Toxicological Assessment of the International Space Station Atmosphere with Emphasis on Metox Canister Regeneration

2003-01-2647

07/07/2003

Event
International Conference On Environmental Systems
Authors Abstract
Content
Space-faring crews must have safe breathing air throughout their missions to ensure adequate performance and good health. Toxicological assessment of air quality depends on the standards that define acceptable air quality, measurements of pollutant levels during the flight, and reports from the crew on their in-flight perceptions of air quality. Air samples returned from ISS on flights 8A, UF2, 9A, and 11A were analyzed for trace pollutants. On average, the air during this period of operations was safe for human respiration. However, about 3 hours into the regeneration of 2 Metox canisters in the U.S. airlock on 20 February 2002 the crew reported an intolerable odor that caused them to stop the regeneration, take refuge in the Russian segment, and scrub air in the U.S. segment for 30 hours. Analytical data from grab samples taken during the incident showed that the pollutants released were characteristic of nominal air pollutants, but were present in much higher concentrations. The odors reported by the crew were due to relatively high concentrations of n-butanol, and possibly other pollutants in the mixture. Later data taken during regeneration of Metox canisters that had not been subject to long-term flows showed minimal effects on air quality. Long-term trending data suggest that a disruption in atmospheric mixing between the Service Module and the U.S. Laboratory has occurred and that formaldehyde concentrations are gradually increasing in the U.S. Laboratory. Trending data also show that the releases of octafluoropropane (OFP) have subsided.
Meta TagsDetails
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-2647
Pages
8
Citation
James, J., Limero, T., Beck, S., Martin, M. et al., "Toxicological Assessment of the International Space Station Atmosphere with Emphasis on Metox Canister Regeneration," SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-2647, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-2647.
Additional Details
Publisher
Published
Jul 7, 2003
Product Code
2003-01-2647
Content Type
Technical Paper
Language
English