Browse Topic: Lane keeping assistance

Items (55)
NHTSA is conducting research to evaluate the current state-of-the-art technology for lane departure warning (LDW) and lane-keeping assistance (LKA) technology. NHTSA is undertaking research to understand the nature of real-world lane departures and recovery behaviors. While some information about lane departures can be learned from crash datasets, the purpose of this work was to mine simulator datasets for lane departures, analyze them in greater detail than is possible from crash reports or naturalistic studies, and link their characteristics to driver drowsiness. The objective of the study was to determine whether there are differences in lane departure characteristics as a function of driver drowsiness. This research used a novel approach by combining data from six different driving simulator studies on driver drowsiness. The dataset included a sample of 380 drivers. Study drives occurred during overnight hours after periods of sleep deprivation, with participants being awake for at least 16 h prior to driving. Study drives ranged in duration from relatively short 45-min to nearly 4 h. The datasets were reduced to characterize 5805 individual lane departures. Lane departures were delineated into three phases (pre-departure, departure, and recovery) and two transition points (onset and reentry) to capture driver behaviors under drowsiness. We hypothesized that lane departures would look different under different levels of drowsiness. Drives took place across a range of roadway environments that included interstate highways, rural highways, rural roads, and low-speed urban areas. Drowsiness was sampled at points before, during, and after the drive using self-ratings [Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) or Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS)] as well as the expert Observational Rating of Drowsiness (ORD). High levels of drowsiness were associated with a narrow speed range at highway speeds and the least amount of throttle input, while low levels of drowsiness had more steering activity, more throttle input, and a broader range of speeds. The results of this study will improve understanding of vehicle kinematics and driver behavior in drowsy lane departures using a safe methodology to help address crash dataset limitations.
Schwarz, ChrisGaspar, JohnShull, EmilyVenegas, Michael
Roadway departures remain a major cause of crashes, injuries, and fatalities on U.S. roads. Technologies such as lane keeping assist (LKA) and lane centering assist (LCA) can help mitigate these crashes, but their development involves extensive characterization of the parameter space in which they operate. Lane and road departures (LDs/RDs) and lane changes (LCs) must be systematically described and quantified to distinguish kinematic features, identify contributing factors, and benchmark system influence on lateral control. This study developed a unified pipeline to mine over 36 million miles of naturalistic driving study (NDS) data collected from more than 3800 participants. The pipeline integrates various types of signals to detect roadway boundary crossings, classify LKA-relevant scenarios, and extract roadway, driver, environmental, and assistance-related parameters. Lane keeping epochs with and without LKA were also extracted to quantify system influence on lateral control. In the NDS analysis, crashes include both object contact events and RDs, defined as non-premeditated departures from the intended travel surface involving at least one tire. Analysis of pre-identified crashes in the NDS showed that unintentional RDs accounted for 5.67%, unintentional LDs for 1.76%, and intentional LCs for 1.55%, corresponding to lower-bound rates of 2.7, 0.8, and 0.7 crashes per million vehicle miles traveled. RD crashes were predominantly right-sided, LD crashes left-sided, and both were overrepresented on curves and under adverse conditions. Loss of control preceded 22% of RD crashes and 69% of LD crashes. Beyond crashes and near-crashes (CNCs), the algorithm identified approximately 3 million LCs and 0.3 million LDs/RDs. LCs typically involved larger crossing angles that decreased with speed, while departures clustered within 0°–2°. Compared with CNCs, these occurred at higher speeds and smaller angles. LKA consistently reduced lateral variability without biasing the mean offset.
Ali, GibranTerranova, PaoloWilliams, VickiHolley, DustinSaffy, JoshuaAntona-Makoshi, JacoboKefauver, KevinShull, EmilyLi, EricVenegas, Michael
The design of advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) is essential to improve the safety and autonomy of rear wheel driven four-wheel vehicle in harsh conditions. This work introduces the design and development of a steering automation system for Lane Keep Assistance (LKA) in an rear wheel driven four-wheel vehicle with a parallel steering system. The system utilizes an ArduCam module to take real time images of the ground in front, and these are processed via machine learning techniques on a Raspberry Pi in order to identify lane edges with great precision. The corrective steering maneuvers are carried out by a motorized steering actuator based on the visual data after processing, and an encoder that is built into the actuator constantly tracks the steering angle and position. This closed-loop feedback affords accurate, real-time corrections to ensure lane discipline without driver intervention. Extensive calculations for steering effort, torque, and gear design confirm the system's mechanical viability. Combining low-cost vision sensing, embedded machine learning, and encoder-based feedback control, this project presents a viable and flexible solution for Lane Keep Assistance in rear wheel driven fourwheel vehicle, paving the way for safer, more autonomous off-road driving.
A R, ArundasSadique, AnwarRafeek, Aayisha
Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) have become an integral part of today’s vehicle development. These systems are designed to provide secondary support to the driver, but the driver is primarily responsible for the driving task, e.g., lane-keeping assist (LKA). The driving setup and testing of these LKA systems is very time-consuming and usually applied in the car, based on experiences and subjective evaluation. This results in a cost-intensive calibration of the system. An objective-based calibration procedure can increase efficiency. For a targeted calibration of the system, it is necessary to define and identify key performance indicators (KPIs), which are able to describe the secondary support in sufficient detail. Usually, subjective feelings are used to derive KPIs. Vice versa, there are no results on how to design an LKA without any subjective assessment, before the calibration. With this in mind, this paper is focused on filling this unknown aspect by using virtual methods to identify driver-specific KPIs in a free driving scenario. A model sequence feedback control (MSFC) is used for the LKA. In addition, three different driver types (sporty, normal, and gentle) are parameterized, and the driving environment is modeled based on a statistical analysis of rural roads. Based on a design of experiments (DoE), the inputs of the LKA are varied, and the variation is measured using KPIs. The DoE output results in KPIs, which allow driver-specific conclusions to be drawn, in a closed-loop scenario. In addition, principal components (PCs) for the characteristic parameters were generated, and each type of driver can be described with sufficient precision with only three PCs. The drivers have 25 distinguishable KPIs in common. These KPIs aren’t vehicle-specific and can be used at a higher level for the driver-specific closed-loop description and for a model-based LKA calibration.
Baumann, BenjaminIatropolous, JannesPanzer, AnnaHenze, Roman
Systems-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is being used as a hazard analysis technique within automotive, due in part to its systems engineering viewpoint making it suitable to automated driving feature analysis and with several new and emerging standards and guidelines suggesting its use as one option its familiarity is increasing. Approaches incorporating the human into the STPA Control Structure Diagram (CSD) have been proposed, such as Engineering for Humans: A New Extension to STPA [1]. Such approaches position the human as the top controller in the CSD hierarchy. While placing the human at the top of the CSD is suited to reasoning about supervisory human machine interactions, perhaps in an industrial control setting, we argue that a different approach is needed to address automotive shared control. In an automotive context the driver is integral to vehicle control. Even for vehicle features delivering partial or conditional automation, low level vehicle control tasks may be shared between the driver and the automation. For example, Lane Keep Assistance (LKA) haptic lateral shared control or steer-by-wire input-mixing lateral shared control. In such situations human and machine control is shared between high-level supervisory tasks and lower-level manoeuvring and control tasks. This necessitates modelling the driver differently within the STPA CSD. In this paper we present a vehicle control model and STPA inspired method, which when used together can help the analyst reason about the nature of shared control and potential hazard causes in an automated driving context.
Monkhouse, Helen ElizabethWard, David
The purpose of this document is to provide guidance for the implementation of DVI for momentary intervention-type LKA systems, as defined by ISO 11270. LKA systems provide driver support for safe lane keeping operations via momentary interventions. LKA systems are SAE Level 0, according to SAE J3016. LKA systems do not automate any part of the dynamic driving task (DDT) on a sustained basis and are not classified as an integral component of a partial or conditional driving automation system per SAE J3016. The design intent (i.e., purpose) of an LKA system is to address crash scenarios resulting from inadvertent lane or road departures. Drivers can override an LKA system intervention at any time. LKA systems do not guarantee prevention of lane drifts or related crashes. Road and driving environment (e.g., lane line delineation, inclement weather, road curvature, road surface, etc.) as well as vehicle factors (e.g., speed, lateral acceleration, equipment condition, etc.) may affect the operation of the LKA system. As used in this document, the term “LKA” refers to lateral control driver assistance that automatically intervenes to address a lane departure if the driver either does not signal intent to change lanes (e.g., via turn signal activation) and/or does not initiate corrective steering action to prevent the lane departure. LKA is temporary in nature and distinct from lane centering assistance, which performs sustained steering adjustments to maintain the vehicle’s lateral position within a given lane. This document addresses DVI parameters for original equipment LKA systems on light-duty vehicles (i.e., passenger cars and light trucks) with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of less than 10000 pounds. This document does not apply to the installation of aftermarket LKA systems or those on motorcycles or medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. This document does not address system or operational requirements for LKA systems, which are specified by ISO 11270. The responsibility for the safe operation of the vehicle always remains with the driver.
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) Committee
This SAE Recommended Practice establishes a test procedure for the evaluation of lane departure warning (LDW), lane keeping assistance (LKA), and lane centering assistance systems used in passenger vehicles and light trucks. This test procedure does not intend to exclude any particular system or sensing technology. The recommended practice can be used to test the functionality and performance of LDW, LKA, and lane centering assistance systems by assessing their ability to (1) warn (LDW) or control (LKA, lane centering assistance) in response to an unintended lane departure, and (2) the ability to indicate a system disengagement. The human machine interface (HMI) is not addressed herein but is considered in SAE J2808. The recommended practice specifies lane markers to enable lane departure testing, or road edges, to enable testing of road departure mitigation systems. The document is separated into two tiers. Tier One establishes a recommended minimum set of performance criteria for LDW, LKA, or lane centering assistance system operation. Tier Two defines additional tests to provide a measure of the system’s anticipated performance in more challenging environments.
Active Safety and Driver Support Systems Standards Committee
This SAE Recommended Practice presents a method and example results for determining the Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL) for automotive motion control electrical and/or electronic (E/E) systems. The ASIL determination activity is required by ISO 26262-3, and it is intended that the process and results herein are consistent with ISO 26262. The technical focus of this document is on vehicle motion control systems. The scope of this SAE Recommended Practice is limited to collision-related hazards associated with motion control systems. This SAE Recommended Practice focuses on motion control systems since the hazards they can create generally have higher ASIL ratings, as compared to the hazards non-motion control systems can create. Because of this, the Functional Safety Committee decided to give motion control systems a higher priority and focus exclusively on them in this SAE Recommended Practice. ISO 26262 has a wider scope than SAE J2980, covering other functions and accidents (not just motion control or collisions as in SAE J2980).
Functional Safety Committee
Expanding various future mobilities such as purpose built vehicle (PBV), urban air mobility (UAM), and robo-taxi, the application of autonomous driving system (ADS) technology is also spreading. The main point of ADS is to ensure safety by monitoring vehicle anomalies to prevent functional failure or accident. In this study, a model-based diagnosis and prognosis process was established using degradation data generated during autonomous driving simulation. A vehicle model was designed using Modelica/Dymola, and autonomous driving simulation was performed by integrating the lane keeping assistant (LKA) system with the vehicle model using Matlab/Simulink. Degradation data for the 3 components (a shock absorber damper, a suspension bush, and a tire) of the chassis system were input into the integrated simulation model. The degradation behavior was monitored with K-nearest neighbor (K-NN) and Gaussian mixture model (GMM). The remaining useful life (RUL) for each component was estimated using a Gaussian process. As a result, a normal/abnormal data classifier was designed to diagnose the autonomous vehicle simulation model, and the RUL was estimated within the 95% prediction interval.
Lee, Kyung-WooSung, Dae-UnHan, Yong HaYoo, YeongminLee, Jongsoo
Lane detection and tracking play a key role in autonomous driving, not only in the LKA System but help estimate the pose of the vehicle. While there has been significant development in recent years, traditional outdoor SLAM algorithms still struggle to provide reliable information in challenging dynamic environments such as lack of roadside landscape or surrounding vehicles at almost the same speed or on the road in the woods. On the structured road, lane markings as static semantic features may provide a stable landmark assist in robust localization. As most of the current lane detection work mainly on separated images ignoring the relationship between adjacent frames, we propose a pixel-level lane tracking method for autonomous vehicles. In this paper, we introduce a deep network to detect and track lane features. The network has two parallel branches. One branch detects the lane position, while the other extracts the point description on a pixel level. In our approach, the performance of lane detection improves by using the features extracted from past frames, and the description branch has been pre-trained on a synthetic dataset with known ground truth. Then we calculate the Euclidean norm between the description vectors of the same lane to find lane point matches and achieve a better performance against the occlusion by surrounding vehicles by using a modified NW algorithm to calculate the matching scores. To validate the system, we experiment on a video-instance lane detection dataset VIL-100. Experiments show that the proposed method can get a precise matching result.
Wang, YinWu, JianWei, ZhenqiHe, RuiSong, Shiping
Four crash modes are overrepresented in traffic fatalities: run-off-road crashes, non-tracking run-off-road crashes, head-on crashes, and pedestrian crashes. Two advanced driver assist systems developed to help prevent tracking run-off-road crashes and head-on crashes are lane departure warning (LDW) and lane keeping assist (LKA). LDW acts to warn the driver when they are encroaching the lane boundary, whereas LKA performs automatic steering to prevent the vehicle from departing the lane. The objective of this research was to use real-world crash data to estimate current LDW and LKA system effectiveness in reducing run-off-road crashes and cross-centerline head-on crashes. All passenger vehicles that experienced a lane departure from 2017 to 2019 in the Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS) were analyzed. The effectivenesses of the LDW and LKA systems were computed using the quasi-induced exposure method, where the exposure group was vehicles that were rear-struck in rear-end crashes. There were an estimated 470,944 vehicle lane departure crashes. Of the vehicles involved in these events, LDW was available in 33,728 of them and LKA was available in 11,138. Our study estimated that LDW and LKA were effective in reducing the overall number of target population crashes by 3.0% ± 32% and 60% ± 16%, respectively. LKA avoided more crashes than LDW because LKA begins evasive action earlier than the driver. Future work should compare lane centering systems to general lane keeping systems, as lane centering may be even more effective in preventing lane departure crashes.
Dean, Morgan E.Riexinger, Luke E.
This document describes [motor] vehicle driving automation systems that perform part or all of the dynamic driving task (DDT) on a sustained basis. It provides a taxonomy with detailed definitions for six levels of driving automation, ranging from no driving automation (Level 0) to full driving automation (Level 5), in the context of [motor] vehicles (hereafter also referred to as “vehicle” or “vehicles”) and their operation on roadways: Level 0: No Driving Automation Level 1: Driver Assistance Level 2: Partial Driving Automation Level 3: Conditional Driving Automation Level 4: High Driving Automation Level 5: Full Driving Automation These level definitions, along with additional supporting terms and definitions provided herein, can be used to describe the full range of driving automation features equipped on [motor] vehicles in a functionally consistent and coherent manner. “On-road” refers to publicly accessible roadways (including parking areas and private campuses that permit public access) that collectively serve all road users, including cyclists, pedestrians, and users of vehicles with and without driving automation features. The levels apply to the driving automation feature(s) that are engaged in any given instance of on-road operation of an equipped vehicle. As such, although a given vehicle may be equipped with a driving automation system that is capable of delivering multiple driving automation features that perform at different levels, the level of driving automation exhibited in any given instance is determined by the feature(s) that are engaged. This document also refers to three primary actors in driving: the (human) user, the driving automation system, and other vehicle systems and components. These other vehicle systems and components (or the vehicle in general terms) do not include the driving automation system in this model, even though as a practical matter a driving automation system may actually share hardware and software components with other vehicle systems, such as a processing module(s) or operating code. The levels of driving automation are defined by reference to the specific role played by each of the three primary actors in performance of the DDT and/or DDT fallback. “Role” in this context refers to the expected role of a given primary actor, based on the design of the driving automation system in question and not necessarily to the actual performance of a given primary actor. For example, a driver who fails to monitor the roadway during engagement of a Level 1 adaptive cruise control (ACC) system still has the role of driver, even while s/he is neglecting it. Active safety systems, such as electronic stability control (ESC) and automatic emergency braking (AEB), and certain types of driver assistance systems, such as lane keeping assistance (LKA), are excluded from the scope of this driving automation taxonomy because they do not perform part or all of the DDT on a sustained basis, but rather provide momentary intervention during potentially hazardous situations. Due to the momentary nature of the actions of active safety systems, their intervention does not change or eliminate the role of the driver in performing part or all of the DDT, and thus are not considered to be driving automation, even though they perform automated functions. In addition, systems that inform, alert, or warn the driver about hazards in the driving environment are also outside the scope of this driving automation taxonomy, as they neither automate part or all of the DDT, nor change the driver’s role in performance of the DDT (see 8.13). It should be noted, however, that crash avoidance features, including intervention-type active safety systems, may be included in vehicles equipped with driving automation systems at any level. For automated driving system (ADS) features (i.e., Levels 3 to 5) that perform the complete DDT, crash mitigation and avoidance capability is part of ADS functionality (see also 8.13).
On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) Committee
Many new vehicles come equipped with Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) as standard or optional features. These technology packages frequently include Lane Departure Warning (LDW), an electronic system designed to alert the driver when the vehicle begins to depart from its lane. These systems identify lane boundaries using computer analysis of video captured by a forward-facing camera, typically mounted near the rear-view mirror. Some vehicles are also equipped with Lane Keeping Assist (LKA). Upon detecting an unintended lane departure, LKA will make electronic steering and/or braking control inputs to keep the vehicle in its original travel lane. Four vehicles equipped with LDW and LKA were tested: a 2019 Toyota Corolla, 2019 Honda Civic, 2020 Ford Explorer, and 2019 Chevrolet Tahoe. Tests were conducted on a straight, flat road with clear lane markings. Lane departures to the left and to the right were initiated by the test driver at 45 and 65 mph. Using a VBOX 3i RTK DGPS, data related to the vehicle’s speed, acceleration, and driver- and software-related control inputs were collected via the vehicle’s CAN bus. Additionally, the VBOX collected vehicle location data of ±2 cm (±0.79 in) accuracy relative to survey points. Analysis of test data yielded details of system-level behaviors. For LDW, the average warning issue point (lateral distance prior to reaching the lane boundary) observed was 1.33 ft, the average rate of departure (lateral velocity) was 1.45 ft/s, and the warning occurred 0.76 sec before lane departure. Lane keeping actions began, on average, 1.13 ft from the lane boundary (0.66 sec before lane departure) and involved 4.81 degrees of steering with an average maximum lateral acceleration of 2.86 ft/s2 (0.09 g). The LKA systems tested permitted the vehicles’ outside tires to exceed the lane boundaries by an average of 0.14 ft.
Nguyen, BenjaminFamiglietti, NicholasKhan, OmarHoang, RyanSiddiqui, OmairLanderville, Jon
This retrospective cohort study uses survival analysis to estimate the effectiveness of Toyota ADAS in helping prevent system-relevant crashes. Toyota production data were merged with police reported crash files from eight U.S. states for crash years 2015 up to 2019 by 17-digit vehicle identification number (VIN). System-relevant crash scenarios included: striking vehicle in front-to-rear, single vehicle run-off-the-road, same-direction sideswipe, head-on, and pedestrian struck. The study vehicle cohort included 11 Toyota/Lexus models, model years 2015 through 2018, sold in the eight study states. ADAS technologies studied included automatic emergency braking (AEB), lane departure warning (LDW), lane keeping assistance (LKA), blind spot monitoring (BSM) and pedestrian automatic emergency braking (PedAEB). Among the study cohort of 2,394,913 vehicles, police reported 308,490 crashes. The crude crash rate ratio (CRR) was 0.61 for AEB-equipped versus non-equipped vehicles. However, the CRR does not adjust for differences in ADAS-equipped versus non- equipped vehicles. To adjust for group differences (confounding factors), Cox proportional-hazards (CPH) regression modeled the relative risk (hazard ratio, HR) of being in a system-relevant crash for vehicles with versus without the ADAS. CPH modeling found that AEB-equipped vehicles were 43% less likely (HR=0.57) to be the striking vehicle in a front-to-rear crash compared to non-equipped vehicles. The analysis was also stratified to look at the effect in intersection versus non-intersection crashes. BSM-equipped vehicles were 4% less likely (HR=0.96) to be involved in a same-direction sideswipe, though the differences were not significant (p=0.252). LKA-equipped vehicles were 9% less likely (HR=0.91) to run off the road. LDW and LKA did not have a significant effect on risk of same-direction sideswipe or head-on crash. PedAEB-equipped vehicles were less likely to hit a pedestrian (HR=0.84), but the hazard ratios were marginally significant (p=0.114). This study contributes new evidence of the effectiveness of ADAS in helping prevent system-targeted crashes.
Spicer, RebeccaVahabaghaie, AminMurakhovsky, DennisBahouth, GeorgeDrayer, BeccaSt. Lawrence, Schuyler
The increase of autonomy demand in the automotive industry made the usage of AI models inevitable. However, such models introduce a variety of threats to automobile safety and security. ISO/PAS 21448 SOTIF is a safety standard that is designed to deal with risks due to non-electrical and non-electronic failures. In this paper we put SOTIF into practice. In our work we introduce a conceivable safety critical scenario that targets the lane keep assist function. We use the suggested modelling techniques in the SOTIF standard to analyze the scenario and extract the trigger event. In result, we propose a contextual based predictive ML model to monitor the intervention between the driver and lane keep assist system. Our approach followed the SOTIF verification and validation guidelines. Empirically, we use a real safety critical scenario dataset as well as an augmented dataset. Our results show a high precision/recall values that exceed 90% by an increase of more than 150% in f1 score compared to non contextual models. It also showed that there is a trade-off relation between the precision/recall values and the sensitivity of models to its inputs.
Abdulazim, AmrElbahaey, MoustafaMohamed, Abduallah
Implementing Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) features that are available in all road scenarios and weather conditions is a big challenge for automotive companies and considered key enablers to achieve autonomous Level 4 (L4) vehicles. One important feature is the Lane Keep Assist System (LKAS). Most LKAS systems are based on lane line detection cameras and lane coefficient estimations by the camera is the key point for LKAS where the camera recognizes the lane lines using edge detection. But when the lane markers are not available due to high traffic and slow driving on the roads, another source of data for the lane lines needs to be available for the LKAS. In this paper a multi-sensor fusion approach based on camera, Lidar, and GPS is used to allow the vehicle to maintain its lateral location within the lane. The lateral distances of the lane lines are measured by LiDAR detection of the markers based on the intensity and fused with lane line information from the HD Map after transforming the sensors to the same reference. This approach was tested on FEV’s Smart Vehicle Demonstrator and the test results show the vehicle was able to maintain the lane.
Alrousan, QusayMatta, SherifTasky, Tom
New Insistence for Driver Assistance21AVEP03_053/1/2021
Panelists at SAE International's 2021 Government/Industry Meeting say assisted-driving technology is worthwhile - but effective driver monitoring is crucial. A panel of automated-driving experts at early February's virtual presentation of SAE International's annual Government/Industry Meeting had strong opinions on the current state of advanced driver-assistance system (ADAS) technology. Although most concurred that so-called “low-level” assisted-driving technology (usually referred to as Level 2 in the SAE Standard for levels of driving automation) can enhance safety and help to prevent accidents, there is considerable variation in functionality and user interface. This has fostered consumer confusion and mitigates the technologies' potential, they noted. The “Leveling Up: Path to Increased Driver Assistance” panel stressed one critical point. To derive maximum effectiveness from Level 2 assisted-driving technology - such as automatic emergency braking (AEB) and pedestrian detection, lane-keeping assist (LKA) or Level 2 integrated systems such as Cadillac's Super Cruise or Nissan's ProPilot Assist - a stringent driver-monitoring system (DMS) is needed to ensure the driver is attentive. Some on the panel suggested regulators in the U.S. and Europe should fast-track either a voluntary agreement or an outright requirement for automakers to fit DMS in every ADAS-equipped vehicle.
Visnic, Bill
A veteran tester who has datalogged many thousands of miles in the U.S. and Japan offers suggestions for rapidly acquiring good test and validation data. Testing for advanced driver-assist systems (ADAS) has required a completely new approach to testing. The most obvious reason for this is the sheer number of sensors and actuators involved in any given feature. Whereas engineers used to test single sensors at a time, today there are upward of 20 sensors to specify. These sensors - short- and long-range radar, mono/stereo cameras, sonar and lidar - need to act in concert. This means that several layers of sensor fusion must be implemented. For example, when it comes to the actuators for the braking system, there are up to seven distinct systems able to apply the brakes. As a result, a failure is not easily tracked to a single root cause but can be a complex combination of several factors. Imagine expanding this to ADAS and autonomous-vehicle (AV) functionalities such as automated cruise control (ACC), lane-keeping assist (LKA), automated emergency braking (AEB) and valet parking, as well as convenience features like blind-spot monitoring, night vision and steering beams, to name just a few.
Dahan, Jeremy
Lane keeping assist system (LKAS) is an advanced assistant driving system, which can effectively avoid unconscious lane departures caused by drivers due to distraction, fatigue driving, insensitive response to emergencies, etc., reduce traffic accidents, and effectively improve Driving safety. This paper is committed to the research of LKAS standard of commercial vehicles in China. According to the working principle of LKAS and the test and evaluation methods of LKAS at home and abroad, the LKAS test scheme of commercial vehicles was designed after repeated discussions and demonstrations in many meetings, including straight and curve test scenarios. The actual vehicle test of commercial vehicle LKAS were completed by CATARC Automotive Test Center (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. in CATARC Yancheng Automotive Proving Ground Co., Ltd. The performance of LKAS of freight cars and passenger cars under different loads was studied. Based on the test results, suggestions on the formulation of domestic LKAS standards are put forward. This paper not only improves the domestic LKAS test method and evaluation system, but also provides reference for the formulation of domestic LKAS national standards.
Ma, WenboWang, BongtongQin, KongjianZhang, HuiXv, SheDing, Ying
In recent decades, research and development in the field of autonomous vehicles have rapidly increased throughout the world, and autonomous driving technologies have begun to be applied to mass production vehicles. Especially recently, even affordable mass production vehicles have begun to be equipped with some autonomous driving systems such as a Lane Keeping Assist (LKA) system. In general, mass-produced LKA systems use a lane detection camera as a means of keeping the lane. One of the common limitations of camera-based LKA systems is that the lane keeping performance significantly decreases when the camera cannot detect lane markings for various reasons such as snow coverage or blurred lane markings. To overcome this limitation, we have developed Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)-based LKA systems, which are not affected by the surrounding environment such as weather and the condition of lane markings. In our latest study, we applied Model Predictive Control (MPC) to our GNSS-based LKA system so as to enhance lane-keeping performance. We then revealed that the GNSS-based LKA system with MPC had low robustness regarding the time delay of a GNSS and that countermeasures for the time delay were necessary. In this paper, we apply Smith predictor-like Time Delay Compensation (TDC) to compensate for the time delay. The TDC predicts the current state variables from the past sensor signals based on the vehicle dynamics. We demonstrate that the TDC stabilizes the LKA system even when the GNSS has a time delay in a simulation. Furthermore we add another TDC to compensate for the time delay of Electrical Power Steering (EPS) with the aim of reducing the oscillation of the steering wheel angle. Finally, we evaluate the lane keeping performance in a real-vehicle experiment on a snow-covered highway.
Tominaga, KentaTakeuchi, YuKitano, HiroakiTomoki, UnoQuirynen, RienCairano, Stefano
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) like Lane Departure Warning (LDW) and Lane Keep Assist (LKA) have been available for several years now but has experienced low customer acceptance and market penetration. These deficiencies can be traced to the inability of many of the perception systems to consistently recognize lane markings and localize the vehicle with respect to the lane markings in the real-world with poor markings, changing weather conditions and occlusions. Currently, there is no available standard or benchmark to evaluate the quality of either the lane markings or the perception algorithms. This work seeks to establish a reference test system that could be used by transportation agencies to evaluate the quality of their markings to support ADAS functions that rely on pavement markings. The test system can also be used by designers as a benchmark for their proprietary systems. To support this development, an extensive video dataset was collected at different times of day and weather conditions on various roads in Central Texas. The videos were evaluated on different state-of-the art lane detection algorithms and their performance was ranked based on a set of metrics specifically developed for evaluating the effectiveness of the lane estimation system. The test scenarios are comprised of a set of roadways and environmental features, as well as the pavement marking presence and luminance variables. A systems approach is presented by correlating the algorithm performance data to the environmental factors, lane marking types, color, material, and the retroreflectivity of pavement markings.
Nayak, AbhishekRathinam, SivakumarPike, AdamGopalswamy, Swaminathan
Lane keeping assist (LKA) is an autonomous driving technique that enables vehicles to travel along a desired line of lanes by adjusting the front steering angle. Reinforcement learning (RL) is one kind of machine learning. Agents or machines are not told how to act but instead learn from interaction with the environment. It also frees us from coding complex policies manually. But it has not yet been successfully applied to autonomous driving. Two control strategies using different deep reinforcement learning (DRL) algorithms have been proposed and used in the lane keeping assist scenario in this paper. Deep Q-network (DQN) algorithm with discrete action space and deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) algorithm with continuous action space have been implemented, respectively. Based on MATLAB/Simulink, deep neural networks representing the control policy are designed. The environment as well as the vehicle dynamics are also modelled in Simulink. By integrating the proposed control method and a vehicle dynamics model, the lane keeping assist simulation is performed. Experimental results demonstrate that the vehicle travel along the centerline of the path and the controller reaches a steady state after a short time, validating the effectiveness of the proposed control method.
Wang, QunZhuang, WeichaoWang, LiangmoJu, Fei
Together with its many partners, ZF supplies camera and radar technology and advanced components for both the passenger car and commercial truck markets, the latter being especially suited for the move to more complex driver-assistance systems, according to Dan Williams, director of ADAS & Autonomy at ZF. “The business case in commercial vehicle for reduction in driver hours of service, fuel cost reduction and safety have strong economic incentives to adopt ADAS/automated driving technology. Additionally, the regulations placed on the industry will require our customers to utilize certain solutions,” he said. ZF is working on both highly automated “revolutionary” systems and on “evolutionary” driver-assistance systems that are increasingly complex, he said, citing the supplier's OnTraX lane keep assist that will launch in 2020 with its first major OEM customer. Williams spoke with TOHE at the recent NACV Show in Atlanta, and he's scheduled to participate in a Commercial Vehicle Safety technical session at the SAE Government/Industry Meeting taking place January 22-24, 2020, in Washington, DC (www.sae.org/attend/government-industry/).
Gehm, Ryan
Lane Keeping Assistance System (LKAS) is a typical lateral driver assistance system with low acceptance. One of the main reasons is that fixed parameters cannot satisfy individual differences. So LKAS adaptive to driver characteristics needs to be designed. Driver Steering Override (DSO) process is an important process of LKAS. It happens when contradiction between driver’s intention and system behavior occurs. As feeling of overriding will affect the overall experience of using LKAS, the design of DSO characteristics is worthy of attention. This research provided an adaptive design scheme aiming at DSO characteristics for LKAS by building Driver Preference Model (DPM) based on simulator test data from preliminary experiments. The DPM was to represent the relationship between driver characteristics indices and driver preferred system characteristics indices. So that new drivers’ preference can be predicted by DPM based on their own daily driving data with LKAS switched off. The inputs of DPMs are 27 lane changing driver characteristics indices which were extracted based on natural lane changing data. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and correlation analysis were used during input-indices selection. The outputs of DPMs are 2 driver preferred system characteristics indices which can express driver’s preferred DSO characteristics. 6 participants took part in preliminary experiments for data collection and evaluation experiments. Their preferred system characteristic indices were calculated through the results of evaluation experiments. The building of DPMs was realized by Random Forest (RF) based on 6 participants’ lane changing driver characteristics indices and driver preferred system characteristics indices. The verification of DPMs’ effectiveness was realized by subjective evaluation. The result showed that DPMs can realize adaptive design of DSO characteristics for LKAS focusing on driver’s preference and improve driver’s acceptance.
Liu, QuyiChen, HuiChen, JiachenNishimura, YosukeIshihara, AtsushiAndo, Kazuya
An ADAS Feature Rating System: Proposing a New Industry Standard2019-24-025110/7/2019
More than 90% of new vehicles include Advanced Driving Assistance Systems that offer features such as Lane Keep Assist and Adaptive Cruise Control [1]. These ever-improving vehicle systems present a great opportunity to increase driving safety and reduce the number of roadway deaths and injuries. Indeed, they are already having a positive effect. However, the wide variety of features offered in the marketplace can be confusing to consumers, who may not clearly understand their vehicles’ true capabilities and limitations, or have an easy way of comparing system performance between vehicle models. This lack of information has the potential to reduce the safety gains of ADAS features by increasing the risk of improper use. To encourage transparency in the marketplace and thus engender the maximum positive effect of ADAS technologies, this paper proposes a five-level rating system, which utilizes diamonds to denote significant milestone achievements in vehicle system performance. The rating charts resulting from this system describe gradients of performance within criteria addressed by certain foundational ADAS features. Presented here in its initial stage of development, this rating system will require continued refinement. We therefore encourage the community of automotive safety organizations to take up the mantle by establishing and performing test protocols for assigning standardized ADAS feature performance ratings. We believe that the result of this effort, a common method for understanding and comparing ADAS performance, promises to deliver a beneficial level of clarity to the industry and consumers.
Heeren, DavidGradu, Mircea
Objectives: The project goal was to create an initial set of standardized tests to explore whether they enable the ongoing evaluation of automated driving features as they evolve over time. These tests focused on situations that were representative of several daily driving scenarios as encountered by lower-level automated features, often called Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), while looking forward to higher levels of automation as new systems are deployed. Methods: The research project initially gathered information through a review of existing literature about ADAS and current test procedures. Thereafter, a focus group of industry experts was convened for additional insights and feedback. With this background, the research team developed a series of tests designed to evaluate a variety of automated driving features in currently available implementations and anticipated future variants. Key ADAS available on current production vehicles include adaptive cruise control (ACC), lane keeping assist (LKA), and automatic emergency braking (AEB). Seven of the most automated production vehicles available in 2018 from six manufacturers were subjected to a series of standardized tests that were performed on a closed test track environment to assess the vehicle capabilities and limitations of the automated driving systems’ operational domains. Results: Considerable performance variability was observed between different vehicle manufacturers and within a single vehicle model across repeated trials and multiple replications. In addition, there were specific roadway characteristics that significantly impacted performance. Conclusions: The results indicate that standardized testing can assist researchers in determining the current capabilities of vehicles with automated driving features. The research team suggests continuing to improve and expand standardized testing of automated driving features and to work toward industry consensus of a robust evaluation mechanism that may play a key role in the conformance of future automated-vehicle systems.
Basantis, AlexisDoerzaph, ZacharyHarwood, LeslieNeurauter, Luke
A Novel Vision-Based Framework for Real-Time Lane Detection and Tracking2019-01-06904/2/2019
Lane detection is one of the most important part in ADAS because various modules (i.e., LKAS, LDWS, etc.) need robust and precise lane position for ego vehicle and traffic participants localization to plan an optimal routine or make proper driving decisions. While most of the lane detection approaches heavily depend on tedious pre-processing and great amount of assumptions to get reasonable result, the robustness and efficiency are deteriorated. To address this problem, a novel framework is proposed in this paper to realize robust and real-time lane detection. This framework consists of two branches, where canny edge detection and Progressive Probabilistic Hough Transform (PPHT) are introduced in the first branch for efficient detection. To eliminate the dependency of the framework on assumptions such as flatten road, deep learning based encoder-decoder detection branch, which leverages the powerful nonlinear approximation ability of CNN, is introduced to improve the robustness and contribute to a precise intermediate result. Since the detection rate of the CNN branch is much slower than the feature-based branch, a coordinating unit is designed. The two branches also backup each other so that the system can be failure-tolerant. Finally, Kalman filter is applied for lane tracking. Experiment result shows that the proposed framework can achieve robust detection result under various driving scenario with more than 100 FPS. A closed-loop lane keeping simulation is also carried out, which shows the precise and robust detection result from proposed framework can greatly contribute to the lane keeping performance.
Yang, ShunWu, JianShan, YanhuYu, YinanZhang, Sumin
GNSS Based Lane Keeping Assist System via Model Predictive Control2019-01-06854/2/2019
Recently, the field of autonomous driving has been dramatically expanding, and some of the key technologies like the Lane Keeping Assist (LKA) system have begun to be applied to mass production vehicles. In general, mass-produced LKA systems use a lane detection camera as a means of keeping the lane. One of the common limitations of camera-based LKA systems is that the lane keeping performance significantly decreases when the camera cannot detect lane markings for various reasons such as snow coverage and sunlight. To overcome this limitation, we have developed a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) based LKA system, which is not affected by the surrounding environment such as weather and lighting. Our LKA system uses centimeter-level augmentation service and high-definition maps, whereby the LKA system can accurately estimate its own position. This feature potentially enables our LKA system to show higher lane-keeping performance than camera-based LKA systems even when lane markings are undetectable. In our previous study, we proposed a GNSS based LKA system in which the target steering angle was calculated by means of a PID controller based on a look-ahead model. Although there were a few problems such as oscillation of steering, the proposed system enabled a real vehicle to keep the lane even under conditions in which camera based LKA systems would probably not work well. In this paper, to aim at improving lane keeping performance, we proposed a GNSS based LKA system that calculates target steering angle via Model Predictive Control (MPC). We then validated the lane keeping performance of the LKA system using MPC in both a simulation and in real vehicle tests.
Tominaga, KentaTakeuchi, YuTomoki, UnoKameoka, ShotaKitano, HiroakiQuirynen, RienBerntorp, KarlCairano, Stefano
Robust Multi-Lane Detection and Tracking in Temporal-Spatial Based on Particle Filtering2019-01-08854/2/2019
The camera-based advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) like lane departure warning system (LDWS) and lane keeping assist (LKA) can make vehicles safer and driving easier. Lane detection is indispensable for these lane-based systems for achieving vehicle local localization and behavior prediction. Since the vision is vulnerable to the variable environment conditions such as bad weather, occlusions and illumination, the robustness is important. In this paper, a robust algorithm for detecting and tracking multiple lanes with arbitrary shape is proposed. We extend the previously lane detection and tracking process from the space domain to the temporal-spatial domain by using a more robust and general multi-lane model. First, new slice images containing temporal information are generated from image sequences. Instead of binarization process, we use a more general detector for extracting the lane marker candidates with prior knowledge to generate the binary slice image. Then, all the lane marker candidates are clustered into many lanes and as the initialization of the following particle filtering tracking process. We calculate the distance map in the binary slice image by using a modified distance algorithm and sample particles in the distance map. Finally, we can track the lane markers with particle filtering successfully. A range of experiment results indicate that the proposed algorithm can detect and track multiple lanes correctly and robustly. Comparing with other method, it has enough tolerance to variant illumination and occlusion.
Chen, SihanHuang, LiboBai, Jie
Lane Keeping Assistance (LKA) system is a very important part in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). It prevents a vehicle from departing out of the lane by exerting intervention. But an inappropriate performance during LKA intervention makes driver feel uncomfortable. The intervention of LKA can be divided into 3 parts: intervention timing, intervention process and intervention ending. Many researches have studied about the intervention timing and ending, but factors during intervention process also affect driver feelings a lot, such as yaw rate and steering wheel velocity. To increase driver’s acceptance of LKA, objective and subjective tests were designed and conducted to explore important indices which are highly correlated with the driver feelings. Different kinds of LKA controller control intervention process in different ways. Therefore, it’s very important to describe the intervention process uniformly and objectively. This paper proposes 16 Characteristic Indices (CI), such as ‘maximum yaw rate’, to describe steering wheel motion, vehicle motion and other aspects during variable LKA intervention processes. Then, to acquire drivers’ subjective evaluation about LKA, a questionnaire including 3 questions from different aspects was designed for drivers to give Subjective Ratings (SR). Lastly, to describe the nonlinear correlation between CI and SR, Random Forests (RF) algorithm was used to establish the correlation model. Different from other modeling methods, RF can not only build the model by data training, but also give out the importance of each CI in the model. Through this method, important indices really affecting the driver feelings during the LKA intervention process were explored. What’s more, by the use of CI, the correlation model can predict the driver feelings regardless of specific LKA controller type, thus important indices can be optimized, which means the prediction about SR can be used to offer necessary guidance to the development and calibration of LKA system.
Zhong, BinChen, HuiChen, JiachenLan, XiaomingLiu, QuyiNishimura, YosukeAndo, Kazuya
Lane-keeping assist system (LKA) alerts the driver or intervenes in the driving when the vehicle deviates from the lane. But its effect is highly dependent on the driver’s acceptance. Distance to Lane Crossing (DTLC) and Time to Lane Crossing (TTLC) are two important factors to consider the danger level of the scenario, which are also two references for drivers to make decisions. At present, most of the functional design standards are based on these values, while they often differ for different vehicle movements. This study uses a driving robot to precisely control the test conditions and performs field tests on two advanced autonomous vehicles in National Intelligent Connected Vehicle (Shanghai) Pilot Zone. The test conditions are extended based on various test standards and the LKA performance of vehicles in the pre-experiment. The application of high-precision maps and RT systems in the test provided positioning information for the driving robot with an accuracy error of less than 2 cm. The FIR filtering of the audio and video data is used to obtain the driver’s feedback on the alarm or intervention. According to the UTC time synchronization, the thresholds of the DTLC and TTLC at that moment are obtained. Finally, one-way ANOVA method is used to obtain the DTLC or TTLC distribution of the vehicle movement status characteristics. This result can be used to compare with the analysis of natural driving behavior, and then apply in proposing a more reasonable Human Machine Interaction (HMI) scheme considering the driver’s operating characteristics.
Yan, Yilin
In order to satisfy design requirements of Lane Keeping Assistance System (LKAS), a Driver Steering Override (DSO) strategy is necessary for driver’s interaction with the assistance system. The assistance system can be overridden by the strategy in case of lane change, obstacle avoidance and other emergency situations. However, evaluation and optimization of the DSO strategy for LKAS cannot easily be completed quantitatively considering driver’s acceptability. In this research, firstly subjective and objective evaluation experiment is designed. Secondly, correlations between the subjective and the objective evaluation results are established by using regression analysis. Finally, based on the correlations established previously, the optimal performance of DSO strategy is obtained by setting the desired comprehensive evaluation ratings as the optimized goal. Except for the whole process of the research, there are some details of the subjective and objective evaluation experiment design to be introduced. For the objective evaluation experiment, several objective characteristic indices (CI) are extracted, which are unrelated to controller. As for the subjective evaluation experiment, a questionnaire consisting of 7 questions is initially designed. Then, based on pre-experiment results, it is simplified by correlation analysis among its questions to eliminate information redundancy. Additionally, proper weights are given to different questions of the questionnaire by using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the driver’s comprehensive evaluation of DSO strategy is added on by this method. Overall, with the conduct of the newly designed experiment, it would be possible to achieve the following five advantages. The first one is a generic objective evaluation regardless of controller types. The second one is a more simplified subjective evaluation experiment. The third one is a reliable comprehensive subjective evaluation. The forth one is the optimization of DSO strategy for LKAS based on the driver’s acceptability. The last one is the obtained target objective CI can be used for different types of controller design.
He, XiaolinChen, HuiChen, JiachenRan, WeiNishimura, YosukeAndo, Kazuya
This SAE Recommended Practice describes motor vehicle driving automation systems that perform part or all of the dynamic driving task (DDT) on a sustained basis. It provides a taxonomy with detailed definitions for six levels of driving automation, ranging from no driving automation (level 0) to full driving automation (level 5), in the context of motor vehicles (hereafter also referred to as “vehicle” or “vehicles”) and their operation on roadways. These level definitions, along with additional supporting terms and definitions provided herein, can be used to describe the full range of driving automation features equipped on motor vehicles in a functionally consistent and coherent manner. “On-road” refers to publicly accessible roadways (including parking areas and private campuses that permit public access) that collectively serve users of vehicles of all classes and driving automation levels (including no driving automation), as well as motorcyclists, pedal cyclists, and pedestrians. The levels apply to the driving automation feature(s) that are engaged in any given instance of on-road operation of an equipped vehicle. As such, although a given vehicle may be equipped with a driving automation system that is capable of delivering multiple driving automation features that perform at different levels, the level of driving automation exhibited in any given instance is determined by the feature(s) that are engaged. This document also refers to three primary actors in driving: the (human) user, the driving automation system, and other vehicle systems and components. These other vehicle systems and components (or the vehicle in general terms) do not include the driving automation system in this model, even though as a practical matter a driving automation system may actually share hardware and software components with other vehicle systems, such as a processing module(s) or operating code. The levels of driving automation are defined by reference to the specific role played by each of the three primary actors in performance of the DDT and/or DDT fallback. “Role” in this context refers to the expected role of a given primary actor, based on the design of the driving automation system in question and not necessarily to the actual performance of a given primary actor. For example, a driver who fails to monitor the roadway during engagement of a level 1 adaptive cruise control (ACC) system still has the role of driver, even while s/he is neglecting it. Active safety systems, such as electronic stability control and automated emergency braking, and certain types of driver assistance systems, such as lane keeping assistance, are excluded from the scope of this driving automation taxonomy because they do not perform part or all of the DDT on a sustained basis and, rather, merely provide momentary intervention during potentially hazardous situations. Due to the momentary nature of the actions of active safety systems, their intervention does not change or eliminate the role of the driver in performing part or all of the DDT, and thus are not considered to be driving automation. It should, however, be noted that crash avoidance features, including intervention-type active safety systems, may be included in vehicles equipped with driving automation systems at any level. For Automated Driving System (ADS) features (i.e., levels 3-5) that perform the complete DDT, crash avoidance capability is part of ADS functionality.
On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) Committee
Recently, development of vehicle control system targeting Full Driving Automation (autonomous driving level 5) has advanced. Some applications of autonomous driving systems like the Lane Keeping Assist system (LKA) and Auto Lane Change system (ALC) (autonomous driving level 1-3) have been put on the market. However, the conventional system using information from front camera, it is difficult to operate in some situations. For example the road that no line, large curvature and number of lane increases or decreases. We propose an autonomous driving system using high accuracy vehicle position estimation technology and a high definition map. An LKA system calculates the target steering wheel angle based on both vehicle position information from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and the target lane of high the definition map, according to the method of front gaze driver model. Then, the system controls steering the wheel angle by Electric Power Steering (EPS). In the case of ALC, a target lane-change path is generated based on information of the vehicle’s own lane and the next one. The proposed system solved the problem of the conventional method. Moreover, the developed method can operate more smoothly than the conventional one. Finally, we demonstrate that the proposed system enables the actual vehicle to operate LKA and ALC in the merged road of a test tracks.
Takeuchi, YuHideyuki, TanakaKazuo, HitosugiTomoki, Uno
Emerging autonomous driving technologies, with emergency navigating capabilities, necessitates innovative vehicle steering methods for operators during unanticipated scenarios. A reconfigurable “plug and play” steering system paradigm enables lateral control from any seating position in the vehicle’s interior. When required, drivers may access a stowed steering input device, establish communications with the vehicle steering subsystem, and provide direct wheel commands. Accordingly, the provision of haptic steering cues and lane keeping assistance to navigate roadways will be helpful. In this study, various steering devices have been investigated which offer reconfigurability and haptic feedback to create a flexible driving environment. A joystick and a robotic arm that offer multiple degrees of freedom were compared to a conventional steering wheel. To evaluate the concept, human test subjects interacted with the experimental system featuring a driving simulator with target hardware, and completed post-test questionnaires. Based on the data collected, drivers’ lane keeping performance was superior using a haptic robotic arm with haptic feedback to the joystick and steering wheel with an improvement of up to 70.18% during extreme maneuvers. Haptic feedback, with a lane keeping algorithm, can assist the operator in steering the vehicle given the likely deterioration of driving skills when autonomous vehicles become prevalent.
Wang, ChengshiWang, YueWagner, John R.
In the recent years, the interaction between human driver and Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS) has gradually aroused people’s concern. As a result, the concept of personalized ADAS is being put forward. As an important system of ADAS, Lane Keeping Assistance System (LKAS) also attracts great attention. To achieve personalized LKAS, driver lane keeping characteristic (DLKC) indices which could distinguish different driver lane keeping behavior should be researched. However, there are few researches on DLKC indices for personalized LKAS. Although there are many researches on modeling driver steering behavior, these researches are not sufficient to obtain DLKC indices. One reason is that most of researches are for double lane change behavior which is different from driver lane keeping behavior. The other reason is that the researches on driver lane keeping behavior only provide model structure and rarely discuss identification procedure such as how to select suitable data. Besides, these researches ignore the relationship between driver behavior and the design of personalized LKAS. In this paper, DLKC indices for personalized LKAS are comprehensively researched. Firstly, DLKC indices are analyzed and determined based on driver lane keeping process and LKAS working process. DLKC indices consist of the following three parts: steering return timing, steering return process, and steering return ending. Secondly, lane keeping experiments are conducted to acquire driver lane keeping data based on virtual Electric Power Steering (EPS) platform. Thirdly, DLKC indices are identified based on statistical method and driver steering model. With statistical method, steering return timing and steering return ending indices are obtained. With driver steering model, steering return process indices are obtained. In the end, the values of DLKC indices are verified and the results show that they are in accordance with driver lane keeping behavior.
Lan, XiaomingChen, HuiHe, XiaolinChen, JiachenNishimura, YosukeAndo, KazuyaKitahara, Kei
This paper outlines the procedure used to assess the performance of a Lane Keeping Assistance System (LKAS) in a virtual test environment using the newly developed Euro NCAP Lane Support Systems (LSS) Test Protocol, version 1.0, November 2015 [1]. A tool has also been developed to automate the testing and analysis of this test. The Euro NCAP LSS Test defines ten test paths for left lane departures and ten for right lane departures that must be followed by the vehicle before the LKAS activates. Each path must be followed to within a specific tolerance. The vehicle control inputs required to follow the test path are calculated. These tests are then run concurrently in the virtual environment by combining two different software packages. Important vehicle variables are recorded and processed, and a pass/fail status is assigned to each test based on these values automatically. Any vehicle with a LKAS, and a validated parameter set can therefore be tested and analysed automatically using this testing tool. Automated testing and analysis of a LKAS ensures reduced testing time, and increased system robustness. This testing tool can also be used for testing Lane Departure Warning (LDW) systems. The development of this testing tool may be used as a template for the development of testing tools for different Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS).
Holland, MichaelGibb, JonathanBierzanowski, KacperRowell, StuartGao, BoLv, ChenCao, Dongpu
This Recommended Practice provides a taxonomy for motor vehicle driving automation systems that perform part or all of the dynamic driving task (DDT) on a sustained basis and that range in level from no driving automation (level 0) to full driving automation (level 5). It provides detailed definitions for these six levels of driving automation in the context of motor vehicles (hereafter also referred to as “vehicle” or “vehicles”) and their operation on roadways. These level definitions, along with additional supporting terms and definitions provided herein, can be used to describe the full range of driving automation features equipped on motor vehicles in a functionally consistent and coherent manner. “On-road” refers to publicly accessible roadways (including parking areas and private campuses that permit public access) that collectively serve users of vehicles of all classes and driving automation levels (including no driving automation), as well as motorcyclists, pedal cyclists, and pedestrians. The levels apply to the driving automation feature(s) that are engaged in any given instance of on-road operation of an equipped vehicle. As such, although a given vehicle may be equipped with a driving automation system that is capable of delivering multiple driving automation features that perform at different levels, the level of driving automation exhibited in any given instance is determined by the feature(s) that are engaged. This document also refers to three primary actors in driving: the (human) driver, the driving automation system, and other vehicle systems and components. These other vehicle systems (or the vehicle in general terms) do not include the driving automation system in this model, even though as a practical matter a driving automation system may actually share hardware and software components with other vehicle systems, such as a processing module(s) or operating code. The levels of driving automation are defined by reference to the specific role played by each of the three primary actors in performance of the DDT. “Role” in this context refers to the expected role of a given primary actor, based on the design of the driving automation system in question and not necessarily to the actual performance of a given primary actor. For example, a driver who fails to monitor the roadway during engagement of a level 1 adaptive cruise control (ACC) system still has the role of driver, even while s/he is neglecting it. Active safety systems, such as electronic stability control and automated emergency braking, and certain types of driver assistance systems, such as lane keeping assistance, are excluded from the scope of this driving automation taxonomy because they do not perform part or all of the DDT on a sustained basis and, rather, merely provide momentary intervention during potentially hazardous situations. Due to the momentary nature of the actions of active safety systems, their intervention does not change or eliminate the role of the driver in performing part or all of the DDT, and thus are not considered to be driving automation. It should, however, be noted that crash avoidance features, including intervention-type active safety systems, may be included in vehicles equipped with driving automation systems at any level. For ADS-equipped vehicles (i.e., levels 3-5) that perform the complete DDT, crash avoidance capability is part of ADS functionality.
On-Road Automated Driving (ORAD) Committee
RACam [1] is an Active Safety product designed and manufactured at Delphi and is part of their ADAS portfolio. It combines two sensors - Electronically Scanned RADAR and Camera in a single package. RADAR and Vision fusion data is used to realize safety critical systems such as Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC), Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB), Lane Departure Warning (LDW), Lane Keep Assist (LKA), Traffic Sign Recognition (TSR) and Automatic Headlight Control (AHL). Figure 1 RACam Front View. With an increase in Active Safety features in the automotive market there is also a corresponding increase in the complexity of the hardware which supports these safety features. Delphi’s hardware design for Active Safety has evolved over the years. In Delphi’s RACam product there are a number of critical components required in order to realize RADAR and Vision in a single package. RACam is also equipped with a fan and heater to improve the operating temperature range. RADAR and Camera sensors go through unit specific calibration to adjust the sensitivity and alignment of the sensors. Manufacturability of this advanced system needs to be part of the design solution. To achieve flawless manufacturing of RACam, Delphi uses XCP protocol at different stages of the manufacturing process. XCP commands are used to verify RADAR, Camera, Heater, Fan, Memory Integrity and Diagnostics. RADAR and Camera sensors are calibrated using XCP commands and calibrations are stored in flash memory. These calibrations are also used for sensor alignment in the vehicle. This paper provides design details of how the XCP protocol is used in the RACam project. RACam specific functions are realized using XCP user commands and they will be discussed in this paper.
Patel, UmeshParnasala, SreenivasaMelinmath, ChamarajKhalid, KMUrsu, Chandrakantha
Mitsubishi Electric has been developing a lane keeping assist system (LKAS). This system consists of our products such as an electric power steering (EPS), a camera, and an electronic control unit (ECU) for ADAS. In this system, the camera detects a lane marker, the ECU estimates reference path and vehicle position, and calculates reference steering wheel angle, and the EPS controls a steering wheel angle based on reference steering wheel angle. In this paper, we explain the calculation method of reference steering wheel angle for path tracking control. We derive a formula of reference steering wheel angle calculation that converges lateral position deviation in desired time by using lateral position deviation change rate control on forward gaze point as path tracking control algorithm. Since the formula is obtained from the vehicle model, we can easily design a controller depending on the vehicle type, by using known vehicle specifications. In addition, we confirmed that the algorithm can be used for LKAS by simulation and examination. The algorithms uses just the lateral position deviation, yaw angle deviation on the forward gaze point and the yaw rate. Since, the algorithm doesn’t need the road curvature information, it can be used for applications such as path tracking control with global navigation satellite system.
Tanaka, TakayukiNakajima, ShunsukeUrabe, TakahiroTanaka, Hideyuki
The purpose of this document is to provide guidance for the implementation of driver-vehicle interfaces (DVI) for intervention-type lane keeping assistance systems (LKAS), as defined by ISO 11270. LKAS provide support for safe lane keeping operations by drivers via momentary intervention in lane keeping actions, but do not automate part or all of the dynamic driving task on a sustained basis (see SAE J3016). Thus they are not classified as a driving automation system per SAE J3016 - Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-Road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems, nor do they prevent possible lane or roadway departures, as drivers can always override an LKAS intervention and road conditions may be such that they cannot support an LKAS intervention (e.g., too slippery, curve to tight, lateral velocity too high, etc.). As used in this document, the term LKAS refers to lateral control driver assistance features that automatically intervene to hinder a lane departure if the driver either fails to signal intent to change lanes (i.e., via turn signal activation) or fails to initiate corrective action to prevent the lane departure. It does not include lane centering-type systems (with or without required minimum steering torque input by the driver), which perform constant steering correction to maintain lane positioning (i.e., within a given lane). This document addresses DVI parameters for intervention-type LKAS equipped on vehicles designed for use on public roadways. The responsibility for the safe operation of the vehicle always remains with the driver. LKAS is intended to operate on highways and equivalent roads. This document applies to original equipment LKAS for light-duty vehicles (i.e., passenger cars and light trucks) with GVWR of less than 10000 pounds. This document does not apply to the installation of LKAS on motorcycles or medium- and heavy-duty vehicles. Finally, this document does not address system or operational requirements for LKAS systems, which are specified by ISO 11270.
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) Committee
ABSTRACT In any active safety system, it is desired to measure the “performance”. For the estimation case, generally a cost function like Mean-Square Error is used. For detection cases, the combination of Probability of Detection and Probability of False Alarm is used. Scenarios that would really expose performance measurement involve complex, dangerous and costly driving situations and are hard to recreate while having a low probability of actually being acquired . Using a virtual tool, we can produce the trials necessary to adequately determine the performance of active safety algorithms and systems. In this paper, we will outline the problem of measuring the performance of active safety algorithms or systems. We will then discuss the approach of using complex scenario design and Monte Carlo techniques to determine performance. We then follow with a brief discussion of Prescan and how it can help in this endeavor. Finally, two Monte Carlo type examples for particular active safety algorithms (LDW and AEB) will be presented.
Gioutsos, TonyBlackburn, Jeff
A novel speed and position dependent Lane Keeping Assistance (LKA) control strategy for heavy vehicles is proposed. This LKA system can be implemented with any torque overlay system capable of accepting external position or torque commands. The proposed algorithm tackles the problem of lane keeping in two ways from a heavy vehicle's perspective. First, it stabilizes the vehicle's lateral position by bringing it to the center of the lane and giving it the correct heading to stay there. This is done using a speed and position dependent control strategy that becomes less aggressive as the vehicle's speed increases and as it gets closer to the center of the lane. Such speed and position dependency is especially critical in heavy vehicles where unnecessary aggressive control can lead to oscillations about the lane's centerline when cruising at high speeds. Furthermore, the proposed controller allows the vehicle to negotiate the road's curvature efficiently while tracking the lane's centerline. This is achieved using a feed-forward strategy based on the angle of attack needed to negotiate a road of a particular curvature at a particular speed. Ultimately, the new LKA system was implemented into a torque overlay system [1, 2], and tested on a heavy vehicle. As a result, significant improvement in lane center tracking was noted, as well as in negotiating road curvature. These capabilities are expected to make driving heavy vehicles such as tractor-trailers and motor homes less strenuous, and have the potential to be the basis for autonomous heavy vehicle applications.
Nhila, AmineWilliams, DanielGupta, Vishi
Predicting driver response to road departure and attempted recovery is a challenging but essential need for estimating the benefits of active safety systems. One promising approach has been to mathematically model the driver steering and braking inputs during departure and recovery. The objective of this paper is to compare a model developed by Volvo, Ford, and UMRTI (VFU) through the Advanced Crash Avoidance Technologies (ACAT) Program against a set of real-world departure events. These departure events, collected by Hutchinson and Kennedy, include the vehicle's off road trajectory in 256 road departure events involving passenger vehicles. The VFU-ACAT model was exercised for left side road departures onto the median of a divided highway with a speed limit of 113 kph (70 mph). At low departure angles, the VFU-ACAT model underpredicted the maximum lateral and longitudinal distances when compared to the departure events measured by Hutchinson and Kennedy. Two sets of driver parameters were used to simulate the trajectories, and similar results were seen for the two sets of driver parameters. Vehicles experienced control loss at higher departure angles, particularly in cases modeled with more aggressive driver steering. Maximum lateral and longitudinal distance tended to be overpredicted at high departure angles. This study is part of a larger study that will use the VFU-ACAT driver model to simulate expected benefits of Lane Departure Warning (LDW) and Lane Keeping Assistance (LKA) systems.
Daniello, AllisonKusano, KristoferGabler, H.
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) for collision avoidance/mitigation have already demonstrated their benefit on vehicle safety. Often those systems have an additional functionality for comfort to assist the driver in non-critical driving. The verification of ADAS functionality using different test scenarios is currently investigated in many different projects worldwide. A harmonization of test scenarios and evaluation criteria is not yet accomplished. Often, these test scenarios focus on objective collision avoidance and not on the subjective interaction between driver and vehicle. The present study deals with the development of an experimental validation plan for the systems Automatic Cruise Control (ACC), Lane Departure Warning (LDW) and Lane Keeping Assist (LKA). Standardized driving maneuvers with two or more vehicles equipped with synchronized measurement are performed by professional test drivers. For this purpose selected public roads are used, and the different maneuvers are conducted avoiding critical situations. The evaluation is carried out by several different standardized criteria. Subjective evaluations are correlated with objective results from the measurements and analyzed in a specially prepared evaluation sheet. The present study summarizes the results of this evaluation using different vehicles equipped with relevant ADAS. The results show that there are significant differences in the ADAS behavior which are recognized and evaluated by the drivers. These results are used for future requirements in the vehicle development process. The limitation of the present study is that the spread in evaluation of professional driver has not yet been investigated and correlated to standard driver behavior.
Bernsteiner, StefanLindvai-Soos, DanielHoll, ReinhardEichberger, Arno
In this paper, switchable Lane Keeping System (LKS) and Active Lane Keeping Assist System (ALKAS) with early/late intervention criteria is proposed and developed. These two systems are commonly based on single track vehicle model and weighted lateral deviation prediction. The main difference is intervention strategy between two systems. Software In the Loop (SIL), Man In the Loop (MIL) verification are fulfilled for both systems till vehicle speed 200kph. For real vehicle verification, only LKS results shall be shown in this paper which shows small maximum lateral deviation also in road transition and vehicle speed variation. Real vehicle verification results for ALKAS shall not be shown because it is more related to steering feeling of driver.
Kim, JaeHeeLee, Sang MinShin, Sung KwangJeong, Sang Ho
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 55