This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Characterization of Aerodynamic Impact of Build Variation in Class 8 Tractor Trailers
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published May 27, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Event: Automotive Technical Papers
Build variation and tolerance stack up are unavoidable in the vehicle manufacturing process, not only for individual components and assemblies but also for the vehicle at large. Deviations across several components, each within tolerance limits, could ultimately have a significant effect on vehicle aerodynamic performance. The objective of this study is to quantify the impact of several such build variations on vehicle drag. A Lattice-Boltzmann-based simulation method was used in conjunction with design of experiments to construct a Kriging response surface interpolation model to efficiently characterize the impact of 17 different body and chassis build variations on the aerodynamic drag of a VNL 780 tractor trailer at a nonzero yaw angle. The top three parameters with greatest aerodynamic impact were then evaluated at the opposite symmetric yaw angle to understand the impact of build variation on vehicle asymmetry. Finally, a Monte Carlo-based stochastic sampling was applied to the Kriging response surface interpolation models to quantify the distribution of drag variation for a known distribution of build variation parameters. The methodology provides a systematic approach for characterizing trends, ranking sensitivities, and quantifying aerodynamic performance impact from build variation.
CitationSowmianarayanan, B., Sengupta, R., Lee, C., and Ellis, M., "Characterization of Aerodynamic Impact of Build Variation in Class 8 Tractor Trailers," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-5054, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-5054.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- US Department of Energy , “Technology Roadmap for the 21st Century Truck Program,” Washington, D.C., 2000.
- Saltzman, E. , “A Summary of NASA Dryden’s Truck Aerodynamic Research,” SAE Technical Paper 821284, 1982, https://doi.org/10.4271/821284.
- Cooper, K. , “Truck Aerodynamics Reborn - Lessons from the Past,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3376, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-3376.
- Cooper, K. and Leuschen, J. , “Model and Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Tests of Second-Generation Aerodynamic Fuel Saving Devices for Tractor Trailer,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3512, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-3512.
- Storms, B., Satran, D., Heineck, J., and Walker, S. , “Detailed Experimental Results of Drag-Reduction Concepts on a Generic Tractor-Trailer,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3525, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-3525.
- Surcel, M. and Shetty, M. , “The Impact of Design, Position and Combination of Aerodynamic Devices on Drag and Fuel Consumption,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 8(2):722-731, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-2894.
- Castellucci, P. and Salari, K. , “Computational Simulation of Tractor-Trailer Gap Flow with Drag-Reducing Aerodynamic Devices,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3625, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-3625.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice , “Road Load Measurement and Dynamometer Simulation Using Coastdown Techniques,” SAE Standard J1263, Rev. Mar. 2010.
- “Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles—Phase 2—Regulatory Impact Analysis, EPA-420-R-16-900,” Aug. 2016.
- “Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles—Phase 2, Final Rule, 49 CFR Parts 523, 534, 535 and 538,” Oct. 2016.
- Lu, L., Zhang, L., Liu, S., Le Loc'h, E. et al. , “Optimization of Aerodynamics and Engine Cooling Performance of a JMC Mid-Size Truck Using Simulation,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-2032, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-2032.
- Sun, S., Chang, Y., Fu, Q., Zhao, J. et al. , “Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of an SUV in Early Development Stage Using a Response Surface Method,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 7(4):1252-1263, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-2445.
- Yang, W., Zhou, X., Peng, J., Li, B. et al. , “Optimization of the Underbody Layout of a Small Van for Better Aerodynamics Using Digital Simulation,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0574, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0574.
- Novacek, J. and Sowmianarayanan, B. , “Characterization of Aerodynamic Design Spaces for Adjustable Tractor Surfaces,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 9(2):350-358, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-8147.
- Heinecke, M., Beedy, J., Horrigan, K., and Sengupta, R. , “Aerodynamic Study of a Production Tractor Trailer Combination using Simulation and Wind Tunnel Methods,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-2040, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-2040.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice , “Guidelines for Aerodynamic Assessment of Medium and Heavy Commercial Ground Vehicles Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” SAE Standard J2966, Rev. Sept. 2013.
- Jones, D. , “A Taxonomy of Global Optimization Methods Based on Response Surfaces,” Journal of Global Optimization 21(4):345-383, Dec. 2001, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101277102557.
- Sóbester, A.S., Leary, S.J., and Keane, A.J. , “On the Design of Optimization Strategies Based on Global Response Surface Approximation Models,” Journal of Global Optimization 33(1):31-59, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-004-6733-1.
- Cressie, N.A.C. , “The Origins of Kriging,” Mathematical Geology 22:239-252, 1990.