Browse Topic: Aircraft deicing

Items (324)
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) establishes the aerodynamic flowoff requirements and test procedures for AMS1424 Type I and AMS1428 Type II, III, and IV fluids used to deice and/or anti-ice aircraft. The objective of this standard is to ensure acceptable aerodynamic characteristics of the deicing/anti-icing fluids as they flow off of aircraft lifting and control surfaces during the takeoff ground acceleration and climb. Aerodynamic acceptance of an aircraft ground deicing/anti-icing fluid is based upon the fluid’s boundary layer displacement thickness (BLDT) on a flat plate, measured after experiencing the free stream velocity time history of a representative aircraft takeoff. Acceptability of the fluid is determined by comparing BLDT measurements of the candidate fluid with a datum established from the values of a reference fluid BLDT and the BLDT over the dry (clean) test plate. Testing is carried out in the temperature range at which the fluid, undiluted and diluted, is to be used in aircraft service. NOTE: No additional aerodynamic testing is required for non-glycol fluids at this time. For more information about non-glycol fluids, please refer to AMS1424 and AMS1428.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
Extreme winter weather often leads to ice accretion on transmission lines. Manual removal is inefficient, costly, and poses safety risks. To address this issue, this paper presents the design of a de-icing robot to replace manual operations for transmission line de-icing. The main content focuses on the detailed structural design of the robot, including the mobile platform, de-icing mechanism, and adaptive adjustment module. Finite element simulations are conducted on key components to verify the structural rationality and the correctness of material selection. The proposed de-icing robot enhances the safety of the de-icing process, improves operational efficiency, and provides a valuable reference for transmission line de-icing methods, demonstrating significant practical value.
Chang, HaoZhen, ChenHan, FengmeiLi, Cheng
In order to improve the polar adaptability of the submarine, a protective coating was applied to a large surface injection-molded part. The anti-icing characteristics of the protective coating under a low-temperature environment were studied using the protective coating as the research object. The contact angle test, freezing time test, and hydrophobic face ice adhesion test between liquid droplets and coating surfaces at low temperatures were completed by controlling variables.The results showed that temperature had a significant impact on the contact angle, with a decrease of 8% to 11% from 25 °C to 0°C, while the droplet salinity only gave a small effect on the contact angle. The inherent properties of coatings and droplet salinity had a huge impact on the ice adhesion on droplets and freezing time.Under the same droplet salinity, there are significant differences in the time of freezing and ice adhesion of droplets on distinct coating surfaces. However, as the droplet salinity increases from 0‰ to 35‰, the droplets on the protective coating surface freeze more slowly, the time increases by 64.7 seconds, and the ice adhesion decreases by 43.9%.
Feng, ShengyaoZou, DeboGuo, ChaoJiang, YongYou, ChuangLu, Bingju
This research demonstrates a facile method for fabricating an anti-icing coating through spray deposition on a metallic substrate. A dual-layer structure was designed to enhance icephobic properties: a primer layer incorporating fluorocarbon resin, butyl acetate, and rod-shaped micrometer-sized metal oxides to establish a secondary roughness morphology, followed by a topcoat composed of butyl acetate and nano-scaled superhydrophobic particles. Evaluation of the coating performance revealed a maximum water contact angle of 171.9°, indicating exceptional hydrophobicity. Furthermore, the coating exhibited notable abrasion resistance and anti-icing capabilities against overlaying ice.
Li, DongyangXu, ZelongWu, JiangTong, WeiWang, WeiqingCong, RimeiQian, JiaweiQu, Shaohui
The purpose of this SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) is to provide the sample selection and endurance time test procedures for SAE Type II, III, and IV aircraft deicing/anti-icing fluids, required for the generation of endurance time data of acceptable quality for review by the SAE G-12 Holdover Time Committee. The related standard ARP5718 provides the process by which endurance time data is converted to holdover times for publication by regulators and subsequent use by aircraft operators.
G-12HOT Holdover Time Committee
The numerical simulation of the transformation process of multiple droplets into liquid films is a complex problem involving multiphase flow, interface dynamics, and heat and mass transfer. It usually requires the combination of fluid mechanics, interface science, and numerical calculation methods. Based on the smooth particle fluid dynamics method, this paper establishes a multiphase fluid-solid coupling interaction model among droplets, surrounding air and solid walls, and studies the dynamic change process of multiple raindrops dispersed in different grooves. The results show that when the contact Angle is small, the boundaries of multiple raindrops do not come into contact. The multiple raindrops evolve in their respective grooves and eventually form multiple raindrops that approach the steady-state contact Angle. The second situation is that the boundaries of multiple raindrops do not come into contact, the raindrops start to fuse, and multiple raindrops form a larger one. At this point, the contact point of the gas-solid-liquid phase disappears, that is, the "regulating force" of the contact Angle is 0. This paper provides important numerical simulation references for flight safety, aerodynamic performance and anti-icing/de-icing technologies during the flight of aviation aircraft.
Huo, YeChen, YonghengSun, Cunxiang
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) provides descriptions of test methods for determining if an aircraft surface coating of any thickness has adverse effects on aircraft deicing/anti-icing fluids with respect to fluid holdover time performance and aerodynamic performance. Although not the primary mandate of the G-12 Aircraft Ground Deicing Committee, this document also provides descriptions of suggested test methods for evaluating aircraft surface coatings with respect to durability, hardness, weathering, aerodynamic drag, ice adhesion, ice accumulation, contact angle, and thermal conductivity. These additional tests can provide informational data for characterizing the coatings and may be useful to operators when evaluating the coatings.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
This document establishes the minimum training and qualification requirements for ground-based aircraft deicing methods and procedures. All guidelines referred to herein are applicable only in conjunction with the applicable documents. Due to aerodynamic and other concerns, the application of deicing fluids shall be carried out in compliance with engine and aircraft manufacturers’ recommendations. The scope of training should be adjusted according to local demands. There are a wide variety of winter seasons and differences of the involvement between deicing operators, and therefore, the level and length of training should be adjusted accordingly. However, the minimum level of training shall be covered in all cases. As a rule of thumb, the amount of time spent in practical training should equal or exceed the amount of time spent in classroom training.
G-12T Training and Quality Programs Committee
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) document establishes criteria and recommended practices for the use of airborne icing tankers to aid in design and certification of aircraft ice protection systems and components. Several icing tankers are described, along with their capabilities and suggested use. Sample data for these tanker spray systems are included, shown with 14 CFR Parts 25 and 29, Appendix C icing envelopes for continuous maximum and intermittent maximum icing conditions. (Note: In the remainder of this document, the phrase “Appendix C icing envelopes” will be used for brevity.) This ARP is intended as a guide toward standard practice and is subject to change to keep pace with experience and technical advances.
AC-9C Aircraft Icing Technology Committee
Pilots, drivers, and automated safety systems in cars and airplanes could be alerted to icy hazards by a pair of sensors developed at the University of Michigan. Ice on roads causes around 20 percent of weather-related car crashes each year, and ice build-up on planes causes roughly 10 percent of all fatal air carrier crashes by interfering with aerodynamics and controls. For instance, a flight from Brazilian airliner Voepass Linhas Aéreas crashed near São Paulo on August 9, 2024, after the plane’s de-icing systems failed, according to a report in the Aviation Safety Network. An Air France flight also crashed in the Atlantic Ocean on June 1, 2009, after ice blocked the probes that measure the plane’s speed. In both cases, all occupants died.
This document establishes a standardized test method designed to provide stakeholders—including runway deicing/anti-icing product manufacturers, users, regulators, and airport authorities—with a means of evaluating the relative ice penetration capacity of runway deicing and anti-icing products over time. The method measures ice penetration as a function of time, thereby enabling comparative assessments under controlled conditions. While commonly applied to runway treatments, these products may also be used on taxiways and other paved surfaces. The test is not intended to provide a direct measurement of the theoretical or extended ice penetration time of liquid or solid deicing/anti-icing products. Instead, it offers a practical and reproducible basis for performance evaluation, supporting operational decision-making and regulatory compliance.
G-12RDP Runway Deicing Product Committee
This information report covers all known aircraft with respect to deicing operations, especially with regard to OEM pressure and temperature limitations on the airframe. It provides data for airlines/operators on compliance with OEM limits and confirms that OEM limits are not exceeded during deicing operations.
G-12M Methods Committee
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) covers the general technical requirements and provides specification guidance for towable deicing vehicles/units equipped with a deicing/anti-icing fluid spraying system. The unit shall be highly maneuverable for applying deicing/anti-icing fluid onto all exterior surfaces of commercial/commuter aircraft to be treated. The unit shall also be suitable for day and night operations and shall be reliable and capable of performing deicing/anti-icing treatments satisfactorily under various precipitation (e.g., moderate snow) and icy weather conditions (e.g., outside air temperatures down to -40 °C/-40 °F) in accordance with the recommendations and instructions specified in aircraft manufacturers’ documents and the current version of AS6285.
G-12E Equipment Committee
This document describes: a The preparatory steps to test experimental Type I fluids according to AMS1424; b The recommendations for the preparation of samples for endurance time testing according to ARP5945; c A short description of the recommended field spray test; d The protocol to demonstrate that Type I fluid can be used with the Type I holdover time guidelines published by the FAA and Transport Canada, including endurance time data obtained from ARP5945; e The protocol for inclusion of Type I fluids on the FAA and Transport Canada lists of fluids; f The protocol for updating the FAA and Transport Canada lists of fluids; g The role of the SAE G-12 Aircraft Deicing Fluids Committee; h The role of the SAE G-12 Holdover Time Committee; and i The process for the publication of Type I holdover time guidelines. This document does not describe laboratory-testing procedures. This document does not include the qualification requirements for AMS1428 Type II, III, and IV fluids (these are provided in ARP5718).
G-12HOT Holdover Time Committee
This document describes: a The preparatory steps to test experimental Type II, III, and IV fluids according to AMS1428 b The recommendations for the preparation of samples for endurance time testing according to ARP5485 c A short description of wind tunnel testing d A short description of the recommended field spray test e The protocol to generate draft holdover time guidelines from endurance time data obtained from ARP5485 f The protocol for inclusion of Type II, III, and IV fluids on the FAA and Transport Canada lists of fluids and the protocol for updating the lists of fluids g The role of the SAE G-12 Aircraft Deicing Fluids Committee h The role of the SAE G-12 Holdover Time Committee i The process for the publication of Type II, III, and IV holdover time guidelines This document does not describe laboratory testing procedures. This document does not include the qualification requirements for AMS1424 Type I fluids (these are provided in ARP6207).
G-12HOT Holdover Time Committee
The AMS1428 specification defines the technical requirements for Type II, III, and IV aircraft deicing/anti-icing fluids. These non-Newtonian thickened fluids are formulated to effectively remove frost, ice, and snow from aircraft surfaces while offering protection times longer than Type I fluids against refreezing or frozen contamination. The document outlines key performance criteria, such as freezing point, aerodynamic acceptance, and anti-icing performance, alongside environmental properties like biodegradability, aquatic toxicity, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Operational considerations, including storage stability, materials compatibility, exposure to dry air, dry-out exposure to cold dry air, successive dry-out and rehydration, and physical properties like pH, refraction, and rheological properties (viscosity) are also specified. Additionally, the specification details the required testing methods to evaluate these properties and sets forth guidelines for the initial qualification, site or unit qualification, periodic requalification, and lot acceptance of Type II, III, and IV fluids. This foundation specification (AMS1428) and its associated category specifications (refer to AMS1428/1 and AMS1428/2) cover a deicing/anti-icing material in the form of a fluid.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
The AMS1428 specification defines the technical requirements for Type II, III, and IV aircraft deicing/anti-icing fluids. These non-Newtonian thickened fluids are formulated to effectively remove frost, ice, and snow from aircraft surfaces while offering protection times longer than Type I fluids against refreezing or frozen contamination. The document outlines key performance criteria, such as freezing point, aerodynamic acceptance, and anti-icing performance, alongside environmental properties like biodegradability, aquatic toxicity, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Operational considerations, including storage stability, materials compatibility, exposure to dry air, dry-out exposure to cold dry air, successive dry-out and rehydration, and physical properties like pH, refraction, and rheological properties (viscosity) are also specified. Additionally, the specification details the required testing methods to evaluate these properties and sets forth guidelines for the initial qualification, site or unit qualification, periodic requalification, and lot acceptance of Type II, III, and IV fluids. This foundation specification (AMS1428) and its associated category specifications (refer to AMS1428/1 and AMS1428/2) cover a deicing/anti-icing material in the form of a fluid.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS) establishes the minimum requirements for ground-based aircraft deicing/anti-icing methods and procedures to ensure the safe operation of aircraft during icing conditions on the ground. This document does not specify the requirements for particular aircraft models. The application of the procedures specified in this document are intended to effectively remove and/or prevent the accumulation of frost, snow, slush, or ice contamination which can seriously affect the aerodynamic performance and/or the controllability of an aircraft. The principal method of treatment employed is the use of fluids qualified to AMS1424 (Type I fluid) and AMS1428 (Type II, III, and IV fluids). All guidelines referred to herein are applicable only in conjunction with the applicable documents. Due to aerodynamic and other concerns, the application of deicing/anti-icing fluids shall be carried out in compliance with engine and aircraft manufacturer’s recommendations.
G-12M Methods Committee
This foundation specification (AMS1424T) and its associated category specifications (AMS1424/1 and AMS1424/2) cover a deicing/anti-icing material in the form of a fluid.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
This document establishes the minimum requirements for an environmental test chamber and test procedures to carry out anti-icing performance tests according to the current materials specification for aircraft deicing/anti-icing fluids. The primary purpose for such a test method is to determine the anti-icing performance under controlled laboratory conditions of AMS1424 Type I and AMS1428 Type II, III, and IV fluids.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
The purpose of this ARP is to provide the sample selection criteria and endurance time test procedures for SAE Type I aircraft deicing/anti-icing fluids required for the generation of endurance time data of acceptable quality for review by the SAE G-12 Holdover Time Committee. A significant body of previous research and testing has indicated that all Type I fluids formulated with conventional glycols, as defined in 3.1.1 of AMS1424, perform in a similar manner from an endurance time perspective. This applies to Type I deicing/anti-icing fluids formulated with propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and diethylene glycol only. As a result, Type I deicing/anti-icing fluids containing these glycol bases no longer require testing for endurance times. The methods described in this ARP shall be employed, however, if endurance time testing of a conventional glycol-based Type I deicing/anti-icing fluid is desired or requested by a fluid manufacturer, operator, or other organization. Fluids formulated with non-conventional glycol, as defined in 3.1.1 of AMS1424, and all non-glycol Type I deicing/anti-icing fluids must be tested for endurance times using the methods described in this ARP (as appropriate).
G-12HOT Holdover Time Committee
This manual contains information regarding aircraft deicing/anti-icing surfaces and areas.
G-12M Methods Committee
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) covers forced air technology including: reference material, equipment, safety, operation, and methodology. This resource document is intended to provide information and minimum safety guidelines regarding the use of forced air or forced air/fluid equipment to remove frozen contaminants.
G-12E Equipment Committee
This document establishes an industry standard checklist for the auditing of the methods and procedures used in aircraft deicing and anti-icing on the ground to support conformance with the industry global standards, AS6285, AS6286 and AS6332. The checklist covers the use of SAE AMS1424 and SAE AMS1428 qualified fluids (Types I, II, III, and IV) and non-fluid methods.
G-12T Training and Quality Programs Committee
This SAE Aerospace Standard (AS)/Minimum Operational Performance Specification (MOPS) specifies the minimum performance requirements of remote on-ground ice detection systems (ROGIDS). These systems are ground based. They provide information that indicates whether frozen contamination is present on aircraft surfaces. Section 1 provides information required to understand the need for the ROGIDS, ROGIDS characteristics, and tests that are defined in subsequent sections. It describes typical ROGIDS applications and operational objectives and is the basis for the performance criteria stated in Sections 3 through 5. Section 2 provides reference information, including related documents, definitions, and abbreviations. Section 3 contains general design requirements for the ROGIDS. Section 4 contains the Minimum Operational Performance Requirements for the ROGIDS, which define performance in icing conditions likely to be encountered during ground operations. Section 5 describes environmental test conditions that provide laboratory means of testing the overall performance characteristics of the ROGIDS in conditions that may be encountered in actual operations. Section 6 describes recommended test procedures for demonstrating compliance with Sections 3 and 4. Section 7 contains the operational evaluation requirements for verifying the performance of the ROGIDS when installed for in-service use.
G-12HOT Holdover Time Committee
As aerospace engineers push the boundaries of new frontiers, the need for advanced materials that can withstand the rigorous demands of these advanced applications is relentless. These materials go beyond functionality; it is about ensuring reliability in the skies, where failure is not an option. Fluorosilicone can help do exactly that. In the 1960s, the U.S. Air Force noticed that conventional silicone-based sealants, coatings, and other components degraded rapidly when exposed to fuels, de-icing fluids, and other hydrocarbon-based solvents. Dimethyl-based silicones are non-polar and easily absorb hydrocarbon-based solvents, which may result in material swelling, mechanical weakening, and ultimately, failure.
This document establishes the minimum training and qualification requirements for ground-based aircraft deicing/anti-icing methods and procedures. All guidelines referred to herein are applicable only in conjunction with the applicable documents. Due to aerodynamic and other concerns, the application of deicing/anti-icing fluids shall be carried out in compliance with engine and aircraft manufacturers’ recommendations. The scope of training should be adjusted according to local demands. There are a wide variety of winter seasons and differences of the involvement between deicing operators, and therefore, the level and length of training should be adjusted accordingly. However, the minimum level of training shall be covered in all cases. As a rule of thumb, the amount of time spent in practical training should equal or exceed the amount of time spent in classroom training.
G-12T Training and Quality Programs Committee
The paper presents recent and ongoing activities of the German Aerospace Center (DLR) focusing on experimental icing investigations within the nationally funded project InTEnt-H (2018-2022) and progressive activities in continuing internal DLR projects. The aim of InTEnt-H was to investigate innovative de-icing and anti-icing technologies for small and medium-weight helicopters, for which no rotor de-icing technologies exist to date, and to demonstrate the effectiveness of these systems in a suitable test facility. For this purpose, the whirl tower test facility of the DLR in Braunschweig has been converted into an icing test facility that is unique in Europe and will allow for the generation of atmospheric icing conditions. In this facility, de-icing and anti-icing systems for rotor blades can be tested under centrifugal loads and various icing conditions. The paper starts with a short presentation of the retrofitting works at the DLR whirl tower test facility and its major components. Then, the progress of the first test campaigns of the projects are reported. The main focus is on the design and test of the de-icing rotor system, carrying different antiicing/ de-icing technologies. The paper closes with an outlook on the upcoming activities planned to satisfy and verify EASA CS-29 Appendix C icing conditions in the frame of the DLR internal project SAFER2.
Bartels, RainerKonrath, RobertKeimer, RalfSahyoun, DominicSchneider, OliverKalow, Steffen
This ARP describes methods that are known to have been used by aircraft manufacturers to evaluate aircraft aerodynamic performance and handling effects following application of aircraft ground deicing/anti-icing fluids (“fluids”), as well as methods under development. Guidance and insight based upon those experiences are provided, including: Similarity analyses. Icing wind tunnel tests. Flight tests. CFD and other numerical analyses. This ARP also describes: The history of evaluation of the aerodynamic effects of fluids. The effects of fluids on aircraft aerodynamics. The testing for aerodynamic acceptability of fluids for SAE and regulatory qualification performed in accordance with AS5900. Additionally, Appendices A to E present individual aircraft manufacturers’ histories and methodologies, which substantially contributed to the improvement of knowledge and processes for the evaluation of fluid aerodynamic effects, and Appendix F considers the modeling of fluid removal from aerodynamic surfaces.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
This specification covers a runway deicing and anti-icing product in the form of a solid. Unless otherwise stated, all specifications referenced herein are latest (current) revision.
G-12RDP Runway Deicing Product Committee
This specification covers runway deicing and anti-icing products in the form of a liquid. Unless otherwise stated, all specifications referenced herein are latest (current) revision.
G-12RDP Runway Deicing Product Committee
The foundation specification (AMS1424) and the category specifications (AMS1424/1 and AMS1424/2) cover deicing/anti-icing materials in the form of a fluid.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
The foundation specification (AMS1428) and the category specifications (AMS1428/1 and AMS1428/2) cover deicing/anti-icing materials in the form of a fluid.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
The foundation specification (AMS1424) and the category specifications (AMS1424/1 and AMS1424/2) cover deicing/anti-icing materials in the form of a fluid.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
The foundation specification (AMS1428) and the category specifications (AMS1428/1 and AMS1428/2) cover deicing/anti-icing materials in the form of a fluid.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
This SAE Aerospace Information Report (AIR) provides a description of a screening method for use in the field for verifying an AMS 1428 anti-icing fluid is above its minimum low shear viscosity as published with holdover time guidelines. The test will determine if the fluid is (a) satisfactory, (b) unsatisfactory, or (c) borderline needing more advanced viscometry testing. Other field tests may be required to determine if an anti-icing fluid is useable, such as refractive index, appearance or other tests as may be recommended by the fluid manufacturer.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) provides guidelines for the standardization of safe operating procedures to be used in performing services and maintenance at designated deicing facilities (DDFs), comprising both central deicing facilities (CDFs) and remote deicing facilities. These procedures are necessary for the proper deicing/anti-icing of aircraft on the ground and performance of associated checks in accordance with the various approved ground icing programs, while considering applicable local environmental, operational, and economic requirements. This document should be used by operators, regulators, and airport authorities to develop and standardize approvals and permits for the establishment and operation of a DDF. The coordination of stakeholders is required prior to the approval of design plans for a deicing facility. Operating procedures shall be agreed to, in writing, by all air operators, airport authorities, regulators, and service providers prior to commencing deicing operations.
G-12DF Deicing Facilities Committee
This foundation specification (AMS1424S) and its associated category specifications (AMS1424/1 and AMS1424/2) cover a deicing/anti-icing material in the form of a fluid.
G-12ADF Aircraft Deicing Fluids
Thermal ice protection systems (IPS) are used extensively in aeronautics. They are tailored according to the aircraft characteristics or flight envelope and can be used in different modes, anti-icing to avoid ice accretion or de-icing to remove the ice once accreted. A relevant issue by this application is the runback icing, caused by the downstream flow of melted or running water to unprotected areas, where activation is not possible in terms of energy consumption. Passive systems are being explored to complement or replace active systems, although, up to now, solutions have not been reported with the required performance for real-life applications. One of the most commonly reported anti-icing strategy relays on superhydrophobicity, i.e., it is based on the water roll-off capacity of Cassie-Baxter superhydrophobic surfaces (CB-SHP). Precisely, running wet phenomena, where liquid water is flowing on the surface, could be an appropiate application field for this type of materials. Herein, we have explored the behavior and limitations of a stable, newly developed, CB-SHP material to protect a runback section under icing conditions (temperature, air speed, liquid water content, droplet size distribution, and angle of attack) closer to those encountered in a wing airfoil.Two icing mechanisms, running-wet and direct impingement of supercooled microdroplets, have been evaluated for short (2 minutes) and long (10 minutes) period tests. It is found that the tested SHP material improved the performance of reference polyurethane (PU) paints, avoiding any ice accretion at low air speeds and low angles of attack.
Mora, JulioGarcía, PalomaCarreño, FranciscoMontes, LauraLópez-Santos, CarmenRico, VictorBorras, AnaRedondo, FranciscoGonzález-Elipe, Agustín R.Agüero, Alina
Ice and snow accretion on aircraft surfaces imposes operational and safety challenges, severely impacting aerodynamic performance of critical aircraft structures and equipment. For optimized location-based ice sensing and integrated ‘smart’ de-icing systems of the future, microwave resonant-based planar sensors are presented for their high sensitivity and versatility in implementation and integration. Here, a conformal, planar complementary split ring resonator (CSRR) based microwave sensor is presented for robust detection of localized ice and snow accretion. The sensor has a modified thick aluminum-plate design and is coated with epoxy for greater durability. The fabricated sensor operates at a resonant frequency of 1.18 GHz and a resonant amplitude of -33 dB. Monitoring the resonant frequency response of the sensor, the freezing and thawing process of a 0.1 ml droplet of water is monitored, and a 60 MHz downshift is observed for the frozen droplet. Using an artificial snow chamber to create falling snow, a 1 mm thick accretion of snow shows a 35 MHz downshift in resonant frequency. The proposed sensor system can be extended using a novel radar-inspired method of Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR). TDR based ice/snow sensors can be implemented in an array or network structure for reliable, local and distributed ice and snow accretion monitoring on aircraft structures. Applying Time-Domain Reflectometry (TDR) methods, three identical sensors with the same resonant frequency are monitored over an approximate length of 10 m and localized sensing of water is presented. This novel method offers a pathway towards implementation of large network-based resonant-microwave sensors for future reliable integrated localized icing and snow accretion rate-measurement sensors.
Shah, AaryamanNiksan, OmidZarifi, Mohammad H.
Research institutes and companies are currently working on 3D numerical icing tools for the prediction of ice shapes on an international level. Due to the highly complex flow situation, the prediction of ice shapes on three-dimensional surfaces represents a challenge. An essential component for the development and subsequent validation of 3D ice accretion codes are detailed experimental data from ice shapes accreted on relevant geometries, like wings of a passenger aircraft for example. As part of the Republic of Austria funded research project JOICE, a mockup of a wingtip, based on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration common research model CRM65 was designed and manufactured. For further detailed investigation of electro-thermal de-icing systems, various heaters and thermocouples were included. The mockup was investigated in the Icing Wind Tunnel of Rail Tec Arsenal in Vienna, Austria under various Appendix C and Appendix O icing conditions with and without activated heating systems. The resulting ice structures were documented and analyzed by using 3D and 4D scanning systems. This paper provides information about the design of the mockup, the test setup in the Icing Wind Tunnel well as the applied documentation procedures. Furthermore, an overview of the conducted experimental investigations is given, and selected results and evaluations are presented.
Puffing, ReinhardNeubauer, ThomasMoser, RichardHassler, WolfgangSchweighart, SimonFerschitz, HermannDiebald, StefanBreitfuss, WolfgangKozomara, David
In-flight icing significantly influences the design of large passenger aircraft. Relevant aspects include sizing of the main aerodynamic surfaces, provision of anti-icing systems, and setting of operational restrictions. Empennages of large passenger aircraft are particularly affected due to the small leading edge radius, and the requirement to generate considerable lift for round out and flare, following an extended period of descent often in icing conditions. This paper describes a CFD-based investigation of the effects of sweep on the aerodynamic performance of a novel forward-swept horizontal stabilizer concept in icing conditions. The concept features an unconventional forward sweep, combined with a high lift leading edge extension (LEX) located within a fuselage induced droplet shadow zone, providing passive protection from icing. In-flight ice accretion was calculated, using Ansys FENSAP-ICE, on 10°, 15° and 20° (low, intermediate, and high) sweep horizontal stabilizers, with the tail as attached to the full-scale aircraft, for a 45-minute holding pattern. The aerodynamic analyses of the iced tails were carried out using Ansys Fluent Aero with angle of attacks from 0° to -15°. All three sweeps show reduction in lifting performance under icing conditions, due to early separation. However, comparisons of lift coefficient versus angle of attack (CL-α) curves, spanwise lift distributions, and three-dimensional flow fields show that increasing sweep reduces the early separation tendency along the span, but also reduces LEX lifting performance. This leads overall to reduced icing associated lift degradation at higher sweep. This effort has been undertaken as part of the Cleansky 2 IMPACT project (GA no. 885052).
Page, JamesOzcer, IsikZanon, AlessandroDe Gennaro, Michele
The purpose of this paper to is to review the methodology applied by Collins Aerospace to develop, test and qualify a more robust surface ply rubber compound that has demonstrable improvements in durability and performance at sub-freezing temperatures. Using in-service products as a reference, pneumatic deicers in use on regional turboprop applications were selected as a basis for operational characteristics and observed failure modes. Custom test campaigns were developed by Collins to comparatively evaluate key characteristics of the surface ply material including low temperature elasticity, erosion durability, and fluid susceptibility. Collins’ proprietary engineered rubber formulations were individually evaluated and built into fully functional test deicers for component level testing to DO-160G environmental exposure, comparative ice shed performance in Collins’ Icing Wind Tunnel and erosion in Collins’ Rain Erosion Silo.
Taylor, AndrewSlane, CaseyHu, JinBotura, Galdemir
This paper describes the feasibility of a de-icing device based on forced vibrations induced in an ice-covered rectangular aluminum plate using an amplified piezoelectric actuator. The removal of the ice layer is caused by the creation of mechanical stresses induced by relatively fast time-varying mode shapes in the very low kHz-range large enough to overcome the adhesion forces at the material/ice interface.
Bolzmacher, ChristianLeroy, Edouard
This work presents a comprehensive numerical model for ice accretion and Ice Protection System (IPS) simulation over a 2D component, such as an airfoil. The model is based on the Myers model for ice accretion and extended to include the possibility of a heated substratum. Six different icing conditions that can occur during in-flight ice accretion with an Electro-Thermal Ice Protection System (ETIPS) activated are identified. Each condition presents one or more layers with a different water phase. Depending on the heat fluxes, there could be only liquid water, ice, or a combination of both on the substratum. The possible layers are the ice layer on the substratum, the running liquid film over ice or substratum, and the static liquid film between ice and substratum caused by ice melting. The last layer, which is always present, is the substratum. The physical model that describes the evolution of these layers is based on the Stefan problem. For each layer, one heat equation is solved. At the ice-water interface, a Stefan condition governs the phase transition. Lastly, mass conservation is imposed. Numerical simulations are compared to reference results, both experimental measurements and numerical simulations for both ice accretion and ETIPS operating in anti-icing and de-icing mode, showing good agreement. A posterior ice shedding analysis is then performed, taking into account the IPS in both anti-icing and de-icing operation modes. The stresses internal to the ice shapes when subjected to the aerodynamic loads are compared with the mechanical properties of ice such as the tensile and adhesion strength. The results show that the de-icing mode is more efficient in causing shedding due to the decrease in adhesion surface and the presence of the under-ice liquid film that tends to break the ice shape.
Gallia, MariachiaraRausa, AndreaMartuffo, AlessandroGuardone, Alberto
Quasicrystalline (QC) coatings were evaluated as leading-edge protection materials for rotor craft blades. The QC coatings were deposited using high velocity oxy-fuel thermal spray and predominantly Al-based compositions. Ice adhesion, interfacial toughness with ice, wettability, topography, and durability were assessed. QC-coated sand-blasted carbon steel exhibited better performance in terms of low surface roughness (Sa ~ 0.2 μm), liquid repellency (water contact angles: θadv ~85°, θrec ~23°), and better substrate adhesion compared to stainless steel substrates. To enhance coating performance, QC-coated sand-blasted carbon steel was further exposed to grinding and polishing, followed by measuring surface roughness, wettability, and ice adhesion strength. This reduced the surface roughness of the QC coating by 75%, resulting in lower ice adhesion strengths similar to previously reported values (~400 kPa). The durability of polished QC coating was evaluated using sand and rain erosion. The sand erosion test was conducted per ASTM D823. The thickness of the QC coating remained unchanged post-erosion, indicating the QC coating is quite resistant to abrasion from sand. Rain erosion tests were conducted following the Icephobic Comparative Jet Pulsating Rain Erosion test (ICPjet) at the Anti-icing Materials International Laboratory, Quebec. The coating remained intact even after 190,000 impacts demonstrating extreme durability against rain erosion, and the coating outperformed current erosion-resistant aircraft paint (SAE AMS-C-83231A). Overall, the extreme erosion resistance of the easy-to-spray coating, combined with its de-icing properties and ability to be repaired using standard polishing techniques, makes the developed quasicrystalline coatings extremely promising for the protection of rotor-craft blades and other aircraft components.
Yang, QimengDolatabadi, AliGolovin, Kevin
This work presents the anti-icing simulation results from a pressure sensing probe. This study used various turbulence models to understand their influence in surface temperature prediction. A fully turbulence model and a transition turbulence model are considered in this work. Both dry air and icing conditions are considered for this study. The results show that at low Angle of Attack (AOA) both turbulence model results compared well and at higher AOA the results deviated. Overall, as AOA increases, the k-ꞷ SST model predicted the surface temperature colder than the Transition SST model result.
Thangavel, SathishBajpai, Shivanshu
One of the most significant challenges for the aviation industry in the winter is the deicing operations on runways. As a result, deicer chemicals can pollute the environment if used in a large amount. A mathematical model could help optimize the use of deicer chemicals. Road deicing models exist to predict pavement temperature covered by snow/ice during deicing operations. However, the specificity of airport operations requires a model for the runway deicing to simulate the mass of ice melted with usage of deicing agents. Here we propose a model for runway deicing and validate it against experimental results. Our model considers temperature, diffusive flux, and time changes in a normal direction. It also calculates the mass and heat transfer in three regions (liquid, mushy, and solid). We used the enthalpy method to determine the temperature and the interface location at each time step. In the liquid and solid, the deicer concentration is obtained by Fick’s law and updated at each time step and location. The melting point temperature is variable due to the dilution of the deicer in the solution. Therefore, melting points are updated depending on the concentration at each location and time. The model uses the phases diagram for water and deicer agent mixture, considering eutectic point, for melting point calculation. The mesh dependency of the model is first investigated. To verify the model sensitivity, the paper proposes parametric studies for the heat transfer coefficient and the diffusion coefficients. Then, to validate the model, the Anti-Icing Materials International Laboratory (AMIL) in Chicoutimi conducted experimental tests on deicer agents for runways. Validation of the model is achieved for potassium acetate and potassium formate, two types of deicers.
Maroufkhani, AidaCharpentier, ClaireMorency, FrancoisMomen, Gelareh
Under the EU Clean Sky 2 research project InSPIRe – Innovative Systems to Prevent Ice on Regional Aircraft, numerical and experimental studies have been performed to investigate the potential to minimise the electrical power required for wing ice protection on a regional aircraft wing. In a standard electrothermal de-ice protection scheme there is a parting strip heater which runs along the full spanwise protected extent and is permanently powered. This splits the ice formation on the leading edge into an upper and lower region, which makes it easier to shed. However, the parting strip is relatively energy intensive and contributes a significant portion of the overall power demand. Developing a system which is able to provide the desired ice protection function without a parting strip would therefore offer a substantial power saving. The great difficulty with such a system is in ensuring that acceptable ice shedding occurs. Through numerical design studies a heater layout and power scheme was developed and a system demonstrator was then manufactured and tested in an icing wind tunnel. The testing confirmed the difficulties in achieving good shedding performance without the parting strip, but a number of cases, including down to -20°C, were successful in providing reasonable ice protection performance. The main outcome of the testing was the sensitivity of shedding performance to the aircraft condition. Whereas robust de-ice scheme solutions with a parting strip can generally be developed using relatively few aircraft parameters as input (e.g. Static and Total Air Temperature), the results from testing showed that there is a much higher sensitivity to parameters such as the angle-of-attack when no parting strip is used. Overall, the results show significant potential to deliver an electrothermal ice protection scheme with power much lower than would be achievable with a standard de-icing system.
Moser, RichardRoberts, IanPlassnegger, BerndKuehnelt, HelmutAnich, MaxNugnes, Giuseppina Giusy
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 324