Comparing Different Pilot Control Schemes for eVTOL and Powered-Lift Aircraft

This paper presents insights into a comparative approach to down-select on the most suitable pilot control schemes for eVTOL and powered-lift aircraft. The investigation examines three main areas: (1) experimental flight test performance, (2) flight control analysis, and (3) Human-Machine Interface (HMI) factors. Experiments were conducted to evaluate how various inceptor control schemes were perceived by people of various experience levels, ranging from manned aviation pilots with experience in flying F-16 jets, AH-64D helicopters and high-performance turboprop trainers, to unmanned aviation pilots of various backgrounds, such as with remote control (RC) rotorcraft and RC fixed-wing aircraft, and finally to participants with zero experience with either of these. In this experimental surveying study, all participants were briefed on a standardized mission profile and tasked to fly a VTOL drone and a computer based flight simulator using various flight control schemes. Videos were recorded for each test and reviewed for in-depth flight performance and controls scoring and analysis. At the end, feedback on key Human Machine Interface (HMI) factors for each flight control method is obtained. These results in totality provided insights, strengths and weaknesses for each flight control scheme. Upon identification of the most optimal control methodology, a novel energy-based control method to unify both multirotor drone and fixed wing aircraft control logics was developed, future testing will involve incorporating the 3+1 control inceptor scheme with the energy-based control method for further testing and optimization in a simulation environment. The goal of this study is providing a design framework to help eVTOL and powered-lift aircraft designers optimize their pilot control methodology; to become more instinctive, easier to operate, safer and more cost-effective to train new eVTOL and powered-lift pilots and operators.