This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Sampling and Conditioning Particle System for Solid Particle Measurements Down to 10 nm
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 9, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The measurement of vehicle particle number emissions and, therefore, regulation, necessitates a rigorous sampling and conditioning technology able to deliver solid emitted particles with minimum particle losses. European legislation follows a solid particle number measurement method with cutoff size at 23 nm proposed by the Particle Measurement Programme (PMP). Accordingly, the raw exhaust is sampled with constant volume, subsequently passes through a volatile particle remover (VPR), and finally is measured with a particle counter. Lowering the 23 nm cutoff size with current VPR technologies introduces measurement uncertainties mainly due to the high particle losses and possible creation of artefacts.
This study describes the development and evaluation of a sampling and conditioning particle system, the SCPS, specially designed for sub-23 nm solid particles measurement. The dilution process is achieved in two stages; the primary dilution is done with a porous tube while the secondary with an ejector diluter that also acts as a pump for the sampling flow. The SCPS offers flexibility in terms of dilution ratio (DR) which is real-time calculated with an algorithm based on a differential pressure measurement across an orifice. Between the two dilution stages, a catalytic stripper removes volatile material with high efficiency. The SCPS evaluation includes the DR calculation algorithm testing, the stability of DR during transient engine conditions, the volatile particle removal efficiency with tetracontane particles, the solid particle penetration efficiency with polydisperse CAST-generated soot particles, and the measurement of sub-23 nm particles emitted by a diesel engine. The high stability of the DR in combination with >99% volatile particle removal and a cutoff size (d50) at 7.5 nm suggest that the SCPS may deliver solid emitted particles for robust particle number measurements down to at least 10 nm.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- WHO , “Review of Evidence on Health Aspects of Air Pollution - REVIHAAP Project,” WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2013, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Giechaskiel, B., Mamakos, A., Andersson, J., Dilara, P. et al. , “Measurement of Automotive Non-Volatile Particle Number Emissions within the European Legislative Framework: A Review,” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 46:719-749, 2012.
- Platt, S.M., El Haddad, I., Pieber, S.M., Zardini et al. , “Gasoline Cars Produce more Carbonaceous Particulate Matter than Modern Filter-Equipped diesel cars,” Sci Rep. 7:4926, 2017.
- Leach, F., Stone, R., Richardson, D., Lewis, A. et al. , “Particulate Emissions from a Highly Boosted Gasoline Direct Injection Engine,” International Journal of Engine Research 19(3):347-359, 2018.
- Price, P., Stone, R., OudeNijeweme, D., and Chen, X. , “Cold Start Particulate Emissions from a Second Generation DI Gasoline Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1931 , 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-1931.
- Khalek, I.A., Bougher, T., and Jetter, J.J. , “Particle Emissions from a 2009 Gasoline Direction Injection Engine Using Different Commercially Available Fuels,” SAE Int. J. Fuel Lubr. 3(2):623-637, 2010.
- Giechaskiel, B., Lähde, T., and Drossinos, Y. , “Regulating Particle Number Measurements from the Tailpipe of Light-Duty Vehicles: The Next Step?” Environmental Research 172:1-9, May 2019.
- SUREAL-23 EU project , “Understanding and Measuring SUb-23 nm Particle Emissions from Direct Injection Engines Including REAL Driving Conditions,” H2020-GV-2016, Proj. Ref. 724136.
- Deuerling, C., Maguhn, J., Nordsieck, H.O., Warnecke, R.D. et al. , “Measurement System for Characterization of Gas and Particle Phase of High Temperature Combustion Aerosols,” Aerosol Science and Technology 44(1):1-9, 2010, doi:10.1080/02786820903325402.
- Mathis, U. and Mohr, M. , “Investigations for the Definition of Sampling Conditions for the Selected Instrumentation,” Deliverable 3 of Project “Characterization of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from Road Vehicles - PARTICULATES,” 2005, https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/projects_sources/particulates_d3a.pdf.
- Giechaskiel, B., Lesueur, D., Müller, R., and Krasenbrink, A. , “Prototype Dilution System for On-Board Measurements Compliant with the Legislation and the Particle Measurement Programme (PMP),” JRC Scientific and Technical Reports, 2009,
- Melas, A.D., Koidi, V., Deloglou, D., Daskalos, E. et al. , “Development and Evaluation of a Catalytic Stripper for the Measurement of Solid Ultrafine particles Emissions from Internal Combustion Engines,” submitted to Aerosol Sci. Technol.
- Andersson, J., Giechaskiel, B., Muñoz-Bueno, R., Sandbach, E., et al. , “Particle Measurement Programme (PMP) Light-duty Inter-laboratory Correlation Exercise (ILCE_LD) Final Report Institute for Environment and Sustainability,” 2007.
- Giechaskiel, B. and Drossinos, Y. , “Theoretical Investigation of Volatile Removal Efficiency of Particle Number Measurement Systems,” SAE Int. J. Engines 3(1), 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1304.
- Giechaskiel, B. and Martini, G. , “Review on Engine Exhaust Sub-23 Nm Particles,” JRC Rep., 2014.
- Hinds, W. , Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles Second Edition (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999).
- Rosner, D. and Tandon, P. , “Knudsen Transition Effects on the Thermophoretic Properties of Fractal-Like Aggregates: Implications for Thermophoretic Sampling of High-Pressure Flames,” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 51(11):1262-1274, 2017.
- Melas, A.D., Isella, L., Konstandopoulos, A.G., and Drossinos, Y. , “Morphology and Mobility of Synthetic Colloidal Aggregates,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 417, 2014.
- Liati, A., Schreiber, D., Dimopoulos, P., Eggenschwiler et al. , “Electron Microscopic Characterization of Soot Particulate Matter Emitted by Modern Direct Injection Gasoline Engines,” Combust. Flame 166:307-315, 2016.
- Filippov, A. , “Drag and Torque on Clusters of N Arbitrary Spheres at Low Reynolds Number,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 229(1):184-195, 2000.
- Melas, A.D., Isella, L., Konstandopoulos, A.G., and Drossinos, Y. , “Friction Coefficient and Mobility Radius of Fractal-like Aggregates in the Transition Regime,” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 48(12), 2014.
- Giechaskiel, B., Arndt, M., Schindler, W., Bergmann, A. et al. , Sampling of Non-Volatile Vehicle Exhaust Particles: A Simplified Guide, SAE Int. J. Engines 5(2), 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0443.
- Mamakos, A., Khalek, I., Giannelli, R., and Spears, M. , “Characterization of Combustion Aerosol Produced by a Mini-CAST and Treated in a Catalytic Stripper,” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 47(8):927-936, 2013.
- Maricq, M. , “Examining the Relationship between Black Carbon and Soot in Flames and Engine Exhaust,” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 48(6):620-629, 2014.
- Giechaskiel, B., Cresnoverh, M., Jörgl, H., and Bergmann, A. , “Calibration and Accuracy of a Particle Number Measurement System,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 21(4):045102, 2010.
- Giechaskiel, B., Lähde, T. and Drossinos Y. , “Regulating Particle Number Measurements from the Tailpipe of Light-Duty Vehicles : The Next Step ?,” Environ. Res., 172, December 2018, 1-9, 2019.