Browse Topic: Head

Items (1,079)
This study looks at how the human head reacts and gets injured during high-G landing impacts in spacecraft return capsules. We used a vertical drop tower system for the experiments. A standard crash test dummy, called the Hybrid III 50th, was used to imitate how astronauts sit during landing. We applied two common safety standards—the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) and the 3 ms cumulative acceleration rule—to measure head response under high-G impacts. The results show several things. First, head acceleration increases linearly as seat acceleration increases. Second, the peak total acceleration of the head is much higher than the seat acceleration. In particular, acceleration in the X and Z directions is much stronger than in the Y direction. Third, when seat acceleration went over 47.71 g, HIC exceeded the safe limit of 700, and the 3 ms head acceleration also passed the 80 g limit. This suggests that 40 g should be considered a safe upper limit for seat acceleration. This work provides experimental support for improving landing systems to protect astronauts’ heads during high-G impacts.
An, HaoWang, YafengGuo, Yazhou
This study investigated how vehicle front-end geometry, impact speed, and vehicle category influence injury risk to a midsize male pedestrian. Eighty-one generic vehicle (GV) models representing sedans, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), pickup trucks, and minivans sold in the United States were developed by morphing three base models using an automated pipeline. Front-end parameters that were varied included ground clearance (GC), bumper height (BH), hood leading-edge (HLE) height, hood length (HL), bumper lead angle (BLA), hood angle (HA), and windshield angle (WSA). Each vehicle impacted the Global Human Body Models Consortium 50th percentile male simplified pedestrian (GHBMC M50-PS) model at 30, 40, and 50 kph, totaling 243 simulations. Boundary conditions followed the European New Car Assessment Program (Euro NCAP) pedestrian test protocol. Thirty-five injury metrics were extracted across the head, neck, thorax, abdomen, pelvis, and lower extremities. Linear mixed-effects regression models assessed relationships between vehicle front-end geometry, impact speed, and injury outcomes, with predictor selection guided by principal component analysis (PCA) and collinearity diagnostics. Impact speed was the strongest predictor of injury severity across all body regions. GC and HLE height were also dominant predictors. Wrap-type trajectories were common at lower speeds and in SUVs, trucks, and minivans, while sedans and minivans showed roof vaulting at higher speeds. Head injury severity increased with speed and was influenced by HA and BLA. Minivans showed elevated brain injury criterion (BrIC) and cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM25) values, indicating increased diffuse brain injury risk. Trucks produced the highest thoracoabdominal injury metrics, which correlated with HL, HA, and HLE height. Sedans showed higher right-side (trailing leg) femur forces, slightly lower left-side femur forces than SUVs and minivans, and lowest tibia moments. Trucks had greater tibia bending moments, while SUVs and minivans had higher left femur moments compared to sedans. GC and impact speed exacerbated lower extremity injuries, varying by vehicle category. These effects are driven by geometry: Higher GC increases the unsupported span below the knee, promoting tibial bending, while lower HLE heights shift impact forces above the knee, elevating femur injury risk.
Poveda, LuisMiller, Logan E.Edwards, Colin C.Pollock, MadelineArmstrong, William M.Hsu, Fang-ChiGayzik, Scott F.Weaver, Ashley A.Stitzel, Joel D.Devane, Karan S.
Aims of the research This study aims to modify the lower body (the pelvis, thigh, and leg) of the mid-sized male pedestrian dummy FE model by considering the latest version of the physical dummy and to evaluate both the accuracy by comparing test results of the past studies and the biofidelity specified in SAE J2782 in both component and full-scale validations. Methods 1 Component validation The validation of the modified pelvis model was performed in dynamic lateral compression simulations. The sacrum and the pubis force-deflection responses of the iliac or the acetabulum impact were measured. The modified thigh and leg models were evaluated in a dynamic 3-point lateral bending simulation, measuring the force-deflection responses. The results from the simulations were compared with test results and the biofidelity requirements. 2 Full-scale validation The whole-body model was updated by incorporating these modified component models. The model of the generic buck developed for the assessment of pedestrian whole-body impact response and specified in SAE J3093 was used in this study. The buck model was made to collide with the full-scale dummy model at 40 km/h laterally. The trajectories of the head, upper spine, mid-thorax, and pelvis were measured and compared with those of the test results and the biofidelity requirements. Results The force-deflection responses from the pelvis, thigh, and leg models were similar to those of the test results, indicating they almost fell within the biofidelity requirements. As the results of the full-scale simulation, the trajectories of the head, upper spine, mid-thorax, and pelvis showed a strong agreement with those of the test results, indicating almost the same tendency as the biofidelity corridors, except for that of the pelvis. Conclusions As the results of component and full-scale validations, the equivalences of the modified pedestrian dummy model to test results and the biofidelity were confirmed in most cases.
Asanuma, HiroyukiGunji, YasuakiMori, FumieNagashima, Akiko
Head restraint requirements and designs have evolved to minimize the delay in head support and reduce differential loading in the neck. As a result, they have become bigger, closer to the occupant’s head, and angled forward relative to the seat back. Head restraints have been found missing or detached in the field; they may be removed pre-crash due to occupant comfort issues, or post-crash for better accessibility during extrication. Additionally, although rare, head restraints may become detached in severe rear impacts due to occupant loading. To better understand occupant-to-head restraint dynamic interactions, nine rear sled tests were conducted. The test conditions were selected to represent worst case severe loading scenarios. An instrumented 50th Hybrid III ATD (Anthropomorphic Test Device) was lap-shoulder belted on a right-front seat. The neck was equipped with a bracket and lower neck load cell designed for rear impacts. Three series of sled tests were performed wherein the kinematics and kinetics of a restrained ATD were compared across 3 seat configurations: a conventional modern seat, a rigidized modern seat, and an ABTS (all-belts-to seat). Occupant postures evaluated included seated nominally and leaning forward, as may occur in response to hard pre-impact braking and/or an initial frontal impact. Two crash severities were evaluated including a moderate speed (24 km/h delta V pulse based on Euro NCAP) and a very high-speed (49 km/h delta V) condition. Within each series, the sled pulse and ATD initial posture were held constant. The first series (Match #1) was conducted at 24 km/h with a leaned occupant. All biomechanical responses were below IARVs (Injury Assessment Reference Values). The highest responses relative to IARV were for upper and lower neck tension and extension. The Nij was greatest with the ABTS seat for upper neck and with the rigidized seat for lower neck, highlighting the importance of using both the upper neck and lower neck instrumentation. The second series (Match #2) was at 49 km/h with the nominally seated ATD, and the third (Match #3) was at 49 km/h with a leaning forward ATD. The biomechanical responses were below IARV when nominally seated. The biomechanical responses of Match #2 were more favourable than Match #3, highlighting the benefits of early energy absorption during the ride-down. For example, the upper neck Nij was 2.4 in the conventional seat, 4.2 in the rigidized seat and 5.1 in the ABTS. The corresponding lower neck Nij was 4.2, 5.5 and 2.3. The normalized chest 3 ms response was greatest in the rigidized seat, followed by the ABTS, irrespective of sitting posture. There are numerous reasons for an occupant to be out of position prior to a rear impact. In this study, the test conditions were selected to assess head-to-head restraint interactions in severe conditions, including leaning forward. Though the head restraints remained attached in all tests, the results provide insight on the seat and head restraint performance, and head and shoulder loading characteristics, in particular in some non-nominal postures.
Parenteau, ChantalBurnett, RogerDavidson, Russell
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of child anthropometry, seating postures (recline and rotation), seatbelt force limiting, and frontal collision scenarios on the kinematic response and injury risk in highly automated vehicles. The TUST IBMs 6YO-O model was conducted the frontal collisions in sled tests. This simulation matrix includes five percentiles six-year-old occupants (P3, P25, P50, P75, and P97), three seatback angles (20°, 30°, and 45°), four seat rotation angles (0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°), three seatbelt force limiting (2.6 kN, 3.6 kN, and 4.6 kN), and three frontal collision types. Injury risks were assessed including the child occupant's head, neck, chest/abdomen, and lumbar region in each simulation (n=540). The results indicate that the child anthropometry, the seatback angle, and the seat rotation angle have a significant influence on the motion responses. Statistically significant differences between all the groups within each independent variable category were observed based on the analysis of variance. As the child dimension increases, the risk of head injury decreases showing by HIC15, while the risk of neck and lumbar injuries increases. As the seatback angle increases, biomechanical parameters of the head show an increasing trend. The risk of upper neck injury decreases, while the risk of lumbar injury decreases and then increases. As the seat rotation angle increases, the risks of head, neck, and chest injuries initially rise and subsequently decrease, while the risk of lumbar injury demonstrates a downward trend. Seatbelt force limiting exhibited a positive correlation with head, neck, and lumbar injury risks. Consequently, small percentile child experiences higher head loads in smart cockpits, with seatback angle and seat rotation angle being key factors contributing to child injuries. These findings highlight the critical need to address the vulnerability of smaller children in smart cockpits by adapting integrated active and passive safety systems to mitigate their injury risk.
Wang, YanxinZhao, HongqianLi, HaiyanHe, LijuanCui, ShihaiLv, Wenle
Drivers obtain road information through head and neck rotation. In order to study the influences of head and neck rotation posture on occupant injury in frontal impact scenario, the THUMS (Total Human Model for Safety) AM50 human body model with five different head and neck rotation postures but without active muscles was adopted to study the biomechanical injury responses of occupant under the frontal impact scenario at 56 km/h in this study. Firstly, the kinematic responses of total body and head acceleration curves at the center of gravity predicted by PMHS (Post Mortem Human Subject) and THUMS AM50 human model under the sled test conditions were compared to verify the simulation model for subsequent study. Then, the THUMS AM50 human model with standard occupant seating posture was adjusted to have five different head and neck rotation postures with 0°, ±20°, and ±40° rotation angle, respectively. Finally, a series of frontal impact sled with or without airbag simulations were conducted for each THUMS AM50 human model with different head and neck rotation postures. The simulation results showed that with the increasing of head and neck rotation angle, the neck injury risk was increased while the thoracic injury risk was decreased. Regardless of whether airbags were present or absent, the model prediction for the standard posture indicated a lower injury risk. And regardless of whether the head and neck posture changed, the airbag always could provide a certain protection in that posture.
Li, Dongqiangjiang, YejieTan, ChunLi, YanyanGong, ChuangyeWu, HequanJiang, Binhui
To investigate the characteristics of injuries sustained by occupant with different lower limb postures under the frontal impact sled conditions. Using the finite element method a series of simulation analyses were conducted on THUMS (Total Human Model for Safety) AM50 human body model with four different postures, including standing posture, lower limb bent at 100°, 90°, and crossed forward-backward, under the frontal impact scenario at 56 km/h in this study. The simulation results indicated that the overall injury risk predicted by the THUMS AM50 huma body model with lower limb crossed forward-backward was higher than that predicted by the model with other postures. The values of injury criteria including of HIC (Head Injury Criterion), head resultant acceleration, and thoracic VC (Viscous Criterion) predicted by the THUMS AM50 huma body model with lower limb crossed forward-backward were highest in these series simulations. Also, the biomechanical responses, including stress or strain of thoracic/abdominal organs, pelvic cortical bone and knee ligaments, predicted by the THUMS AM50 huma body model with lower limb crossed forward-backward was higher than these predicted by the model with other postures.
Li, Dongqiangjiang, YejieTan, ChunLi, YanyanLi, YihuiWu, HequanJiang, BinhuiZhu, Feng
Head restraint requirements and designs have evolved to minimize the delay in head support and reduce differential loading in the neck. As a result, head restraints have become bigger and more angled forward, sitting, closer to the occupant’s head. Head restraints separation from seatbacks are sometimes observed in the field. Are head restraint detachments resulting from occupant comfort issues prior to the crash, occupant loading during the crash or were they removed by emergency personnel for extrication? Understanding the retention strength of head restraints and the type of evidence left behind by a forced removal may help researchers resolve the question of how a head restraint may be found post-crash separated from the seat. Quasistatic pull tests were conducted to measure vertical retention capabilities, compare vertical adjustment and release mechanisms, and document deformation and damage. Eighteen different front seat head restraint designs were evaluated. The model years ranged from 2014 to 2019. All head restraints complied with FMVSS 202A requirements. Each head restraint design was tested in two tension loading configurations: In-line nominal pull and 45-degree pull. In the nominal configuration, the head restraints were pulled vertically upwards, in line with the adjustment posts. Additionally, head restraints were pulled at a 45-degree angle to the ground in the 45-degree configuration. The force at detachment averaged 1,758 ± 559 N for the in-line tests and 2,505 ± 662 N for the 45 degree pull tests. Damage was observed in all 36 tests and was evidenced by deformation in the locking mechanism and/or the guide sleeve being displaced out of the seatback. Detachment occurred due to overload or deformation of the locking mechanism or the guide sleeve being pulled out of the seatback. Bypassing detachment occurred in 21 of the tests while detachment from guide sleeve separation resulted in 15 of the tests. Half of the head restraints were equipped with two locking sides and half with one side. However, there does not appear to be a correlation between peak force and number of locking sides. There are currently no head restraint retention regulations for tensile loading. This study is a first to document head restraint separation resulting from forceful loading. The damage was documented in detail. This information may assist in answering the questions posed above.
Parenteau, ChantalBurnett, RogerDavidson, Russell
Autonomous vehicles may attract more passengers to recline their seat for comfort. However, under severe rear-end crashes and large reclining angle, the backward inertia could completely throw occupant out of seat. Even if the occupant body can be restrained by seatbelt, the occupant’s head could slide out of the head restraint area. Any of these situations may cause severe injuries. To address this safety concern, we developed a sliding seat system designed to enhance occupant retention. Activated by impact inertia of rear-end collision, the system allows the seat sliding backward along its track in a controlled manner, and the sliding stroke is accompanied by a restraint force and absorbs some amount of kinetic energy during the sliding. Thus, occupant retention can be enhanced, and injury risks of head and neck can be reduced. To demonstrate this concept, we built a MADYMO model and conducted a parametric analysis. The model includes a 50th percentile human model, a vehicle seat, and a seat-mounted three-point seatbelt. Under 50 km/h rear-impact load, we evaluated occupant kinematics and critical injury metrics of 45o reclined posture. The relative displacement between occupant pelvis and seatback was used to measure the distance that occupant slides backward, which is a metric for occupant retention. The results have shown that seat sliding distance is the most critical factor for occupant retention, and the longer the sliding distance, the greater the retention effect and the lower the injury risk. In a typical scenario when 200 mm of sliding distance is available for sliding, compared to traditional fixed seat (no sliding allowed), the occupant displacement is reduced by 45%, the Head Injury Criterion value is reduced by 55%, and the Neck Injury Criterion value is decreased by 66%. For vehicle seat design, using the sliding seat system may help off-load the burden of enhancing recliner stiffness, a critical component for maintaining seatback stiffness level in rear-end collisions.
Dai, RuiZhou, QingPuyuan, TanShen, Wenxuan
Five sled tests were performed with a Hybrid III (H-III) 10-year-old child sized Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD) positioned in the 2nd row left seat of a three row 2006 Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV). A HYGE Sled buck was positioned to represent/replicate a side impact collision to the passenger (right) side of the SUV, with a Principal Direction of Force (PDOF) of 60 degrees, resulting in a far side side-impact for the ATD. Of the 5 tests performed, three of the five tests were performed with a delta-V of 17 mph, and two of the tests at a delta-V of 24 mph. Of the 17 mph tests, one test was performed with a properly restrained ATD, and two tests performed with improper restraint positioning. Both of the 24 mph tests were performed with improper restraint positioning, effectively identical to the two 17 mph delta-V tests. The two improper restraint use tests (at both 17 and 24 mph delta-V) included two different improper restraint scenarios. The first scenario of improper restraint positioning involved moving the torso belt from the left shoulder, over the head, and onto the right shoulder. The second scenario involved the same belt re-positioning as the first scenario, but additionally a disengaged latch plate from the buckle, essentially creating a condition of seat belt entanglement. Each of the five tests utilized its own salvage-vehicle-harvested seat belt assembly, originating from the same model series of SUV. All tests were documented with 4 high-speed video cameras. Occupant kinematics and seat belt physical evidence were analyzed and compared across the test series. Head accelerations and upper neck loads were also evaluated. The results demonstrated the uniqueness of physical evidence left behind on components of the seat belt system, both in terms of locations of the evidence as well as the extent and geometric orientation of the evidence, across the three demonstrated scenarios (proper, improper, and improper and unbuckled). Additionally, the three scenarios exhibited significant differences with respect to the head accelerations and neck loads experienced by the ATD.
Luepke, PeterHewett, NatalieBetts, KevinVan Arsdell, WilliamWeber, PaulStankewich, CharlesMiller, GregoryWatson, RichardSochor, Mark
The objective of the present study is to examine trends in occupant kinematics and injuries during side impact tests carried out on vehicle models over the period of time. Head, shoulder, torso, spine, and pelvis kinematic responses are analysed for driver dummy in high speed side impacts for vehicle model years, MY2016-2024. Side impact test data from the tests conducted at The Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) is examined for MY2016-2024. The test procedure is as specified in AIS099 or UNECE R95, wherein a 950kg moving deformable barrier (MDB) impacts the side of stationary vehicle at 50km/hr. An Instrumented 50th percentile male EUROSID-2 Anthropomorphic Test Device is positioned in the driver seat on the impacting side. Occupant kinematic data, including head accelerations, Head Injury Criterion (HIC15), Torso deflections at thorax and abdominal ribs, spine accelerations at T12 vertebra, and pelvis accelerations are evaluated and compared. The “peak” and “time to- peak” responses are compared across different vehicle model years. The effect of delta-V, vehicle MY, on occupant kinematics is examined. For different vehicle delta V, MY2016-2020 demonstrated higher average peak kinematic responses compared to the MY2020-2024. The present study enhances the existing database of occupant kinematics in side impacts. A general trend of reduction in occupant kinematics and risks for injury is observed in vehicle models over the past decade.
Mishra, SatishBorse, TanmayKulkarni, DileepMahajan, Rahul
Severe rear-impact collisions can cause significant intrusion into the occupant compartment when the structural integrity of the rear survival space is insufficient. Intrusion patterns are influenced by impact configuration—underride, in-line, or override—with underride collisions channeling forces below the beltline through the rear wheels as a primary load path. This force concentration rapidly propels the rear seat-pan forward, contacting the rearward-rotating front seatback. The resulting bottoming-out phenomenon produces a forward impulse that amplifies loading on the front occupant’s upper torso, increasing the risk of thoracic injury even when the head is properly supported by the head restraint. This study analyzes a real-world rear-impact collision that resulted in fatal thoracic injuries to the driver, attributed to the interaction between the driver’s seatback and the forward-moving rear seat pan. A vehicle-to-vehicle crash test was conducted to replicate similar intrusion characteristics and assess the relative kinematics between the seatback and rear seat structure. Results demonstrate that seatback bottoming out under intrusion conditions significantly elevates thoracic loading. These findings highlight the need for improved rear structural design strategies to manage load paths in underride scenarios and to minimize front seatback rearward collapse and associated occupant loading.
Thorbole, Chandrashekhar
Perceiving the movement characteristics of specific body parts of a driver is crucial for determining their activity. Moreover, the driver’s body posture significantly impacts personnel safety during collision. This study investigates the creation of a dataset using Kinect depth camera for acquiring, organizing, annotating with skeleton tracking assistance, and optimizing interpolation. The pose recognition methods enhanced through an anchor regression mechanism, leading to the refinement of a lightweight anchor regression network capable of end-to-end learning ability from depth images. The improved backbone neck head structure offers advantages of reduced model parameters and enhanced accuracy. This engineering optimization makes it better suited for practical applications within vehicles with limited computational resources limitations and high real-time demands.
Xu, HailanLi, WuhuanLu, JunWang, XinHe, WenhaoChen, ZhenmingLiu, Yunjie
Image sensors built into every smartphone and digital camera, distinguish colors like the human eye. In our retinas, individual cone cells recognize red, green and blue (RGB). In image sensors, individual pixels absorb the corresponding wavelengths and convert them into electrical signals.
The return to Earth is a rough ride for astronauts, from the violent turbulence of atmospheric entry to a jarring landing. Hitting the ground in a Soyuz capsule is the equivalent of driving a car backward into a brick wall at 20 mph, and it’s resulting in more head and neck injuries than NASA computer models predicted. To collect more data, NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston commissioned a Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) project to develop a wearable data recorder for astronaut spacesuits. One result, created by Diversified Technical Systems Inc. (DTS), is a miniature commercial device that now collects and transmits data for any application from airplane test flights to tracking high-value shipments.
The development of drones has raised questions about their safety in case of high-speed impacts with the head. This has been recently studied with dummies, postmortem human surrogates and numerical models but questions are still open regarding the transfer of skull fracture tolerance and procedures from road safety to drone impacts. This study aimed to assess the performance of an existing head FE model (GHBMC M50-O v6.0) in terms of response and fracture prediction using a wide range of impact conditions from the literature (low and high-speed, rigid and deformable impactors, drones). The fracture prediction capability was assessed using 156 load cases, including 18 high speed tests and 19 tests for which subject specific models were built. The GHBMC model was found to overpredict peak forces, especially for rigid impactors and fracture cases. However, the model captured the head accelerations tendencies for drone impacts. The formulation of bone elements, the failure representation and the scalp material properties were found of interest for future investigation. The model still predicted a sizable proportion of skull fractures. With failure enabled, it reached a sensitivity of 86.6% and a specificity of 82.0% (n=156). With failure disabled, risk curves with a rating of good according to ISO/TS 18506:2014 were developed using the second principal strain in the outer table cortical solid elements.
Pozzi, ClémentGardegaront, MarcAllegre, LucilleBeillas, Philippe
Subjective perception of vehicle secondary ride is dependent on simultaneous touchpoint vibrations and audible inputs to the occupants. Standards such as ISO 2361 provide guidelines for objective assessments of human body thresholds to vibration [1]. However, when a human experiences vibration inputs at multiple touchpoints, as well as aural inputs, it becomes complicated to judge each individual contribution to the overall subjective perception [2]. Additional factors, such as ambient conditions, ergonomics, age, gender etc. also play a role. Secondary ride, which is defined as energy in the 10-30 Hz frequency range, is one such event that affects the customers’ perception of ride comfort and quality. The goal of this work is to develop a sound and vibration simulator model and execute a secondary ride jury study of vehicle driving over cleats. The aim of the study is to rank the contributions of each touch point vibration input, as well as sound to the overall subjective perception of secondary ride during these impact events. The driver touch points considered in this study are floor, steering wheel, seat back, seat pad/cushion and driver ear noise.
Jayakumar, VigneshJoodi, BenjaminGeissler, ChristianPilz, FernandoLynch, LukeConklin, ChrisWeilnau, KelbyHodgkins, Jeffrey
Visual object tracking technology is the core foundation of intelligent driving, video surveillance, human–computer interaction, and the like. Inspired by the mechanism of human eye gaze, a new correlation filter (CF) tracking algorithm, named human eye gaze (HEG) tracking algorithm, was proposed in this study. The HEG tracking algorithm expanded the tracking detection idea from the traditional detection-tracking to detection-judging-tracking by adding a judging module to check the initial and retrack the unreliable tracking result. In addition, the detection module was further integrated into the edge contour feature on the basis of the HOG (histogram of oriented gradients) extracting feature and the color histogram to reduce the sensitivity of the algorithm to factors such as deformation and illumination changes. The comparison conducted on the OTB-2015 dataset showed that the overall overlap precision, distance precision, and center location error of the HEG tracking algorithm were significantly better than those of nine transitional mainstream tracking algorithms. Even in the challenging sequences, the HEG tracking algorithm on handling of occlusion, out-of-view, deformation, and illumination variations are obviously advantageous.
Jiang, YejieJiang, BinhuiChou, Clifford C.
Automotive Engineering: April 202525AUTP044/3/2025
Undeterred, WCX strides to future As the industry grapples with volatile economies and competition from China, WCX 2025 speakers focus on how engineers are forging ahead and keeping skills relevant. Manufacturers must take the wheel to scale SDV success Four suggestions on how OEMs should manage their SDV development process, from core competencies to leveraging AI. How emerging technologies can transform EV battery reliability and safety Four suggestions on how OEMs should manage their SDV development process, from core competencies to leveraging AI. How emerging technologies can transform EV battery reliability and safety Above it all, battery developers and manufacturers need to be agile across the entire product lifecycle. Editorial Absolutely nothing's changed Supplier Eye The world re-regionalizes Elaphe readies in-wheel motors for OEM EVs after 2030. Case study: accuracy is key in AHP Hydraulics' new ball joint tester Mitsubishi Fuso announces energy storage demonstration Building Resilient SDVs: Secure by Design in the automotive industry Accelerating materials development with quantum computing 2026 Escalade IQL is Cadillac's biggest, roomiest EV yet 2025 Nissan Murano: Variable compression to the mpg rescue 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 brings all the right updates 2025 Toyota 4Runner: Capable across the lineup Product Briefs Spotlight: Battery management Q&A Siemens senior director for battery industry: Industrial AI is coming
The skull-brain interface is structurally complex, and various simplification methods have been employed in existing head models to simulate the interaction between the skull and the brain. The modeling approach of the skull-brain interface determines how loads are transmitted to the interior, which is critical for accurately simulating head injuries. Thus, understanding the impact of current skull-brain interface modeling approaches on intracranial simulation results is significant. This study aims to explore the influence of different skull-brain interface modeling methods on the results of finite element models during the development of Advanced Chinese Human Body Models (AC-HUMs) based on the LS-DYNA solver. By comparing the responses of rigidly bonded connections (tied Contact), failure-allowing bonded contacts (tiebreak Contact), shared nodes, and arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) methods under the Nahum 37 test load conditions, the study analyzes the effects of different modeling methods on pressure and deformation trends. Additionally, varying the failure values of tiebreak contact allows for the calculation of intracranial pressure responses under the same load conditions, revealing the influence of failure values on intracranial pressure responses. The results indicate that only the tiebreak model can simulate the transition from negative to positive pressure observed in experimental results, with significant variations in simulation outcomes corresponding to changes in failure values. This research provides a reference for the selection and optimization of finite element head modeling methods. Tiebreak contact is a better choice if the interface tearing effect needs to be modelled under linear impact conditions; Tied contact and shared nodes methods provide better computational stability and are more considered at the early stage of modelling; the ALE method is more common in studies for specific injuries and should be used in conjunction with the previously mentioned methods.
Gan, Qiuyujiang, YejieJunpeng, XuZhou, RunzhouZhang, LiyingJiang, Binhui
The National Highway Safety Administration (NHTSA) recently published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) to evaluate seat performance in rear impacts [1]. The ANPRM was issued partially in response to two petitions requesting an increase in seatback strength requirements and high-speed testing with various size Anthropometric Test Devices (ATDs). To better understand the effect of these requests, this study evaluates ATD responses with two high-speed rear sled conditions, three occupant sizes and various seat designs. Seat designs varied from modern conventional seats with yielding properties to stronger and stiffer seats represented by seat integrated restraint (SIR) designs, and rigidized SIR seats. Twenty-four rear sled tests were analyzed. The tests were matched by crash severity, seat designs (strength), ATD sizes and initial postures (nominal/in-position, leaned forward and leaned outboard). The test data and videos were reviewed to identify time coinciding with maximum seatback rotation. Sixteen tests were conducted with the lap-shoulder belted 50th male Hybrid III ATD at 40 km/h, 10 with nominal position and 6 with the ATD leaned forward. In the nominal position, the biomechanical responses were below Injury Assessment Reference Values (IARV); the lower neck Nij was however higher with SIR than non-SIR seats. The gap between the head/upper torso and seat/head restraint increased when the ATD was leaned forward. Compared to nominal position, the responses were higher due to the increase in differential velocity between the ATD and the seat/head restraint. The head, lower neck and chest responses were higher in the SIR than in the non-SIR seats. However, the responses were below IARV except for the lower neck extension in the SIR seat, highlighting the need to support the occupant early in the crash event and the need for yielding properties. Six tests were conducted at 56 km/h with the 5th female Hybrid III, 4 in nominal position and 2 leaned outboard. The biomechanical responses were higher with SIR than non-SIR seats in the nominal position. When the ATD was leaned outboard, the head engaged the SIR rigid structures, resulting in high head responses. Two tests were also conducted with the 95th male Hybrid III at 56 km/h in two SIR seats. The seatback deflected more than 60 degrees, and the normalized biomechanical responses were below IARV. The results from this study indicated that the ATDs’ kinematics were well controlled when the head, neck and torso were centered on the head restraint and when they were supported early in the 40 and 56 km/h rear sled tests. Seatback rotation increased with occupant size. It was higher in non-SIR seats than in SIR seats. The results also showed similar responses with the 5th ATD in a conventional seat and for the 95th in a stronger and stiffer SIR at 56 km/h. In conclusion, seat and occupant responses were favorable with the lap-shoulder belted 50th Hybrid III placed in position in a 40 km/h delta V test, regardless of seat design. The responses were also favorable with the 95th male Hybrid III placed in position at 56 km/h in a stronger seat. However, the responses were unfavorable with the stronger seat with the 5th female Hybrid III at 56 km/h, and/or when the ATD was placed out-of-position. These results highlight concerns with respect to smaller occupants when recommending stronger and stiffer seats, higher test speeds and heavier ATDs.
Parenteau, ChantalBurnett, Roger
With the increasing adoption of Zero-Gravity Seats in intelligent cockpits, there is a growing concern over the safety of occupants in reclined postures during collisions. The newly released anthropomorphic test device (ATD), THOR-AV, has modified the neck, spine, and pelvis structures to better match reclined postures. This study aims to investigate the changes in kinematic response and injury metrics for occupants in reclined postures, through high-speed frontal sled tests utilizing the THOR-AV. The tests were conducted using an adjustable rigid seat with a zero-gravity characteristic and an integrated three-point seat belt. Six tests were performed across four seat configurations: Standard, Semi-Reclined, Reclined, and Zero-gravity postures. The input acceleration pulse for these tests was derived from the equivalent double trapezoidal waveform of the Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier (MPDB) test. Data from sensors and high-speed video were collected for analysis. The results indicated that with an increasing seat back angle, the degree of head flexion relative to the torso and neck load increased, with abnormal contact between the shoulder belt and neck. After posture reclining, the forward displacement of the ATD's torso increased, with a concomitant increase in lower chest compression, a decrease in thoracic forces, and a significant rise in lumbar axial forces. The zero-gravity posture exhibited submarining, as inferred from the iliac force reduction rate and video analysis. These findings provide critical insights for optimizing occupant restraint systems in reclined postures. Furthermore, the simplified rigid seat sled test environment demonstrated in this study is conducive to modeling and validation, suggesting the potential for further simulation-based investigations.
Wang, QiangLiu, YuFei, JingYang, XiaotingWang, PeifengBai, Zhonghao
In the pre-crash emergency braking scenario, the occupant inside the vehicle will move forward due to inertia, deviating from the standard upright seating position for which conventional restraint systems are designed. Previous studies have mainly focused on the influence of out-of-position (OOP) displacement on occupant injuries in frontal collisions, and provided solutions such as active pretensioning seatbelts (APS). But little attention has been paid to the influence of OOP on whiplash injury during a subsequent rear-end collision. To investigate the forward OOP impact on whiplash injuries and the effectiveness of APS in this accident scenario, a vehicle interior model with an active human body model (AHBM) was setup in the MADYMO simulation platform. Different braking strengths (0.8g and 1.1g), APS triggering times (from 0.2s before to 0.2s after the braking initiation) and pretensioning forces (from 100N to 600N) were input to the simulation matrix. The occupant’s forward OOP displacement prior to the rear-end collision and the corresponding whiplash injury metrics including neck shear force, tension force, and neck injury criteria (NIC) in the subsequent moderate rear-end collision were recorded. The simulation results indicated that: (1) The occupant’s whiplash injury metrics were positively linearly correlated with the pre-crash forward OOP displacement. (2) The APS could not fully eliminate the forward displacement brought by neck flexion, causing whiplash injury metrics to exceed the capping limits (upper bounds) defined in current vehicle safety assessment protocols like Euro-NCAP.
Fei, JingQiu, HangWang, PeifengLiu, YuCheng, James ChihZhou, QingTan, Puyuan
There are numerous commercially available neck and back support/cushion/pillow devices which are commonly attached to seats by vehicle owners. To our knowledge, there has been no published research on the biomechanical effects of these devices in low-speed rear impacts. To address this, a series of 54 simulated low-speed rear impact tests were conducted using a validated remote-controlled crash sled system. All tests utilized an instrumented BioRID II rear impact anthropomorphic test device (ATD) restrained using a 3-point seatbelt system in a 2018 Toyota Camry LE driver’s seat. Two delta-V ranges were used: a lower range from 7.2 to 8.0 kph (4.5 to 5.0 mph) and a higher range from 10.5 to 11.3 kph (6.5 to 7.0 mph). Six neck only devices, one combination neck and back device, and three back only devices were assessed. Two tests per delta-V range for each device and each device adjustment position were conducted and compared against five reference tests without any devices at each delta-V range. Statistical analyses and comparison of the biomechanical responses between each neck only and back only devices and the reference tests at each delta-V range were conducted. Additionally, Nkm, LNL, WIC, and NIC were calculated for each test. While not all devices and/or delta-V ranges showed consistent effects, the results indicated trends for certain peak biomechanical measures. Specifically, these support devices demonstrated a tendency to increase the tension forces in the upper neck, lower neck, and lumbar spine. Additionally, the back support devices tended to increase the head-to-head restraint contact forces as well as upper neck flexion (positive) moments. This study presents a parametric investigation into the biomechanical effects of various neck and back support/cushion/pillow devices during lower-speed rear impact exposures. The focus is on assessing changes in biomechanical measures associated with the use of these devices, and the injury criteria calculated should only be compared with the reference tests.
Phan, AndrewGross, JamieUmale, SagarCrowley, ShannonGlasser, GabrielFurbish, Christopher
Neck injury is one of the most common injuries in traffic accidents, and its severity is closely related to the posture of the occupant at the time of impact. In the current era of smart vehicle, the triggered AEB and the occupant's active muscle force will cause the head and neck to be out of position which has significant affections on the occurrence and severity of neck injury responses. Therefore, it is very important to study the influences of active muscle force on neck injury responses in in frontal impact with Automatic Emergency Braking conditions. Based on the geometric characteristics of human neck muscles in the Zygote Body database, the reasonable neck muscle physical parameters were obtained firstly. Then a neck finite element model (FEM) with active muscles was developed and verified its biofidelity under various impact conditions, such as frontal, side and rear-end impacts. Finally, using the neck FEM with or without active muscle force, a comparative study was conducted on the kinematics and injury responses of the neck in the frontal impact with AEB condition. The research findings indicate that the activation of cervical active muscle forces effectively reduces the displacement of the head's center of gravity prior to the collision and significantly decreases the relative angular displacements between cervical vertebrae during the collision. These dynamic response changes mitigate the injury severity of cervical vertebrae, ligaments, and intervertebral discs, thereby enhancing the biomechanical tolerance of the cervical structure to mechanical loads.
Junpeng, XuGan, QiuyuJiang, BinhuiZhu, Feng
A team led by University of Maryland computer scientists invented a camera mechanism that improves how robots see and react to the world around them. Inspired by how the human eye works, their innovative camera system mimics the tiny involuntary movements used by the eye to maintain clear and stable vision over time. The team’s prototyping and testing of the camera — called the Artificial Microsaccade-Enhanced Event Camera (AMI-EV) — was detailed in a paper published in the journal Science Robotics in May 2024.
The introduction of unrestrained torso neck braces as a safety intervention for helmeted motorcycle riders has introduced a set of unsolved challenges. Understanding the injury prevention afforded by these devices depends on a reliable test methodology by which to critically evaluate their efficacy against the most common mechanisms of neck injury. An inverted pendulum test is proposed to evaluate compression flexion (CF), tension flexion (TF), and tension extension (TE) of the neck using a Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device (HIII ATD) neck and a motorcycle-specific ATD (MATD) neck. In addition to investigating methods to quantify the beneficial effects of a neck brace, potential adverse effects of such a device are evaluated by measuring and evaluating relevant neck response measures. To that end, measured data using a current neck brace were analyzed and applied to various injury criteria related to the ATD neck used to compare the injury risk predicted by each parameter. The HIII ATD neck allows for a more conservative evaluation due to its exaggerated response in compression and may be more suitable in evaluating the neck injury criterion and injury risk in CF loading for low energy impacts. The MATD neck is limited to certain impact modalities, particularly the uncoupled behavior between head and neck during hyperextension, and individual neck measures at lower impact energy due to its limited structural integrity in direct head impacts. In the proposed tests, injury mechanisms were initially associated with a pre-impact head orientation and expected head and neck motion. However, these associations are not definitive. Although the most relevant neck injury mechanisms related to the unrestrained torso were addressed, the authors suggest that the presented tests are supplemented by a method to evaluate higher energy vertex impacts as a means to determine a neck brace’s efficacy during this loading modality.
de Jongh, Cornelis U.Basson, Anton H.Knox, Erick H.Leatt, Christopher J.
With the capability of predicting detailed injury of occupants, the Human Body Model (HBM) was used to identify potential injuries for occupants in car impact events. However, there are few publications on using HBM in the aviation industry. This study aims to investigate and compare the head, neck, lumbar spine and thoracic responses of the Hybrid III and the THUMS (Total Human Model for Safety) model in the horizontal 26g and vertical 19g sled tests required by the General Aviation Aircraft Airworthiness Regulations. The HIC of THUMS and Hybrid III did not exceed the requirements of airworthiness regulations. Still, THUMS had higher intracranial pressures and intracranial stresses, which could result in brain injury to the occupants. In vertical impact, the highest stress of the neck of THUMS appears at the cervical spine C2 and the upper neck is easily injured; in horizontal impact, the cervical spine C7 has the highest load, and the lower neck is easily injured. Due to the low biofidelity of the Hybrid III ATD neck structure, the injuries that appeared at different neck locations cannot be identified by the Hybrid III ATD. Because of the submarining phenomenon, the lumbar spine load and bending moment of the THUMS are much smaller than that of the ATD model, which shows a lower risk of injuries. In both impact scenarios, the THUMS chest deformation was higher. In the vertical 19g impact, the THUMS developed much higher shoulder belt loads than the ATD. The results indicate the Hybrid III ATD underestimates the risk of injury to passengers' heads and chests, while overestimating the risk to the lumbar spine compared to THUMS. Furthermore, due to limitations in the locations of sensors, the Hybrid III ATD is unable to identify the severe injury at lower neck and upper lumbar.
Shi, XiaopengDing, XiangheGuo, KaiLiu, TianfuXie, Jiang
Rear-end vehicle collisions may lead to whiplash-associated disorders (WADs), comprising a variety of neck and head pain responses. Specifically, increased axial head rotation has been associated with the risk of injuries during rear impacts, while specific tissues, including the capsular ligaments, have been implicated in pain response. Given the limited experimental data for out-of-position rear impact scenarios, computational human body models (HBMs) can inform the potential for tissue-level injury. Previous studies have considered external boundary conditions to reposition the head axially but were limited in reproducing a biofidelic movement. The objectives of this study were to implement a novel head repositioning method to achieve targeted axial rotations and evaluate the tissue-level response for a rear impact condition. The repositioning method used reference geometries to rotate the head to three target positions, showing good correspondence to reported interverbal rotations. Under a 7 g rear impact scenario, the head-turned models were compared with the neutral position and demonstrated increases in the maximum capsular ligament distractions. Increased head rotation was associated with increased ligament distractions. The locations with critical ligament distractions shifted to the lower cervical spine (below C3) and lateral portion of the capsular ligaments for the head-turned position cases. The proposed repositioning method introduced in this study enabled the model to achieve steady head rotations with realistic cervical spine movements, increasing the biofidelity of out-of-position rear impact simulations.
Reis, Matheus SeifCronin, Duane
Forward-facing child restraint systems (FF CRS) and high-back boosters often contact the vehicle seat head restraint (HR) when installed, creating a gap between the back surface of the CRS and the vehicle seat. The effects of HR interference on dynamic CRS performance are not well documented. The objective of this study is to quantify the effects of HR interference for FF CRS and high-back boosters in frontal and far-side impacts. Production vehicle seats with prominent, removeable HRs were attached to a sled buck. One FF CRS and two booster models were tested with the HR in place (causing interference) and with the HR removed (no interference). A variety of installation methods were examined for the FF CRS. A total of twenty-four tests were run. In frontal impacts, HR interference produced small but consistent increases in frontal head excursion and HIC36. Head excursions were more directly related to the more forward initial position rather than kinematic differences caused by HR interference. In far-side impacts, HR interference did not have consistent effects on injury metrics. Overall, these results suggest only slight benefits of removing the HR in frontal impacts specifically. Caregivers should use caution if removing a vehicle HR to ensure that the current child occupant and all future vehicle occupants have adequate head support available in case of a rear impact.
Mansfield, Julie A.
A team led by University of Maryland computer scientists invented a camera mechanism that improves how robots see and react to the world around them. Inspired by how the human eye works, their innovative camera system mimics the tiny involuntary movements used by the eye to maintain clear and stable vision over time. The team’s prototyping and testing of the camera — called the Artificial Microsaccade-Enhanced Event Camera (AMI-EV) — was detailed in a paper published in the journal Science Robotics in May 2024.
Most humans rely heavily on our visual abilities to function in the world—we are optically oriented. In the broadest sense, “optics” refers to the study of sight and light. At its foundation, Radiant’s business is all about optics: measuring light and the properties of light in relation to the human eye. Photometry is the science of light according to our visual perception. Colorimetry is the science of color: how our eyes interpret different wavelengths of light.
The advent of neck braces for the helmeted motorcycle rider has introduced a pertinent research question: To what extent do they reduce measures related to the major mechanism of neck injury in unrestrained torso accidents, i.e., compression flexion (CF)? This question requires a suitable method of testing and evaluating the measures for a load case resulting in the required mechanism. This study proposes a weighted swinging anvil striking the helmeted head of a supine HIII ATD by means of a near vertex impact with a low degree of anterior head impact eccentricity to induce CF of the neck. The applied impact was chosen for the baseline (no neck brace) so that the upper and lower neck axial forces approached injury assessment reference values (IARV). The head impact point evaluated represents those typically associated with high-energy burst fractures occurring within the first 20 ms, with possible secondary disruption of posterior ligaments. The proposed test can be used to evaluate the initial and secondary period of neck loading resultant from a near vertex impact and the effect of a neck brace thereon. The presented case study shows that unless almost touching the helmet, neck braces are likely to have a negligible effect on the axial load response of the neck within the first 20 ms after impact and are, therefore, unlikely to affect injury risk related to initial compressive loading of the neck. Conversely, a neck brace can affect neck response in bending during a near vertex CF loading event. Hence, assessing these devices is important to determine their potential in stabilizing the spine. The proposed test shows that the neck loading mechanism does not necessarily correspond with the observed head motion, especially in the early stages of neck response. These head/neck kinetics are important to consider when designing an evaluation load case.
de Jongh, Cornelis U.Basson, Anton H.Knox, Erick H.Leatt, Christopher J.
Researchers have found a way to bind engineered skin tissue to the complex forms of humanoid robots. This brings with it potential benefits to robotic platforms such as increased mobility, self-healing abilities, embedded sensing capabilities and an increasingly lifelike appearance. Taking inspiration from human skin ligaments, the team, led by Professor Shoji Takeuchi of the University of Tokyo, included special perforations in a robot face, which helped a layer of skin take hold. Their research could be useful in the cosmetics industry and to help train plastic surgeons.
Ergonomics plays an important role in automobile design to achieve optimal compatibility between occupants and vehicle components. The overall goal is to ensure that the vehicle design accommodates the target customer group, who come in varied sizes, preferences and tastes. Headroom is one such metric that not only influences accommodation rate but also conveys a visual perception on how spacious the vehicle is. An adequate headroom is necessary for a good seating comfort and a relaxed driving experience. Headroom is intensely discussed in magazine tests and one of the key deciding factors in purchasing a car. SAE J1100 defines a set of measurements and standard procedures for motor vehicle dimensions. H61, W27, W35, H35 and W38 are some of the standard dimensions that relate to headroom and head clearances. While developing the vehicle architecture in the early design phase, it is customary to specify targets for various ergonomic attributes and arrive at the above-mentioned dimensions. In general, specifications that relate to headroom are only a consequence of static assessments carried out inside a laboratory and not on real-time driving condition. The static assessment can be as simple as positioning a digital manikin in CAD environment and then specifying how high or low the interior trim of the headliner be to achieve a certain head clearance. In actual driving scenario, the vehicle would experience rough terrain. In such cases, the road undulations can displace the occupant from their normal seated position in effect reducing the head clearance. Therefore, it is important to understand this dynamic variance of head clearance on actual driving condition. Undertaking a volunteer test to study this variance comes with risk of endangering the participant and has other measurement related complexities. Hence, we adopt a simulation-based approach for the same using Human Body Models (HBMs) of different anthropometry, which are proven having high bio-fidelity. The aim of this study is to validate this hypothesis and develop a head envelope for drivers considering dynamic road conditions, thus enabling vehicle manufactures digitally evaluate head clearance during early development phase. A typical driving scenario with various vehicle speeds on different stochastic roads and braking conditions are simulated using MBS vehicle models and the acceleration signatures from the simulations are used to estimate the vertical lift of driver over the seat. The resulting displaced posture is compared with the normal driving posture and various head clearances are analyzed. The outcome of this work will help in validating and (or) updating the static head envelope and use it for specifying the headroom target for driver in the early phase of the vehicle design.
Rajakumaran, SriramS, RahulVasireddy, Rakesh MitraNair, Suhas
The Large Omnidirectional Child (LODC) developed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has an improved biofidelity over the currently available Hybrid III 10-year-old (HIII-10C) Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD). The LODC design incorporates enhancements to many body region subassemblies, including a redesigned HIII-10C head with pediatric mass properties, and the neck, which produces head lag with Z-axis rotation at the atlanto-occipital joint, replicating the observations made from human specimens. The LODC also features a flexible thoracic spine, a multi-point thoracic deflection measurement system, skeletal anthropometry that simulates a child's sitting posture, and an abdomen that can measure belt loading directly. This study presents the development and validation of a dynamic nonlinear finite element model of the complete LODC dummy. Based on the three-dimensional CAD model, Hypermesh was used to generate a mesh of the finite element (FE) LODC model. LS-PrePost was used to specify the material parameters, contact definitions, and initial conditions and then converted to LS-DYNA solver input format. A detailed description of the assemblies of the LODC dummy and their finite element representation is given. Component-level qualification test procedures were simulated using the LODC FE model, replicating the experimental test setups and boundary conditions for the head, neck, thorax, abdomen, and spine. Each component test provides a physical response that is used to calibrate the model's strain-rate-dependent viscoelastic material properties and other characteristics using an inverse method that minimizes the divergence between measured and predicted data. CORrelation and Analysis (CORA) ratings are provided between the simulation and experimental curves. Finally, a system-level sled test was modeled with the dummy upright on a sled bench for validation.
Challa, Balaji Naga Sai AbhishiktYang, PeiyuCarlson, MichaelSuntay, BrianStammen, JasonNoll, Scott
The history of construction materials and methods has evolved over time, with Portland cement concrete being the most widely used material on Earth. Constructing habitats and infrastructure on the Moon and Mars, however, requires a different approach given the lack of such conventional construction resources and materials. Recognizing the need for in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) to support long-duration human missions to the Moon and Mars, NASA’s Kennedy Space Center and Sidus Space have developed a novel three-dimensional print head apparatus using regolith-polymer mixtures as a building material.
Seatback and head restraints are the primary restraining devices in rear-impact collisions. The seatback failures expose front seat occupants to dive deep into the rear compartment survival space. Furthermore, it allows the occupants to get in a position with lower spinal tolerance to the impact direction. This paper employs sled tests to demonstrate the dangers of seatback failures in severe rear impact by allowing the occupants to orient their spine in its lowest tolerance zone to the impact direction. Furthermore, the sled test shows the potential of head pocketing phenomena and torso augmentation producing compressive cervical spine loading enough to cause first-order neck buckling. Finally, the results of collapsing seatback dynamics are compared to the strong seatback performance by conducting a similar test with a strong ABTS seatback. The study demonstrates that the strong seatbacks in severe rear impacts produce favorable outcomes while keeping the occupant in their higher spinal tolerance zone to the impact direction.
Thorbole, Chandrashekhar
Patients with dizziness problems can now get better diagnosis in a simple and painless way. A new type of bone conduction speaker, easily attached behind the ear, can make the diagnosis more efficient and safer — especially for patients who also suffer from hearing problems. The technology has been developed by researchers at Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, and is now ready for manufacturing.
Objective: This study aimed to optimize restraint systems and improve safety equity by using parametric human body models (HBMs) and vehicle models accounting for variations in occupant size and shape as well as vehicle type. Methodology: A diverse set of finite element (FE) HBMs were developed by morphing the GHBMC midsize male simplified model into statistically predicted skeleton and body shape geometries with varied age, stature, and body mass index (BMI). A parametric vehicle model was equipped with driver, front passenger, knee, and curtain airbags along with seat belts with pretensioner(s) and load limiter and has been validated against US-NCAP results from four vehicles (Corolla, Accord, RAV4, F150). Ten student groups were formed for this study, and each group picked a vehicle model, occupant side (driver vs. passenger), and an occupant model among the 60 HBMs. About 200 frontal crash simulations were performed with 10 combinations of vehicles (n = 4) and occupants (m = 8). The airbag inflation, airbag vent size, seatbelt load limiter, and steering column collapse force were varied to reach better occupant protection. The joint injury probability (Pjoint) combining head, neck, chest, and lower extremity injury risks was used for the design optimization. Injury risk curves were scaled based on the skeleton size and shape of each HBM. Results and Conclusions: We observed that tall and heavier male occupants tend to strike through the airbag leading to higher head injury risk; older and female occupants tend to sustain higher chest injury risk, while obese occupants tend to have higher lower extremity injury risk. After design optimizations, the average Pjoint was reduced from 0.576 ± 0.218 to 0.343 ± 0.044. The airbag inflation and venting were found to be highly effective in head protection, while the belt load limit and steering column force were sensitive to chest injury risks. Conflicting parameter effects were found between head and chest injuries and among different occupants, highlighting the complexity of achieving safety equity across a diverse population. This study demonstrated the benefit of adaptive restraint systems for a diverse population.
Yang, ZhenhaoDesai, AmoghsiddBoyle, KyleRupp, JonathanReed, MatthewHu, Jingwen
Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of global death and disability. Clinically relevant large animal models are a vital tool for understanding the biomechanics of injury, providing validation data for computation models, and advancing clinical translation of laboratory findings. It is well-established that large angular accelerations of the head can cause TBI, but the effect of head impact on the extent and severity of brain pathology remains unclear. Clinically, most TBIs occur with direct head impact, as opposed to inertial injuries where the head is accelerated without direct impact. There are currently no active large animal models of impact TBI. Sheep may provide a valuable model for studying TBI biomechanics, with relatively large brains that are similar in structure to that of humans. The aim of this project is to develop an ovine model of impact TBI to study the relationships between impact mechanics and brain pathology. An elastic energy impact injury device has been developed to apply scalable head impacts to rapidly rotate the head without causing hard tissue damage. A motion constraint device has been developed to limit the head motion to a single plane of rotation. The apparatus has been tested using deceased animals to assess the controllability of impact velocities, the repeatability of head kinematics, and the dynamic response of the head to impact. Impact velocities are effectively controlled by modulating the elastic energy stored in the impact piston. The resulting head kinematics are somewhat variable, and are influenced by impact location, time-dependent postmortem tissue changes, and specimen head and neck physiology. Model development will continue, and in vivo testing will be conducted to assess the brain pathology following impacts of varying severity.
Magarey, Charlie CQuarrington, Ryan DJones, Claire F
Computational and experimental studies have been undertaken to investigate injurious head-first impacts (HFI), which can occur during automotive rollovers. Recent studies assume a torso surrogate mass (TSM) boundary condition, wherein the first or first two thoracic vertebrae are potted and constrained to only move in the vertical loading direction. The TSM boundary condition has not been compared with a full body (FB) model computationally or experimentally for HFI. In this study, the Global Human Body Models Consortium 50th percentile male detailed human body model (M50-O, Version 6.0) was applied to compare the kinematic, kinetic, and injury response of an HFI with a TSM boundary condition (M50-TSM), and a full body boundary condition (M50-FB). Impacts (to M50-TSM and M50-FB) were simulated between the head and a rigid plate using a commercial FE code (LS-DYNA). The impact velocity of 3.1 m/s corresponded to the onset of spinal injury in diving reconstructions, and the impact velocity reported in experiments. The TSM boundary condition was simulated by applying a mass of 16 kg to the first thoracic vertebra (T1), and constraining motion to only the vertical direction. A quantitative comparison of the head and spine impact forces, spine kinematics, and prediction of hard tissue fracture was reported. The M50-TSM model demonstrated a 53.4% lower (straighter) spinal curvature 10 ms after impact, compared to the M50-FB. The lower curvature of the M50-TSM resulted in higher neck loads during that timeframe (2.26 kN M50-TSM, 1.44 kN M50-FB). The resulting hard tissue fracture in M50-TSM was attributed to direct compression at an early time (<5 ms) in the impact, while M50-FB demonstrated compression-extension fractures later (>16 ms) in the simulation. It was concluded that kinematics, kinetics, and injury response differed for the TSM and FB boundary conditions, and therefore these conditions are critical to consider when investigating HFI.
Morgan, M.I.Corrales, M.Cripton, P.Cronin, D.S.
The objective of this study was to compare head, neck, and chest injury risks between front and rear-seated Hybrid III 50th-percentile male anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) during matched frontal impacts. Seven vehicles were converted to rear seat test bucks (two sedans, three mid-size SUVs, one subcompact SUV, and one minivan) and then used to perform sled testing with vehicle-specific frontal NCAP acceleration pulses and a rear seated (i.e., second row) Hybrid III 50th male ATD. Matched front seat Hybrid III 50th male ATD data were obtained from the NHTSA Vehicle Crash Test Database for each vehicle. HIC15, Nij, maximum chest acceleration, and maximum chest deflection were compared between the front and rear seat tests, as well as between vehicles with conventional and advanced three-point belt restraint systems in the rear seat. Additionally, a modified version of the NCAP frontal star rating was calculated for the front and rear seat tests. All injury metrics, except for chest acceleration, were higher in the rear seat compared to the front. In addition, injury thresholds were exceeded or nearly exceeded in the rear seat for Nij in three vehicles, chest acceleration in one vehicle, and chest deflection in three vehicles, while no thresholds were exceeded in the front seat. When comparing advanced and conventional restraints in the rear seat, all injury metrics were higher in the vehicles with conventional restraints. All vehicles with conventional restraints in the rear had a star rating of 1, while those with advanced restraints in the rear ranged from 2 to 3. Conversely, all vehicles had 5 stars for the front seat, except one that had 4 stars. Overall, these data highlight the disparity between front and rear seat occupant protection and the benefits of advanced rear seat safety restraints, and the need for future testing.
Bianco, Samuel T.Albert, Devon L.Guettler, Allison J.Hardy, Warren N.Kemper, Andrew R.
Oblique motor vehicle crashes can cause serious head or brain injuries due to contact with interior vehicle structures even with the deployment of air bags, as they are not yet completely successful in preventing traumatic brain injury. Rotational head velocity is strongly correlated to the risk of brain injury, and this head motion is potentially related to the tangential friction force developed during contact between the head and air bags. Although crash test dummy head skins are designed with appropriate mass properties and anthropometry to simulate the normal direction impact response of the human head, it is not known whether they accurately represent the frictional properties of human skin during air bag interaction. This study experimentally characterized the dynamic friction coefficient between human/dummy skins and air bag fabrics using a pin-on-disc tribometer. Human skin samples were harvested from five locations (left and right forehead, left and right cheek, and chin) from male and female postmortem human subjects (PMHSs); some samples had previously been frozen and some were fresh. Crash dummy head skin samples were obtained from Hybrid III, ES-2re, and THOR-50M 50th-percentile male anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) and were characterized in both chalked and unchalked conditions. Fabric samples were obtained from five different air bags spanning various vehicle manufacturers and interior mounting locations. Neither sex, linear speed, nor the harvested skin location on the head played a significant role on the dynamic friction between PMHS skin samples and air bag fabrics, while PMHS skin samples that had not been previously frozen had a higher coefficient of friction than those that had. Further, increasing normal load reduced the dynamic friction coefficient between PMHS skin samples and air bag fabrics. Unchalked ATD head skins exhibited significantly higher dynamic friction coefficients than PMHS skins for the air bag fabrics tested. The presence of a thin chalk layer on ATD skins reduced friction and produced dynamic friction coefficients with air bag fabrics that were not significantly different from those of PMHS skins; however, neither unchalked nor chalked ATD head skins differentiated the air bag fabric dynamic friction coefficients in the same pattern as the PMHS skin samples.
Noll, ScottDong, ShengKang, Yun-SeokBolte, JohnStammen, JasonMoorhouse, Kevin
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 1079