This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine/Fuels Combustion Performance and Emissions-A Cooperative Research Program
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 1985 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
A cooperative research program has been completed evaluating the impact of fuel composition (volatility, aromatics and sulfur) on the combustion and emissions performance of a Caterpillar 3406B turbo-charged diesel engine, which is representative of diesel truck engines of the late 1980s. Tests included both steady-state and transient operation measuring regulated and unregulated emissions. The fuel set was blended using only commercially available refinery stocks typical of those which could be considered for use in distillate fuel. The compositions of the blends were selected so that direct measurements of the individual effects of 10% and 90% distillation temperatures, aromatic content, and sulfur content could be made independently.
Engine combustion performance data indicated that all fuels operated satisfactorily; aromatic content was as high as 50% and cetane number as low as 39. Further, the cetane number did not predict the engine measured ignition delay in this program.
In steady-state emission tests, the data indicate that changes in the volatility or aromatic content had no substantial effect on particulates, smoke emissions, or gaseous emissions except NOx. Increasing aromatic content increased NOx emissions. Sulfur content had the expected impact of increasing the weight of particulate emissions but had no evident effect on the smoke opacity.
Transient testing did not change any trends except for the effect of aromatic content on HC, particulate, and smoke emissions; increasing aromatic content increased these emissions. An examination of the transient emissions engine test cycle indicates that this trend may in fact be due to engine overfueling as a result of the test cycle or possibly fuel-related factors such as fuel density or a combination of both. This is an area for further study.
No significant changes in the concentration of unregulated emissions were noted that would increase their level to an extent that any specific compound would exceed current threshold limiting values (TLV) or levels of concern. Carbonyl (aldehyde) measurements confirmed earlier good correlations with HC emissions. Engine operating conditions, rather than fuel composition, had the major determining effect on carbonyl levels. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emissions levels did not substantially increase with increasing aromatic content at levels below 35%. Fuel sulfur conversion to SO4 emissions, engine type, and operating mode are the dominant factors in establishing the rate of formation of particulate sulfate levels.
CitationBarry, E., McCabe, L., Gerke, D., and Perez, J., "Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine/Fuels Combustion Performance and Emissions-A Cooperative Research Program," SAE Technical Paper 852078, 1985, https://doi.org/10.4271/852078.
- (1) Barry E. G., Hills F. J. and McCabe L. J., “Diesel Fuel Availability, Trends and Performance,” SAE Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, Paper 790921, October 1979.
- (2) Conner D. H. and Stapf R. A, “Caterpillar 3406B Truck Engine,” SAE Paper 831201, Vancouver, Aug. 1983.
- (3) Strange H. O., “Diesel Fuel Quality and Trends,” NPRA Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, November 1982.
- (4) Hills F. J. and Schleyerbach C. G., “Diesel Fuel Properties and Engine Performance,” SAE International Automotive Engineering Congress Paper 770316, March 1977.
- (5) Schleyerbach C. G., “The Influence of Increasing the Final Boiling Point of Middle Distillate on the Performance of Diesel Equipment and Heating Installations,” 23rd Annual Meeting of the German Association for Oil Research and Coal Chemistry CDGMK), Hamburg, Germany, 1974.
- (6) Carpenter P. R., Daniel G., Portail C. and Schleyerbach C., “Middle Distillate with a Very High End Point, Their Properties and Suitability for Use as Diesel Fuel and Heating Oil,” 26th Annual Meeting DGMK, Berlin, Germany, October 1978.
- (7) Barry E. G., Portail C. and Schwindeman W. R., “Impact of the Diesel Passenger Car on European Refining and Fuel Quality,” Conference on Energy Utilization, Societe des Ingenieurs de 1'Automobile, Paris, France, 1976
- (8) “Informational Report on the Measurement and Characterization of Diesel Exhaust Emissions,”” CRC Report 517 (NTIS Accession PB81221251), December 1980.
- (9) Perez J. M., Lipari F. and Seizinger D. E., “Cooperative Development of Analytical Methods for Diesel Emissions & Particulates - Solvent Extractable Aldehydes and Sulfate Methods,” SAE Paper 840413, Detroit, MI, March 1984.
- (10) Eisenberg W. C., Schuetzle D. and Williams R. W., “Cooperative Evaluation of Methods for the Analysis of PAH in Extracts from Diesel Particulate Emissions,” SAE Paper 840414, Detroit, MI, March 1984.
- (11) U.S. EPA Transient Smoke Test Procedure, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 86, Subpart I.
- (12) U.S. EPA Heavy-Duty Diesel Transient Test, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 86, Subpart N.
- (13) Hardenberg H. O. and Ehnert E. R., “Ignition Quality Determination Problems with Alternative Fuels for Compression Ignition Engines,” SAE Paper 811212, 1981.
- (14) Kirsch L. J., Rosenfeld J. L. J. and Summers R., “Studies of Fuel Injection into a Rapid Compression Machine,” Combustion and Flame, 43:11-21, 1981.
- (15) Fortnagle M., Hardenberg H. O., and Gairing M., “Requirements of Diesel Fuel Quality, Effects of Poor Quality Fuel,” API Refining Dept., 61 (1982), 43-53.
- (16) Gross G. P. and Murphy K. E., Jr., “The Effects of Diesel Fuel Properties on Performance, Smoke and Emissions,” ASME, Energy Technology Conference and Exhibition, Paper 78-DGP-26, November 1978.
- (17) “Investigation of the Effects of Fuel Composition and Injection and Combustion System Type on Light-Duty Diesel Exhaust Emissions,” CRC Project CAPE-32-80.
- (18) Schleyerbach C. G., Drummond J. and McNally M. J., “Performance of Future Type Diesel Fuel,” I Mech. E. Paper C114/82, 1982.
- (19) Rife J. and Heywood J. B., “Photographic and Performance Studies of Diesel Combustion with a Rapid Compression Machine,” SAE Transactions, V. 83, Paper 740948.
- (20) Dent J. C., “Turbulent Mixing Rate - Its Effect on Smoke and Hydrocarbon Emissions from Diesel Engines,” SAE Congress and Exposition, Paper 800092, February 1980.
- (21) Hiereth H., “Comparison of Diesel Combustion and Turbocharging Systems as Regards Their Specific Characteristics and Application,” NPRA Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, November 1977.
- (22) Shamah E. and Wagner T. O., “Fuel Quality or Engine Design: Which Controls Diesel Emission?” SAE International Automotive Engineering Congress, Paper 730168, January 1973.
- (23) Marshall W. F. and Flemming R. D., “Diesel Emissions as Related to Engine Variables and Fuel Characteristics,” SAE National Combined Fuels and Lubricants and Powerplant and Truck Meetings, Paper 710836, October 1971.
- (24) Broering L. C. and Holtman L. W., “Effect of Diesel Fuel Properties on Emissions and Performance,” National Combined Farm, Construction and Industrial Machinery and Powerplant Meetings, Paper 740692, September 1974.
- (25) Muller K., “Influence of Engine Design and Fuel Quality on Diesel Emissions, II Fuel Quality,” Ninth World Petroleum Congress, Panel Discussion 23 (4 II).
- (26) Howells H. E. and Walker S. T., “Fuel Limitations on Diesel Engine Development and Application,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engr., V. 184, Part 3P, Paper 10.
- (27) Wall J. C. and Hoekman S. K., “Fuel Composition Effects on Heavy-Duty Diesel Particulate Emissions,” SAE Fuels and Lubricants Meeting, Paper 841364, October 1984.
- (28) Khatri N. J., Johnson J. H. and Leddy D. G., “The Characterization of the Hydrocarbon and Sulfate Fractions of Diesel Particulate Matter,” SAE Paper 780111, Detroit MI, Feb. 1978.
- (29) Springer K. J. and Stahman R. C., “Unregulated Emissions from Diesels Used in Trucks and Buses,” SAE Paper 770258, Detroit, MI, Feb. 1977.
- (30) Perez J. M., “Chemical Characterization of Diesel Exhaust - A Report of Cooperative Studies of Analytical Methods,” 76th Annual Meeting, APCA, Paper 83-48.5, June 1983.
- (31) Harvey C. A., Carey P. M., Sommers J. H. and Garbe R. J,, “Toxicologically Acceptable Levels of Methanol and Formaldehyde Emissions from Methanol-Fueled Vehicles,” SAE Paper 841357, Baltimore, MD, October 1984.
- (32) Perez J. M., Personal Communication to CRC-APRAC, CAPE-24-72 Project Group, Sept. 30, 1980.
- (33) Williams R. L., Perez J. M. and Griffing M. E., “A Review of Sampling Condition Effects on Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PNA) from Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines,” SAE Paper 852081, Tulsa, OK, Oct. 1985.
- (34) Perez J. M. and Otto C. M., “Carbonyl Compounds - A Possible Nomograph Approach”, CAPI-1-64, Chemical Characterization, CRC-APRAC Panel Workshop, Detroit, MI, March 1985 (oral presentation).
- (35) Springer K. J., “The Measurement of Diesel Odor by a Trained Panel,” SwRI, CRC-APRAC Diesel Emission Measurement Symposium, Chicago, IL, 1977.
- (36) Coluccl J. M. and Barnes G. J., “The Effect of Exhaust System Geometry on Exhaust Dilution and Odor Intensity,” SAE Paper 710219, Detroit, MI, 1971.
- (37) Sax N. I., Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials, Van Nostrand Rheinhold Co., 5th Edition, 1979.
- (38) Eisenberg W. C. and Perez J. M., “Analysis of Volatile Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Heavy-Duty Diesel Exhaust Emissions,” Presented at EPA Diesel Emissions Symposium, Raleigh, NC, October 1981.