This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Framework for Effective Implementation and Sustenance of Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Guidelines in the Aerospace Product Design and Development Phase of Aerospace Advanced Product Quality Planning
Technical Paper
2020-01-5111
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Event:
Automotive Technical Papers
Language:
English
Abstract
The aerospace industry had recently initiated the journey towards the transition to the Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) process, for the manufacturing and assembly process of their products in their supply chain, aiming to continually meet the rising delivery demand of the global aerospace industry and improve the quality and costs of current products and services. Of the various APQP process elements and requirements, one specific requirement is the application of Design For Manufacturing and Assembly (DFMA®) guidelines, early in the product design and development phase, aiming to design, develop, and analyze the designs for effective and efficient product realization. These guidelines, though widely used, are fairly new for the aerospace industry, and there is no standard framework readily available to aerospace organizations for the successful deployment of these guidelines in the Aerospace APQP process. The study in this technical paper is a continuation of the research work carried out on the enhanced Design For Manufacture (DFM) guidelines in the aerospace industry and focuses on the development of such a framework derived from the existing APQP and DfMA models that can be specifically enhanced to suit aerospace processes for the implementation and sustenance of the DFMA® guidelines in the Aerospace APQP product design and development phase. The study focuses on the importance of the framework for the application of DfMA principles in aerospace designs, highlighting the design intents, actions, and sources that support the design goals. The study analyzes the current challenges and opportunities that the design and supplier organizations can mitigate and adapt for a successful APQP transition from the current traditional manufacturing and assembly processes appropriate for all aerospace product designs and services. The framework methodology is developed using the Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) concept by defining, measuring, analyzing, designing, and validating the DfMA guidelines for successful implementation and sustenance in an aerospace environment. The framework proposed can be tested in an aerospace design manufacturing environment and used as a reference guide for organizations intending to effectively apply and sustain the DfMA element in the Aerospace APQP Phase 2 of Product Design and Development.
Recommended Content
| Aerospace Standard | Software Supportability Program Standard |
| Aerospace Standard | Software Supportability Program Implementation Guide |
| Aerospace Standard | Software Support Concept |
Authors
Citation
Rajamani, M. and Punna, E., "A Framework for Effective Implementation and Sustenance of Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Guidelines in the Aerospace Product Design and Development Phase of Aerospace Advanced Product Quality Planning," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-5111, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-5111.Data Sets - Support Documents
| Title | Description | Download |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 4 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 5 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 6 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 7 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 8 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 9 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 10 |
Also In
References
- Anderson , M.D. Design for Manufacturability; How to Use Concurrent Engineering to Rapidly Develop Low-Cost, High-Quality Products for Lean Production, Productivity New York CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group 2014
- Boothroyd , G. , Dewhurst , P. , and Knight , W.A. Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly Boca Raton, FL CRC Press 2013
- SAE International Standard https://doi.org/10.4271/AS9145 2020
- SAE International https://iaqg.org/tools/scmh/ 2020
- G.F , B. , and Carvalho , J. Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Methodology Applied to Aircrafts Design and Manufacturing IFAC Proceedings Volumes 46 7 116 121 2013
- Rolls-Royce Value Chain Competitiveness (VCC) https://www.rolls-royce.com/~/media/Files/R/Rolls-Royce/documents/sustainability/value-chain-competitiveness/7-vcc-how-to-design-for-manufacture-and-assembly.pdf 2020
- Matousek , R. , Burton , A.H. , and Johnson , D.C. Engineering Design a Systematic Approach London Blackie & Son Limited 1974
- Peck , H. Designing for Manufacture: Topics in Engineering Design London Pitman 1973
- Blockley , R. , and Shyy , W. Aircraft Design for Manufacture and Assembly—Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering Chichester, West Sussex Wiley 2010
- Poli , C. Design for Manufacturing a Structured Approach Boston Butterworth-Heinemann 2001
- Bralla , J.G. Design for Manufacturing Dearborn, MI Society of Manufacturing Engineers 2010
- Selvaraj , P. , Radhakrishnan , P. , and Adithan , M. An Integrated Approach to Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Based on Reduction of Product Development Time and Cost The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 42 1-2 13 29 2009
- Azamatov , A. , Lee , J.-W. , and Byun , Y.-H. Comprehensive Aircraft Configuration Design tool for Integrated Product and Process Development Journal Advances in Engineering Software 42 1-2 35 49 2011
- Birch , A. , Hon , K.K.B. , and Short , T.D. Performance Evaluation of DFE Tools IET Conference Publications 2010 565 CP 51 56 2010
- Bralla , J.G. Design for eXcellence New York McGraw-Hill 1996
- Curran , R. , Raghunathan , S. , and Price , M. Review of Aerospace Engineering Cost Modelling: The Genetic Causal Approach Progress in Aerospace Sciences 40 8 487 534 2004
- Howard , L. , and Lewis , H. The Development of a Database System to Optimize Manufacturing Processes during Design Journal of Materials Processing Technology 134 3 374 382 2003
- Ibusuki , U. , and Kaminski , P.C. Product Development the Process with Focus on Value Engineering and Target-Costing: A Case Study in an Automotive Company International Journal of Production Economics 105 2 459 474 2007
- Lohtander , M. , Eskelinen , H. , and Varis , J. Review of Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Aspects to Designing Modern Micro-Wave and Sheet Metal Products Key Engineering Materials 486 9 12 2011
- Meerkamm , H. Design for X-A Core Area of Design Methodology Journal of Engineering Design 5 2 165 181 1994
- Sadraey , M.H. Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach Hoboken, NJ Wiley 2013
- Sahmrani , N. , and Harik , R.F. DFMA+, a Quantitative DFMA Methodology Computer-Aided Design and Applications 7 5 701 709 2010
- Petit , R.G. , Wang , J.J. , and Toh , C. Validated Feasibility Study of Integrally Stiffened Metallic Fuselage Panels for Reducing Manufacturing Costs Hampton, VA NASA Langley Research Center 2000
- Groover , M.P. Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems Hoboken, NJ John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
- Rajamani , M. , and Punna , E. Enhancement of Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Guidelines for Effective Application in Aerospace Part and Process Design SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-6001 2020 https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-6001
- Rajamani , M. , and Punna , E. A Study on the Development of Aerostructures Design for Assembly Guidelines and Their Effective Use to Proactively Identify Opportunities for Improvement in Mitigating Common Defects of the Aerostructures Assembly SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0009 2020 https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0009
- Rajamani , M. , and Punna , E. A Study on the Development of an Effective Framework for Implementation and Sustenance of an Obsolescence Material Management System in an Aerospace Supplier Manufacturing Industry Environment SAE Technical Paper 2019-28-0145 2019 https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-28-0145
- Rajamani , M. , and Punna , E. A Framework for Effective Implementation of Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis with Control Plan to Mitigate Process, Discrete Manufacturing, and Service Industries, Using Aerospace Standard Best Practices SAE Technical Paper 2019-28-0149 https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-28-0149
- Rajamani , M. A Study on Mitigating Head Gap Defects due to Radius of Externally Threaded Fasteners in Aerostructures Assembly SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-6004 2019 https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-6004
- Rajamani , M.R. and Punna , E. A Study on the Application of Engineering Tolerance Analysis, Variation Sensitivity Analysis Management and Their Effect on Establishing, Improving Aerospace Parts and Systems Reliability Management the 34th Indian Engineering Congress 2019 Hyderabad, India Dec. 27-29, 2019 978-81-942561-5-1
- Rajamani , M. , and Punna , E. Application of Weight, Quality, Cost, Delivery, and Productivity Optimization Techniques as an Aerospace Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Guideline in the Selection of Alternate Aerospace Commercial Off-the-Shelf Consumables SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-6002 2020 https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-6002
- Rajamani , M.R. 2019