This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Roles of Vehicle Seat Cushion Stiffness and Length in Child Restraint System (CRS) Performance
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The objective is to determine whether responses and injury risks for pediatric occupants in child restraint systems (CRS) are affected by vehicle seat cushion stiffness and fore/aft cushion length. Eighteen sled tests were conducted using the Federal Motor Vehicles Safety Standard (FMVSS) 213 frontal pulse (48 km/h). Seats from a recent model year vehicle were customized by the manufacturer with three different levels of cushion stiffness: compliant, mid-range, and stiff. Each stiffness level was quantified using ASTM D 3574-08 and all were within the realistic range of modern production seats. The usable length of each seat cushion was manipulated using foam spacers provided by the manufacturer. Two different seat lengths were examined: short (34.0 cm) and long (43.5 cm). Three different types of CRS were tested with size-appropriate anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs): rear-facing (RF) CRS with 12-month-old CRABI, forward-facing (FF) CRS with Hybrid III 3-year-old, and high-back booster with Hybrid III 6-year-old. Each CRS, vehicle seat (including cushion and frame), seat belt webbing and buckle were replaced after every test. ATD kinematic and kinetic data were compared across seat cushion lengths and cushion stiffness levels to determine which seat configurations were the most beneficial for each type of CRS. For RF CRS, short vehicle seats allowed more y-axis rotation (SAE J211) but reduced several injury metrics including HIC36. For FF CRS, long and short seats resulted in similar injury metrics across matched conditions. For boosters, short seats increased chest resultant acceleration but did not have a noticeable effect on other injury metrics. The range of cushion stiffness examined in this study did not have a consistent or relevant effect on any of the CRS or occupant responses.
CitationMansfield, J., Kwon, H., and Kang, Y., "The Roles of Vehicle Seat Cushion Stiffness and Length in Child Restraint System (CRS) Performance," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0977, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0977.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
- Durbin, D., Hoffman, B., and AAP Council on Injury, Violence, and Poison Prevention , “Child Passenger Safety,” Pediatrics 142(5), 2018.
- Huang, S. and Reed, M. , “Comparison of Child Body Dimensions with Rear Seat Geometry,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1142, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-1142.
- Bilston, L. and Sagar, N. , “Geometry of Rear Seats and Child Restraints Compared to Child Anthropometry,” Stapp Car Crash Journal 51:275-298, 2007.
- Reed, M., Ebert-Hamilton, S., Klinich, K., Manary, M. et al. , “Assessing Child Belt Fit, Volume I: Effects of Vehicle Seat And Belt Geometry on Belt Fit for Children With and Without Belt Positioning Booster Seats,” University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, UMTRI Report, UMTRI-2008-49-1, 2008.
- Klinich, K., Reed, M., Wu, J., Rupp, J. , “Assessing the Restraint Performance of Vehicle Seats and Belt Geometry Optimized for Older Children,” US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, DOT HS 812 048, 2014.
- Klinich, K., Manary, M., Orton, N., Reed, M. et al. , “Performance of Harnessed Child Restraints on Vehicle Seats with Modified Cushion Lengths and Variable Belt Geometry,” US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, DOT HS 812 116, 2015.
- Klinich, K., Reed, M., Ebert, S., and Rupp, J. , “Effect of Realistic Vehicle Seats, Cushion Length, and Lap Belt Geometry on Child ATD Kinematics,” University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute UMTRI Report, Ann Arbor, MI, UMTRI-2011-20, 2011.
- Hu, J., Wu, J., Reed, M., Klinich, K. et al. , “Rear Seat Restraint System Optimization for Older Children in Frontal Crashes,” Traffic Inj Prev 14:614-622, 2013.
- NHTSA, National Child Passenger Safety Board, Safe Kids Worldwide , “National Child Passenger Safety Certification Training Program,” Washington, DC, 2014.
- NHTSA , “Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 213: Child Restraint Systems,” Code of Federal Regulations, Washington DC, 2011.
- Prasad, A. and Weston, D. , “NHTSA’s Rear Seat Safety Research,” in Proceedings of the 22nd Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference, Washington, DC, 2011, Paper #11-0348.
- ASTM , “Standard Test Methods for Flexible Cellular Materials-Slab, Bonded, and Molded Urethane Foams,” ASTM D3574-08, 2008. doi:10.1520/D3574-08.
- Bing, J., Bolte, J. IV, and Agnew, A. , “Investigation of Child Restraint System (CRS) Compatibility in the Vehicle Seat Environment,” Traffic Inj Prev 16:S1-S8, 2015.
- Bing, J., Agnew, A., and Bolte, J. IV , “Compatibility of Booster Seats and Vehicles in the US Market,” Traffic Inj Prev 19(4):385-390, 2018.
- Society of Automotive Engineers , “SAEJ211-1 Instrumentation for Impact Test, Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice,” SAE International, Warrendale, PA, 2007.
- Mertz, H., Irwin, A., and Prasad, P. , “Biomechanical and Scaling Basis for Frontal and Side Impact Injury Assessment Reference Values,” Stapp Car Crash Journal 60:625-657, 2016.
- Sherwood, C., Abdelilah, Y., and Crandall, J. , “The Performance of Various Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems in a Frontal Crash,” Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 487:303-321, 2004.
- Sherwood, C. and Crandall, J.R. , “Frontal Sled Tests Comparing Rear and Forward Facing Child Restraints with 1-3 Year Old Dummies,” Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 51:169-180, 2007.
- Sherwood, C., Shaw, C., Van Rooij, L., Kent, R. et al. , “Prediction of Cervical Spine Injury Risk for the 6-Year-Old Child in Frontal Crashes,” Traffic Inj Prev 4(3):206-213, 2003.
- Reed, M. , “Measurement of the Contour and Deflection of Vehicle Seats for Comparison with the FMVSS 213 Dynamic Test Bench,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0265, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0265.
- Wietholter, K., Echemendia, C., and Louden, A. , “Development of a Representative Seat Assembly for FMVSS No. 213,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Detroit, MI, 17-0431, 2017.