This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
FAULT/FAILURE ANALYSISFor Digital Systems and Equipment
- Aerospace Standard
Published June 01, 1997 by SAE International in United States
Downloadable datasets availableAnnotation ability available
ARP1834 provides general guidance for the selection, approach to, and performance of various kinds of F/FA of digital systems and equipment. Its prime objective is to present several industry-acceptable, cost-effective methods for identifying, analyzing, and documenting digital-equipment failure modes and their effects. The analysis techniques and considerations presented here are directed to digital-equipment hardware faults and failures exclusively.
ARP1834 is not intended as an exhaustive treatment of the enormously complex process involved in the analytical failure evaluation of complete digital systems, nor as a universally applicable, definitive listing of the necessary and sufficient steps and actions for such evaluation.
ARP4761 provides updated methods and processes for use on civil aircraft safety assessment. When analyzing these types of systems, ARP4761 should be used in lieu of this ARP.
ARP1834 addresses the following areas of consideration in the preparation and performance of F/FA's for digital equipment:
Possible Analysis Approaches: Top-Down and/or Bottom-Up (Section 3)
Fault/Failure Modes, as they affect equipment operation and performance (Section 4)
Fault Monitoring Methodology: Reasons for, types of, and effectiveness (Section 5)
Analysis Methods: Preparation for, types of, effectiveness and coverage (Section 6)
|Aerospace Standard||Fault/Failure Analysis For Digital Systems and Equipment|
|Technical Paper||Comprehensive Design Reliability Process for the Automotive Component Industry via the Integration of Standard Reliability Methods|
Data Sets - Support Documents
|TABLE 1||F/FA Objective Versus Development Phase|
|TABLE 2||One Example of Categorizing Scope and Approach of Analysis|
|TABLE 3||Digital Systems Considerations of F/FA Approaches|
|TABLE 4||Typical Device Failure Modes|
|TABLE A1||Power-Up and Ground Test Definitions|
|TABLE A3||Data Versus Fault Status Condition|
|TABLE A4||Detection Summary|
|TABLE A5||Self-Test Detection Summary|
|TABLE B1||Mnemonics Listed in the Fault Tree|
|TABLE B3||Failure Rate (λ) and Probability of Failure (P ) for Functions Listed in the Final Boolean Equations|
S-18 Aircraft and Sys Dev and Safety Assessment Committee
The SAE S-18 Committee is active in the development of guidelines, including processes, methods and tools, to accomplish safety assessment of airplanes and related systems and equipment.
|ARP4761||GUIDELINES AND METHODS FOR CONDUCTING THE SAFETY ASSESSMENT PROCESS ON CIVIL AIRBORNE SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT|
|ARP926||DESIGN ANALYSIS PROCEDURE FOR FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS (FMECA)|
|MIL-HDBK-217||This document is not part of the subscrption.|
|RTCA Document No. DO-178||This document is not part of the subscrption.|
|RTCADocumentNo.||This document is not part of the subscrption.|
* Redlines comparisons are available for those standards listed in the Revision History that contain a radio button. A redline comparison of the current version against a revision is accomplished by selecting the radio button next to the standard and then selecting 'compare'. At this time, Redline versions only exist for some AMS standards. SAE will continue to add redline versioning with ongoing updates to SAE MOBILUS.