Browse Topic: Aircraft displays

Items (58)
This document presents criteria for flight deck controls and displays for Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems.
S-7 Flight Deck Handling Qualities Stds for Trans Aircraft
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) contains methods used to measure the optical performance of airborne electronic flat panel display (FPD) systems. The methods described are specific to the direct view, liquid crystal matrix (x-y addressable) display technology used on aircraft flight decks. The focus of this document is on active matrix, liquid crystal displays (LCD). The majority of the procedures can be applied to other display technologies, however, it is cautioned that some techniques need to be tailored to different display technologies. The document covers monochrome and color LCD operation in the transmissive mode within the visual spectrum (the wavelength range of 380 to 780 nm). These procedures are adaptable to reflective and transflective displays paying special attention to the source illumination geometry. Photometric and colorimetric measurement procedures for airborne direct view CRT (cathode ray tube) displays are found in ARP1782. Optical measurement procedures for airborne head up displays (HUDs) can be found in ARP5287. Generally, the procedures describe manual single point measurements. The individual procedures may be readily incorporated into automated testing equipment (ATE) or other automated environments. This also includes, but is not limited to Fourier scopes and video imaging devices. This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this Technical Report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user.
A-20A Crew Station Lighting
Aerospace manufacturers are leveraging multicore processors and modularity to design smarter cockpit displays and avionic computers that are smaller and capable of supporting more applications from a single line replaceable unit (LRU). Some are also starting to embed more of the processing required to enable cockpit display applications within the display itself, rather than having it enabled by an associated LRU. The development of new electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft and avionics companies changing their approach to the development of safety critical computers and aircraft networking technologies are some of the aerospace industry factors driving this design trend. In the U.S., the Department of Defense (DoD) embracing the Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) across the purchase of all new aircraft technologies is influencing design changes in cockpit displays and aircraft computers as well.
661P1-9 Cockpit Display System Interfaces to User Systems, Part 1, Avionics Interfaces, Basic Symbology, and BehaviorARINC661P1-9 (Current)2/9/2024
ARINC 661 defines logical interfaces to Cockpit Display Systems (CDS) used in all types of aircraft installations. The CDS provides graphical and interactive services to user applications within the flight deck environment. When combined with data from user applications, it displays graphical images to the flight deck crew. The document emphasizes the need for independence between aircraft systems and the CDS. This document defines the interface between the avionics equipment and display system graphics generators. This document does not specify the "look and feel" of any graphical information, and as such does not address human factors issues. These are defined by the airline flight operations community. Supplement 9 adds numerous changes and additions: Restructuring of the document for ease of use Addition of GpVertexBuffer and GpVertexRender Widgets Formalization of the Super Layer concept Generalization of input device text Timeout values for things like popups Extended Block protocol Parent/child relationships across levels of hierarchy Clean up of ExcludedRegionsExtension Map clarifications Updated widget guidance MapBoundary and ExcludedRegionsExtension clarifications String length fields in event structures Correction of Supplement 8 Errata Symbol command example issues Ability for UA to request widget parameter values from CDS Array Parameters including discussing race conditions associated with updating the array content and “NumberOf” parameters New run-time parameter and event for EditBox widgets MapGrid related updates CursorMapEventsExtension Map buffer of item parameter cleanup Addition of glossary definitions for widget level terms used in the document EditBoxNumericBCD cleanup Map Management and MapGrid cleanup Additional key codes
Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee
661P2-1 Cockpit Display System Interfaces, Part 2, User Interface Markup Language (UIML)ARINC661P2-1 (Current)2/9/2024
This document defines the User Interface Markup Language (UIML) which allows developers to specify the interface, look, and behavior of any Graphical User Interface (GUI). The GUI consists of several components, from the simplest, called primitive components (such as rectangle, text, image, group), to more complex components built by the aggregation of several primitive components and by providing relational specific logic. Also defined is the execution model, which provides the rules to interpret the language so that the graphical user interface has a standardized and consistent behavior defined for any platform. Supplement 1 adds numerous additions and changes: Scripting Language Definition Creation of A661P2_StringType Addition of Color property to the Image Primitive Addition of color Standard Library. Correction of ColorMatrix Datatype Addition of Private Library schema Constraints on max array size and max string size Rectangle primitive clarification Function Library function restrictions Touch & Gesture primitives’ clarification Type Restriction Modalities clarification of Initialization of In and InOut Clipping Region extension and clarification BorderImage Positive Real clarification Maps Clarification of State Machine Syntax and Behavior CustomPrimitive standard XML tag Clarification on PropSetter/Getter/onChange Updated Metadata to support Custom Primitives State Machine Layout Metadata KeyboardInput events clarification ConstIn Init Expression Appendix on Changelog Crown Clarification Font Library Issue Semantics of Transform Skew Path Clarification
Airlines Electronic Engineering Committee
This document is intended to highlight critical design issues that a panel designer should understand when designing panels for NVIS applications. It is not intended to be a discussion of the benefits of one lighting technology versus another. Refer to ARP4168 for a more complete discussion of these lighting technologies.
A-20A Crew Station Lighting
Mortimer, BruceFrench, JonMcGrath, BradenRupert, Angus
This document recommends criteria and requirements for a flight management system (FMS) for transport aircraft. The FMS shall provide the functions of lateral navigation, vertical navigation, and performance management and may include time of arrival control. The FMS design shall take human factors considerations into account to produce a fault tolerant system.
S-7 Flight Deck Handling Qualities Stds for Trans Aircraft
The objective of this ARP is to provide a set of user-centered design guidelines for the implementation of data driven electronic aeronautical charts, which dynamically create charts from a database of individual elements. The data driven chart is intended to provide information required to navigate, but it is not intended to supplant the aircraft’s primary navigation display. These guidelines seek to provide a balance between standardization of equipment with similar intended functions and individual manufacturer innovation. This ARP provides guidelines for the display of an electronic chart that can replace existing paper. This document addresses what information is required, when it is required, and how it should be displayed and controlled. This document does not include all the detailed specifications required to generate an electronic aeronautical chart. This document primarily addresses the human factors aspects of electronic chart display, and does not address the software, hardware or system integrity/availability issues associated with certification of an electronic chart system. During the transition to data driven charts, the guidelines of this document should be applied to interim electronic chart products that may be pre-composed, such as vector or raster based electronic charts. This document is designed primarily for IFR Aeronautical Charts. There is a limited discussion of its applicability to VFR charts.
G-10EAB Executive Advisory Group
The recommendations of this document apply to such aircraft as are able to perform both normal angle and steep IMC approaches, the latter being defined as those approaches having a final approach segment angle greater than 4°. Such aircraft can include both conventional and STOL fixed-wing aircraft, commercial air transport and/or utility and normal category helicopters, compound helicopters and powered lift vehicles (tiltrotors, tiltfans, tiltwings, etc.).
G-10EAB Executive Advisory Group
The recommended design approach is described in Figure 1. The approach emphasizes the fundamental relationship between symbols, the information they encode, the context within which the symbols are displayed, and the tasks being supported. While this document is aimed at aircraft displays involving dynamic control or monitoring tasks, the methodology is applicable to a wide range of symbology development situations.
G-10EAB Executive Advisory Group
This paper presents the results of a simulator study. The study evaluated the situation awareness provided by an obstacle awareness and warning display (OAWD) and DLR’s conformal 3D landing symbology (CLS) which were presented in a head-worn see-through display (HWD). The OAWD is shown as inset or so called virtual cockpit instrument (VCI). It represents an coplanar orthogonal 360 degree top view and HWD-adapted obstacle awareness and warning display (VCI-OAWD) developed by DLR. The study investigated the application of the VCI-OAWD and the CLS on its own as well as in conjunction. The different display conditions were tested with 7 helicopter pilots conducting an offshore platform landing operation in DLR’s generic experimental cockpit simulator. The study addressed two main questions firstly, the comparison of the spatial awareness provided by the VCI-OAWD and the CLS and secondly, the influence of the amount of information presented in the head-worn display.
Ebrecht, LarsErnst, JohannesSchmerwitz, Sven
The effectiveness of helicopter electronic Engine Indications and Crew Alerting Systems (EICAS) can be improved by applying display techniques rooted in human factors principles. These display techniques were developed to rapidly communicate systems information so that "head inside the cockpit" time could be minimized for safety. These design principles are not new, but as the EICAS design community has changed over the last 30 years, recognition of these proven techniques is extremely relevant. As the industry moves towards more "display-by-exception" presentations, also known as 'black cockpit" designs, certain indications are only present when there is a problem. In these designs it is especially important that the presentation be intuitive as the pilot may no longer be familiar with the behavior of the indication since it is only presented in an abnormal situation. The presentation must be intuitive at a glance.
Oltheten, Erik
This paper presents recent advances in automotive microprocessor, operating system, and supporting software technology that supports regulatory and/or functional safety graphics within vehicle cockpit displays. These graphics include “virtual switches” that replace physical switches in the vehicle, as well as “virtual indicators” that replace physical indicator lights. We discuss the functional safety design process and impacts to software and hardware architecture as well as the software design methods to implement End-To-End [E2E] network protection between different ECUs and software processes. We also describe hardware monitoring requirements within the display panel, backlighting, and touch screen and examine an example system design to illustrate the concepts.
Rush, Scott
This document presents criteria for flight deck controls and displays for Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems.
S-7 Flight Deck Handling Qualities Stds for Trans Aircraft
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice covers the recommended requirements for the lighting and characteristics of instruments; information plates and displays, emergency, cautionary, advisory and status displays; circuit breaker and toggle switch positions; and the recommended requirements for the utility lighting system.
A-20A Crew Station Lighting
This paper details the design and limited flight testing of a preliminary system for visual pilot cueing during autorotation maneuvers. The cueing system is based on a fully-autonomous, multi-phase autorotation control law that has been shown to successfully achieve autonomous autorotation landing in unmanned helicopters. To transition this control law to manned systems, it is employed within a cockpit display to drive visual markers which indicate desired collective pitch and longitudinal cyclic positions throughout the entire maneuver, from autorotation entry to touchdown. A series of simulator flight experiments performed at University of Liverpool's HELIFLIGHT-R simulator are documented, in which pilots attempt autorotation with and without the pilot cueing system in both good and degraded visual environments. Performance of the pilot cueing system is evaluated based on both subjective pilot feedback and objective measurements of landing survivability metrics, demonstrating suitable preliminary performance of the system.
Rogers, JonathanJump, MichaelStrickland, LauraRepola, CarolineCameron, NeilFell, Thomas
This collection of C++ classes allows users to create and simulate aerospace vehicle models that are needed to test prototyped display software. A software model of the Apollo LEM spacecraft was developed on a Windows-based PC, and was used for initial testing and research of cockpit displays. The model was later updated to the current Altair configuration — the name of NASA’s next lunar lander. The software models the Moon geometry based on Clementine data and lunar gravity in a 6-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) model. The mass/inertias are modeled from the current, known data of the latest released Altair model.
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) addresses the information content for the electronic presentation of data linked weather Meteorological (MET) information used in the cockpit. It defines guidelines for the electronic presentation of MET information (including text, graphics, textures, icons, and symbology) to the flight crew. This ARP is applicable to certified equipment for the electronic display (whether installed or portable) of MET information in the cockpit. This ARP also provides a set of symbols that illustrate the depiction of data linked MET information on flight deck display systems such as Navigation Displays, Multi-function Displays, and Electronic Flight Bags. These recommendations complement standard symbology guidelines for airborne applications already in existence (see reference section for applicable documents).
G-10W Weather Information Systems Committee
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) includes the minimum human factors requirements and recommendations for the flight deck display of data linked Aeronautical Information (AI), specifically Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs). The goal of human factors is to make it easy for users to do things right and hard to do them wrong. The guidance in this ARP supports this goal by defining minimum requirements and recommendations that focus on the text and potential graphics for NOTAMs as well as the human’s interaction with these on the flight deck. In this ARP “flight deck” includes both single pilot flight decks as well as multi-pilot flight decks. The FAA defines NOTAMs1 as any information concerning the establishment, condition, or change in any component of, or hazard to, the National Airspace System. ICAO Annex 15 defines a NOTAM as “a notice distributed by means of telecommunication containing information concerning the establishment, condition, or change in any aeronautical facility, service, procedure or hazard, the timely knowledge of which is essential to personnel concerned with flight operations.”2 The minimum requirements and recommendations in this ARP do not replace guidelines or requirements for existing airborne applications or displays on the flight deck. It does not replace existing general human factors design standards. It also does not address every specific NOTAM category, series or type, but focuses on a subset, which includes the most safety critical NOTAMs (such as closed runways), most common NOTAMs, or ones which may affect the efficiency of the airspace such as Temporary Flight Restrictions (TFRs). This ARP also does not reference other aeronautical information such as private provider updates, such as Company NOTAMs and/or private sector charting notices or advisories such as charting errors or omissions, which might be sent to pilots via data link. Finally, this ARP does not address data integrity as the NOTAM moves from its originator to the flight deck and all the steps in between. This is addressed by the aeronautical information services data link standards developed by the RTCA Special Committee 206 while the quality of the aeronautical information is addressed by the RTCA 217 Special Committee. There may come a time in the future when data linked NOTAMs presented in graphical format (gNOTAMs) are the primary source for NOTAMs on the flight deck. However, standardization and data quality issues must be addressed before gNOTAMs can be considered anything other than a visual supplement or an additional safety layer to text-based NOTAMs. Data quality at the origination point will be handled by quality control/quality assurance programs for each State producing NOTAMs. The aviation industry is still years away from complete standardization of all NOTAMs, but progress is being made. For example, regulators and others are working to develop geo-referenced data for airport and airspace subjects (e.g., navigation aids, obstructions, runways, taxiways, temporary flight restrictions and airspace). Similarly, regulators are creating new tools for the origination of NOTAMs that result in digital NOTAMs that are comprised of standardized elements. Such standardization allows automation (machines or software) to check accuracy, apply various sorting or filtering choices to the NOTAMs, or add other data to them such as displaying their shapes or locations over maps or other baseline data. Unfortunately, the current lack of standardization means that not every NOTAM created today is machine-readable, thus accuracy is dependent upon human analysis which is very labor intensive and costly. In the U.S. alone, approximately one (1) million NOTAMs are issued each year and the number is growing. As a result, for the foreseeable future, we remain in a mixed use environment where some NOTAMs are standardized and machine-readable but many are not. As a consequence, not every NOTAM created can be sorted, filtered, or converted to its graphical form with the accuracy that pilots and aviation regulators require. There are advantages to having standardized gNOTAMs among every manufacturer. This increases the ability of the pilot to see, comprehend and project into the future the applicability of the NOTAM to their flight, reduces training costs, and improves pilot performance. Consistent depictions of gNOTAMs across different flight deck display manufacturers would enable pilots to move from display to display within an aircraft, and from aircraft to aircraft with more ease and would likely result in a reduction of errors. However, it is not the mandate of this Committee to stifle innovation by dictating specific symbols or graphics. Consequently, this ARP is geared toward identifying minimum human factors requirements and recommendations that will help ensure that all products meet some basic minimum standards for usability. Many choices have been left for the designer, after working with users, to determine what their highest priorities are and to find the most intuitive and efficient way to present the information. While this ARP focuses solely on the flight deck of aircraft, the guidance may be expanded in the future to apply to displays for dispatchers, air traffic controllers, and other NOTAM users.
G-10A Aeronautical Information System Committee
This ARP describes methods for measuring the visual performance of direct view cathode ray tube displays used in aircraft flight decks and cockpits. Procedures may vary depending upon the type of display (for example, monochrome, color shadowmask, beam index, etc.), but all types are considered.
A-20A Crew Station Lighting
CLARA identifies four functions: Data Space Generator, Truth Data Generator, Coefficient Generator, and Reconstructor. Together these four functions standardize the solution to the LAR problem. This ICD defines the logical interfaces of the four functions.
AS-1B Aircraft Store Integration Committee
Design and Flight Test of a Primary Flight Display Combined Vision System11VATC400043/19/2012
A series of flight tests were conducted to design and evaluate a Combined Vision System (CVS) that integrates a forward looking infrared video image with synthetic vision on a primary flight display. System features included colorizing the video image to mesh with the synthetic terrain background, decluttering the approach symbology to facilitate the detection of the approach lights and runway markings, creating a semi-transparent IR sky to ensure continuous situational awareness of the surrounding terrain, and annunciating the decision height to facilitate the transition to the actual runway environment. Over 100 approaches were flown during three flight test sessions. For the first flight test session pilots reviewed early CVS proofs of concept on Honeywell's Citation Sovereign. During the approach in low visibility conditions, the Pilot Flying remained head-down to 100 ft AGL, at which time he lifted his head and made a subjective judgment of whether he could easily and safely complete the transition to land before making a go-around. In the second flight test session enhancements included IR image coloring, IRS/GPS navigation system integration, and display annunciations. The series of flight tests culminated in a CVS integration on Honeywell's Gulfstream G450 aircraft for a direct head-up display (HUD) versus head-down display (HDD) comparison of the IR imagery. The HUD location is currently the standard for low visibility approaches with IR imagery. The G450 evaluation had three highly experienced pilots with an average of over 12,000 flight hours and over 2,500 hours with a HUD. They flew a total of 46 approaches, most to full-stop landings and many were in high workload conditions - low visibility weather or strong crosswinds. Again the Pilot Flying stayed head-down to 100 ft AGL and then transitioned to the outside view of actual runway environment before landing. Pilot performance with the CVS was equivalent to performance with the HUD on all flight parameters including glideslope deviation, airspeed deviation, configuration to land at the crossing threshold, and the landing footprint on the runway.Workload scores and display ratings were equivalent between the two displays, giving a strong indication that the Honeywell CVS provides equivalent performance and an alternative means to the HUD for displaying the IR imagery. Presenter Patricia May Ververs, Honeywell International, Inc.
May, Patricia
Safety and Operational Improvements Using Head-Up Displays in Small Aircraft and Helicopters11VATC400033/12/2012
Small aircraft and helicopters have an increasing need for heads out presentations, which means a projected presentation of symbols and images, primarily infrared, on an optical combiner in the pilots field of view. The information presented will appear at an infinite distance i.e. the focal point is far away enabling the pilot to see the symbology superimposed on and correlated to the outside world. The driving factors for a heads out presentations are increased safety through improved situation awareness in almost all weather conditions as well as operational improvements due to reduced landing minimal prerequisites in adverse weather conditions. Also safety during taxiing and landing are improved through early detection of eventual other aircraft and objects. The landing aid is important for small aircraft like business jets that often fly into unequipped airfields. The overall benefits are reduction in number of incidents/accidents, cost savings and reduced number of diversions. For helicopters performing special transport missions, for example transporting people and gods to off-shore oil platforms, a system featuring heads out symbology and infrared imagery would mean a great safety improvement during adverse weather. The presented information shows the pilot what he needs for flight and navigation, gives guidance to assist his maneuvering of the aircraft and enhances his vision through use of special imaging sensors. The heads-out solution is configured into a sub-system in different ways. The Head-Up Display (HUD) cold be sold as a stand-alone equipment integrated into the avionics data buses or as one part of the total cockpit display system or as an Enhanced Flight Vision System (with the display itself and an infrared camera). New types of head-up displays are no longer designed as two units, an over-head projector and a combiner, but built into one single unit using new optical solutions. In combination with a reduced equipment and integration cost. This will open up the introduction into smaller aircraft and helicopters. One trend breaking solution is the newly developed Saab Head-Up Display (HUD) named RIGS. Presenter Hans Brandtberg, Saab AB, Avionics Division
Brandtberg, Hans
Wilbrecht LEDCO’s new Night Vision Imaging System (NVIS) compatible LEDs are designed for avionics applications that require night vision compatibility. Available in green, yellow, white and red in both 3mm and 5mm sizes, these specially filtered LEDs allow the cockpit display to be visible to the unaided eye, as well as fully night vision goggle (NVG) compatible per MIL-STD-3009 and MIL-L-85762A.
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) contains methods used to measure the optical performance of airborne electronic flat panel display (FPD) systems. The methods described are specific to the direct view, liquid crystal matrix (x-y addressable) display technology used on aircraft flight decks. The focus of this document is on active matrix, liquid crystal displays (LCD). The majority of the procedures can be applied to other display technologies, however, it is cautioned that some techniques need to be tailored to different display technologies. The document covers monochrome and color LCD operation in the transmissive mode within the visual spectrum (the wavelength range of 380 to 780 nm). These procedures are adaptable to reflective and transflective displays paying special attention to the source illumination geometry. Photometric and colorimetric measurement procedures for airborne direct view CRT (cathode ray tube) displays are found in SAE ARP1782. Optical measurement procedures for airborne head up displays (HUDs) can be found in ARP5287. Generally, the procedures describe manual single point measurements. The individual procedures may be readily incorporated into automated testing equipment (ATE) or other automated environments. This also includes, but is not limited to Fourier scopes and video imaging devices. This report is published by SAE to advance the state of technical and engineering sciences. The use of this Technical Report is entirely voluntary, and its applicability and suitability for any particular use, including any patent infringement arising therefrom, is the sole responsibility of the user.
A-20A Crew Station Lighting
This ARP describes methods for measuring the visual performance of direct view cathode ray tube displays used in aircraft flight decks and cockpits. Procedures may vary depending upon the type of display (for example, monochrome, color shadowmask, beam index, etc.), but all types are considered.
A-20A Crew Station Lighting
The recommended design approach is described in Figure 1. The approach emphasizes the fundamental relationship between symbols, the information they encode, the context within which the symbols are displayed, and the tasks being supported. While this document is aimed at aircraft displays involving dynamic control or monitoring tasks, the methodology is applicable to a wide range of symbology development situations.
G-10EAB Executive Advisory Group
Helicopter Health and Usage Monitoring Systems (HUMS) provide many benefits, one of which is the ability to provide real time condition of aircraft systems on-board. Providing the aircraft pilot with pending failure information increases safety and in most cases affords the pilot ample time to perform safe precautionary landings. The information displayed to the pilot must be specific as to the system affected to allow for an immediate, intelligent assessment of the aircraft condition. The predominant challenge facing system engineering is establishing parameter and signal validity prior to generating parameter exceedance alarms. Data fidelity must be carefully considered and accomplished in every aspect prior to generating onboard alarms. The United States Marine Corp CH- 46E aircraft program has installed over 130 Honeywell Aircraft Integrated Maintenance Systems (AIMS), which provides a method of providing onboard alarming in three categories. (1) Non-Abort, post flight maintenance required, (2) Pilot informational displayed on the Control Display Navigation Unit, (3) Master Caution panel illumination for flight abort alarms. These three alarm categories represent the best approach to providing aircrew and maintenance personnel with system critical information for continued safe operation of the aircraft while performing maintenance in a field environment. The AIMS’ current configuration has over 100 alarms programmed for cockpit display if advisory criteria are valid. System architecture requires several faulting and alarming mechanisms working together to ensure data fidelity has been met prior to generating an alarm. Several techniques are employed to validate incoming engine parameter signals, such as range checking and rate of change qualification. If signals do not pass validity, alarming is suppressed. Vibration alarming is slightly different. The alarming mechanism utilized is a time hysteresis method, which employs a band alarm with an amplitude and time duration trigger, as well as an amplitude and time duration release. If validity fails, the alarming is suppressed. The Safety aspects are obvious; however just as significant are the maintenance savings recognized from reduction of component collateral damage. . With the belief that all pilots need to know the condition of the machine they are flying at all times, on-board alarming of critical flight components is a necessary function of HUMS. Condition based maintenance starts with safe landing of the aircraft without mishap. On-board alarming will provide increased safety, reliability, and maintainability for the fleet. Savings are incalculable as prevention of the mishap is pricele
Todd, KennethEason, FrankWogoman, ChadLaw, Kristen
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) specifies minimum performance standards for airborne binocular Head Up Displays (HUDs) in fixed wing aircraft. This document covers criteria for conformal and non-conformal HUD systems that are intended for use in the cockpit by the pilot or copilot. Display minimum performance characteristics are specified for standard and other environmental conditions for the purpose of product qualification. This document does not address sensor imaging systems, displays worn by the pilot (goggles, helmet mounted displays) or specific symbology to be displayed.
A-4HUD Head-up Display Subcommittee
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) contains methods used to measure the optical performance of airborne binocular Head Up Displays (HUDs). This document covers methods for conformal and non-conformal HUD systems that are intended for use in the cockpit by the pilot or copilot. The focus of this document is on displays that generate the HUD information using a cathode ray tube (CRT), however, the majority of the methods can be applied to other display technologies. These measurement methods are provided for testing to the requirements of AS8055. This document does not address measurement methods for sensor imaging systems, or displays worn by the pilot (goggles, helmet mounted displays).
A-4HUD Head-up Display Subcommittee
This document presents criteria for flight deck controls and displays for Airborne Collision Avoidance Systems providing vertical-only guidance, and provides design guidance for operational, functional, and installation characteristics and requirements for airborne collision avoidance systems in existing and future aircraft.
S-7 Flight Deck Handling Qualities Stds for Trans Aircraft
CLARA identifies four functions: Data Space Generator, Truth Data Generator, Coefficient Generator, and Reconstructor. Together these four functions standardize the solution to the LAR problem. This ICD defines the logical interfaces of the four functions.
AS-1B Aircraft Store Integration Committee
A prototype hybrid terrain database is being developed in conjunction with other databases and with hardware and software that constitute subsystems of aerospace cockpit display systems (known in the art as synthetic vision systems) that generate images to increase pilots’ situation awareness and eliminate poor visibility as a cause of aviation accidents. The basic idea is to provide a clear view of the world around an aircraft by displaying computer generated imagery derived from an onboard database of terrain, obstacle, and airport information.
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) specifies minimum performance standards for Electronic Displays which are intended for use in the cockpit by the pilot or other flight personnel under standard and other environmental conditions. The four basic types of displays based on function and criticality are covered as follows: Airborne Electronic Displays can include one or more of the following interconnected components. Other configurations are possible. Symbol Generator/Processor Unit (SG) containing display processing and symbol generation processing and symbol generation capability, power supplies, interface logic/buffer circuits and Display Unit interface capability. The SG receives data from external sources, produces symbols as electronic signals, and transmits the symbols to the Display Units(s). Control Panel (CP) is an optional component providing the means for manually selecting display symbology options/modes, selections, settings, brightness, etc. Display Unit (DU) providing the visual display of SG symbology. In the case of Head Up Displays, this information is combined with a view of the real world. The minimum performance standards for Head Up Displays given in AS8055 are applicable. Electronic display systems covered by this document are displays whose failure may lead to loss of critical displayed information. System design or installation must recognize this characteristic and include appropriate redundancy criteria where applicable. ARP4256 gives recommended means, but not the only means, of compliance to this standard for Part 25 LCD displays. That document is subject to change to keep pace with experience and technical advances. A similar document for Part 23 aircraft does not exist.
A-4ED Electronics Display Subcommittee
This specification covers the general requirements for integrally illuminated information panels.
A-20AC Crew Station and Interior Lighting Committee
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) contains methods used to measure the optical performance of airborne flat panel display (FPD) systems. The methods described are specific to the direct view, liquid crystal matrix (x-y addressable) display technology used on aircraft flight decks. The focus of this document is on active matrix, liquid crystal displays (LCD), however, the majority of the procedures can be applied to other display technologies. The document covers monochrome and color LCD operation in the transmissive mode within the visual spectrum (the wavelength range of 380 to 780 nm). These procedures are adaptable to reflective and transflective displays paying special attention to the source illumination geometry. Generally, the procedures describe manual single point measurements. The individual procedures may be readily incorporated into automated testing equipment (ATE) or other automated environments. This also includes, but is not limited to Fourier scopes and video imaging devices.
A-20AC Crew Station and Interior Lighting Committee
Flight 2000 Program97563810/13/1997
Recognizing that modernization of the National airspace system must be accelerated to accommodate aviation growth, the Federal Aviation Administration, in partnership with the aviation industry, has initiated Flight 2000, a real-world implementation of advanced communications, navigation, surveillance, and air traffic management capabilities. Flight 2000 is a precursor of Free Flight, an evolutionary air traffic management concept that will greatly increase user flexibility to plan and fly their preferred routes. Flight 2000 transfers the Free Flight concept to a real operational setting and gives the FAA an opportunity to conduct a complete operational system evaluation prior to NAS-wide deployment. At the center of Flight 2000 is the integration of information via digital communications, navigation satellites, automatic dependent surveillance broadcasts, weather processors, cockpit displays, air traffic control and flight planning tools for the safe planning and efficient execution of all phases of flight. Approximately 2000 aircraft will be equipped with compatible on-board avionics for evaluation in Hawaii and Alaska. Both were selected as evaluation sites because of their unique features. In the FAA's Air Route Traffic Control Center in Oakland, California, the oceanic conflict probe and data communications will be improved and evaluated. Flight 2000 provides the opportunity to evaluate several user benefits, including overall enhancements in safety and efficiency as a result of improved flight planning, more efficient and safer surface movement, reduced fuel consumption and operating costs, reduced passenger delays, and avoidance of bad weather, aircraft, and mountainous terrain. Flight 2000 presents a unique opportunity for users, operators, and the entire aviation industry to participate in developing and deploying the future NAS. This partnership is made possible by a Flight 2000 steering group comprised of FAA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and industry representatives who provide high-level guidance.
Tuttle, David
The recommended design approach is described in Figure 1. The approach emphasizes the fundamental relationship between symbols, the information they encode, the context within which the symbols are displayed, and the tasks being supported. While this document is aimed at aircraft displays involving dynamic control or monitoring tasks, the methodology is applicable to a wide range of symbology development situations.
G-10 Aerospace Behavioral Engineering Technology
Newman, Richard L.Brans, Patrick
This ARP describes methods for measuring the visual performance of direct view cathode ray tube displays used in aircraft flight decks and cockpits. Procedures may vary depending upon the type of display (for example, monochrome, color shadowmask, beam index, etc.), but all types are considered.
A-20AC Crew Station and Interior Lighting Committee
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 58