This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Driver response to left incurring path intrusions at sign-controlled intersections
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
To be published on April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
Straight intersecting path or “side” collisions account for 12% of all motor vehicle crashes and 24% of fatalities. While previous research has examined driver responses to hazards striking from the right (near side), no research has quantified driver responses to hazards striking from the left (far side) of an intersection. The purpose of this study was to measure driver response time (DRT) and response choice for two versions of this scenario. In one condition, the hazard vehicle was initially stopped at the intersection before accelerating into the path of the participant driver. In the other condition, the hazard vehicle approached and entered the intersection while moving at a constant speed of 50km/h. Testing was conducted using an Oktal full car driving simulator. 107 licenced drivers (NFemale=57, NMale=50) completed a short familiarization drive followed by the experimental drive in which they encountered both the initially stopped and moving conditions of the straight path hazard, in a counterbalanced order. DRT was defined as the time between when the hazard vehicle crossed a trigger located two meters from the curb until the driver reacted either by touching the brake pedal or swerving. The average DRT was 0.38s in the initially moving hazard condition and 2.34s in the stopped condition. In the moving condition, many participants were able to anticipate the hazard before it crossed the defined starting location. To account for the more obvious hazard precursor in the moving condition, a geographic location further from the intersection is proposed as the starting location for measuring DRT in gradually developing hazard scenarios. There was also a significant difference in DRT (p=0.002) based on the avoidance action taken. Drivers who swerved had significantly longer response times than those who braked (p=0.02). They were also more likely to get into a collision.