This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Understanding the Charging Flexibility of Shared Automated Electric Vehicle Fleets
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The combined anticipated trends of vehicle sharing (ride-hailing), automated control, and powertrain electrification are poised to disrupt the current paradigm of predominately owner-driven gasoline vehicles with low levels of utilization. Shared, automated, electric vehicle (SAEV) fleets offer the potential for lower cost and emissions and have garnered significant interest among the research community. While promising, unmanaged operation of these fleets may lead to unintended negative consequences. One potentially unintended consequence is a high quantity of SAEVs charging during peak demand hours on the electric grid, potentially increasing the required generation capacity. This research explores the flexibility associated with charging loads demanded by SAEV fleets in response to servicing personal mobility travel demands. Travel demand is synthesized in four major United States metropolitan areas: Detroit, MI; Austin, TX; Washington, DC; and Miami, FL. In each of these four cities, SAEV simulations are performed using local projected electricity prices from the Regional Energy Deployment System (ReEDS) for a handful of supply side scenarios. A coordinated charging model is introduced that seeks to reduce fleet charging costs in response to time-varying electricity prices and increasing shares of personal trip demand served (between 1% and 25% of all metro trips served by the SAEV fleet). Simulation results are presented across various scenarios assuming fleetwide coordination to minimize charging energy costs while constrained by offering adequate mobility service to fleet customers. The results indicate that the SAEV charging load is highly flexible; energy costs were shown to reduce between 13% and 46% across a wide range of simulated scenarios. In addition, these savings were realized without detrimentally impacting the fleet’s ability to service trips.
CitationMoniot, M., Ge, Y., Reinicke, N., and Schroeder, A., "Understanding the Charging Flexibility of Shared Automated Electric Vehicle Fleets," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0941, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0941.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- Office of Transportation and Air Quality , “Fast Facts U.S. Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions 1990-2016,” Environmental Protection Agency, 2018.
- Wolfram, P. and Lutsey, N. , “Electric Vehicles: Literature Review of Technology Costs and Carbon Emissions,” International Council on Clean Transportation, 2016.
- International Energy Agency , “Global EV Outlook 2019,” Paris, 2019.
- Slowik, P. and Lutsey, N. , “The Surge of Electric Vehicles in United States Cities,” International Council on Clean Transportation, 2019.
- Faisal, A., Kamruzzaman, M., Yigitcanlar, T., and Currie, G. , “Understanding Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Literature Review on Capabililty, Impact, Planning and Policy,” The Journal of Transport and Land Use 12(1):45-72, 2019.
- Industry Research , “Global Mobility as a Service (MaaS) Market Research Report 2019,” 2019.
- Fagnant, D. and Kockelman, K. , “The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios,” Transportation Research Part C 40:1-13, 2013.
- Fagnant, D. and Kockelman, K. , “Dynamic Ride-Sharing and Fleet Sizing for a System of Shared Autonomous Vehicles in Austin, Texas,” Transportation 45(1):143-158, 2018.
- Jung, J., Jayakrishnan, R., and Park, J. , “Dynamic Shared-Taxi Dispatch Algorithm with Hybrid-Simulated Annealing,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 31(4):275-291, 2016.
- Chen, T., Kockelman, K., and Hanna, J. , “Operations of a Shared, Autonomous, Electric Vehicle Fleet: Implications of Vehicle & Charging Infrastructure Decisions,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 94:243-254, 2016.
- Bischoff, J. and Maciejewski , “Agent-Based Simulation of Electric Taxicab Fleets,” Transportation Research Procedia 4:191-198, 2014.
- Jung, J. and Jayakrishnan , “Simulation Framework for Modeling Large-Scale Flexible Transit System,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2016:31-41, 2014.
- Agatz, N., Erera, A., Savelsbergh, M., and Wang, X. , “Dynamic Ride-Sharing: A Simulation Study in Metro Atlanta,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 45(9):1450-1464, 2011.
- Alonso-Mora, J., Samaranayake, S., Wallar, A., Frazzoli, E. et al. , “On-Demand High-Capacity Ride-Sharing via Dynamic Trip-Vehicle Assignment,” Proceedings of the National Academies of Science 114(3):462-467, 2017.
- Jung, J. and Chow, J. , “Large-Scale Simulation-Based Evaluation of Fleet Repositioning Strategies for Dynamic Rideshare in New York City,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0924, 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0924.
- Bauer, G., Greenblatt, J., and Gerke, B. , “Cost, Energy, and Environmental Impact of Automated Electric Taxi Fleets in Manhattan,” Environmental Science & Technology 52(8):4920-4928, 2018.
- U. S. C. Bureau , “2010 Census Urban Area Reference Maps,” 2010.
- Ballou, R.H. and Rahardja, H.S.N. , “Selected Country Circuity Factors for Road Travel Distance Estimation,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 36(9):843-848, 2002.
- United States Department of Transportation , “2017 National Household Travel Survey 2017,” https://nhts.ornl.gov/, accessed Aug. 1, 2019.
- Cole, W., Frazier, W., Donohoo-Vallett, Mai, T. et al. , “2018 Standard Scenarios Report: A U.S. Electricity Sector Outlook,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2018.
- Neubauer, J. and Wood, E. , “Thru-Life Impacts of Driver Aggresion, Climate, Cabin Thermal Management, and Battery Thermal Management on Battery Electric Vehicle Utility,” Journal of Power Sources 259:262-275, 2014.