Browse Topic: Torso

Items (756)
Thoracic injuries are common for belted occupants in frontal motor vehicle crashes. However, there remains a lack of female post-mortem human subject (PMHS) data in the literature to generate female-specific biomechanical response corridors and evaluate engineering tools such as anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) and computational human body models (HBMs). Additionally, the effect of breast tissue on thoracic response has not been directly investigated despite female ATDs and HBMs having features representing breasts. As such, this study sought to utilize simplified frontal hub impacts to (1) generate female PMHS thoracic response corridors both with breasts positioned with a bra and without breasts (no bra) and (2) preliminarily explore the influence of breasts on the thoracic responses of female PMHS. Twelve female PMHS (9 small and 3 midsize) were subjected to frontal impacts at mid-sternum with a 14.0 kg circular impactor at 4.3 m/s in conditions with and without breasts. Force versus deflection (FD) response corridors were generated, and comparisons were made between groups and to scaled FD corridors representing female response. Overall, female PMHS with and without breasts displayed differences in FD response compared to scaled corridors in terms of the shape of the initial response and peak force and deflection. Additionally, female PMHS with breasts produced lower peak force and greater peak deflection compared to those without breasts. These results suggest the importance of collection and evaluation of female biomechanical data that can be used for continued evaluation of female-specific safety tools as well as the further reduction of injury risk for all occupants during motor vehicle crashes.
Baker, Gretchen H.Kang, Yun-SeokMarcallini, AngeloLang, RyanHutter, ErinMoorhouse, KevinAgnew, Amanda M.
As automated vehicle technologies enable increased seat recline angles during travel, understanding the biomechanics of injury under these novel occupant postures becomes imperative. This study evaluated the pelvis injury response and associated kinematics of reclined small female post-mortem human surrogates (PMHS) subjected to frontal sled tests across three restraint configurations. Each configuration varied in seat stiffness and the presence of a knee bolster to assess their influence on pelvic dynamics and submarining risk. Nine PMHS tests were conducted using a consistent reclined posture (38° thorax, 75–80° pelvis angle) and production restraint systems. Submarining probability was estimated using a validated logistic regression referenced from previous study. Distinct pelvic kinematics, fracture patterns, and associated injury mechanisms emerged across the test configurations in the current dataset. Configuration 1, featuring a stiffer seat without a knee bolster, exhibited complex pelvic fractures—most notably iliac wing fractures resulting from inward bending of the ilium—and a higher probability of submarining primarily due to rearward pelvic rotation. In contrast, Configuration 2, with a compliant seat and no knee bolster, produced comminuted iliac wing fractures, dominated by shear component and a moderate probability of submarining driven primarily by downward pelvic displacement. Configuration 3, which included a knee bolster, showed injury propagation to the posterior pelvis, and none of the subjects submarined. Each configuration included three specimens; therefore, results should be interpreted with caution. Despite the small sample size, the findings highlight the critical influence of seat stiffness and restraint design on pelvic kinematics and injury mechanisms under reclined conditions. The data provided could serve in validating computational models and anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) in reclined seating configurations.
Somasundaram, KarthikDriesslein, KlausPintar, Frank A.
The objective of this study is to use parametric human body models (HBMs) to understand how geometric variability among individuals who have the same sex, stature, and body weight may affect the impact responses and injury outcomes, using midsize male and midsize female populations as representative cases. Methods were developed to quantify skeletal and external body surface variations using principal component analysis, regression, and residual error analysis. Based on this analysis, nine midsize male and nine midsize female geometric models were created, focusing on ribcage and pelvis variations, which account for most of the observed variability. These geometries were then applied to morph the simplified Global Human Body Model Consortium (GHBMC) midsize male model, producing 18 distinct HBMs. Each morphed HBM was subjected to nine impact scenarios, resulting in a total of 162 simulations to assess the effects of geometric variability. Substantial geometric variation was observed in the ribcage and pelvis, while the femur and tibia showed minimal variability for both midsize males and females. All morphed HBMs had good mesh quality, and all crash simulations terminated normally without error. Component-level tests showed relatively minor differences in impact responses among HBMs with identical sex, stature, and body weight. However, the United States New Car Assessment Program (US-NCAP) frontal crash simulations revealed considerable differences in injury risk, especially in the front passenger position. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for geometric variability, even among HBMs with the same sex, stature, and body weight, when evaluating injury risks in severe frontal crashes. It is especially important to consider ribcage geometry variations, which could impact occupant sitting height, posture, and injury risks at different body regions in frontal crashes. This study demonstrated that future virtual testing frameworks using HBMs should consider human geometric variations, especially in the ribcage and pelvis, when assessing injury risks in vehicle frontal crashes.
Hu, JingwenLin, Yang-ShenBoyle, KyleKhandare, SujataBonifas, AnneReed, Matthew P.Hasija, Vikas
This study investigated how vehicle front-end geometry, impact speed, and vehicle category influence injury risk to a midsize male pedestrian. Eighty-one generic vehicle (GV) models representing sedans, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), pickup trucks, and minivans sold in the United States were developed by morphing three base models using an automated pipeline. Front-end parameters that were varied included ground clearance (GC), bumper height (BH), hood leading-edge (HLE) height, hood length (HL), bumper lead angle (BLA), hood angle (HA), and windshield angle (WSA). Each vehicle impacted the Global Human Body Models Consortium 50th percentile male simplified pedestrian (GHBMC M50-PS) model at 30, 40, and 50 kph, totaling 243 simulations. Boundary conditions followed the European New Car Assessment Program (Euro NCAP) pedestrian test protocol. Thirty-five injury metrics were extracted across the head, neck, thorax, abdomen, pelvis, and lower extremities. Linear mixed-effects regression models assessed relationships between vehicle front-end geometry, impact speed, and injury outcomes, with predictor selection guided by principal component analysis (PCA) and collinearity diagnostics. Impact speed was the strongest predictor of injury severity across all body regions. GC and HLE height were also dominant predictors. Wrap-type trajectories were common at lower speeds and in SUVs, trucks, and minivans, while sedans and minivans showed roof vaulting at higher speeds. Head injury severity increased with speed and was influenced by HA and BLA. Minivans showed elevated brain injury criterion (BrIC) and cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM25) values, indicating increased diffuse brain injury risk. Trucks produced the highest thoracoabdominal injury metrics, which correlated with HL, HA, and HLE height. Sedans showed higher right-side (trailing leg) femur forces, slightly lower left-side femur forces than SUVs and minivans, and lowest tibia moments. Trucks had greater tibia bending moments, while SUVs and minivans had higher left femur moments compared to sedans. GC and impact speed exacerbated lower extremity injuries, varying by vehicle category. These effects are driven by geometry: Higher GC increases the unsupported span below the knee, promoting tibial bending, while lower HLE heights shift impact forces above the knee, elevating femur injury risk.
Poveda, LuisMiller, Logan E.Edwards, Colin C.Pollock, MadelineArmstrong, William M.Hsu, Fang-ChiGayzik, Scott F.Weaver, Ashley A.Stitzel, Joel D.Devane, Karan S.
Aims of the research This study aims to modify the lower body (the pelvis, thigh, and leg) of the mid-sized male pedestrian dummy FE model by considering the latest version of the physical dummy and to evaluate both the accuracy by comparing test results of the past studies and the biofidelity specified in SAE J2782 in both component and full-scale validations. Methods 1 Component validation The validation of the modified pelvis model was performed in dynamic lateral compression simulations. The sacrum and the pubis force-deflection responses of the iliac or the acetabulum impact were measured. The modified thigh and leg models were evaluated in a dynamic 3-point lateral bending simulation, measuring the force-deflection responses. The results from the simulations were compared with test results and the biofidelity requirements. 2 Full-scale validation The whole-body model was updated by incorporating these modified component models. The model of the generic buck developed for the assessment of pedestrian whole-body impact response and specified in SAE J3093 was used in this study. The buck model was made to collide with the full-scale dummy model at 40 km/h laterally. The trajectories of the head, upper spine, mid-thorax, and pelvis were measured and compared with those of the test results and the biofidelity requirements. Results The force-deflection responses from the pelvis, thigh, and leg models were similar to those of the test results, indicating they almost fell within the biofidelity requirements. As the results of the full-scale simulation, the trajectories of the head, upper spine, mid-thorax, and pelvis showed a strong agreement with those of the test results, indicating almost the same tendency as the biofidelity corridors, except for that of the pelvis. Conclusions As the results of component and full-scale validations, the equivalences of the modified pedestrian dummy model to test results and the biofidelity were confirmed in most cases.
Asanuma, HiroyukiGunji, YasuakiMori, FumieNagashima, Akiko
This study investigated sex-specific differences in thoracic injury prevalence, causation, and rib fracture patterns among seriously injured occupants in frontal motor vehicle collisions. Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) data from 2005 to 2022 included 793 front-seat occupants aged 16 years and older with Abbreviated Injury Scale 2+ thorax injury, representing 1802 thoracic injuries. Injuries were grouped as rib fracture, sternum fracture, hemo/pneumothorax, lung injury, heart injury, and other. A weighted scoring system captured contributions of involved physical components to each injury. Logistic and linear regression with generalized estimating equations assessed sex associations with injury presence and causation. Two models were estimated: a comprehensively adjusted model including demographic, crash, vehicle, restraint, and airbag deployment, and a simplified model adjusting for age, body mass index, delta-V, and occupant role. Among occupants with AIS 2+ thoracic injuries, sex-specific differences were observed in injury patterns and causation. Females were less likely than males to sustain lung injuries (OR = 0.70, p = 0.038) and more likely to sustain rib fractures (OR = 1.25, p = 0.006). Females had higher odds of rib fractures attributed to seatbelt loading in both models (Full: OR = 2.20, p = 0.005; Simplified: OR = 1.55, p = 0.021). Females were less likely than males to sustain lung injuries (OR = 0.17, p = 0.042) and hemo/pneumothoraces (OR = 0.15, p = 0.044) from instrument panel loading. Steering wheel, airbag, and other components showed no significant sex-specific associations with thoracic injury. Rib fracture patterns showed clusters along the seatbelt path in belted occupants and a more diffuse pattern in unbelted occupants, with minimal significant findings of differences between sexes. These findings contribute to the growing evidence of sex-specific injury patterns and may inform future research on injury prediction and prevention strategies. However, this dataset includes only occupants with AIS 2+ thoracic injuries and therefore cannot be extrapolated to the general population or to collisions outside those represented in the sample.
Armstrong, WilliamDevane, KaranHsu, Fang-ChiHeilmann, NinaSink, JoelMiller, Anna N.Kiani, BahramMartin, R. ShaynStitzel, Joel D.Weaver, Ashley
Head restraint requirements and designs have evolved to minimize the delay in head support and reduce differential loading in the neck. As a result, they have become bigger, closer to the occupant’s head, and angled forward relative to the seat back. Head restraints have been found missing or detached in the field; they may be removed pre-crash due to occupant comfort issues, or post-crash for better accessibility during extrication. Additionally, although rare, head restraints may become detached in severe rear impacts due to occupant loading. To better understand occupant-to-head restraint dynamic interactions, nine rear sled tests were conducted. The test conditions were selected to represent worst case severe loading scenarios. An instrumented 50th Hybrid III ATD (Anthropomorphic Test Device) was lap-shoulder belted on a right-front seat. The neck was equipped with a bracket and lower neck load cell designed for rear impacts. Three series of sled tests were performed wherein the kinematics and kinetics of a restrained ATD were compared across 3 seat configurations: a conventional modern seat, a rigidized modern seat, and an ABTS (all-belts-to seat). Occupant postures evaluated included seated nominally and leaning forward, as may occur in response to hard pre-impact braking and/or an initial frontal impact. Two crash severities were evaluated including a moderate speed (24 km/h delta V pulse based on Euro NCAP) and a very high-speed (49 km/h delta V) condition. Within each series, the sled pulse and ATD initial posture were held constant. The first series (Match #1) was conducted at 24 km/h with a leaned occupant. All biomechanical responses were below IARVs (Injury Assessment Reference Values). The highest responses relative to IARV were for upper and lower neck tension and extension. The Nij was greatest with the ABTS seat for upper neck and with the rigidized seat for lower neck, highlighting the importance of using both the upper neck and lower neck instrumentation. The second series (Match #2) was at 49 km/h with the nominally seated ATD, and the third (Match #3) was at 49 km/h with a leaning forward ATD. The biomechanical responses were below IARV when nominally seated. The biomechanical responses of Match #2 were more favourable than Match #3, highlighting the benefits of early energy absorption during the ride-down. For example, the upper neck Nij was 2.4 in the conventional seat, 4.2 in the rigidized seat and 5.1 in the ABTS. The corresponding lower neck Nij was 4.2, 5.5 and 2.3. The normalized chest 3 ms response was greatest in the rigidized seat, followed by the ABTS, irrespective of sitting posture. There are numerous reasons for an occupant to be out of position prior to a rear impact. In this study, the test conditions were selected to assess head-to-head restraint interactions in severe conditions, including leaning forward. Though the head restraints remained attached in all tests, the results provide insight on the seat and head restraint performance, and head and shoulder loading characteristics, in particular in some non-nominal postures.
Parenteau, ChantalBurnett, RogerDavidson, Russell
The WorldSID-50M dummy is widely adopted in regulatory and third-party testing programs (e.g., ECE, Euro-NCAP, C-NCAP) owing to its advanced design and superior biofidelity. However, in vehicle side oblique pole crash tests involving shoulder-covered side airbags - an expanded testing modality - excessive deflection of the upper thoracic ribs was observed. Notably, this phenomenon was absent in standard side moving deformable barrier (SMDB) tests. This study pursued two core objectives: (1) to systematically document the excessive upper thoracic rib deflection of the WorldSID-50M dummy in side oblique pole crash tests; and (2) to investigate the influence of arm-thorax interaction on such deflection using a Human Body Model (HBM) representative of a 50th percentile male occupant. Numerical simulation results reveal that while arm-thorax interaction does contribute to rib deflection, its impact on the excessive deflection of the upper thoracic ribs is negligible.
Zhou, DYChen, ShaopengYan, LiWu, JingLiu, ChongLv, XiaojiangYang, Heping
This study aimed to evaluate the influence of child anthropometry, seating postures (recline and rotation), seatbelt force limiting, and frontal collision scenarios on the kinematic response and injury risk in highly automated vehicles. The TUST IBMs 6YO-O model was conducted the frontal collisions in sled tests. This simulation matrix includes five percentiles six-year-old occupants (P3, P25, P50, P75, and P97), three seatback angles (20°, 30°, and 45°), four seat rotation angles (0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°), three seatbelt force limiting (2.6 kN, 3.6 kN, and 4.6 kN), and three frontal collision types. Injury risks were assessed including the child occupant's head, neck, chest/abdomen, and lumbar region in each simulation (n=540). The results indicate that the child anthropometry, the seatback angle, and the seat rotation angle have a significant influence on the motion responses. Statistically significant differences between all the groups within each independent variable category were observed based on the analysis of variance. As the child dimension increases, the risk of head injury decreases showing by HIC15, while the risk of neck and lumbar injuries increases. As the seatback angle increases, biomechanical parameters of the head show an increasing trend. The risk of upper neck injury decreases, while the risk of lumbar injury decreases and then increases. As the seat rotation angle increases, the risks of head, neck, and chest injuries initially rise and subsequently decrease, while the risk of lumbar injury demonstrates a downward trend. Seatbelt force limiting exhibited a positive correlation with head, neck, and lumbar injury risks. Consequently, small percentile child experiences higher head loads in smart cockpits, with seatback angle and seat rotation angle being key factors contributing to child injuries. These findings highlight the critical need to address the vulnerability of smaller children in smart cockpits by adapting integrated active and passive safety systems to mitigate their injury risk.
Wang, YanxinZhao, HongqianLi, HaiyanHe, LijuanCui, ShihaiLv, Wenle
With the rapid development of automated driving and the increasing adoption of “zero-gravity” seats, the crash safety of highly reclined occupants has become a critical issue. The current THOR dummy, designed for frontal impacts in the standard upright posture, exhibits limitations when directly applied to reclined seating configurations, including insufficient spinal flexion capability and excessive posterior pelvic rotation. In this study, the thoracolumbar spine kinematics of the THUMS human body model, reconstructed against post-mortem human subject (PMHS) tests, were analyzed. A two-segment linear fitting was employed to characterize a “dummy-like” spinal flexion response, yielding a virtual rotational hinge located near the thoracolumbar joint of the original THOR model. The characteristic rotation angle obtained from THUMS showed a strong linear correlation with the flexion moment of the T12–L1 vertebrae. Based on this relationship, the rotational joint of the THOR dummy was unlocked during impact and assigned a torsional stiffness of 600 Nm/rad. Additional modifications were implemented in the hip region to enhance model applicability. Comparative simulations demonstrated that the modified THOR model achieved closer agreement with PMHS responses than both the Hybrid III and the baseline open-source THOR models. In particular, the posterior pelvic tilt was reduced from approximately 20° in the baseline THOR to about 10° in the modified version. These results indicate that incorporating PMHS-based thoracolumbar flexion characteristics together with targeted hip modifications significantly improves the biofidelity of the THOR dummy for reclined-occupant crash scenarios, providing a solid foundation for future dummy development and safety assessment.
Guo, WenchengKuang, GaoyuanShen, WenxuanTan, PuyuanZhou, Qing
Drivers obtain road information through head and neck rotation. In order to study the influences of head and neck rotation posture on occupant injury in frontal impact scenario, the THUMS (Total Human Model for Safety) AM50 human body model with five different head and neck rotation postures but without active muscles was adopted to study the biomechanical injury responses of occupant under the frontal impact scenario at 56 km/h in this study. Firstly, the kinematic responses of total body and head acceleration curves at the center of gravity predicted by PMHS (Post Mortem Human Subject) and THUMS AM50 human model under the sled test conditions were compared to verify the simulation model for subsequent study. Then, the THUMS AM50 human model with standard occupant seating posture was adjusted to have five different head and neck rotation postures with 0°, ±20°, and ±40° rotation angle, respectively. Finally, a series of frontal impact sled with or without airbag simulations were conducted for each THUMS AM50 human model with different head and neck rotation postures. The simulation results showed that with the increasing of head and neck rotation angle, the neck injury risk was increased while the thoracic injury risk was decreased. Regardless of whether airbags were present or absent, the model prediction for the standard posture indicated a lower injury risk. And regardless of whether the head and neck posture changed, the airbag always could provide a certain protection in that posture.
Li, Dongqiangjiang, YejieTan, ChunLi, YanyanGong, ChuangyeWu, HequanJiang, Binhui
In recent years, virtual models have been extremely helpful in predicting potential injury risk to occupants in vehicle crashes. Virtual models offer detailed occupant anthropometry and closest possible bio-fidelity over existing test devices. This study focuses on the assessment of chest deflections in frontal thorax impacts using virtual human body models of a few anthropometries and transforming the assessment of injuries for a broader range of anthropometries (sections of the population). The study utilizes machine learning to enable injury assessment across a wide range of body types. A standard test scenario (Kroell load case) with a frontal blunt thoracic impact is considered for this study. Results from physical tests and simulations from various finite element human body models (HBMs) from literature are used to train supervised machine learning models. The combination of virtual simulation and machine learning reduces the reliance on physical prototypes and expands the reach of chest injury prediction for various populations. It provides a scalable, time-efficient approach to estimate injury risk and to protect a more diverse range of occupants. By integrating advanced simulation with data-driven modelling, this study offers a practical framework for evaluating chest injury risk in a wider population. The study highlights and demonstrates how predictive algorithms can enhance the versatility of simulation outcomes. Future work will explore expanding this approach to other impact types and body configurations, including vulnerable and underrepresented population groups.
Sridhar, RaamArya, BibhuDivakar, PrajwalR, Udhaya KumarBhutki, PrasadKumar, DevendraKurkuri, MahendraMohan, Pradeep
The objective of the present study is to examine trends in occupant kinematics and injuries during side impact tests carried out on vehicle models over the period of time. Head, shoulder, torso, spine, and pelvis kinematic responses are analysed for driver dummy in high speed side impacts for vehicle model years, MY2016-2024. Side impact test data from the tests conducted at The Automotive Research Association of India (ARAI) is examined for MY2016-2024. The test procedure is as specified in AIS099 or UNECE R95, wherein a 950kg moving deformable barrier (MDB) impacts the side of stationary vehicle at 50km/hr. An Instrumented 50th percentile male EUROSID-2 Anthropomorphic Test Device is positioned in the driver seat on the impacting side. Occupant kinematic data, including head accelerations, Head Injury Criterion (HIC15), Torso deflections at thorax and abdominal ribs, spine accelerations at T12 vertebra, and pelvis accelerations are evaluated and compared. The “peak” and “time to- peak” responses are compared across different vehicle model years. The effect of delta-V, vehicle MY, on occupant kinematics is examined. For different vehicle delta V, MY2016-2020 demonstrated higher average peak kinematic responses compared to the MY2020-2024. The present study enhances the existing database of occupant kinematics in side impacts. A general trend of reduction in occupant kinematics and risks for injury is observed in vehicle models over the past decade.
Mishra, SatishBorse, TanmayKulkarni, DileepMahajan, Rahul
Occupant Safety systems are usually developed using anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs), such as the Hybrid III, THOR-50M, ES-2, and WorldSID. However, in compliance with NCAP and regulatory guidelines, these ATDs are designed for specific crash scenarios, typically frontal and side impacts involving upright occupants. As vehicles evolve (e.g., autonomous layouts, diverse occupant populations), ATDs are proving increasingly inadequate for capturing real-world injury mechanisms. This has led to the adoption of computational Human Body Models (HBMs), such as the Global Human Body Models Consortium (GHBMC) and Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS), which offer superior anatomical fidelity, variable anthropometry, active muscle behaviour modelling, and improved postural flexibility. HBMs can predict internal injuries that ATDs cannot, making them valuable tools for future vehicle safety development. This study uses a sled CAE simulation environment to analyze the kinematics of the HBMs model in a frontal crash scenario. The methodology includes the initial correlation of Hybrid III CAE simulation results with physical sled test data, followed by a comparative analysis with GHBMC M50-O v6-2 based simulations. A significant difference was observed in pelvic forward displacement between the Hybrid III and GHBMC M50-O v6-2. The difference in interaction originates from the difference in the construction of the pelvis between the Hybrid III and GHBMC. In the GHBMC, reduced displacement occurs because the pelvis locks in the seat. This interaction is absent in ATDs, resulting in increased torso rotation and a potential rise in upper extremity injury risk for HBMs. The study examines the various reasons for pelvic locking and increased upper body rotation. These evaluations aim to raise the negative consequences of pelvic locking on upper extremity injuries. The probable solutions that can reduce pelvis locking while preserving occupant stability is also discussed. The study highlights the significance of HBMs in understanding occupant interactions and supports their use in the development of next-generation restraint systems.
Raj, PavanRao, GuruprakashPendurthi, Chaitanya SagarNehe, VaibhavChavan, Avinash
Severe rear-impact collisions can cause significant intrusion into the occupant compartment when the structural integrity of the rear survival space is insufficient. Intrusion patterns are influenced by impact configuration—underride, in-line, or override—with underride collisions channeling forces below the beltline through the rear wheels as a primary load path. This force concentration rapidly propels the rear seat-pan forward, contacting the rearward-rotating front seatback. The resulting bottoming-out phenomenon produces a forward impulse that amplifies loading on the front occupant’s upper torso, increasing the risk of thoracic injury even when the head is properly supported by the head restraint. This study analyzes a real-world rear-impact collision that resulted in fatal thoracic injuries to the driver, attributed to the interaction between the driver’s seatback and the forward-moving rear seat pan. A vehicle-to-vehicle crash test was conducted to replicate similar intrusion characteristics and assess the relative kinematics between the seatback and rear seat structure. Results demonstrate that seatback bottoming out under intrusion conditions significantly elevates thoracic loading. These findings highlight the need for improved rear structural design strategies to manage load paths in underride scenarios and to minimize front seatback rearward collapse and associated occupant loading.
Thorbole, Chandrashekhar
Real-world crashes involve diverse occupants, but traditional restraint systems are designed for a limited range of body types considering the applicable regulations and protocols. While conventional restraints are effective for homogeneous occupant profiles, these systems often underperform in real-world scenarios with diverse demographics, including variations in age, gender, and body morphology. This study addresses this critical gap by evaluating adaptive restraint systems aligned with the forthcoming EURO NCAP 2026 protocols, which emphasize real-world crash diversity and occupant type. Through digital studies of frontal impact scenarios, we analyze biomechanical responses using adaptive restraints across varied occupant demographics, focusing on head and chest injury (e.g., Chest Compression Criterion [CC]). This study used a Design of Experiments (DOE) approach to optimize occupant protection by timing the actuating of these adaptive systems. The results indicate that activating adaptive seatbelts and airbags before reaching peak chest and pelvis accelerations can help reduce injuries. The study suggests a rule-based framework for adaptive restraints, demonstrating that injury optimization correlates strongly with time control of restraint parameters. These insights advance the development of occupant-centric safety systems, offering scalable solutions for emerging regulatory standards and enhancing protection for underrepresented demographics in vehicular safety engineering.
satija, AnshulSuryawanshi, YuvrajChavan, AvinashRao, Guruprakash
This paper investigates the use of multi-modal cueing through full-body haptic feedback to enhance pilot-vehicle system (PVS) performance, reduce mental workload (MWL), and increase situational awareness (SA) in both good and degraded visual environments (GVE/DVE). Piloted simulations were conducted using an H-60-like flight dynamics model in a virtual reality (VR) motion-based simulator, evaluating two ADS-33-like mission task elements (MTEs) – precision hover and slalom – under visual-only and combined visual and haptic feedback conditions in both GVE and DVE. The H-60 flight dynamics were augmented with a dynamic inversion (DI)- based stability augmentation system (SAS), implementing rate-command/attitude hold (RCAH) response type on the roll, pitch, and yaw axes and altitude hold response type on the vertical axis. The SAS was designed to achieve Level 1 handling qualities per ADS-33 standards. The full-body haptic cueing strategy leveraged an outer-loop DI control law, which provided vibrotactile feedback to cue desired roll, pitch, and yaw attitudes to the pilot. Roll cues were delivered via tactors mounted on the upper arms, pitch cues via tactors on the chest and back, and yaw cues via tactors on the calves. Eight test subjects participated in the piloted simulations, including three U.S. Navy test pilots and five subjects with different flying experiences. Results indicated that haptic feedback significantly improved hover performance, reducing MWL and enhancing SA, particularly in DVE. However, in the slalom task, predefined haptic guidance misaligned with pilots’ individual control strategies, leading to performance degradation. This finding highlights the need for pilot-specific adaptive haptic feedback to mitigate inconsistencies in dynamic maneuvering tasks.
Morcos, Michael T.Saetti, UmbertoGeiger, Derek H.Kubik, Stephen T.Breed, Adam R.Crane, Clifton J.Luzzani, GabrieleFischer, Madeline R.Jun, DogyuGary, Evan
The National Highway Safety Administration (NHTSA) recently published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) to evaluate seat performance in rear impacts [1]. The ANPRM was issued partially in response to two petitions requesting an increase in seatback strength requirements and high-speed testing with various size Anthropometric Test Devices (ATDs). To better understand the effect of these requests, this study evaluates ATD responses with two high-speed rear sled conditions, three occupant sizes and various seat designs. Seat designs varied from modern conventional seats with yielding properties to stronger and stiffer seats represented by seat integrated restraint (SIR) designs, and rigidized SIR seats. Twenty-four rear sled tests were analyzed. The tests were matched by crash severity, seat designs (strength), ATD sizes and initial postures (nominal/in-position, leaned forward and leaned outboard). The test data and videos were reviewed to identify time coinciding with maximum seatback rotation. Sixteen tests were conducted with the lap-shoulder belted 50th male Hybrid III ATD at 40 km/h, 10 with nominal position and 6 with the ATD leaned forward. In the nominal position, the biomechanical responses were below Injury Assessment Reference Values (IARV); the lower neck Nij was however higher with SIR than non-SIR seats. The gap between the head/upper torso and seat/head restraint increased when the ATD was leaned forward. Compared to nominal position, the responses were higher due to the increase in differential velocity between the ATD and the seat/head restraint. The head, lower neck and chest responses were higher in the SIR than in the non-SIR seats. However, the responses were below IARV except for the lower neck extension in the SIR seat, highlighting the need to support the occupant early in the crash event and the need for yielding properties. Six tests were conducted at 56 km/h with the 5th female Hybrid III, 4 in nominal position and 2 leaned outboard. The biomechanical responses were higher with SIR than non-SIR seats in the nominal position. When the ATD was leaned outboard, the head engaged the SIR rigid structures, resulting in high head responses. Two tests were also conducted with the 95th male Hybrid III at 56 km/h in two SIR seats. The seatback deflected more than 60 degrees, and the normalized biomechanical responses were below IARV. The results from this study indicated that the ATDs’ kinematics were well controlled when the head, neck and torso were centered on the head restraint and when they were supported early in the 40 and 56 km/h rear sled tests. Seatback rotation increased with occupant size. It was higher in non-SIR seats than in SIR seats. The results also showed similar responses with the 5th ATD in a conventional seat and for the 95th in a stronger and stiffer SIR at 56 km/h. In conclusion, seat and occupant responses were favorable with the lap-shoulder belted 50th Hybrid III placed in position in a 40 km/h delta V test, regardless of seat design. The responses were also favorable with the 95th male Hybrid III placed in position at 56 km/h in a stronger seat. However, the responses were unfavorable with the stronger seat with the 5th female Hybrid III at 56 km/h, and/or when the ATD was placed out-of-position. These results highlight concerns with respect to smaller occupants when recommending stronger and stiffer seats, higher test speeds and heavier ATDs.
Parenteau, ChantalBurnett, Roger
With the increasing adoption of Zero-Gravity Seats in intelligent cockpits, there is a growing concern over the safety of occupants in reclined postures during collisions. The newly released anthropomorphic test device (ATD), THOR-AV, has modified the neck, spine, and pelvis structures to better match reclined postures. This study aims to investigate the changes in kinematic response and injury metrics for occupants in reclined postures, through high-speed frontal sled tests utilizing the THOR-AV. The tests were conducted using an adjustable rigid seat with a zero-gravity characteristic and an integrated three-point seat belt. Six tests were performed across four seat configurations: Standard, Semi-Reclined, Reclined, and Zero-gravity postures. The input acceleration pulse for these tests was derived from the equivalent double trapezoidal waveform of the Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier (MPDB) test. Data from sensors and high-speed video were collected for analysis. The results indicated that with an increasing seat back angle, the degree of head flexion relative to the torso and neck load increased, with abnormal contact between the shoulder belt and neck. After posture reclining, the forward displacement of the ATD's torso increased, with a concomitant increase in lower chest compression, a decrease in thoracic forces, and a significant rise in lumbar axial forces. The zero-gravity posture exhibited submarining, as inferred from the iliac force reduction rate and video analysis. These findings provide critical insights for optimizing occupant restraint systems in reclined postures. Furthermore, the simplified rigid seat sled test environment demonstrated in this study is conducive to modeling and validation, suggesting the potential for further simulation-based investigations.
Wang, QiangLiu, YuFei, JingYang, XiaotingWang, PeifengBai, Zhonghao
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the biofidelity of the Advanced Chinese Human Body Model (AC-HUMs) by utilizing a generic sedan buck model and post-mortem human surrogates (PMHS) test data. Methods: The boundary conditions of the simulation were derived from the PMHS test with the buck vehicle. The methodology involved the pose adjustment of the upper and lower extremities of AC-HUMs, executed through a pre-simulation approach. Subsequently, a 200 milliseconds whole body pedestrian crash simulation was conducted using the buck vehicle and the AC-HUMs pedestrian model. The trajectories of AC-HUMs during the period from initial position to head impact were recorded, including the Head CG, T1, T8 and pelvis. Based on the knee joint, the corridors of trajectories from the PMHS test were scaled to match the Chinese 50th percentile male to evaluate the biofidelity of AC-HUMs's kinematic response. Furthermore, the biomechanical responses were compared with the PMHS tests, including injuries of chest and lower extremities. This comparison comprehensively evaluated the injury prediction capability of the AC-HUMs pedestrian model under whole-body pedestrian collision scenarios. Conclusion: The results indicate that the trajectories of the four markers on the AC-HUMs pedestrian model were all within the scaled trajectory corridors, confirming that the model exhibits good biofidelity. The results reconstructed similar ligament rupture scenarios (left LCL, right ACL, and MCL) as well as partial rib injuries. The findings also revealed potential biofidelity issues in the neck, ribs, knee joint, and tibia regions of the AC-HUMs model. Despite these challenges, the AC-HUMs pedestrian model demonstrates good biofidelity in motion trajectories and possesses the ability to replicate biomechanical responses. This indicates that the AC-HUMs model has significant potential for virtual vehicle safety assessments in China, positioning it as a promising tool for this purpose.
Qian, JiaqiWang, QiangLiu, YuWu, XiaofanHuida, ZhangBai, Zhonghao
The development of autonomous driving technology will liberate the space in the car and bring more possibilities of comfortable and diverse sitting postures to passengers, but the collision safety problem cannot be ignored. The aim of this study is to investigate the changes of injury pattern and loading mechanism of occupants under various reclined postures. A highly rotatable rigid seat and an integrated three-point seat belt were used, with a 23g, 50kph input pulse. Firstly, the sled test and simulation using THOR-AV in a reclined posture were conducted, and the sled model was verified effective. Based on the sled model, the latest human body model, THUMS v7, was used for collision simulation. By changing the angle of seatback and seat pan, 5 seat configurations were designed. Through the calculation of the volunteers' pose regression function, the initial position of THUMS body parts in different seat configurations was determined. The responses of human body parts were output, including kinematics, biomechanics and kinetics. The results show that the bending state of spine in motion changes with the reclined posture changing, and more attention should be paid to the injuries of the head, chest, lumbar vertebra and pelvis. As the tilt increased, there was an increased likelihood of abnormal belt-neck contact, and the deflection of the ribcage and loading mechanism of lumbar spine changed. Raising the seat pan could help prevent significant pelvis excursion and injury. The findings will help to guide the design of inclined occupant protection and provide theoretical guidance for future crash safety evaluation.
Yang, XiaotingWang, QiangLiu, YuFei, JingWang, PeifengLi, ZhenBai, Zhonghao
The effect of seat belt misuse and/or misrouting is important to consider because it can influence occupant kinematics, reduce restraint effectiveness, and increase injury risk. As new seatbelt technologies are introduced, it is important to understand the prevalence of seatbelt misuse. This type of information is scarce due to limitations in available field data coding, such as in NASS-CDS and FARS. One explanation may be partially due to assessment complexity in identifying misuse and/or misrouting. An objective of this study was to first identify types of lap-shoulder belt misuse/misrouting and associated injury patterns from a literature review. Nine belt misuse/misrouting scenarios were identified including shoulder belt only, lap belt only, or shoulder belt under the arm, for example, while belt misrouting included lap belt on the abdomen, shoulder belt above the breasts, or shoulder belt on the neck. Next, the literature review identified various methods used to assess misuse/misrouting including testimonies and physical evidence on the occupant (i.e., belt marks/injury pattern) and on the vehicle interior and/or restraint system (i.e., loading marks). The literature review also highlighted the scarcity of test data on this topic, which may be beneficial to help guide technologies used to address and detect such scenarios. A surrogate study with a female volunteer was conducted for each of the nine belt misuse/misrouting scenarios identified from the literature review. The webbing lengths and angles at the hardware were measured. The results provide a first step in documenting evidence that could be part of a crash investigation. Additional studies with various size occupants are suggested, in conjunction with physical and/or mathematical simulation tests. Based on the literature review, a comprehensive and integrated framework to determine belt misuse/misrouting was summarized. The framework is based on information from police and accident vehicle investigation, and medical and radiology records. It also highlighted the need to measure webbing lengths and seat belt hardware angles that can be used in conjunction with surrogate studies and dynamic tests. Technologies such as video footage from in-vehicle cameras have the potential to provide additional data.
Gu, EmilyParenteau, Chantal
The introduction of unrestrained torso neck braces as a safety intervention for helmeted motorcycle riders has introduced a set of unsolved challenges. Understanding the injury prevention afforded by these devices depends on a reliable test methodology by which to critically evaluate their efficacy against the most common mechanisms of neck injury. An inverted pendulum test is proposed to evaluate compression flexion (CF), tension flexion (TF), and tension extension (TE) of the neck using a Hybrid III anthropomorphic test device (HIII ATD) neck and a motorcycle-specific ATD (MATD) neck. In addition to investigating methods to quantify the beneficial effects of a neck brace, potential adverse effects of such a device are evaluated by measuring and evaluating relevant neck response measures. To that end, measured data using a current neck brace were analyzed and applied to various injury criteria related to the ATD neck used to compare the injury risk predicted by each parameter. The HIII ATD neck allows for a more conservative evaluation due to its exaggerated response in compression and may be more suitable in evaluating the neck injury criterion and injury risk in CF loading for low energy impacts. The MATD neck is limited to certain impact modalities, particularly the uncoupled behavior between head and neck during hyperextension, and individual neck measures at lower impact energy due to its limited structural integrity in direct head impacts. In the proposed tests, injury mechanisms were initially associated with a pre-impact head orientation and expected head and neck motion. However, these associations are not definitive. Although the most relevant neck injury mechanisms related to the unrestrained torso were addressed, the authors suggest that the presented tests are supplemented by a method to evaluate higher energy vertex impacts as a means to determine a neck brace’s efficacy during this loading modality.
de Jongh, Cornelis U.Basson, Anton H.Knox, Erick H.Leatt, Christopher J.
Thorax injuries are a significant cause of mortality in automotive crashes, with varying susceptibility across sex and age demographics. Finite element (FE) human body models (HBMs) offer the potential for injury outcome analysis by incorporating anthropometric variations. Recent advancements in material constitutive models, cortical bone fracture and continuum damage mechanics model (CFraC) and an orthotropic trabecular bone model (OrthoT), offer the opportunity to further improve rib models. In this study, the CFraC and OrthoT material modes, coupled with age-specific material properties, were progressively implemented to the Global Human Body Model Consortium small female 6th rib. Four distinct 6th rib models were developed and compared against sex and age-specific experimental data. The updated material models notably refined the predictions of force–displacement responses, aligning them more closely with the experimental averages. The CFraC model significantly improved the prediction of displacement at fracture, suggesting that incorporating stress triaxiality criteria can better account for the complex loading conditions ribs face in crashes, such as combined cortical tension and shear due to rib bending and torque. The study highlights the importance of using biofidelic material models and sex and age-specific data to simulate hard tissue fractures. The improved rib model demonstrates the effectiveness of integrating updated material properties and constitutive models to enhance injury prediction accuracy, which can inform better automotive safety designs and reduce mortality rates. Further research is recommended to extend these models across different demographic groups to fully capture population variability in rib fracture risk.
Corrales, Miguel A.Holcombe, SvenAgnew, Amanda M.Kang, Yun-SeokMarkusic, CraigSugaya, HisakiCronin, Duane S.
Ongoing research in simulated vehicle crash environments utilizes postmortem human subjects (PMHS) as the closest approximation to live human response. Lumbar spine injuries are common in vehicle crashes, necessitating accurate assessment methods of lumbar loads. This study evaluates the effectiveness of lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) pressure sensors in detecting various loading conditions on component PMHS lumbar spines, aiming to develop a reliable insertion method and assess sensor performance under different loading scenarios. The pressure sensor insertion method development involved selecting a suitable sensor, using a customized needle-insertion technique, and precisely placing sensors into the center of lumbar IVDs. Computed tomography (CT) scans were utilized to determine insertion depth and location, ensuring minimal tissue disruption during sensor insertion. Tests were conducted on PMHS lumbar spines using a robotic test system for controlled loading in flexion, compression, and a combination, while monitoring pressure changes. The compression force, flexion angle, and sensor-recorded IVD fluid pressure were recorded during tests. CT images were analyzed to assess sensor placement and its impact on sensing ability. Pressure readings during various loading conditions were examined for different specimens, with data reported from the beginning of tests through relevant loading phases. The study successfully established a methodology for inserting pressure sensors into the IVD and assessed their ability to detect changes in flexion angle, compression, and combined loading. Sensors accurately tracked compression force and detected changes in flexion angle, although with some differences in response. Sensors placed optimally showed expected responses, while those placed suboptimally exhibited variability, particularly in detecting changes during flexion. This variability underscores the importance of sensor placement for accurate detection of loading states. Overall, the study provides a foundation for utilizing pressure sensors to monitor loading states in sled tests, with future work focusing on refining differentiation between loading types.
Burns, Michael R.Caldwell, A. JamesShin, JeesooSochor, Sara H.Kopp, Kevin P.Shaw, GregGepner, BronislawKerrigan, Jason R.
Thorax injury remains a primary contributor to mortality in car crash scenarios. Although human body models can be used to investigate thorax response to impact, isolated rib models have not been able to predict age- and sex-specific force-displacement response and fracture location simultaneously, which is a critical step towards developing human thorax models able to accurately predict injury response. Recent advancements in constitutive models and quantification of age- and sex-specific material properties, cross-sectional area, and cortical bone thickness distribution offer opportunities to improve rib computational models. In the present study, improved cortical and trabecular bone constitutive models populated with age-specific material properties, age- and sex-specific population data on rib cross-sectional area, and cortical bone thickness distribution were implemented into an isolated 6 th rib from a contemporary human body model. The enhanced rib model was simulated in anterior-posterior loading for comparison to experimental age- and sex-specific (twenty-three mid-size males, age range of 22- to 57-yearold) population force-displacement response and fracture location. The improved constitutive models, populated with age-specific material properties, proved critical to predict the rib failure force and displacement, while the improved cortical bone thickness distribution and cross-sectional area improved the fracture location prediction. The enhanced young mid-size male 6 th rib model was able to predict young mid-size male 6 th rib experimental force-displacement response and fracture location (overpredicted the displacement at failure by 35% and underpredicted the force at failure by 8% but within ±1 SD). The results of the present study can be integrated into full body models to potentially improve thorax injury prediction capabilities.
Corrales, Miguel A.Holcombe, SvenAgnew, Amanda M.Kang, Yun-SeokCronin, Duane S.
Due to the lack of biofidelity seen in GHBMC M50-O in rear-facing impact simulations involving interaction with the seat back in an OEM seat, it is important to explore how the boundary conditions might be affecting the biofidelity and potentially formulate methods to improve biofidelity of different occupant models in the future while also maintaining seat validity. This study investigated the influence of one such boundary condition, which is the seat back foam material properties, on the thorax and pelvis kinematics and injury outcomes of the GHBMC 50th M50-O model in a high-speed rear-facing frontal impact scenario, which involves severe occupant loading of the seat back. Two different seat back foam materials were used – a stiff foam with high densification and a soft foam with low densification. The peak magnitudes of the T-spine resultant accelerations of the GHBMC M50-O increased with the use of soft foam as compared to stiff foam. However, the change in the average biofidelity of T-spine kinematics, as quantified through both BRS and CORA, was not significant. With an increased rearward excursion of the thorax in the case of the simulation with the soft foam, posterior rib fractures that matched PMHS rib fracture locations were predicted in the GHBMC M50-O, unlike the simulation with stiff foam. Pelvis kinematics of the GHBMC M50-O trended towards PMHS kinematics using soft foam, which was supported by a significant improvement in the average biofidelity as quantified through both BRS and CORA. However, pubic rami fractures were predicted in the GHBMC M50-O pelvis with the use of soft foam, unlike the PMHS. This study found that the peak magnitudes, shape of GHBMC M50-O kinematics and injuries are sensitive to foam material. However, a significant improvement in biofidelity of the kinematics and injury prediction of the GHBMC M50-O would require testing of foam materials at a compression rate that can be obtained from the PMHS tests, to accurately represent the seat foam in the rear-facing simulations, as well as age- and anthropometry-specific modifications to the GHBMC M50-O to capture PMHS characteristics more closely.
Pradhan, VikramRamachandra, RakshitKang, Yun Seok
Compared to other age groups, older adults are at more significant risk of hip fracture when they fall. In addition to the higher risk of falls for the elderly, fear of falls can reduce this population’s outdoor activity. Various preventive solutions have been proposed to reduce the risk of hip fractures ranging from wearable hip protectors to indoor flooring systems. A previously developed rubberized asphalt mixture demonstrated the potential to reduce the risk of head injury. In the current study, the capability of the rubberized asphalt sample was evaluated for the risk of hip fracture for an average elderly male and an average elderly female. A previously developed human body model was positioned in a fall configuration that would give the highest impact forces toward regular asphalt. Three different rubber contents with 14, 28, 33 weight percent (% wt.) were implemented as the ground alongside one regular non-rubberized (0%) asphalt mixture, one baseline, and one extra-compliant playground rubber-composite material. The whole-body model was simulated to fall on the rubberized asphalt mixtures with an initial vertical velocity of 3 m/s with a 10° trunk angle and +10° anterior pelvis rotation. The impact forces were measured on the femoral head, and a previously developed hip fracture risk function was used to compare the rubberized asphalt mixtures. It was found that the rubberized asphalt mixture with 33% wt. rubber can reduce the impact forces up to 10% for the elderly male and female model compared to regular asphalt. The impact forces were most reduced for the extra-compliant playground material, with a 23% reduction for the female model. The risk of injury for the asphalt mixture with 33% wt. rubber was reduced up to 18% for elderly females and 20 for elderly males, compared to regular asphalt. The extra-compliant playground material had the most reduction of hip fracture risk for both sexes, 39 and 43% for elderly females and males, respectively.
Sahandifar, PooyaWallqvist, VivecaKleiven, Svein
Government of India, in 2017, mandated a Side Impact Test (AIS 099 technically aligned to UN ECE Regulation No. 95.03 series of amendments) on M1 category Passenger Vehicles to ensure protection of occupants in lateral impact accident scenarios. Later, in 2022, a draft notification has been issued by the Government mandating installation of 6 airbags (2 Nos of thorax side airbags, 2 Nos of head protection or curtain airbags in addition to already mandated installation of Driver and Passenger Airbags) in all such passenger vehicles. However, the vehicles fitted with side thorax airbag and curtain airbags are proposed to be assessed as per AIS099 test only. Curtain Airbags are typically installed to protect occupant’s head from severe injuries in narrow object impacts simulated in Pole Side Impact Test Configurations. However, at present, India has not notified an equivalent standard to UN R135 demanding performance of the vehicle in pole side impact scenarios. Typically, OEMs may need to perform a series of Side MDB and Pole Side Impact Tests in order to integrate the thorax and side curtain airbags in the vehicle structure and to optimize their performance. However, non-existence of a mandatory standard for Pole Side Impact scenario creates a gap in the regulatory requirements and may lead to situations wherein such airbags are not validated to the minimum performance requirements. This paper compares the structural performance and occupant protection performance of the vehicles that are equipped with side thorax airbag and side curtain airbag in an AIS099 and UN R135 test scenario. The paper attempts to highlight the importance of conducting a Side Pole test in addition to the Side Impact test on a vehicle to better judge the performance of a thorax side and curtain airbag.
Jaju, DivyanKulkarni, DileepMahindrakar, RahulMahajan, Rahul
Seatback and head restraints are the primary restraining devices in rear-impact collisions. The seatback failures expose front seat occupants to dive deep into the rear compartment survival space. Furthermore, it allows the occupants to get in a position with lower spinal tolerance to the impact direction. This paper employs sled tests to demonstrate the dangers of seatback failures in severe rear impact by allowing the occupants to orient their spine in its lowest tolerance zone to the impact direction. Furthermore, the sled test shows the potential of head pocketing phenomena and torso augmentation producing compressive cervical spine loading enough to cause first-order neck buckling. Finally, the results of collapsing seatback dynamics are compared to the strong seatback performance by conducting a similar test with a strong ABTS seatback. The study demonstrates that the strong seatbacks in severe rear impacts produce favorable outcomes while keeping the occupant in their higher spinal tolerance zone to the impact direction.
Thorbole, Chandrashekhar
Computational and experimental studies have been undertaken to investigate injurious head-first impacts (HFI), which can occur during automotive rollovers. Recent studies assume a torso surrogate mass (TSM) boundary condition, wherein the first or first two thoracic vertebrae are potted and constrained to only move in the vertical loading direction. The TSM boundary condition has not been compared with a full body (FB) model computationally or experimentally for HFI. In this study, the Global Human Body Models Consortium 50th percentile male detailed human body model (M50-O, Version 6.0) was applied to compare the kinematic, kinetic, and injury response of an HFI with a TSM boundary condition (M50-TSM), and a full body boundary condition (M50-FB). Impacts (to M50-TSM and M50-FB) were simulated between the head and a rigid plate using a commercial FE code (LS-DYNA). The impact velocity of 3.1 m/s corresponded to the onset of spinal injury in diving reconstructions, and the impact velocity reported in experiments. The TSM boundary condition was simulated by applying a mass of 16 kg to the first thoracic vertebra (T1), and constraining motion to only the vertical direction. A quantitative comparison of the head and spine impact forces, spine kinematics, and prediction of hard tissue fracture was reported. The M50-TSM model demonstrated a 53.4% lower (straighter) spinal curvature 10 ms after impact, compared to the M50-FB. The lower curvature of the M50-TSM resulted in higher neck loads during that timeframe (2.26 kN M50-TSM, 1.44 kN M50-FB). The resulting hard tissue fracture in M50-TSM was attributed to direct compression at an early time (<5 ms) in the impact, while M50-FB demonstrated compression-extension fractures later (>16 ms) in the simulation. It was concluded that kinematics, kinetics, and injury response differed for the TSM and FB boundary conditions, and therefore these conditions are critical to consider when investigating HFI.
Morgan, M.I.Corrales, M.Cripton, P.Cronin, D.S.
Introduction: The use of less lethal impact munitions (LLIMs) by law enforcement has increased in frequency, especially following nationwide protests regarding police brutality and racial injustice in the summer of 2020. There are several reports of the projectiles causing severe injuries when they penetrate the skin including pulmonary contusions, bone fractures, liver lacerations, and, in some cases, death. The penetration threshold of skin in different body regions is due to differences in the underlying structure (varying degree of muscle, adipose tissue, and presence or absence of bone). Objective: The objective of this study was to further investigate what factors affected the likelihood of skin penetration in various body regions and to develop corresponding penetration risk curves. Methods: A total of eight, fresh/never frozen, unembalmed, postmortem human specimens (PMHS) were impacted by two projectile sizes: a 1″ and 5/8″ neoprene rubber ball in various body regions. Impacted body regions included the thigh, abdomen, anterior torso between ribs, anterior torso on a rib, sternum, scapula, posterior torso on a rib, and lower back for a total of a minimum of 24 shots per PMHS. To achieve both a penetrating and non-penetrating shot for each set of impacts, the impact location was assessed post impact to determine if penetration occurred, and the velocity of the next shot was adjusted to target the alternate outcome on the contralateral side within the same body region. Post-test, each PMHS underwent X-rays to determine if any other additional injuries occurred. Results: A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine which factors (e.g., velocity and energy density) were statistically significant at predicting the risk of penetration. Energy density was utilized as the primary predictor to evaluate the two projectiles’ data together and additional parameters (e.g., skin thickness and BMI) were also tested as co-factors. Statistical significance was obtained with energy density alone for the thigh (p = 0.004), anterior torso between ribs (p = 0.043), lower back (p = 0.04), scapula (p = 0.03), and posterior torso on a rib (p = 0.005). The abdomen region was not significant with energy density alone (p = 0.085) but when BMI was added as a co-factor significance was found to be (p = 0.021). The sternum and anterior torso on a rib were not found to have statistical significance with any of the predictors analyzed. The 50% risk of penetration was found for each region that had statistical significance. The thigh had a 50% risk at 12.62 J/cm2, 22.3 J/cm2 for the anterior torso between ribs, 28.6 J/cm2 for the lower back, 33.3 J/cm2 for the scapula, and 34.3 J/cm2 for the posterior torso on ribs. Conclusion: The results support that energy density is a good predictor for estimating the likelihood of the skin to penetrate and that the risk of penetration varies by body region.
Foley, SierraSherman, DonaldDavis, AndrewMacDonald, RobertBir, Cynthia
The objective of this study was to compare head, neck, and chest injury risks between front and rear-seated Hybrid III 50th-percentile male anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) during matched frontal impacts. Seven vehicles were converted to rear seat test bucks (two sedans, three mid-size SUVs, one subcompact SUV, and one minivan) and then used to perform sled testing with vehicle-specific frontal NCAP acceleration pulses and a rear seated (i.e., second row) Hybrid III 50th male ATD. Matched front seat Hybrid III 50th male ATD data were obtained from the NHTSA Vehicle Crash Test Database for each vehicle. HIC15, Nij, maximum chest acceleration, and maximum chest deflection were compared between the front and rear seat tests, as well as between vehicles with conventional and advanced three-point belt restraint systems in the rear seat. Additionally, a modified version of the NCAP frontal star rating was calculated for the front and rear seat tests. All injury metrics, except for chest acceleration, were higher in the rear seat compared to the front. In addition, injury thresholds were exceeded or nearly exceeded in the rear seat for Nij in three vehicles, chest acceleration in one vehicle, and chest deflection in three vehicles, while no thresholds were exceeded in the front seat. When comparing advanced and conventional restraints in the rear seat, all injury metrics were higher in the vehicles with conventional restraints. All vehicles with conventional restraints in the rear had a star rating of 1, while those with advanced restraints in the rear ranged from 2 to 3. Conversely, all vehicles had 5 stars for the front seat, except one that had 4 stars. Overall, these data highlight the disparity between front and rear seat occupant protection and the benefits of advanced rear seat safety restraints, and the need for future testing.
Bianco, Samuel T.Albert, Devon L.Guettler, Allison J.Hardy, Warren N.Kemper, Andrew R.
Some anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs) currently being developed are equipped with abdominal pressure twin sensors (APTS) for the assessment of abdominal injuries and as an indicator of the occurrence of the submarining of an occupant during a crash event. The APTS is comprised of a fluid-filled polyurethane elastomeric bladder which is sealed by an aluminum cap with an implanted pressure transducer. It is integrated into ATD abdomens, and fluid pressure is increased due to the abdomen/bladder compression due to interactions with the seatbelt or other structures. In this article, a nonlinear dynamic finite element (FE) model is constructed of an APTS using LS-PrePost and converted to the LS-Dyna solver input format. The polyurethane bladder and the internal fluid are represented with viscoelastic and isotropic hypoelastic material models, respectively. The aluminum cap was considered a rigid part since it is significantly stiffer than the bladder and the fluid. To characterize the APTS, dynamic compression tests were conducted on a servo-hydraulic load frame under displacement control and held at the peak compression to allow for stress relaxation prior to slowly releasing the compression amount. The initial peak pressures and loads were 15–17% above the level observed at a 10-second hold period with 50% of the decay occurring within 300 ms. The material properties are identified using an inverse method that minimizes the difference between measured and predicted load and pressure time histories. Further, the bio-fidelity static specifications of the APTS manufacturer are used as a basis to identify the quasi-static material parameters. This approach resulted in a reasonable match between physical test data and model-simulated data for dynamic compressions of 10 mm and 15 mm (~50% compression). Additional compression tests are conducted at two compression levels (5 and 10 mm) and at four load offset configurations for use in the model validation. The FE model was used to predict peak pressure responses within approximately 10% error at full-load capacity and achieved CORA ratings >0.99 for the pressure time history. The proposed inverse method is expected to be generally applicable to the component characterization of other models and sizes of APT sensors.
Yang, PeiyuKatangoori, DivyaNoll, ScottStammen, JasonSuntay, BrianCarlson, MichaelMoorhouse, Kevin
This user’s manual covers the small adult female Hybrid III test dummy. It is intended for technicians who work with this device. It covers the construction and clothing, disassembly and reassembly, available instrumentation, external dimensions and segment masses, as well as certification and inspection test procedures. It includes instructions for safe handling of the instrumented dummy, repairing dummy flesh, and adjusting the joints throughout the dummy.
Dummy Testing and Equipment Committee
This user's manual covers the Hybrid III 10-year old child test dummy. The manual is intended for use by technicians who work with this test device. It covers the construction and clothing, assembly and disassembly, available instrumentation, external dimensions and segment masses, as well as certification and inspection test procedures. It includes guidelines for handling accelerometers, guidelines for flesh repair, and joint adjustment procedures. Finally, it includes drawings for some of the test equipment that is unique to this dummy.
Dummy Testing and Equipment Committee
Injury assessment by using a whole-body pedestrian dummy is one of the ways to investigate pedestrian safety performance of vehicles. The authors’ group has improved the biofidelity of the lower limb and the pelvis of the mid-sized male pedestrian dummy (POLAR III) by modifying those components. This study aims to evaluate the biofidelity of the whole-body response of the modified dummy in full-scale impact tests. The pelvis, the thigh and the leg of POLAR III have been modified in a past study by optimizing their compliance by means of the installation of plastic and rubber parts, which were used for the tests. The generic buck developed for the assessment of pedestrian dummy whole-body impact response and specified in SAE J3093 was used for this study. The buck representing the geometry of a small family car is comprised of six parts: lower bumper, bumper, grille, hood edge, hood and windshield. Tests were performed by conforming to SAE J2782 that specifies test conditions to evaluate the performance of a mid-sized male pedestrian research dummy. The buck was made to collide with the pedestrian dummy on its right side at 40 km/h. The trajectory of the head, upper spine, mid-thorax and pelvis and the time history of the head velocity were measured and compared with the requirements specified in SAE J2782. In addition, the test results were quantitatively assessed using the ranking method proposed by a past study. The trajectories of the landmarks along with the time histories of the head velocity generally showed a good match with the requirements specified in SAE J2782, except the trajectory of the pelvis. The biofidelity ranking parameters were rated as “excellent” or “good” using the proposed thresholds. The trajectory of the pelvis was further analyzed from the viewpoints of the structure of the dummy and the generic buck.
Asanuma, HiroyukiBae, HyejinNakamura, HidetoshiGunji, YasuakiNagashima, AkikoMori, Fumie
This procedure establishes a recommended practice for performing a lumbar flexion test to the Hybrid III 50th male anthropomorphic test device (ATD or crash dummy). This test was created to satisfy the demand from industry to have a certification test which characterizes the lumbar without interaction of other dummy components. In the past, there have not been any tests to evaluate the performance of Hybrid III 50th lumbar.
Dummy Testing and Equipment Committee
Human thoracic injury under frontal collisions is an inevitable problem in vehicle safety research. Compared with the Multiple Rigid-Body Models (MRBMs) and Finite Element Human Body Models (FEHBMs), Mathematical Equivalent Models (MEMs) can not only provide important data but also improve the research efficiency. The current thoracic MEMs usually adapted the mechanical isolation method to isolate the thorax from the human body; therefore, the effects of the head, neck, and lower body internal organs on the mechanical responses of the thorax are not considered. In this article, a new thoracic MEM, named as Improved Consistent Lobdell Model (ICLM), is developed based on the concentrated mass-spring-damping system to consider the energy absorbed by the deformation of the internal soft tissue and the motion hysteresis of the head, neck, and lower body. Thorax equivalent stiffness curve predicted by the ICLM has a good fit with the corridor obtained by the Post-Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) experiments under the medium-speed pendulum impact. Based on the parametric and sensitivity analysis, the values of parameters in each subsystem of the ICLM are adjusted to improve the accuracy of different impact tests predicted by the ICLM. The thoracic responses predicted by the adjusted ICLM under the medium-speed pendulum impact were basically consistent with that predicted by the Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS). The relative errors of maximum chest force (Fmax) and maximum chest deflection (Dmax) between the adjusted ICLM model and THUMS are 0.57% and 0.86%, respectively. The adjusted ICLM has good biofidelity and can be applied in the field of automotive engineering in the future.
Liu, ZhixinZheng, HongMa, Weijie
The purpose of this document is to provide the user with the procedures needed to properly assemble and disassemble the 50th percentile male Hybrid III dummy, certify its components and verify its mass and dimensions. Also within this manual are guidelines for handling accelerometers, repairing flesh and setting joints.
Dummy Testing and Equipment Committee
This procedure establishes a recommended practice for establishing the sensitivity of the chest displacement potentiometer assembly used in the Hybrid III family of Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs, or crash dummies). This potentiometer assembly is used in the Hybrid III family to measure the linear displacement of the sternum relative to the spine (referred to as chest compression). An inherent nonlinearity exists in this measurement because a rotary potentiometer is being used to measure a generally linear displacement. As the chest cavity is compressed the potentiometer rotates, however the relationship between the compression and the potentiometer rotation (and voltage output) is nonlinear. Crash testing facilities have in the past used a variety of techniques to calibrate the chest potentiometer, that is to establish a sensitivity value (mm/(volt/volt) or mm/(mvolt/volt)). These sensitivity values are used to convert recorded voltage measurements to engineering units, in this case chest compression in mm. Some of these techniques intended to correct for the nonlinearity and others did not. Of those that did correct for the nonlinearity, there was a variation in techniques used. This variation in calibration procedures was in part identified by the SAE Dummy Testing Equipment Committee (DTEC) and led to overall variability in chest compression measurements between laboratories. The intent of this recommended practice is to minimize the variations in chest deflection measurements between crash testing laboratories. Before this procedure was written, a round robin showed variations for the Small Female of 10% among eight labs for the chest pot sensitivity value. A follow-up round robin of this procedure showed a worst case variation of 2.7% among 10 labs, with a standard deviation of 0.9%. The initial version of SAE J2517 released in May 2000 attempted to fix this problem by recommending a two-point calibration which was not intended to correct for the nonlinearity (which, for example, is as large as 3% for the Small Female but is small near the peak). It also did not require the measurement of a starting position of the potentiometer before each crash test, thus it did not correct for the difference in starting chest geometry between a subject dummy and its design intent. It was intended to be a simple and reproducible calibration procedure which crash test facilities could easily adopt with little or no modifications to their facilities. In practice, most laboratories did not adopt the procedure since it did not correct for the nonlinearities. Recent attempts to reduce dummy-to-dummy and lab-to-lab variations at lower deflection levels (around 25 mm) have renewed interest in adopting a calibration procedure to correct for the nonlinearity of the measurement system. This current revision of this procedure uses a multipoint calibration with a third order regression to correct for the nonlinearities of the system with a standardized method. It requires changes in the calibration method of the transducer, the data collection procedures when used in a dummy, and the processing procedures after test data is collected. Following this standardized methodology will minimize linearity errors as well as lab-to-lab variations.
Dummy Testing and Equipment Committee
This SAE Recommended Practice outlines a series of performance recommendations, which concern the whole data channel. These recommendations are not subject to any variation and all of them shall be adhered to by any agency conducting tests to this practice. However, the method of demonstrating compliance with the recommendations is flexible and can be adapted to suit the needs of the particular equipment the agency is using. It is not intended that each recommendation be taken in a literal sense, as necessitating a single test to demonstrate that the recommendation is met. Rather, it is intended that any agency proposing to conduct tests to this practice shall be able to demonstrate that if such a single test could be and were carried out, then their equipment would meet the recommendations. This demonstration shall be undertaken on the basis of reasonable deductions from evidence in their possession, such as the results of partial tests. In some systems, it may be necessary to divide the whole channel into subsystems, for calibration and checking purposes. The recommendations have been written only for the whole channel, as this is the sole route by which subsystem performances affect the quality of the output. If it is difficult to measure the whole channel performance, which is usually the case, the test agency may treat the channel as two or more convenient subsystems. The whole channel performance could then be demonstrated on the basis of subsystem results, together with a rationale for combining the subsystem results together. SAE J211-1 of this SAE Recommended Practice covers electronic instrumentation. SAE J211-2 covers photographic instrumentation.
Safety Test Instrumentation Standards Committee
This procedure establishes a recommended practice for performing a Low Speed Thorax Impact Test to the Hybrid III Small Female Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD or crash dummy). This test was created to satisfy the demand by the industry to have a certification test which results in peak chest deflection similar to current full vehicle, frontal impact tests. An inherent problem exists with the current certification procedure because the normal (6.7 m/s) thorax impact test has test results for peak chest deflection that are greater than those currently seen in full vehicle, frontal tests. The intent of this document is to develop a low speed thorax certification procedure for the H-III5F dummy with a 3.0 m/s impact similar to the SAE J2779 procedure for the H-III50M dummy.
Dummy Testing and Equipment Committee
Fracture to the lumbo-pelvis region is prevalent in warfighters seated in military vehicles exposed to under-body blast (UBB). Previous high-rate vertical loading experimentation using whole body post-mortem human surrogates (PMHS) indicated that pelvis fracture tends to occur earlier in events and under higher magnitude seat input conditions compared to lumbar spine fracture. The current study hypothesizes that fracture of the pelvis under high-rate vertical loading reduces load transfer to the lumbar spine, thus reducing the potential for spine fracture. PMHS lumbo-pelvis components (L4-pelvis) were tested under high-rate vertical loading and force and acceleration metrics were measured both inferior-to and superior-to the specimen. The ratio of inferior-to-superior responses was significantly reduced by unstable pelvis fracture for all metrics and a trend of reduced ratio was observed with increased pelvis AIS severity. This study has established that pelvis fracture reduces compression forces at the lumbar spine during high-rate vertical loading, thus reducing the potential for fracture to the lumbar spine. Therefore, pelvis injury potential should be considered when implementing lumbar injury criteria specific to UBB.
R. Barnes, DavidYoganandan, NarayanMoore, JasonHumm, JohnPintar, FrankL. Loftis, Kathryn
The Test Device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR) is an advanced crash test dummy designed for frontal impact. Originally released in a 50th percentile male version (THOR-50M), a female 5th version (THOR-05F) was prototyped in 2017 (Wang et al., 2017) and compared with biofidelity sub-system tests (Wang et al., 2018). The same year, Trosseille et al. (2018) published response corridors using nine 5th percentile female Post Mortem Human Subjects (PMHS) tested in three sled configurations, including both submarining and non-submarining cases. The goal of this paper is to provide an initial evaluation of the THOR-05F biofidelity in a full-scale sled test, by comparing its response with the PMHS corridors published by Trosseille et al. (2018). Significant similarities between PMHS and THOR-05F were observed: as in Trosseille et al. (2018), the THOR-05F did not submarine in configuration 1, and submarined in configurations 2 and 3. The lap belt tension and seat forces were similar in magnitude. For configurations 2 and 3, the pelvis excursions were of the same order of magnitude between both human surrogates. However, significant differences were also observed: compared to the PMHS, the THOR-05F showed shoulder belt forces that were 1.6 to 2.1 times higher in magnitude, and lap belt force time histories that were delayed by 10 to 20 ms. In configuration 1, the chest and pelvis resultant accelerations of the dummy were delayed as well, and the pelvis excursion and rotation more than doubled that of the PMHS.
Richard, OlivierLebarbé, MatthieuUriot, JérômeTrosseille, XavierPetit, PhilippeWang, Z. JerryLee, Ellen
In vehicle collisions, the lap belt should engage the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). In this study, three-dimensional (3D) shapes of bones and soft tissues around the pelvis were acquired using a computed tomography (CT) scan of 10 male and 10 female participants wearing a lap belt. Standing, upright sitting, and reclined postures were scanned using an upright CT and a supine CT scan system. In the upright sitting posture, the thigh height was larger with a higher BMI while the ASIS height did not change significantly with BMI. As a result, the height of the ASIS relative to the thigh (ASIS-thigh height) became smaller as the BMI increased. Because the thigh height of females was smaller than that of males, the ASIS-thigh height was larger for females than for males. As the ASIS-thigh height was larger, the overlap of the lap belt with the ASIS increased. Thus, the lap belt overlapped more with the ASIS for the females than for the males. The abdomen outer shape is characterized by the trouser cord formed valley, the torso/thigh junction, and the anterior convexity formed between them depending on the adipose tissues. The abdomen outer shapes changed from the standing, the reclined posture to the upright sitting posture. In the reclined sitting posture, the lap belt is positioned upward and rearward relative to the ASIS, and the overlap of the lap belt with the ASIS was smaller compared to the upright posture.
Tanaka, YoshihikoNakashima, AtsushiFeng, HaijieMizuno, KojiYamada, MinoruYamada, YoshitakeYokoyama, YoichiJinzaki, Masahito
Vehicles with automated driving systems (ADS) may allow nontraditional seating arrangements, such as a reclined seat that is rear facing in a frontal impact. Currently, there is not a widely accepted, commercially available, anthropomorphic test device (ATD) that is designed for a reclined, rear-facing, high-speed crash situation. To begin to identify what modifications are needed for candidate ATDs to exhibit human-like characteristics in these nontraditional scenarios, ATDs should be tested and compared to available postmortem human subject (PMHS) biofidelity response corridors in these seating arrangements. The first objective of this study was to present and discuss updates to the Biofidelity Ranking System (BRS). The second objective was to use the updated BRS to evaluate the responses of the THOR 50th percentile male (Test device for Human Occupant Response, THOR-50M) ATD in the rear-facing condition. Quantitative comparisons were made between the THOR responses and biofidelity corridors obtained from matched pair PMHS 56 kph tests at 25° and 45° seatback recline angles utilizing a rear impact sled buck; the occupant seats were supported by an instrumented, rigidized structure to prevent seatback/head restraint motion and measure occupant loads applied to the seat. BRS scores revealed that the THOR has a more biofidelic average occupant response at 45° than at 25° recline, and a better average seat loading biofidelity score at 25° compared to 45° recline. Injury prediction results were mixed in how well THOR-50M measurements align with PMHS injuries. Revisions to THOR would be necessary to produce more realistic vertical spinal motion to match the PMHS head and pelvis kinematics in a reclined seat.
Hagedorn, AlenaStammen, JasonRamachandra, RakshitRhule, HeatherThomas, ColtonSuntay, BrianKang, Yun-SeokKwon, Hyun JungMoorhouse, KevinBolte IV, John H.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the thoracic response and injury metrics of the Hybrid III (HIII-50M) and Test device for Human Occupant Restraint (THOR-50M) 50th-percentile male Anthropomorphic Test Devices (ATDs) during frontal, rear-seated sled tests using modern vehicles with various rear seat characteristics. Test bucks were fabricated from seven vehicles (two sedans, three midsize sport utility vehicles [SUVs], one SUV, and one minivan) that represented varying levels of rear seat designs and safety technologies, e.g., three vehicles had advanced restraints with pretensioners (PT) and load limiters (LL). Twenty-four frontal sled tests were conducted using three sled pulses derived from the vehicle-specific New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) crash pulses (NCAP85 ΔV = 56 kph, Scaled ΔV = 32 kph, and Generic ΔV = 32 kph). The HIII-50M and THOR-50M ATDs were positioned in the right and left rear seats, respectively. Maximum chest acceleration (3 ms clip), maximum chest deflection, and deflection-based thoracic injury risk were quantified for both ATDs. For the HIII-50M, the maximum chest acceleration was below the injury threshold (60 g) for all Scaled and Generic tests, but above the threshold during one NCAP85 test with conventional restraints. The THOR-50M maximum chest acceleration was below the injury threshold for all tests. The HIII-50M Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)3+ maximum sternum deflection injury risk threshold was exceeded or nearly exceeded during the NCAP85 tests for three vehicles, none of which had advanced restraints. The THOR-50M AIS3+ maximum chest deflection injury risk threshold was exceeded during the NCAP85 test for one vehicle, which had PT and LL. Although this study indicates that there may be room for improvement with regard to rear-seat occupant protection, it is currently unknown whether or not either ATD provides a realistic kinematic response or injury risk prediction in the rear seat. Future matched postmortem human subjects (PMHS) testing will facilitate the assessment of the biofidelity and injury risk prediction capabilities of these ATDs in the rear seat.
Bianco, SamuelGuettler, Allison J.Hardy, Warren N.Albert, Devon L.Kemper, Andrew R.
Many vehicles allow consumers to adapt the vehicle environment to their families’ needs by folding or removing one or more rear row seats. It is currently unclear how different seat configurations affect child restraint systems (CRS) installed in adjacent seats. The objective is to quantify CRS performance in far-side impacts when the seating position adjacent to the CRS is in its normal upright position, folded in half, or removed. Twelve tests were conducted. Second row seats from a recent model year minivan were obtained, including full size captain’s chairs from the outboard positions and narrow seats from the center position. Rear-facing (RF) and forward-facing (FF) CRS were installed one at a time in either the outboard or center position. The seating position adjacent to the CRS was set in either the standard upright position, folded in half, or removed. Far-side impacts were conducted at 10° anterior of pure lateral at 24.8 ± 0.2 g. The Q3s ATD was used for all tests. CRS installed with the adjacent seat removed tended to have the most lateral displacement but lowest HIC36, resultant chest acceleration, and neck loads. Adjacent upright vehicle seats limited the motion of the CRS bases with mid-level level injury metrics. Adjacent folded vehicle seats reduced CRS displacement the most but resulted in higher injury metrics in the head, neck, and chest. When the RF CRS was installed in the narrow center seat with the adjacent (outboard) seat removed, the lower anchor connector of the RF CRS released from the anchor during the impact. This likely occurred due to the narrow seat cushion combined with the shape of the lower anchor hardware. With the exception of this extreme failure, the RF CRS tended to produce lower injury metrics compared to the FF CRS for all corresponding conditions.
Mansfield, JulieKang, Yun Seok
This study was conducted to assess the effects of differing rear impact pulse characteristics on restraint performance, front-seat occupant kinematics, biomechanical responses, and seat yielding. Five rear sled tests were conducted at 40.2 km/h using a modern seat. The sled buck was representative of a generic sport utility vehicle. A 50th percentile Hybrid III ATD was used. The peak accelerations, acceleration profiles and durations were varied. Three of the pulses were selected based on published information and two were modeled to assess the effects of peak acceleration occurring early and later within the pulse duration using a front and rear biased trapezoidal characteristic shape. The seatback angle at maximum rearward deformation varied from 46 to 67 degrees. It was lowest in Pulse 1 which simulates an 80 km/h car-to-car rear impact. The seatback plastic deformation was greater in the pulse with the rear biased trapezoidal acceleration profile, Pulse 4, than in the front biased trapezoidal acceleration profile, Pulse 5 (46 degrees v 41 degrees). Coincidingly, the longitudinal head displacement was slightly greater in the Pulse 4. There was limited relative motion between the ATD torsos and the seatbacks. The relative motion between the ATD torso and the seatback was less than 7 cm in all tests. The head, chest and pelvis peak acceleration and timing varied depending on the pulse. All peak head, chest, pelvis and upper and lower-neck moments occurred prior to maximum seatback dynamic deflection. The biomechanical responses were all well below injury assessment reference values. The seatback structural restitution was the highest in Pulse 1 which had the lowest amount of dynamic and plastic seatback deformation and had the highest lap belt load. All peak belt loads occurred in the rebound phase of the ATD. The sled coordinate-based data was used to determine the effective restraint stiffness. The results were used to develop a spring-mass model. The model will help understand the effects of pulse characteristics on predicted chest acceleration for future research. In conclusion, the results from this study show that pulse shape has a measurable effect of seat and ATD kinematics in high-speed rear impacts and should considered for future research and testing.
Parenteau, ChantalWhite, SamuelBurnett, Roger
Items per page:
1 – 50 of 756