As regulatory frameworks for zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) and battery electric vehicles (BEVs) continue to evolve, there is growing emphasis on monitoring battery durability and usage throughout the vehicle lifecycle. These regulations increasingly specify the use of data monitors and tracking mechanisms to assess battery health and performance. In addition, regulations require anti tampering mechanisms especially for monitors that have external write access.
Historically, regulations focused primarily on vehicle warranty; however, with the introduction of battery durability monitors, clarity is needed for the new battery durability monitors. More specifically if the battery durability monitors track with the lifetime of the vehicle or if they follow the lifetime of the battery. Furthermore, current regulations provide no guidance on high-voltage (HV) traction battery service strategies or methods to protect monitors from tampering by external customers.
This paper will classify battery durability tracking parameters (DIDs) according to whether they align to the lifetime of the vehicle or the battery itself. Building on this classification, a service strategy is proposed that considers typical vehicle architectures: when the battery management Electrical Computer Unit (ECU) is fully integrated with or separated from the high voltage traction (HV) battery. The outlined service strategy not only supports regulatory compliance, but also enhances data integrity by mitigating the risk of tampering with monitored parameters through a Digital Twin framework. More specifically, the Digital Twin framework introduces redundant storage of critical information in multiple storage locations such as ECUs and then a mechanism for correlating that critical information to determine a mismatch. This approach anticipates future requirements for tamper-proofing and ensures secure, reliable tracking of battery durability metrics through redundant ECU storage.