This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Implementation Methodologies for Simulation as a Service (SaaS) to Develop ADAS Applications

Journal Article
2021-01-0116
ISSN: 2641-9645, e-ISSN: 2641-9645
Published April 06, 2021 by SAE International in United States
Implementation Methodologies for Simulation as a Service (SaaS) to Develop ADAS Applications
Sector:
Citation: Kagalwala, H., Srivastava, S., Venkatesan, M., Srinivasan, S. et al., "Implementation Methodologies for Simulation as a Service (SaaS) to Develop ADAS Applications," SAE Int. J. Adv. & Curr. Prac. in Mobility 3(4):2123-2135, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4271/2021-01-0116.
Language: English

References

  1. Department of Transportation, Office of Operations, D Jan. 2007 https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/seitsguide/
  2. Kaleto , H.A. , Winkelbauer , D. , Havens , C.J. , and Smith , M. Advancements in Testing Methodologies in Response to the FMVSS 201U Requirements for Curtain-Type Side Airbags SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0470 2001 https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0470
  3. Kalra , N. May 18, 2017 https://www.rand.org/pubs/testimonies/CT475.html
  4. Gomes , L. April 02, 2020 https://www.technologyreview.com/2014/08/28/171520/hidden-obstacles-for-googles-self-driving-cars/
  5. https://www.tesla.com/
  6. Templeton , B. April 30, 2019 https://www.forbes.com/sites/bradtempleton/2019/04/29/teslas-shadow-testing-offers-a-useful-advantage-on-the-biggest-problem-in-robocars/
  7. Department of Transportation, Office of Operations, D Jan. 2007 https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/seitsguide/
  8. Koopman , P. and Wagner , M. Challenges in Autonomous Vehicle Testing and Validation SAE Int. J. Trans. Safety 4 1 15 24 2016 https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0128
  9. Butler , R. and Finelli , G. The Infeasibility of Quantifying the Reliability of Life-Critical Real-Time Software IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 19 1 3 12 1993 10.1109/32.210303
  10. Huang , W. , Wang , K. , Lv , Y. , and Zhu , F. Autonomous Vehicles Testing Methods Review 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2016 10.1109/itsc.2016.7795548
  11. Schöner , H. Simulation in Development and Testing of Autonomous Vehicles Proceedings 18, Internationales Stuttgarter Symposium 1083 1095 2018 10.1007/978-3-658-21194-3-82
  12. Wang , F. , Wang , X. , Li , L. , Mirchandani , P. , and Wang , Z. Digital and Construction of a Digital Vehicle Proving Ground IEEE IV2003 Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8683) 10.1109/ivs.2003.1212968
  13. Prochazka , D. and Hodicky , J. Modelling and Simulation as a Service and Concept Development and Experimentation 2017 International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT) 2017 10.1109/miltechs.2017.7988851
  14. Wang , S. and Wainer , G. Jan. 01, 1970 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0037549714562994
  15. Cayirci , E. Modeling and Simulation as a Cloud Service: A Survey 2013 Winter Simulations Conference (WSC) 2013 10.1109/wsc.2013.6721436
  16. Nair , V.G.
  17. Fadaie , J.G.
  18. GmbH , I. Aug. 25, 2020 https://ipg-automotive.com/products-services/simulation-software/carmaker/
  19. Mechanical Simulation https://www.carsim.com/
  20. MSC Software Corporation https://www.mscsoftware.com/product/adams-car
  21. Waymo https://waymo.com/
  22. Madrigal , A.C. Dec. 03, 2018 https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/08/inside-waymos-secret-testing-and-simulation-facilities/537648/
  23. Intel Labs https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/research/overview.html
  24. TRI https://www.tri.global/
  25. Barcelona Computer Vision Center http://www.cvc.uab.es/
  26. Unity https://unity.com/
  27. Unreal Engine https://www.unrealengine.com/en-US/
  28. CARLA https://carla.org/
  29. AutoNavi https://www.autonavi.com/
  30. Baidu https://www.baidu.com/
  31. Apollo https://apollo.auto/
  32. PreScan https://tass.plm.automation.siemens.com/prescan
  33. Metamoto https://www.metamoto.com/
  34. https://www.cognata.com/
  35. Metamoto https://medium.com/@metamoto/how-legacy-automotive-simulation-tools-differ-from-metamotos-scalable-cloud-based-simulation-c9a1e07b9c2c
  36. OpenCAV - Automation Robotics & Manufacturing Lab, Clemson University International Center for Automotive Research https://sites.google.com/view/opencav/
  37. Clemson University International Center for Automotive Research https://cuicar.com/
  38. Clemson - Metamoto Presentation at Nvidia GTC 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uACVoNThBdk&ab_channel=NVIDIA
  39. gRPC https://grpc.io/
  40. Google-Protobuf https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers
  41. Docker https://www.docker.com/
  42. Xavier , M.G. , Neves , M.V. , Rossi , F.D. , Ferreto , T.C. et al. Performance Evaluation of Container-Based Virtualization for High Performance Computing Environments 2013 21st Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing 2013 10.1109/pdp.2013.41
  43. ROS http://wiki.ros.org/ROS/Introduction
  44. Autoware.AI https://www.autoware.ai/
  45. Autoware.Auto https://www.autoware.auto/
  46. MATLAB/Simulink https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html
  47. ROS Toolbox - MATLAB https://www.mathworks.com/help/ros/getting-started-with-ros-toolbox.html
  48. MATLAB Coder https://www.mathworks.com/help/coder/

Cited By