This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Simulation Study Assessing the Viability of Shifting the Location of Peak In-Cylinder Pressure in Motored Experiments
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
To be published on September 27, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Hybrid powertrains utilize an engine to benefit from the power density of the liquid fuel to extend the range of the vehicle. On the other hand, the electric machine is used for; transient operation, for very low loads and where legislation prohibits any gaseous and particulate emissions. Consequently, the operating points of an engine nowadays shifted from its conventional, broad range of speed and load to a narrower operating range of high thermal efficiency. This requires a departure from conventional engine architecture, meaning that analytical models used to predict the behavior of the engines early in the design cycle are no longer always applicable. Friction models are an example of sub-models which struggle with previously unexplored engine architectures. The “pressurized motored” method has proven to be a simple experimental setup which allows a robust FMEP determination against which engine friction simulation can be fine-tuned. This is due to the elimination of the experimental variability introduced by combustion, whilst retaining the fired-like load on the cranktrain, as reported in SAE 2018-01-0121. It employs a “shunt pipe” recirculating air from the exhaust back into the intake, therefore requiring very little air supply demands. The temperature of the bulk gas was also maintained similar to that of a fired engine with the use of Argon as the working gas, reported in SAE 2019-01-0930. Mixtures of Argon-to-air were also used to investigate the effect of temperature on FMEP, published in SAE 2019-24-0141 and SAE 2020-01-1063. This leaves one pending criticism of the pressurized motoring method - that of having a relatively fixed location of peak pressure (≈1DegCA BTDC), when compared to a fired engine, which is around 10DegCA for CI and 20DegCA for SI. In this publication, a simulation investigation is performed to assess the viability and extent of an experimental modification to the pressurized motoring method, involving the use of small fuel injections to shift the location of peak pressure in the aim of replicating better the fired engine, whilst retaining the benefits of a motored setup.
CitationSammut, G., Pipitone, E., Caruana, C., and Farrugia, M., "A Simulation Study Assessing the Viability of Shifting the Location of Peak In-Cylinder Pressure in Motored Experiments," SAE Technical Paper 2020-24-0009, 2020.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
- Mufti, R.A., and Priest, M. , “Experimental Evaluation of Piston-Assembly Friction under Motored and Fired Conditions in a Gasoline Engine,” Transactions of the ASME 127:826-836, Oct. 2005.
- Pranay, N., and Scott, M. , “Friction between Piston and Cylinder of an IC Engine: A Review,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1405, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-1405.
- Mauke, D., Dolt, R., Stadler, J., Huttinger, K. et al. , Methods of Measuring Friction under Motored Conditions with External Charging (Switzerland: Kistler Group, 2016).
- Richardson, D.E. , “Review of Power Cylinder Friction for Diesel Engines,” Transactions of the ASME 122, 2000.
- Caruana, C., Farrugia, M., and Sammut, G. , “The Determination of Motored Engine Friction by Use of Pressurized ‘Shunt’ Pipe between Exhaust and Intake Manifolds,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0121, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0121.
- Allmaier, H. et al. , “An Experimental Study of the Load and Heat Influence from Combustion on Engine Friction,” International Journal of Engine Research 17(3):347-353, Mar. 2015.
- MAHLE International GmbH , “Engine Testing,” Pistons and Engine Testing (Stuttgart, Germany: Springer), ch. 7, 117-281.
- Caruana, C., Farrugia, M., Sammut, G., and Pipitone, E. , “Further Experimental Investigation of Motored Engine Friction Using Shunt Pipe Method,” SAE Int. J. Adv. & Curr. Prac. in Mobility 1(4):1444-1453, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0930.
- Caruana, C., Pipitone, E., Farrugia, M., and Sammut, G. , “Experimental Investigation on the Use of Argon to Improve FMEP Determination Through Motoring Method,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-24-0141, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-24-0141.
- Caruana, C., Farrugia, M., Sammut, G., and Pipitone, E. , “Further Experiments on the Effect of Bulk In-Cylinder Temperature in the Pressurized Motoring Setup Using Argon Mixtures,” SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-1063, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-1063.
- Pipitone, E., Beccari, A., and Beccari, S. , “The Experimental Validation of a New Thermodynamic Method for TDC Determination,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-24-0052, 2007, https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-24-0052.
- Woschni, G. , “A Universally Applicable Equation for the Instantaneous Heat Transfer Coefficient in the Internal Combustion Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 670931, 1967, https://doi.org/10.4271/670931.
- Finol, C.A., and Robinson, K. , “Thermal Modelling of Modern Engines: A Review of Empirical Correlations to Estimate the In-Cylinder Heat Transfer Coefficient,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 220(12):1765-1781, Dec. 2006.
- Chen, S., and Flynn, P. , “Development of a Single Cylinder Compression Ignition Research Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 650733, 1965, https://doi.org/10.4271/650733.
- Livengood, J.C., Rogowski, A.R., and Taylor, C.F. , “The Volumetric Efficiency of Four-Stroke Engines,” SAE Quarterly Transactions 6(4):617-636, Oct. 1952.
- Heywood, J.B. , “Gas Exchange Processes,” Internal Combustion Engines Fundamentals (McGraw-Hill Series in Mechanical Engineering, 1988), 211.