This study compares 4 representative tiltrotor platforms: Joby S4, Archer Midnight, Vertical Aerospace VX4, and Uber eCRM-001 in a typical UAM mission profile under standardized rotor and wing assumptions using an integrated OpenVSP-SUAVE-VSPAero framework. This work aims to isolate the influence of eVTOL configuration from proprietary optimizations on thrust generation and aerodynamic interaction by using standard wing airfoils and a consistent rotor design tool.
Vehicle geometries were modeled in OpenVSP. Rotor Operating conditions were obtained from the SUAVE conceptual design platform. Mid-fidelity aerodynamic analysis was done using VSPAero.
SUAVE results show a decrease in thrust requirements as the tilt angle decreases, with the most complexity occurring in the transition phase where lift shifts from rotors to wing. Archer Midnight and Vertical Aerospace VX4 show higher hover thrust requirements due to their high takeoff weights. They display localized thrust increase near mid transition due to numerical adjustments made to achieve solver convergence. Joby S4 and Uber eCRM-001 display a smoother thrust requirement trend. VSPAero simulations also show a gradual decrease in thrust from hover to cruise. Joby S4’s continuously active rotor configuration maintained more stable performance than the hybrid configurations, which deactivate lift-only rotors after takeoff.
A comparative flight feasibility analysis was conducted, defined as the difference between VSPAero-predicted thrust and SUAVE-required thrust. This analysis reveals that Joby S4 maintains a positive margin across most flight phases. Archer Midnight and Vertical Aerospace VX4 show a marginal deficit in near-cruise phases. Uber eCRM-001 showed negative margins throughout the mission, indicating limited aerodynamic robustness under standardized assumptions.
Rotor-wing interactions enhances rotor thrust across all mission segments, while creating periodic pressure oscillations on the wings. Rotor-rotor interactions provide limited near-field benefits that dissipate in forward flight. The findings of this study highlight the significance of eVTOL configuration in determining performance and aerodynamic efficiency.