Display Standards Committee
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) specifies minimum performance standards for all types of electronic displays and electronic display systems that are intended for use in the flight deck by the flight crew in all 14 CFR Part 23, 25, 27, and 29 aircraft. The requirements and recommendations in this document are intended to apply to all installed electronic displays and electronic display systems including those that have a touch screen interface within the flight deck, regardless of intended function, criticality, or location within the flight deck, but may also be used for non-installed electronic displays. This document provides baseline requirements and recommendations (see 2.3 for definitions of “shall” and “should”). This document primarily addresses hardware requirements, such as electrical, mechanical, optical, and environmental. It does not address system specific functions. It does not contain an exhaustive or comprehensive list of requirements for specific systems or functions, such as TCAS, ADS-B, GPS, weather, or shared display considerations (e.g., when should alerts be inhibited on a display system that simultaneously depicts navigation data integrated with terrain data or traffic alerting). This document is intended to be used in combination with other guidance material contained in current system specific, TSOs, Advisory Circulars (ACs), and other Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-approved guidance material. The requirements and recommendations in this document are intended to apply to, but are not limited to, the following types of display functions: Primary flight and primary navigation which include vertical situation, horizontal situation, and moving map displays. Systems display and displays that have alerting functions which may include engine instrument, aircraft systems information/control, pilot or flight crew alerting, and documentation displays. Control displays including communication, navigation, and system control displays. Information displays which may include navigation displays used for situation awareness only, supplemental data displays, and maintenance displays. Electronic displays can include one or more of the following interconnected components. Other configurations are possible. Symbol Generator/Processor Unit (SG) containing display processing and symbol generation processing and symbol generation capability, power supplies, interface logic/buffer circuits and display unit interface capability. The SG receives data from external sources, produces symbols as electronic signals, and transmits the symbols to the display units(s). Control Panel (CP) is an optional component providing the means for manually selecting display symbology options/modes, selections, settings, brightness, etc. Touch Screen (TS) is an optional component providing the means for manually selecting display symbology options/modes, selections, settings, brightness, etc. Display Unit (DU) providing the visual display of SG symbology. Head up displays are out of scope for this document. The minimum performance standards for head up displays are provided in AS8055A. NOTE: This document is expected to be used by the FAA as the basic requirement for a Technical Standard Order (TSO) for multipurpose electronic displays. While not required, ARP1874 and ARP4067 give recommended means, but not the only means, of compliance to this standard for CRT based displays. In addition, while not required, ARP4256 gives recommended means, but not the only means, of compliance to this standard for Part 25 LCD displays. That document is subject to change to keep pace with experience and technical advances. A similar document for Part 23 aircraft does not exist at this time, however these documents may be used as the basis for electronic displays intended to be installed in Part 23, 27, and 29 aircraft, realizing that additional requirements may also apply.
A-4ED Electronics Display Subcommittee
The adoption of head-up displays (HUDs) is increasing in modern automobiles. Yet integrating this technology into vehicles with standard windshield (WS) laminates can create negative effects for drivers, primarily due to the thickness of glass used. The double ghosting in HUD images is typically overcome by employing a wedged PVB between the two glass plies of the laminate. Another solution is to reduce the thickness of the glass without impacting the overall windshield toughness. Although this still requires the use of a wedged PVB to eliminate HUD ghosting, the thinner glass provides opportunity to increase the image size. However, reducing the thickness of a soda-lime glass (SLG) ply or plies in a conventional soda-lime glass (SLG) laminate can significantly impact the robustness of the laminate to external impact events. This paper will review how a hybrid laminate made from one ply of a relatively thick SLG and a second ply of relatively thin, chemically-strengthened glass, will not only improve the windshield robustness but simultaneously provide better optical performance for HUD applications. Exemplary thin, chemically-strengthened glass can be fusion-formed and demonstrates superior optical and surface qualities compared to float-formed SLG, and typically exhibits greater damage resistance than SLG. When used in a windshield, these lightweight hybrid laminates offer enhanced HUD performance and require a smaller wedge angle. The thickness and wedge angle reduction reviewed in this paper have a significant impact on the ghosting of objects observed in transmission through the windshield. While thick laminates with panoramic shapes suffer from degraded night vision, the use of hybrid laminates significantly reduces the ghosting in transmission. Hybrid laminates can help OEMs move towards more elaborate windshield shapes and assist in improving the vehicle’s aesthetics and aerodynamics.
Park, Sang-KiBhatia, Vikram
Head-up displays (HUDs) give visual information to drivers in an easy to understand manner and prevent traffic accidents. Augmented reality head-up displays (AR-HUDs) display the driving information overlaid on the actual scenery. The AR-HUD must allow the visual information and the actual scene to be viewed at the same time, and a sense of depth and distance are key factors in achieving this. Binocular parallax used in stereoscopic 3D display is one of the most useful methods of providing a sense of depth and distance. Generally, stereoscopic 3D displays must limit the image range to within Panum’s fusional area to ensure fusion of the stereoscopic images. However, when using a stereoscopic 3D display for an AR-HUD, the image range must extend beyond Panum’s fusional area to allow the visual information and the actual scene to be displayed at the same time. In this study, we investigate the visibility of images displayed beyond Panum’s fusional area on a stereoscopic 3D display for an AR-HUD. Ease of fusion was measured by the recognition time for participants watching remote projector images and parallax images displayed at the same time beyond Panum’s fusional area. We found that one group of participants was unable to recognize the relationship between the two images under certain conditions.
Takeda, KodaiIshihara, KazuyukiKawamorita, Takushi
It's become a rarity for automakers to place manual-transmission models in their press-evaluation fleets, but the Elantra Sport's direct (if light) lever action and skillfully-weighted clutch pedal made it all the more pleasing to manual-shift for a week. Although the Sport has a unique, assertively-styled grille and other panels that differentiate it from the rest of the Elantra lineup, it's not just an appearance job-there's something going here: don't forget, Hyundai hired BMW's former M-division engineering boss a couple years ago. There's a useful 201 hp from the turbocharged, direct-injected 1.6-L 4-cylinder and scant lag. With the 6-speed manual, the Sport's just on the civil side of fast-and is a treat to hustle around in the middle gears.
Continental is developing its innovative 3D instrument display cluster with the aim of bringing it to production within the next 24-36 months. The display, previewed by Automotive Engineering at a recent technology meeting, features a high-definition (1920 × 720 pixel) 12.3-in screen but is suitable for displays measuring 15 in. “The proliferation of displays in the interior of the cabin allows for more individuality, variety of shapes and appearances” a Continental engineer explained, adding, “Instead of relying on flat, one-dimensional surfaces, we are offering a solution that allows designers to play with the interior in a creative and cost-efficient way.”
Adcock, Ian
A new concept of Head Up Display is presented, using the windshield as a transparent screen. This breakthrough technology does not need the use of complex combiner, bulky optics and overhead projection unit. The novel system uses several holographic optical elements to perform a 3D stereoscopic display, with the ability to present floating graphical objects in a large field of view. Augmented Reality display will be possible, increasing considerably the User Experience and situational awareness, without the need of wearing a bulky and complex Head Mounted Display.
Coni, PhilippeBARDON, Jean Lucservantie, Xavier
Head-up Display (HUD) system can avoid drivers’ distraction on dashboard and effectively reduce collisions caused by emergency events, which is gradually being realized by researchers around the world. However, the current HUD only displays information like speed, fuel consumption, other information like acceleration and braking can’t be displayed yet. This research will use the indicator symbol‘s color and position change to remind drivers to brake or accelerate. Drivers can do driving operation timely and accurately. The system has the advantages of safety, intuition and real-time. The vehicle safe speed is calculated according to the road parameters, like adhesion coefficient and slope, and vehicle parameters, such as vehicle mass and centroid. Then, the appropriate braking operations are obtained by combining the vehicle driving state. The braking information is corresponded to the color and position change of the indicator symbol to prompt the drivers by the HUD interface. At the same time, under different driving conditions, experiments will be carried out to find out the difference of driver’s braking operations when there is braking information presentation or there is not. The effects of different braking operations on driving safety performance will be evaluated. Compared with the condition of no braking information presentation, braking information presentation can make the start braking time ahead of schedule. In addition, the emergency braking situation will be reduced appropriately. The results show that the braking information presentation based on the HUD system has significant effects on improving driving safety.
Huang, BoXia, WanyangTan, GangfengXiao, LongjieWang, Zongsong
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 265