Browse Topic: Vehicle to vehicle (V2V)
Electrical/Electronic Architectures (EEAs) are continuously evolving to meet newly emerging demands. In recent years, major drivers of this evolution have been the increasing software-defined nature of vehicles and the push toward automated driving. Key technologies such as edge-enhanced functions, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, and service-oriented architectures are therefore the focus of current research efforts. This paper presents a vision of how these technologies can be used to enable cooperation between vehicles, illustrated by using parked vehicles as edge nodes. These are typically seen as obstructions, as they significantly increase the risk of missing or misinterpreting vulnerable road users such as pedestrians or cyclists. Our proposed approach to counteract this problem is the use of the parked vehicles themselves as edge nodes that support object detection or even trajectory planning. Current research primarily considers smart traffic infrastructure, roadside units, and other vehicles as potential edge nodes. Including parked vehicles as edge nodes means that, instead of acting solely as obstacles, we leverage their built-in sensors to contribute to cooperative awareness. While such cooperation will enhance the safety of automated vehicles in urban areas, several challenges arise. In this paper, we discuss how data traceability, decision-making in the presence of conflicting information, and incentive mechanisms for owners of parked vehicles can be addressed. Based on these challenges, the paper outlines requirements for future cooperative architecture and highlights the role of edge-enhanced functions, Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication, and service-oriented architectures in enabling fully automated driving.
This document provides vehicle-level data collection, data analysis, and data verification procedures that may be used to verify that an instrument under test (IUT) satisfies the vehicle-level requirements specified in SAE J3161/1. For the purposes of this report, “vehicle-level requirements” primarily consist of those requirements which can be verified external to the vehicle. The IUT for these procedures is a configured LTE-V2X vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) device as defined in SAE J3161/1 and is installed on a vehicle of class 2, 3, 4, or 5. While the IUT is conceptually separated from the vehicle it is installed on, the tests outlined in this document are primarily vehicle level, so the terms “vehicle” and “IUT” can generally be considered interchangeable. Additionally, non-vehicle-level complementary tests, not included in this document, are required to verify that the entire set of requirements specified in SAE J3161/1 is satisfied. This document also includes a Traceability Matrix to provide traceability between SAE J3161/1 sections and the test procedures. This can be used to ensure thoroughness of testing coverage. The traceability matrix in Section 7 correlates test procedures from this document with the sections in SAE J3161/1 being tested. The SAE J3161/1 sections that are addressed in this document are indicated in Table 1. SAE J3161/1 major section numbers that are indicated as N/A do not contain any requirements (subsections may include requirements). Sections that are not in scope, such as standards profiles, are expected to be tested and verified as part of device-level certification, done prior to the vehicle-level testing described in this document.
This paper presents a comprehensive testing framework and safety evaluation for Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) charging systems, incorporating advanced theoretical modeling and experimental validation of a modern, integrated 3-in-1 combo unit (PDU, DCDC, OBC). The proliferation of electric vehicles has necessitated the development of resilient and flexible charging solutions, with V2V technology emerging as a critical decentralized infrastructure component. This study establishes a rigorous mathematical framework for power flow analysis, develops novel safety protocols based on IEC 61508 and ISO 26262 functional safety standards, and presents comprehensive experimental validation across 47 test scenarios. The framework encompasses five primary test categories: functional performance validation, power conversion efficiency optimization, electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) assessment, thermal management evaluation, and comprehensive fault-injection testing including Byzantine fault scenarios. Through systematic experimental validation using advanced power electronics simulation and hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) testing, we demonstrate 98.2% power conversion efficiency, sub-50ms fault detection response times, and compliance with automotive safety integrity level ASIL-D requirements. Our results establish the theoretical foundations and practical validation methodologies essential for next-generation V2V charging infrastructure deployment.
This article introduces a comprehensive cooperative navigation algorithm to improve vehicular system safety and efficiency. The algorithm employs surrogate optimization to prevent collisions with cooperative cruise control and lane-keeping functionalities. These strategies address real-world traffic challenges. The dynamic model supports precise prediction and optimization within the MPC framework, enabling effective real-time decision-making for collision avoidance. The critical component of the algorithm incorporates multiple parameters such as relative vehicle positions, velocities, and safety margins to ensure optimal and safe navigation. In the cybersecurity evaluation, the four scenarios explore the system’s response to different types of cyberattacks, including data manipulation, signal interference, and spoofing. These scenarios test the algorithm’s ability to detect and mitigate the effects of malicious disruptions. Evaluate how well the system can maintain stability and avoid collisions under compromised conditions. It also analyzes the impact of varying levels of attack severity on overall system performance. The cooperative navigation framework highlights its potential as a robust solution for secure, efficient, and safe autonomous vehicle operations in increasingly interconnected and potentially hostile environments. Case 1 simulates communication jamming, where all channels except vehicle-to-vehicle communication are compromised. Case 2 extends this to jamming in the smart traffic light system, creating a non-signalized environment. Case 3 represents an ideal scenario with seamless communication. Case 4 explores vulnerability to deliberate interference in actor vehicle velocities, amplifying collision risk. Surrogate optimization with radial functions ensures proactive collision avoidance, while model predictive control with the interior point solver optimizes trajectory planning, promoting collision-free operation, and improving traffic flow. The algorithm’s outputs are seamlessly integrated into the vehicle control system, with the ego vehicle’s dynamics modeled realistically. Through extensive simulations, the algorithm proves effective across diverse scenarios, including communication disruptions and intentional interference. The research contributes to cooperative navigation system advancement, showcasing potential improvements in safety, efficiency, and adaptability in contemporary vehicular environments. The algorithm’s ability to handle various scenarios presents promising prospects for future intelligent transportation systems research.
Letter from the Guest Editors
The proliferation of the electric vehicle (EVs) in the US market led to an increase in the average vehicle weight due to the assembly of the larger high-voltage (HV) batteries. To comply with this weight increase and to meet stringent US regulations and Consumer Ratings requirements, Vehicle front-end rigidity (stiffness) has increased substantially. This increased stiffness in the larger vehicles (Large EV pickups/SUVs) may have a significant impact during collision with smaller vehicles. To address this issue, it is necessary to consider adopting a vehicle compatibility test like Euro NCAP MPDB (European New Car Assessment Program Moving Progressive Deformable Barrier) for the North American market as well. This study examines the influence of mass across vehicle classes and compares the structural variations for each impact class. The Euro NCAP MPDB (European New Car Assessment Program Moving Progressive Deformable Barrier) protocol referenced for this analysis. Our evaluation approach comprises of two sections: (i) The impact of the barrier mass on to the vehicle structure (V2B) and (ii) vehicle-to-vehicle impact (V2V) analysis. To predict the correct segment weight representing the barrier weight for the North American market, we analyzed the 2022 year to sales data for North American market to assess the average vehicle weight. Data was then compared with CAE predictions barrier mass (~1500kg- 1600kg). Based on the sales data, the average vehicle mass found to be ~1500 kg, aligning with the CAE simulations predictions. This study aims to determine the US sales volume and conduct CAE simulations to predict the precise weight of the barrier that replicates the lightest vehicle currently available in the North American market, as per this study, a barrier weight of (~1500 -1600) kg can be considered for the future vehicle compatibility for NA market. This predicted vehicle weight aligns with the typical vehicle sale data for North American market. Background In 2022, Electric Vehicles (EVs) constituted 14% of all car sales globally, with every major market experiencing year-over-year sales increase. In United States, this meant that over one in five cars sold were electric. To improve the range of EVs, Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) are significantly increasing the weight of high-voltage battery assemblies, leading to an overall increase in the vehicle weight, this in turn, results in substantial increase in front-end-stiffness of the vehicle to meet other US vehicle regulations. The heightened front-end-stiffness is expected to significantly impact vehicle compatibility. To understand various parameters such as Occupant Loading Criterion (OLC) and Standard Deviation (deformation of barrier profile), we referenced Euro NCAP MPDB (European New Car Assessment Program Moving Progressive Deformable Barrier) test protocol. This helped determine the weight of the barrier that represents the small vehicle segment in the North American market. Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) impact CAE simulations were also conducted, selecting smaller vehicle as target vehicles (to represent the barrier mass), and impacting them with different vehicle classes such as Pick-up trucks, Large SUVs, and Compact SUVs. The impact vehicle mass varied from 1800kg to 3200kg.The primary aim of this study is to estimate the barrier weight that replicates the lightest vehicle currently available in the North American market.
The integration of Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication technologies holds immense potential to revolutionize the automotive industry by enabling vehicles to communicate with each other (V2V) and with infrastructure (V2I). This paper investigates the feasibility of V2X and V2I communication, exploring available communication methods for vehicles to communicate. Many a times people like to travel together and it involves more than one vehicle travelling together, in such cases they often get lost the information about fellow vehicles due to the traffic condition and different driving behaviors of the individual driver. In such cases they communicate over phones to get to know the location of fellow vehicle or keep sharing their live locations. In such cases they don’t just follow the destination in maps also they should be continuously monitoring their fellow vehicles position. It is important for vehicles travelling in group to have communication and be connected so that they know fellow vehicles position and check on where to stop next for food/other purpose. Also immediately let other vehicle know if they are going in a wrong direction. This paper explores solutions that can be applied to the existing 2-wheeler/4-wheeler for simpler ways to stay connected during group travel.
This SAE Standard specifies the system requirements for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) safety system for Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) vehicle classes 1 (motorcycles) and 6 through 13 (non-light-duty vehicles), including functional requirements and performance requirements. The system can transmit and receive the SAE J2735-defined Basic Safety Message (BSM) over a wireless communications interface; the communications interface itself is outside the scope of this document. This document provides the specifications necessary to build interoperable systems that support V2V safety applications for non-light-duty vehicles, as well as motorcycles which rely on the exchange of BSMs. The document covers vehicle classes not addressed in SAE J2945/1 and SAE J3161/1.
This document specifies the on-board system requirements for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) safety system for school buses, including functional requirements and performance requirements. The system can send the SAE J2735-defined basic safety message (BSM) over a wireless communications interface; the communications interface itself is outside the scope of this document. This document provides the specifications necessary to build interoperable systems that support V2V applications that rely on receiving BSMs from school buses.
This article offers an algorithmic solution for moving a homogeneous platoon of position-controlled vehicles on a curved path with varying speeds and in the presence of communication losses and delays. This article considers a trajectory-based platooning with the leader–following communication topology, where the lead vehicle communicates its reference position and orientation to each autonomous follower vehicle. A follower vehicle stores this communicated information for a specific period as a virtual trail of the lead vehicle starting from the lead vehicle’s initial position and orientation. An algorithm uses this trail to find the follower vehicle’s reference position and orientation on that trail, such that the follower vehicle maintains a constant distance from the lead vehicle. The proposed algorithm helps form a platoon where each vehicle can traverse a curve with varying speeds. In contrast, in the existing literature, most of the solutions for vehicle platooning on a curved path demonstrate constant speed motion. This article considers delayed information as lost. Therefore, the communication losses and delays are considered as packet drops. The algorithm uses estimates of the lost information of the lead vehicle’s trail to generate the reference path for the follower vehicles. Analysis of the algorithm shows a relationship between the platoon’s performance and the extent of packet drops. Simulation results agree with the relationship.
Data privacy questions are particularly timely in the automotive industry as—now more than ever before—vehicles are collecting and sharing data at great speeds and quantities. Though connectivity and vehicle-to-vehicle technologies are perhaps the most obvious, smart city infrastructure, maintenance, and infotainment systems are also relevant in the data privacy law discourse. Facial Recognition Software and Privacy Law in Transportation Technology considers the current legal landscape of privacy law and the unanswered questions that have surfaced in recent years. A survey of the limited recent federal case law and statutory law, as well as examples of comprehensive state data privacy laws, is included. Perhaps most importantly, this report simplifies the balancing act that manufacturers and consumers are performing by complying with data privacy laws, sharing enough data to maximize safety and convenience, and protecting personal information. Click here to access the full SAE EDGETM Research Report portfolio.
Connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) and their productization are a major focus of the automotive and mobility industries as a whole. However, despite significant investments in this technology, CAVs are still at risk of collisions, particularly in unforeseen circumstances or “edge cases.” It is also critical to ensure that redundant environmental data are available to provide additional information for the autonomous driving software stack in case of emergencies. Additionally, vehicle-to-everything (V2X) technologies can be included in discussions on safer autonomous driving design. Recently, there has been a slight increase in interest in the use of responder-to-vehicle (R2V) technology for emergency vehicles, such as ambulances, fire trucks, and police cars. R2V technology allows for the exchange of information between different types of responder vehicles, including CAVs. It can be used in collision avoidance or emergency situations involving CAV responder vehicles. The benefits of R2V are not limited to fully autonomous vehicles (e.g., SAE Level 4), but can also be used in Level 2 CAV scenarios. However, despite the potential benefits of R2V, discussions on this topic are still limited. This chapter aims to provide an overview of R2V technology and its applications for CAV systems, particularly in the context of collision-avoidance features. The responder vehicles in question can be autonomous or non-autonomous. It is hoped that it will provide valuable information and knowledge on vehicle connectivity and automation in the current automotive and mobility ecosystem, enabling the development of safer and more reliable autonomous driving technology. The chapter is intended for both industrial and academic experts and is expected to stimulate further discussions on the development and standardization of R2V technology.
Letter from the Focus Issue Editors
This SAE Standard specifies the system requirements for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) safety system for FHWA vehicle classes 1 (motorcycles and 4 through 13 (non-light-duty), including functional requirements and performance requirements. The system can transmit and receive the SAE J2735-defined Basic Safety Message (BSM) over a wireless communications interface; the communications interface itself is outside the scope of this document. This document provides the specifications necessary to build interoperable systems that support V2V safety applications for non-lightweight vehicles, as well as motorcycles which rely on the exchange of BSMs. The document covers vehicle classes not addressed in SAE J2945/1 and SAE J3161/1.
Letter from the Special Issue Editor
Items per page:
50
1 – 50 of 655