A Comparison of Propulsion Systems for V/STOL Supersonic Combat Aircraft

801141

09/01/1980

Event
Aerospace Congress and Exposition
Authors Abstract
Content
Three lift/propulsion concepts for a V/STOL supersonic combat aircraft have been compared. The intention was to show the effect of the propulsion system on aircraft weight and size, performance, and life cycle costs for:
  1. 1
    Vectored thrust with Plenum Chamber Burning (bypass air augmentation)
  2. 2
    Lift engines and a lift/cruise reheated turbofan
  3. 3
    A reheated lift/cruise turbofan with a remote augmented lift system (RALS)
For a postulated deck-launched intercept mission, the vectored thrust propulsion system with Plenum Chamber Burning gives the smallest and cheapest aircraft having the required performance. In addition, for a given take-off ground run the vectored thrust powered aircraft has the longest fighter escort mission radius.
Meta TagsDetails
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/801141
Pages
16
Citation
Lewis, W., and Simpkin, P., "A Comparison of Propulsion Systems for V/STOL Supersonic Combat Aircraft," SAE Technical Paper 801141, 1980, https://doi.org/10.4271/801141.
Additional Details
Publisher
Published
Sep 1, 1980
Product Code
801141
Content Type
Technical Paper
Language
English