Browse Topic: Anthropomorphic test devices
Letter from the Guest Editors
Since 2019, sex equity in traffic crashes has been a highly debated topic in vehicle safety, especially following the 2019 study by Forman et al. (1) claiming that female occupants face a 73 percent greater risk of serious injury in frontal crashes compared to male occupants. This was soon followed by a Consumer Reports Article by Keith Barry (2), which attempted to identify underlying factors contributing to the higher risk. These have been embraced by several parties since 2019. Firstly, it was alleged that vehicle design practice over the last four decades considered safety for the male population only and ignored that of the female as evidenced by the exclusive use of the mid-sized male Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) in Regulatory and Safety Ratings tests and not with an average sized female ATD. The absence of such an ATD for testing of vehicles “set the course for four decades’ worth of car safety design, with deadly consequences” (2). Secondly, although there is a recognition of the fact that Regulatory testing with a Small Female ATD, the Hybrid III-05F, was introduced in the FMVSS208 in 2003, this ATD was only a scaled version of the average male ATD of the 1970’s implying that this ATD is incapable of driving the design of restraint systems for females due to “They’re put together differently. Their material properties—their structure—is different” (2). Thirdly, according to a quote “These same trends have been observed in many, many studies in the past.” We assume that the trends refer to the apparent disparity in safety of females when compared to those of males. This document aims to outline historical activities, associated research and the development of countermeasures addressing crashworthiness concerns related to vehicle safety for females, as well as factors affecting both males and females, such as age-related impacts. This paper deals mainly with the frontal crash modes, mentions side impacts briefly as it affected designs of inflatable restraints for side impact to protect the smaller portion of the population from inflation induced injuries but the history behind the use of female ATDs by IIHS and NHTSA in full scale testing is not covered. Where ever possible, the time periods of reported activities related to female safety have been divided to pre-1997 corresponding to a change in US frontal crash regulation to address serious-to-fatal injuries to females and children, between 1997 to 2003 corresponding to the proposal by Canada for its frontal impact standard, and between 2003 and 2006 when the Advanced Restraint Regulation in the US FMVSS 208 was promulgated. This was followed by activities between 2007 and 2019, and post 2019 period.
Letter from the Guest Editor
With the rapid development of automated driving and the increasing adoption of “zero-gravity” seats, the crash safety of highly reclined occupants has become a critical issue. The current THOR dummy, designed for frontal impacts in the standard upright posture, exhibits limitations when directly applied to reclined seating configurations, including insufficient spinal flexion capability and excessive posterior pelvic rotation. In this study, the thoracolumbar spine kinematics of the THUMS human body model, reconstructed against post-mortem human subject (PMHS) tests, were analyzed. A two-segment linear fitting was employed to characterize a “dummy-like” spinal flexion response, yielding a virtual rotational hinge located near the thoracolumbar joint of the original THOR model. The characteristic rotation angle obtained from THUMS showed a strong linear correlation with the flexion moment of the T12–L1 vertebrae. Based on this relationship, the rotational joint of the THOR dummy was unlocked during impact and assigned a torsional stiffness of 600 Nm/rad. Additional modifications were implemented in the hip region to enhance model applicability. Comparative simulations demonstrated that the modified THOR model achieved closer agreement with PMHS responses than both the Hybrid III and the baseline open-source THOR models. In particular, the posterior pelvic tilt was reduced from approximately 20° in the baseline THOR to about 10° in the modified version. These results indicate that incorporating PMHS-based thoracolumbar flexion characteristics together with targeted hip modifications significantly improves the biofidelity of the THOR dummy for reclined-occupant crash scenarios, providing a solid foundation for future dummy development and safety assessment.
Occupant Safety systems are usually developed using anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs), such as the Hybrid III, THOR-50M, ES-2, and WorldSID. However, in compliance with NCAP and regulatory guidelines, these ATDs are designed for specific crash scenarios, typically frontal and side impacts involving upright occupants. As vehicles evolve (e.g., autonomous layouts, diverse occupant populations), ATDs are proving increasingly inadequate for capturing real-world injury mechanisms. This has led to the adoption of computational Human Body Models (HBMs), such as the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) and Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS), which offer superior anatomical fidelity, variable anthropometry, active muscle behaviour modelling, and improved postural flexibility. HBMs can predict internal injuries that ATDs cannot, making them valuable tools for future vehicle safety development. This study uses a sled CAE simulation environment to analyze the kinematics of the HBMs model in a frontal crash scenario. The methodology includes the initial correlation of Hybrid III CAE simulation results with physical sled test data, followed by a comparative analysis with GHBMC M50-O v6-2 based simulations. A significant difference was observed in pelvic forward displacement between the Hybrid III and GHBMC M50-O v6-2. The difference in interaction originates from the difference in the construction of the pelvis between the Hybrid III and GHBMC. In the GHBMC, reduced displacement occurs because the pelvis locks in the seat. This interaction is absent in ATDs, resulting in increased torso rotation and a potential rise in upper extremity injury risk for HBMs. The study examines the various reasons for pelvic locking and increased upper body rotation. These evaluations aim to raise the negative consequences of pelvic locking on upper extremity injuries. The probable solutions that can reduce pelvis locking while preserving occupant stability is also discussed. The study highlights the significance of HBMs in understanding occupant interactions and supports their use in the development of next-generation restraint systems.
Traditionally, occupant safety research has centered on passive safety systems such as seatbelts, airbags, and energy-absorbing vehicle structures, all designed under the assumption of a nominal occupant posture at the moment of impact. However, with increasing deployment of active safety technologies such as Forward Collision Warning (FCW) and Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB), vehicle occupants are exposed to pre-crash decelerations that alter their seated position before the crash. Although AEB mitigates the crash severity, the induced occupant movement leads to out-of-position behavior (OOP), compromising the available survival space phase and effectiveness of passive restraint systems during the crash. Despite these evolving real-world conditions, global regulatory bodies and NCAP programs continue to evaluate pre-crash and crash phases independently, with limited integration. Moreover, traditional Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) such as Hybrid III dummies, although highly repeatable, lack the bio-fidelity necessary to capture human-like kinematics during pre-crash braking events involving low g. ATDs do not simulate the spinal articulation, posture adjustments and active muscle contraction that occur during emergency maneuvers or pre-crash scenarios. To overcome these limitations, researchers have increasingly turned to Human Body Models (HBMs) such as Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) and Global Human Body Model Consortium (GHBMC). These models enable high-fidelity finite element (FE) simulations with anatomical realism, allowing for the inclusion of active musculature and posture changes. This study aims to quantify the occupant forward excursion under pre-crash phase (due to AEB) and explore the possibility of an integrated simulation framework that evaluates occupant safety across both pre-crash and crash events. For this, the approach was to carry out full vehicle braking tests (1g braking pulse) with adult male (AM50) volunteers at different speeds to measure forward head excursion during pre-crash. These scenarios were replicated in LS-Dyna using THUMS HBM, showing strong agreement with experimental data. The resulting excursed postures were then used in crash simulations with ATDs to evaluate the effect on injury outcomes. Overall, the findings demonstrate effect of forward excursion on occupant injuries and the effectiveness of HBMs in capturing occupant kinematics, during pre-crash events.
The objective of this effort is to create a methodology to posture and position equipped manikins in Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software for ground vehicle workstation design. A collaborative effort is taking place to evaluate the current practices used to posture and position both physical and digital human representations. The goal of the group is to determine how best to utilize posture and position data to update positioning procedures. Data from the Seated Soldier Study and follow-on studies is being utilized to develop statistical models using multivariate analysis methods. Design is the first area of focus across the broader design-develop-evaluate process. The products to address this need are parametric CAD accommodation models with imbedded Digital Human Models (DHMs). Developing updated positioning procedures for each of the manikins will provide a traceable justification for positioning manikins based on Soldier data.
As part of a larger project aimed at gaining a better understanding of factors that affect the quality of test results using anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs), the FAA tested the effects of dynamic loading of an ATD pelvis. The ATDs required in the aviation regulations were initially developed for the automotive crash environment, which does not include a vertical testing component. One of the two dynamic tests is a vertical impact, with the principal measurement being the compressive load in the lumbar spinal column, with a regulatory limit of 1500 lb. The lumbar load cell is mounted to the pelvis, and data collected could be affected by the performance of the ATD pelvis. The ability to define a vertical calibration test could be used to determine if the pelvis is acceptable for initial use or to monitor in-service degradation. Three ATD pelvises were compressed in a high-rate load frame. The peak load and loading rate of the pelvis compression were selected to simulate conditions achieved in transport category aircraft vertical seat testing. The primary test objective was to measure changes to the rubber and foam cover of the metallic pelvis during high cyclic loading. Each pelvis was subjected to over 100 cycles. Static dimensional measurements, based on a manufacturing tolerance evaluation, were collected during testing. The high-cycle testing did not deform the foam and rubber covers enough to exceed the total dimensional tolerance of the pelvises (± 0.120 in.). The appearance of visual damage was closely monitored throughout the testing. Similar visual damage was seen for each pelvis and occurred at low cycles — 15 to 30. Results suggest the appearance of damage minimally changed the dynamic response of the pelvis. Force-deflection data were also collected from each test series. These data showed minimal change during testing, with the deflection at 2000 lb. changing approximately 0.100 in. across the 105 cycles. This value is similar to the manufacturer’s tolerance for the height of the pelvis. Based on this, the number of vertical sled tests that would precipitate replacement may be over 100 cycles. Due to the harsh environment of dynamic sled testing, other factors, such as cuts in the foam and rubber due to belt loading, may trigger the removal of an ATD pelvis from service prior to the pelvis reaching a defined number of cycles. Future FAA research will evaluate how this change in pelvis force-deflection affects lumbar load.
The Crashworthy and Escape Systems Branch at NAWCAD has been developing an integrated restraint harness concept for several years, with the intent of developing a novel method of providing improved occupant protection in a crash scenario. A series of tests was conducted on the Horizontal Accelerator at NAS Patuxent River to evaluate the performance of the prototype integrated-restraint system under MIL-STD-58095 conditions with the 50th percentile male Hybrid III Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD). While occupant flail was the primary metric being analyzed in this effort, ATD instrumentation was also captured, showing that the integrated restraint system demonstrated a significant reduction in head flail compared to five-point restraints while maintaining injury criteria within acceptable levels.
Theory and principles of occupant protection for automobiles in rear-end collisions have experienced significant evolution over the decades. Performance of the seatback, specifically the stiffness of the structure, during such a collision has been a subject of particular interest and debate among design engineers, accident reconstruction experts, critics, etc. The majority of current seat designs rely on plastic deformation of the seatback structure to protect the occupant from the dynamics of the crash. In attempt to highlight and provide background information for understanding this subject, this work highlights significant events, research, and publications over the past five decades to illustrate how this subject, automobile design, government regulation and public opinion has evolved. It is observed that technology and design for improving rear-impact protection has received less attention than collisions of other principal directions of force. The different types of Anthropometric Test Devices (ATDs) used in research are quantified. Lessons may be learned by design engineers to ensure seatback safety moves forward with progress to improve future generations of automobile seats. It is also observed that the quantity of published works could be influenced by historical events as well as certain research topics trending in the automotive industry.
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 1394