HUD Symbology for Surface Operations: Command Guidance vs. Situation Guidance Formats

2002-01-3006

11/05/2002

Event
World Aviation Congress & Exposition
Authors Abstract
Content
This study investigated pilots' taxi performance, situation awareness and workload while taxiing with three different head-up display (HUD) symbology formats: Command-guidance, Situation-guidance and Hybrid. Command-guidance symbology provided the pilot with required control inputs to maintain centerline position; Situation-guidance symbology provided conformal, scene-linked navigation information; while the Hybrid symbology combined elements of both symbologies. Taxi speed, centerline tracking accuracy, workload and situation awareness were assessed. Taxi speed, centerline accuracy, and situation awareness were highest and workload lowest with Situation-guidance and Hybrid symbologies. These results are thought to be due to cognitive tunneling induced by the Command-guidance symbology. The conformal route information of the Situation-guidance and Hybrid HUD formats provided a common reference with the environment, which may have supported better distribution of attention.
Meta TagsDetails
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-3006
Pages
14
Citation
Foyle, D., Hooey, B., Wilson, J., and Johnson, W., "HUD Symbology for Surface Operations: Command Guidance vs. Situation Guidance Formats," SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-3006, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-3006.
Additional Details
Publisher
Published
Nov 5, 2002
Product Code
2002-01-3006
Content Type
Technical Paper
Language
English