COMPARISON OF HELICOPTER COPILOT WORKLOAD WHILE USING THREE NAVIGATION SYSTEMS DURING NAP-OF-THE-EARTH FLIGHT

VFS-F37-013

5/17/1981

Authors
Abstract
Content

Three different generic navigation systems were examined for their effects on copilot/navigator workload and performance during nap-of-the-earth (NOE) flight. The navigation systems examined were: (1) the conventional 1:50,000 scale topographic hand-held map, (2) a Doppler navigation system in conjunction with a hand-held map, and (3) a projected map system driven by Doppler signals in conjunction with a hand-held map. Eighteen subjects performed copilot/navigator duties in an Army JUH-1H utility helicopter flown by a pilot from the US Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory (USAARL), Fort Rucker, Alabama. Data collected include copilot/navigator eye movements, pilot-copilot communications and aircraft flight path. From the summary statistics, it appears that automatic navigation systems like the ones used in this project may reduce navigation workload and improve navigation performance.

Meta TagsDetails
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4050/VFS-F37-013
Citation
Cote, D., Simmons, R., and Krueger, G., "COMPARISON OF HELICOPTER COPILOT WORKLOAD WHILE USING THREE NAVIGATION SYSTEMS DURING NAP-OF-THE-EARTH FLIGHT," Forum 37 - New Orleans, LA 1981, New Orleans, LA, May 17, 1981, https://doi.org/10.4050/VFS-F37-013.
Additional Details
Publisher
Published
5/17/1981
Product Code
VFS-F37-013
Content Type
Technical Paper
Language
English