Jet-Induced Compression Ignition (JICI)—Application of Spark-Assisted Compression Ignition (SACI) in a Combustion System with Active Pre-Chamber

The application of short burn durations at lean engine operation has the potential to increase the efficiency of spark-ignition engines. To achieve short burn durations, spark-assisted compression ignition (SACI) as well as active pre-chamber (PC) combustion systems are suitable technologies. Since a combination of these two combustion concepts has the potential to achieve shorter burn durations than the application of only one of these concepts, the concept of jet-induced compression ignition (JICI) was investigated in this study. With the JICI, the fuel is ignited in the PC, and the combustion products igniting the charge in the main combustion chamber (MC) triggered the autoignition of the MC charge. A conventional gasoline fuel (RON 95 E10) and a Porsche synthetic fuel (POSYN) were investigated to assess the fuel influence on the JICI. Variations of the relative air/fuel ratio in the exhaust gas (λ_ex) were performed to evaluate both the occurrence of the JICI and the dilution capability. To assess the sensitivity of the JICI, variations of the engine speed and the engine load were performed. When using RON 95 E10, a shift from a conventional PC combustion to the JICI was observed between λ_ex = 2.3 and λ_ex = 2.5. The variations of the engine speed and the engine load revealed an increased JICI intensity when the engine speed decreased and when the engine load increased. When using POSYN, no JICI was observed. The occurrence of the JICI was correlated to the knock resistances of the fuels, i.e., the lower knock resistance of RON 95 E10 yielded the JICI, whereas the higher one of POSYN did not. At λ_ex = 2.8, applying POSYN resulted in an increase of the burn duration of 5.5°CA, which was a relative increase of 41%, compared to the use of RON 95 E10 due to the absence of the JICI in case of POSYN. However, the application of POSYN resulted in the highest net indicated efficiency (η_i,net). In particular, the application of RON 95 E10 yielded a maximum of η_i,net = 41.5% at λ_ex = 2.6, whereas using POSYN resulted in a maximum of η_i,net = 42.6% at λ_ex = 2.2 due to the higher knock resistance of POSYN.