Browse Topic: Octane
Renewable synthetic fuels offer the opportunity to significantly reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions worldwide if burned in the internal combustion engines of existing and future passenger car fleets. To evaluate this potential, two renewable synthetic gasoline fuels and alcohol blends that can be produced via the methanol-to-gasoline (MtG) synthesis process are evaluated in this study. The first synthetic gasoline, hereafter referred to as MtG, was developed by Chemieanlagenbau Chemnitz GmbH and Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, produced within the closed carbon cycle mobility (C3-Mobility) project, and was blended with 10%(V/V) ethanol (MtG-E10), 20%(V/V) ethanol (MtG-E20), 15%(V/V) methanol (MtG-M15), and 15%(V/V) 2-butanol (MtG-2Bu15). The second synthetic fuel, named POSYN (POrsche SYNthetic fuel), was developed by Porsche. The suitability of the synthetic fuels was experimentally investigated in a spark-ignition (SI) single-cylinder research engine with a compression ratio (CR) of 10.8 and compared with conventional gasoline fuel with Research Octane Number 95 and 10%(V/V) ethanol (RON95 E10) gasoline fuel. Load variations at a constant engine speed of 2500 rpm showed no significant differences between Methanol-to-Gasoline with 10%(V/V) ethanol (MtG-E10) and RON95 E10 in terms of both combustion performance and emissions. Additionally, a load variation with MtG-E10 and RON95 E10 at an engine speed of 3000 rpm was performed on a commercially available BMW multi-cylinder engine (MCE), which confirmed that both these fuels show an almost identical combustion and emission behavior. However, the knock resistance improved with higher alcohol fractions. Because of the favorable anti-knock properties of methanol, Methanol-to-Gasoline with 15%(V/V) methanol (MtG-M15) showed the highest maximum net indicated efficiency of 39.33%. This is 2% more than with Methanol-to-Gasoline with 20%(V/V) ethanol (MtG-E20), despite the lower alcohol volume fraction. In contrast, Methanol-to-Gasoline with 15%(V/V) 2-butanol (MtG-2Bu15) showed no improvement. POSYN enabled a significant efficiency advantage over RON95 E10 because of its high knock resistance, however, achieved the same maximum engine load because of the reduced octane sensitivity. The variation of the relative air/fuel ratio at an engine speed of 2500 rpm and an engine load of 16 bar net indicated mean effective pressure confirmed these findings. The highest net indicated efficiency of 42.4% was achieved with POSYN at a relative air/fuel ratio of 1.6. The lean limit could not be increased with the synthetic fuels and alcohol blends albeit with an improved combustion stability.
Ethanol and gasoline are widely used with fuels in Otto cycle engines. These fuels have different heating power and octane number and the engine behaves differently depending on the type of fuel used. The objective of this study is to measure, compare and investigate the factors that affect the block vibration of an internal combustion engine as a function of the fuel used ethanol or gasoline. The experiment consisted of instrumenting the side of the engine block with an accelerometer to measure the level of vibration intensity of the engine running on a bench dynamometer varying engine speed and load conditions. The results showed that the engine vibration level increases with the increase in engine speed and load. The highest level of vibration was achieved in the region of maximum torque and maximum pressure combustion. The combustion process is mainly responsible for the highest level of vibration achieved with ethanol. In all operating conditions the vibration level of the engine block was higher as ethanol. On average, the longitudinal, vertical and transverse engine vibration was 3%, 31% and 56% higher in the engine running on ethanol compared to the engine using gasoline. This research is important because it correlates the vibration level of the block of an internal combustion engine as an engine combustion process fueled with ethanol and gasoline.
This is the second part of a two-phase study revolving around the determination of fuel K-factor for different fuels in a 2.0L, 4-cylinder, direct-injected, turbocharged spark-ignition (SI) engine for different engine speeds and loads. Prior studies relating to K-factor claim that K depends only on the engine’s combustion system and operating condition, but Phase 1 of this study detected contrary results. Experimental determination of K at multiple test points showed the K value was different for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certification Tier 2 and Tier 3 regular fuels. That study also found strong correlations of the K value with macroscopic parameters (e.g., speed, load, and combustion phasing) and end gas conditions, irrespective of the fuel. This second phase of the study showed that the effect of variation in day-to-day conditions on the K-factor is negligible and that K-factor stays the same with changes in intake air temperature (IAT) for a specific speed-load condition.
Ethanol is regarded as a potential alternative fuel for combustion engine as it provides lower exhaust emissions, higher efficiency and higher octane rating. However, the solubility of ethanol in oil can effect lubricant quality. The impact of ethanol-blend gasoline on lubricants is a matter of concern that must be addressed. With this in mind, the current study investigates the effect of blending ethanol with gasoline on the oil layer adsorption/desorption mechanism. The blends used for the study are E0, E5, E10, and E15. The study is carried out with the help of a mathematical model that predicts the fuel adsorbed/desorbed in the oil layer of an engine. The mathematical model predictions are compared to experimental results obtained on a single-cylinder gasoline engine. Fuel adsorbed in the oil layer ranges from 0.46% for E0 fuel to 0.35% for E15 fuel. Similarly, the desorbed fuel ranges from 0.45% to 0.29% as the ethanol fraction increases from 0% to 15%. Despite the fact that the amount of fuel adsorbed/desorbed in the oil layer decreases as the ethanol fraction increases, the amount of fuel stored in the oil layer (i.e., the difference between adsorbed and desorbed fuel) increases from 0.01 percent to 0.06 percent which can significantly degrade the lubricant quality.
In order to maximize the efficiency of light-duty gasoline engines, the Co-Optimization of Fuels and Engines (Co-Optima) initiative from the U.S. Department of Energy is investigating multi-mode combustion strategies. Multi-mode combustion can be describe as using conventional spark-ignited combustion at high loads, and at the part-load operating conditions, various advanced compression ignition (ACI) strategies are being investigated to increase efficiency. Of particular interest to the Co-Optima initiative is the extent to which optimal fuel properties and compositions can enable higher efficiency ACI combustion over larger portions of the operating map. Extending the speed-load range of these ACI modes can enable greater part-load efficiency improvements for multi-mode combustion strategies. In this manuscript, we investigate fuel effects for six different fuels, including four with a research octane number (RON) of 98 and differing fuel chemistries, iso-octane, and a market representative E10 fuel, on the load limits for two different ACI strategies: spark-assisted compression ignition (SACI) and partial fuel stratification-gasoline compression ignition (PFS-GCI) operation. Experimental results show that limits to intake boosting limit high load operation for most fuels, but high smoke emissions for high particulate matter index (PMI) fuels under SACI conditions could also be a limitation. Contrastingly, low load is limited by combustion efficiency, but these effects have more pronounced variation with fuel chemistry for PFS-GCI than with SACI. Additional, distinct effects affecting autoignition timing and peak heat release at higher speeds were identified for fuels having different low temperature heat release (LTHR) propensities for both ACI modes.
Prior research studies have investigated a wide variety of gasoline compression ignition (GCI) injection strategies and the resulting fuel stratification levels to maintain control over the combustion phasing, duration, and heat release rate. Previous GCI research at the US Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory has shown that for a combustion mode with a low degree of fuel stratification, called “partial fuel stratification” (PFS), gasoline range fuels with anti-knock index values in the range of regular-grade gasoline (~87 anti-knock index or higher) provides very little controllability over the timing of combustion without significant boost pressures. On the contrary, heavy fuel stratification (HFS) provides control over combustion phasing but has challenges achieving low temperature combustion operation, which has the benefits of low NOX and soot emissions, because of the air handling burdens associated with the required high exhaust gas recirculation rates. This work investigates HFS and PFS combustion, efficiency, and emissions performance on a single-cylinder, medium-duty engine with a regular-grade gasoline (91 research octane number) at 1,200 rpm, 4.3 bar, and 3.0 nominal gross indicated mean effective pressure operating points with boost levels similar to those in a medium-duty diesel application. Authority of combustion phasing with main injection timing sweeps for HFS and second injection timing sweeps and fuel split sweeps for PFS are shown. In addition, this work is discussed in the context of previous findings with a light-duty diesel platform, and next steps and future direction for this work are presented1.
Autoignition delay times of two full blend gasoline fuels (high and low RON) were explored in a rapid compression machine. CO2 dilution by mass was introduced at 0%, 15%, and 30% levels with the O2:N2 mole ratio fixed at 1:3.76. This dilution strategy is used to represent exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) substitution in spark ignition (SI) engines by using CO2 as a surrogate for major EGR constituents(N2, CO2, H2O). Experiments were conducted over the temperature range of 650K-900K and at 10 bar and 20 bar compressed pressure conditions for equivalence ratios of (Φ =) 0.6-1.3. The full blend fuels were admitted directly into the combustion chamber for mixture preparation using the direct test chamber (DTC) approach. CO2 addition retarded the autoignition times for the fuels studied here. The retarding effect of the CO2 dilution was more pronounced in the NTC region when compared to the lower and higher temperature range. The effect of dilution was more pronounced for the higher RON fuel in comparison to the lower RON fuel. With CO2 dilution, ignition delay times of the low RON fuel matched the undiluted high RON fuel delay times showcasing octane relaxation potential. The ignition delay times of the gasoline fuels were compared with that of iso-octane, a major component in gasoline surrogates, at both diluted and undiluted conditions. The CO2 dilution did not affect the ignition delay curve of the fuels or iso-octane but rather shifted it horizontally, hence no significant chemical reactivity due to CO2 dilution was observed in this study.
Over the years, spark-ignition engine operation has changed significantly, driven by many factors including changes in operating conditions. The variation in operating conditions impacts the state of the end-gas, and therefore, its auto-ignition. This can be quantified in terms of K-factor, which weighs the relative contribution of Research Octane Number (RON) and Motor Octane Number (MON) to knocking tendency at any operating condition. The current study investigates the fuel requirements when operating an engine at increasing intake air pressures. A model engine was operated at varying intake air pressure in GT-Power software, from naturally aspirated intake air to heavily boosted intake air pressure of 4 bar absolute. The pressure-temperature information from the GT-Power model was used to calculate ignition delay times of the unburnt end-gas composed of a sensitive and a non-sensitive fuel in ChemKin software. The results show that high octane sensitivity is desired at negative K values (operating at high intake air pressures). In contrast, zero octane sensitivity fuel performed best at low load operation (positive K). Interestingly, the maximum benefit for using a sensitive fuel was achieved at an intake air pressure of 1.75 bar with diminishing returns at higher intake air pressure for 1000 rpm and at lower intake pressures, as engine speed increased. The pressure effect on auto-ignition tendency was also investigated over existing HCCI data. The auto-ignition tendency was found to be sensitive to octane index in a region of low K value (K~0). This region lies in the negative temperature coefficient (NTC) region, where Primary Reference Fuels (PRFs) shown an increased sensitivity to pressure variation.
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 948