Comparison of Different EGR Solutions

2008-01-0206

4/14/2008

Authors
Abstract
Content
This paper compares 4 different EGR systems by means of simulation in GT-Power. The demands of optimum massive EGR and fresh air rates were based on experimental results. The experimental data were used to calibrate the model and ROHR, in particular. The main aim was to investigate the influence of pumping work on engine and vehicle fuel consumption (thus CO2 production) in different EGR layouts using optimum VG turbine control. These EGR systems differ in the source of pressure drop between the exhaust and intake pipes. Firstly, the engine settings were optimized under steady operation - BSFC was minimized while taking into account both the required EGR rate and fresh air mass flow. Secondly, transient simulations (NEDC cycle) were carried out - a full engine model was used to obtain detailed information on important parameters. The study shows the necessity to use natural pressure differences or renewable pressure losses if reasonable fuel consumption is to be achieved.
Meta TagsDetails
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-0206
Citation
Vítek, O., Macek, J., Polášek, M., Schmerbeck, S., et al., "Comparison of Different EGR Solutions," SAE World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, Michigan, United States, April 14, 2008, https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-0206.
Additional Details
Publisher
Published
4/14/2008
Product Code
2008-01-0206
Content Type
Technical Paper
Language
English