Energy Absorption Of Composite Materials

This paper presents results of a study on the energy absorption characteristics of selected composite material systems and compares the results with aluminum. Composite compression tube specimens were fabricated with both tape and woven fabric prepreg using graphite/epoxy (Gr/E), Kevlar® epoxy (K/E) and glass/epoxy (GI/E). Chamfering and notching one end of the composite tube specimen reduced the peak load at initial failure without altering the sustained crushing load, and prevented catastrophic failure. Static compression and vertical impact tests were performed on 128 tubes. The results varied significantly as a function of material type and ply orientation in general, the Gr/E tubes absorbed more energy than the GI/E or K/E tubes for the same ply orientation. The [0/±15] Gr/E tubes absorbed more energy than the aluminum tubes. Gr/E al. d Gl/E tubes failed in a brittle mode and had negligible post crushing integrity, whereas the K/E tubes failed in an accordian buckling mode similar to the aluminum tubes. The energy absorption and cost crushing integrity of hybrid composite tubes were not significantly better than that of the single material tubes.