Browse Topic: Driver behavior
This SAE Recommended Practice is intended to establish a procedure to certify the low mu/winter driving skill levels of professional drivers. This certification can be used by the individual driver to qualify their skills when seeking employment or other professional activity. These certification levels may also be used by test facilities or other organizations when seeking test or professional drivers of various skills. This document provides directions for obtaining certification through Probitas Authentication®1 and the low mu/winter driving skill examination requirements. This document is a supplement to SAE J3300, providing information specific to the low mu/winter driving skill certification and clarifying the application of the rules set forth in SAE J3300 to the low mu/winter driving certification. While the references, definitions, rules, and guidelines presented in SAE J3300, Sections 1 through 5 apply to the low mu/winter driving certification, they are not repeated in this document.
To address the lack of safe and effective on-site vehicle blocking and control methods in the event of fires or other emergencies in extra-long tunnels — which can significantly reduce traffic safety risks and prevent secondary accidents — this study proposes a novel barrier-free light–smoke curtain interception method. The method integrates conventional traffic safety warning facilities (gantry-mounted variable message signs and audio–visual alarms) with two light–smoke curtain interception images to form a composite early-warning and interception system. Driving simulation experiments were conducted to comprehensively evaluate its warning effectiveness, interception performance, and operational safety in comparison with methods employing only traditional warning facilities or light curtain images. Furthermore, field drills were performed to validate its real-world applicability and interception effectiveness under both daytime and nighttime conditions. The main findings are as follows: 1) The fixation ratio and interception success rate associated with the proposed method were significantly higher than those of the other two methods, demonstrating enhanced visual attention and superior warning and interception performance. 2) The maximum deceleration observed with the proposed method was lower than that of the light curtain–only method and did not trigger emergency braking, thereby indicating high operational stability and driver comfort. 3) In field drills, after activation of the interception equipment, only one and two vehicles entered the tunnel under daytime and nighttime conditions, respectively, and full control of on-site vehicles was achieved within two minutes without any traffic accidents, verifying the system’s rapid response and effective safety assurance.
This document is intended to establish a procedure to certify AD fallback test driver skill levels as an endorsement to SAE J3300 foundational level certification. The SAE J3300/3 endorsement can be used by the individual driver to qualify their skills as a test driver of vehicles with automated driving features. The SAE J3300/3 endorsement levels may also be used by test facilities or other organizations when seeking test or professional drivers with these skills. This document provides directions for obtaining the endorsement, including associated AD fallback test driving skill examination requirements, through SAE J3300-certified Examiners (refer to SAE J3300 for definition). Endorsement registration and associated records are administered through Probitas Authentication®. Probitas Authentication® is the current Independent Program Administrator for the SAE J3300 series. This document is a supplement to SAE J3300, providing information specific to the AD fallback test driver skill endorsement and clarifying the application of the rules set forth in SAE J3300 to the AD fallback test driver endorsement. While the references, definitions, rules, and guidelines presented in SAE J3300 Sections 1 through 5 apply to the AD fallback test driver endorsement, they are not repeated in this document.
To explore the impact of guiding and warning visual combination factors at the entrance sections of highway tunnels on drivers’ visual characteristics and driving behavior, this study recruited 16 drivers to conduct on-road vehicle experiments at the entrance sections of the Yunling Tunnel’s left bore (with visual combination factors) and right bore (without visual combination factors). Seven visual characteristics and driving behavior indicators, including pupil diameter and vehicle speed, were collected and statistically analyzed. Representative indicators such as pupil diameter, standard deviation of fixation point position, and vehicle speed were selected to establish a trend surface model of visual characteristics and driving behavior. The results indicate that when driving at the entrance section of the left bore, drivers’ pupil diameter and fixation duration were significantly lower than those at the entrance section of the right bore. With the increase in the sweeping view angle, there was a more dispersed distribution of fixation points. Additionally, there were significant differences in the acceleration and lateral deviation of the driving vehicle, with the range of variation narrowing by 52.5% and 35.7%, respectively. The trend surface model results show that under the influence of visual combination factors, the reduction in drivers’ vehicle speed was smaller, and the impact of pupil diameter and standard deviation of fixation point position on vehicle speed was less pronounced. Overall, under the influence of visual combination factors, drivers’ visual characteristics showed significant changes, with improved speed control and manipulation levels, leading to more stable vehicle operation.
Rigorous validation of SAE Levels 3 and 4 autonomous systems increasingly relies on simulation. However, the simulation-reality gap remains a challenge for human-in-the-loop assessments. This study empirically quantifies the behavioral fidelity of the Car-Learning-to-Act (CARLA) simulator by recreating specific real-world traffic scenarios using the high-precision exiD drone dataset. Twenty-five participants performed a series of maneuvers, including lane changes and time-critical cut-ins. Their performance was analyzed using Dynamic Time Warping (DTW), driver profiling, and Time-to-Collision (TTC) metrics. The findings reveal a clear distinction between relative and absolute behavioral validity. In strategic decision-making tasks, the simulation demonstrated remarkably high temporal fidelity. DTW analysis explained 94% of the trajectory variance. Participants initiated lane changes with an average lag of -9 frames (0.36 s) compared to naturalistic references. These results indicate that, despite the absence of peripheral optical flow, the simulator successfully elicits temporally correlated decision-making patterns suitable for assessing strategic driver intent. However, physical execution in reactive scenarios revealed significant absolute discrepancies. Although the high Pearson correlation (r ≈ 0.89) in velocity profiles proves that drivers recognize and react to hazards with realistic timing, their physical inputs were exaggerated. Participants displayed digital, over-modulated braking responses and maintained a negative safety bias of -11.26 m, a deviation attributed to the lack of vestibular g-force feedback and geometric minification. Furthermore, distinct driver profiles emerged. Risk-oriented participants exhibited a gaming effect by neglecting safety margins. In conclusion, while CARLA is highly valid for testing the temporal logic of driver interactions, absolute dynamics require calibration functions, such as force-feedback (pedal) tuning and visual deceleration cues like camera shake, to compensate for sensory limitations before it can be used for safety-critical validation.
Letter from the Guest Editor
As the adoption of electric vehicles continues to accelerate, the demand for their development and testing using chassis dynamometers has also increased significantly. Compared with internal combustion engine vehicles, chassis dynamometer testing for electric vehicles typically requires test durations several to several dozen times longer, resulting in substantially increased labor requirements. In addition, low-temperature testing is often required, further intensifying the workload associated with vehicle testing. To address these challenges, this study developed and evaluated a pedal robot designed to enable unmanned and automated testing. The pedal robot developed in this study weighs only 12 kg and can be installed within a few minutes. It is, to the authors’ knowledge, the world’s first pedal robot that mimics human driving behavior by using a single foot to operate both the accelerator and brake pedals. Unlike conventional driving robots, the actuators of the proposed system do not require direct mechanical attachment to the vehicle pedals, allowing for rapid installation. Furthermore, the robot is mounted on the driver-side floor, eliminating the need for attachment to the seat structure. The pedal robot features three degrees of freedom driven by three motors and employs artificial intelligence to recognize the shape and position of pedals across different vehicle models, thereby enabling automated test initiation without manual adjustment. The performance of the pedal robot was evaluated under UDDS, HWFET, and WLTC driving modes, and the results were analyzed in accordance with the SAE J2951 standard. Comparative evaluations demonstrated that the pedal robot achieved superior speed-tracking performance relative to that of an experienced human test driver. The developed pedal robot is currently being utilized for vehicle certification testing of electric and other vehicles at the Mobile Environment Research Center of the National Institute of Environmental Research in Korea. This paper presents a detailed analysis of the corresponding experimental results.
Despite remarkable advances in vehicle technology - enhancing comfort, safety, and automation – productivity of transportation over the road continues to decline. Stop-and-go driving remains one of the most persistent inefficiencies in modern mobility systems, leading to greater travel delays, energy waste, emissions, and accident risk. As vehicle volumes rise, these effects compound into systemic challenges, including driver frustration, unstable flow dynamics, and elevated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. To address these issues, an extensive data-driven evaluation was performed characterizing the underlying causes of traffic instability and uncovering hidden behavioral parameters influencing traffic flow. This research led to the identification of a previously unrecognized metric - the Driver Comfort Index (DCI) - which quantifies an inter-vehicle spacing behavior that reflects intrinsic human driving behavior. Building on this discovery, mixed traffic is explored to identify its phenomena, where human-driven and machine-controlled vehicles coexist and share the road. It appears that adaptive cruise control (ACC) and connected autonomous vehicles (CAV) are controlled by a non-intrinsic parameter so that traffic mix suffers from a mismatch of vehicle dynamics. This mismatch is explored, and it is proposed to harmonize traffic dynamics by adopting the natural DCI parameter as the single control mechanism. Analytical studies demonstrate that DCI-based traffic flow orchestration, applied integrally to human- and machine-controlled vehicles, enhances traffic flow stability, mitigates stop-and-go oscillations, and significantly improves network efficiency, safety, and environmental performance.
Autonomous vehicle navigation requires accurate prediction of driving path curvature to ensure smooth and safe trajectory planning. This paper presents a novel approach to curvature prediction using deep neural networks trained on GPS-derived ground truth data, rather than model predictions, providing a more accurate training signal that reflects actual vehicle motion. We develop a multi-modal neural network architecture with temporal GRU encoders that processes vision features, driver intent signals, historical curvature, and vehicle state parameters to predict curvature. A key innovation is the use of GPS-based actual curvature measurements computed from vehicle motion data (κ = ωz/v) as training supervision, enabling the model to learn from real-world driving patterns. The model is trained on 5,322 samples from real-world driving data collected on The University of Oklahoma’s Norman Campus using a Comma 3X device and a 2025 Nissan Leaf electric vehicle. Experimental results demonstrate high steering curvature prediction accuracy with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.805, Mean Absolute Error of 0.027654, and Root Mean Squared Error of 0.034402 on the validation set. The model achieves stable convergence within 10 epochs and maintains consistent performance across diverse driving scenarios, from straight highway segments to complex turning maneuvers. This work contributes to autonomous driving technology by demonstrating the effectiveness of GPS-supervised learning for curvature prediction, successfully deployed in OpenPilot’s production system with real-time inference at 5 Hz.
Avoiding and mitigating any potential collision is dependent on (1) road user ability to avoid entering into a conflict (conflict avoidance effect) and (2) road user response should a conflict be entered (collision avoidance effect). This study examined the collision avoidance effect of the Waymo Driver, a currently deployed SAE level 4 automated driving system (ADS), using a human behavior reference model, designed to be representative of a human driver that is non-impaired, with eyes on the conflict (NIEON). Reliable performance benchmarking methodologies for assessing ADS performance are an essential component of determining system readiness. This consistently performing, always-attentive driver does not exist in the human population. Counterfactual simulations were run on responder collision scenarios based on reconstructions from a 10-year period of human fatal crashes from the Operational Design Domain of the Waymo ADS in Chandler, Arizona. Of 16 simulated conflicts entered, 12 (75%) were prevented by the Waymo Driver, and 10 (62.5%) were prevented by the NIEON model. The NIEON Model mitigated an additional 5 collisions and did not mitigate 1 collision. In these 16 conflicts entered, 93% of serious injury risk was reduced by the Waymo Driver, whereas 84% of serious injury risk was reduced by the NIEON model. Further, in a case-by-case evaluation, the Waymo Driver’s collision avoidance led to reduced serious injury risk when compared to the NIEON model in every simulated event. The results of this paper demonstrate that a reference model like NIEON can be used to benchmark ADS responder performance in response to high-risk initiating behaviors performed by the current driving population.
A Detroit-based startup says its device can analyze brain activity to help figure out whether a driver is impaired. The impaired driver-detection business has been heating up since even before NHTSA announced in 2024 that it was working what would eventually be a mandate that vehicles be able to detect impaired drivers and mitigate the danger they represent to the motoring public.
In automotive engineering, understanding driving behavior is crucial for decision on specifications of future system designs. This study introduces an innovative approach to modeling driving behavior using Graph Attention Networks (GATs). By leveraging spatial relationships encoded in H3 indices, a graph-based model constructed, which captures dependencies between various vehicle operational parameters and their operational regions using H3 indices. The model utilizes CAN signal features such as speed, fuel efficiency, engine temperature, and categorical identifiers of vehicle type and sub-type. Additionally, regional indices are incorporated to enrich the contextual information. The GAT model processes these heterogeneous features, learning to identify patterns indicative of driving behavior. This approach offers several significant advantages. Firstly, it enhances the accuracy of driving behavior modeling by effectively capturing the complex spatial and operational dependencies inherent in vehicle data. The use of GATs allows for the dynamic weighting of different features, ensuring that the most relevant information is prioritized in the analysis. Secondly, the integration of regional indices provides a deeper contextual understanding, enabling the model to discern region-specific driving patterns that might otherwise be overlooked. Furthermore, this method facilitates the identification of abnormal behavioral trends, offering valuable insights for design engineers. By understanding region-based driving behavior, engineers can modify vehicle systems to better meet the needs of specific areas, leading to improved performance and user satisfaction. The combination of graph-based methods with attention mechanisms represents a significant advancement in vehicle performance monitoring, paving the way for a more comprehensive understanding of driving behavior across different regions.
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 772