This study aimed to evaluate the influence of child anthropometry, seat posture (recline and rotation), seatbelt force limiting, and frontal collision scenarios on the kinematic response and injury risk to children in highly automated vehicles. The TUST IBMs 6YO-O model was conducted the frontal collisions in sled tests. This simulation matrix includes five percentiles six-year-old occupants (P3, P25, P50, P75, and P97), three seatback angles (20°, 30°, and 45°), four seat rotation angles (0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°), three seatbelt force limiting (2.6 kN, 3.6 kN, and 4.6 kN), and three collision types. Injury risks were assessed including the child occupant's head, neck, chest/abdomen, and lumbar region in each simulation (n=540). The results indicate that the child anthropometry, the seatback angle, and the seat rotation angle have a significant influence on the motion responses. Statistically significant differences between all the groups within each independent variable category were observed based on the analysis of variance. As the child dimension increases, the risk of head injury decreases based on HIC and 3ms resultant acceleration, while the risk of neck and lumbar injuries increases. As the seatback angle increases, biomechanical parameters of the head show an increasing trend. The risk of upper neck injury decreases, while the risk of lumbar injury decreases and then increases. As the seat rotation angle increases, the risks of head, neck, and chest injuries initially rise and subsequently decrease, while the risk of lumbar injury demonstrates a downward trend. Seatbelt force limiting exhibited a positive correlation with head, neck, and lumbar injury risks. Consequently, small percentile child experiences higher head loads in smart cockpits, with seatback angle and seat rotation angle being key factors contributing to child injuries. These findings highlight the critical need to address the vulnerability of smaller children in smart cockpits by adapting integrated active and passive safety systems to mitigate their injury risk.
Keywords: Frontal Collision; Child Occupants; Injury Risk; Highly Automated Vehicles; Unconventional Seating