To fulfil the global aspiration of achieving net-zero emissions, hydrogen as a
fuel seems to be one of the promising candidates. High energy density per unit
mass and zero carbonaceous emissions are the two salient advantages that
hydrogen offers. In the present study, a set of detailed chemistry-based 3D CFD
combustion simulation has been carried on a 3-cylinder turbocharged,
water-cooled port fuel injection SI Hydrogen engine to understand its optimum
air–fuel ratio, compression ratio, spark timing and combustion chamber geometry.
The simulations have been conducted at the full load of the rated power and
maximum torque engine rpms. During simulation, the λ zone for
study is restricted between 2.1 and 2.7. Two different bowl geometries
(spherical and cylindrical), with two compression ratio options (12 and 14) are
explored in the simulations. While the spherical bowl seems to accommodate flame
front better than the cylindrical bowl, the compression ratio of 12 is a safer
choice to control the maximum rate of pressure rise
(dp/dθ). At full load and rated speed, the
indicated thermal efficiency drops by 7.7% as the λ swings from
2.1 to 2.7, whereas the indicated specific NOx and
dp/dθ drop by 99% and 81%, respectively.
Similarly, at full load and maximum torque RPM, the indicated thermal efficiency
drops by 6.4% with λ swing from 2.1 to 2.7, whereas the
indicated specific NOx and dp/dθ
drop by 99% and 91%, respectively. Beyond λ = 2.4
NOx reaches almost to zero, however, at a compromise of the
thermal efficiency. The dp/dθ remains well
within the acceptable limit under this scenario. To account this trade-off
between the performance and emission parameters, optimum λ zone
has been found out to be between 2.3 and 2.5.