Try Mobilus Beta
Search tips
 This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Assessing Fit and Finish Design Sensitivity by Mapping Measurements to Utility

Journal Article
2020-01-0600
ISSN: 2641-9645, e-ISSN: 2641-9645
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0600
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
Assessing Fit and Finish Design Sensitivity by Mapping Measurements to Utility
Sector:
Citation: Slon, C., LI, X., Valetchikov, V., and Pandey, V., "Assessing Fit and Finish Design Sensitivity by Mapping Measurements to Utility," SAE Int. J. Adv. & Curr. Prac. in Mobility 2(4):1925-1934, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0600.
Language: English

References

  1. Stylidis , K. , Wickman , C. , and Söderberg , R. Defining Perceived Quality in the Automotive Industry: An Engineering Approach Procedia CIRP 36 165 170 2015
  2. Mansour , J. , Jawad , B. , Liu , L. , Fernandez , V. et al. Optimizing the Rear Fascia Cutline Based on Investigating Deviation Sources of the Body Panel Fit and Finish SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1600 2017 https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1600
  3. Babu , J.R. and Asha , A. Tolerance Modelling in Selective Assembly for Minimizing Linear Assembly Tolerance Variation and Assembly Cost by Using Taguchi and AIS Algorithm The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 75 5-8 869 881 2014
  4. Kazmer , D. , Barkan , P. and Ishii , K. Quantifying Design and Manufacturing Robustness Through Stochastic Optimization Techniques ASME Design Automation Conference August 1996
  5. Khorzad , D. , Shi , J. , Hu , S.J. , and Ni , J. 1995
  6. Stylidis , K. , Madrid , J. , Wickman , C. , and Söderberg , R. Towards Overcoming the Boundaries between Manufacturing and Perceived Quality: An Example of Automotive Industry Procedia CIRP 63 733 738 2017
  7. Falgarone , H. , Thiébaut , F. , Coloos , J. , and Mathieu , L. Variation Simulation during Assembly of Aon-Rigid Components Procedia CIRP 43 202 207 2016
  8. Wearring , C. and Slon , C. Process Capability Measurements for Complex Assemblies SAE Technical Paper 911641 1991 1991 https://doi.org/10.4271/911641
  9. Wu , S.K. 1991
  10. Deming , W.E. Improvement of Quality and Productivity Through Action By Management National productivity review 1 1 12 22 1981
  11. Juran , J.M. 1993
  12. Crosby , P.B. 1986
  13. Zeithaml , V.A. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence Journal of Marketing 52 3 2 22 1988
  14. Aaker , D.A. Managing Brand Equity Simon and Schuster 2009
  15. Garvin , D.A. and Quality , W.D.P. What Does Product Quality Really Mean Sloan management review 25 1984
  16. Castleberry , S.B. and McIntyre , F.S. Consumers’ Quality Evaluation Process Journal of Applied Business Research 8 3 74 82 1992
  17. Mitra , D. and Golder , P.N. How Does Objective Quality Affect Perceived Quality? Short-Term Effects, Long-Term Effects, and Asymmetries Marketing Science 25 3 230 247 2006
  18. Power , D. , Schoenherr , T. , and Samson , D. Assessing The Effectiveness of Quality Management In a Global Context IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 58 2 307 322 2010
  19. Chang , H.C. and Chen , H.Y. Optimizing Product Form Attractiveness Using Taguchi Method and TOPSIS Algorithm: A Case Study Involving a Passenger Car Concurrent Engineering 22 2 135 147 2014
  20. Dagman , A. , Wickman , C. and Söderberg , R. A Study of Customers’ and the Automotive Industry’s Attitude Regarding Visual Quality Appearance of Split-Lines 4th International Conference on Advanced Engineering Design AED 2004, September
  21. Bhise , V.D. , Hammoudeh , R. , Nagarajan , R. , Dowd , J.D. , and Hayes , M. Towards Development of a Methodology to Measure Perception of Quality of Interior Materials SAE Transactions 503 509 2005
  22. Stoll , T. , Stockinger , A. , and Wartzack , S. Geometric Manipulation Method for Evaluation of Aesthetic Quality in Early Design Phases DS 68-9: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design Lyngby/Copenhagen, Denmark 2011 153 164
  23. Stylidis , K. , Madrid , J. , Wickman , C. , and Söderberg , R. Towards Overcoming the Boundaries Between Manufacturing and Perceived Quality: An Example of Automotive Industry Procedia CIRP 63 733 738 2017
  24. Bernoulli , D. Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk Econometrica 22 1 22 36 1954
  25. Bentham , J. The Principles of Morals and Legislation Amherst, NY Prometheus Books 1780 1988
  26. Von Neumann , J. and Morgenstern , O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior Third Princeton University Press Princeton 1954
  27. Friedman , M. and Savage , L.J. The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk Journal of Political Economy 56 4 279 304 1948
  28. Howard , R.A. The Foundations of Decision Analysis Revisited Advances in Decision Analysis: From Foundations to Applications Edwards , W. , Miles , R.F. , and von Winterfeldt , D. Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2007
  29. Pandey , V. Decision Based Design CRC Press 2013
  30. Edwards , W. How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking IEEE transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 7 5 326 340 1977
  31. Klein , G. , Moskowitz , H. , Mahesh , S. and Ravindran , A. 1985
  32. Thurston , D.L. A Formal Method for Subjective Design Evaluation with Multiple Attributes Research in Engineering Design 3 2 105 122 1991
  33. Malak , R.J. Jr. , Aughenbaugh , J.M. , and Paredis , C.J. Multi-Attribute Utility Analysis in Set-Based Conceptual Design Computer-Aided Design 41 3 214 227 2009
  34. Abbas , A.E. and Cadenbach , A.H. On the Use of Utility Theory in Engineering Design IEEE Systems Journal 12 2 1129 1138 2018
  35. Keeney , R.L. Multiplicative utility functions Operations Research 22 1 22 34 1974
  36. Wassenaar , H.J. and Chen , W. 2001
  37. Thurston , D.L. Real and Misconceived Limitations to Decision Based Design with Utility Analysis Journal of Mechanical Design 123 2 176 182 2001

Cited By

Recommended Content

Technical Paper Stone Impact Damage to Automotive Paint Finishes: A Precision Instrumented Impact Device for Laboratory Simulations
Aerospace Standard FERRULE, COUPLING, RIGID, FIXED CAVITY THREADED, FERRULE TYPE TUBE ENDS
Aerospace Material Specification Blackening Solution for Aluminum Touch-Up Solution