Comparison Between Lean-Burn and Stoichiometric Technologies for CNG Heavy-Duty Engines

950057

02/01/1995

Event
International Congress & Exposition
Authors Abstract
Content
Natural gas is a viable alternative fuel to obtain low exhaust emissions. A heavy duty DI Diesel engine was converted to Otto cycle natural gas operation. Two alternative solutions were compared:
  • lean-burn technology;
  • stoichiometric feed with three-way catalyst and EGR.
Power and efficiency were similar for the two above solutions, and exhaust temperature resulted similar to the diesel engine in both cases due to the diluted operation.
The lean bum engine met EURO II ECE-R49 limits except for total hydrocarbons. Stoichiometric engine emissions resulted much lower than the limits. Particulate emissions were quite negligible for the two solutions.
Meta TagsDetails
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/950057
Pages
6
Citation
Corbo, P., Gambino, M., Iannaccone, S., and Unich, A., "Comparison Between Lean-Burn and Stoichiometric Technologies for CNG Heavy-Duty Engines," SAE Technical Paper 950057, 1995, https://doi.org/10.4271/950057.
Additional Details
Publisher
Published
Feb 1, 1995
Product Code
950057
Content Type
Technical Paper
Language
English