Evaluation of Uncertainties in Classical and Component (Blocked Force) Transfer Path Analysis (TPA)
Published June 5, 2019 by SAE International in United States
Downloadable datasets for this paper availableAnnotation of this paper is available
Transfer path analysis (TPA) has become a widely used diagnostic technique in the automotive and other sectors. In classic TPA, a two-stage measurement is conducted including operational and frequency response function (FRF) phases from which the contribution of various excitations to a target quantity, typically cabin sound pressure, are determined. Blocked force TPA (also called in situ Source Path Contribution Analysis, in-situ TPA and component TPA) is a development of the classic TPA approach and has been attracting considerable recent attention. Blocked force TPA is based on very similar two stage measurements to classic TPA but has two major advantages: there is no need to dismantle the vehicle and the blocked forces obtained are an independent property of the source component and are therefore transferrable to different assemblies. However, despite the now widespread reliance on classic TPA, and the increasing use of blocked force TPA in the automotive sector, it is rare to see any evaluation of the associated uncertainties. This paper therefore aims to summarize recent work and provide a guide to the evaluation of uncertainties in both forms of TPA. The various types of uncertainty are first categorized as, ‘model’, ‘source’ and ‘experimental’ uncertainties. Model uncertainties arise due to incomplete or inconsistent representation of the physical assembly by the measurements. Criteria are provided for evaluation of completeness in terms of measured quantities. Experimental and source uncertainties are evaluated through a first order propagation approach. Expressions are provided allowing the uncertainty in the target quantity to be estimated from measured quantities. Additional data storage and analysis is required but no additional measurements are needed over and above the usual TPA measurements. An illustrative example is provided.
CitationMoorhouse, A., Meggitt, J., and Elliott, A., "Evaluation of Uncertainties in Classical and Component (Blocked Force) Transfer Path Analysis (TPA)," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1544, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-1544.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- van der Seijs, M.V., Klerk, D., and Rixen, D.J. , “General Framework for Transfer Path Analysis: History, Theory and Classification of Techniques,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 68:217-244, 2016.
- Verheij, J.W. , “Multi-Path Sound Transfer from Resiliently Mounted Shipboard Machinery: Experimental Methods for Analyzing and Improving Noise Control,” Ph.D. diss., TNO, 1982.
- Dobson, B.J. and Rider, E. , “A Review of the Indirect Calculation of Excitation Forces from Measured Structural Response Data,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Mechanical Engineering Science 204(2):69-75, 1990.
- Elliott, A.S., Moorhouse, A.T., Huntley, T., and Tate, S. , “In-Situ Source Path Contribution Analysis of Structure Borne Road Noise,” Journal of Sound and Vibration 332(24):6276-6295, 2013.
- Magrans, F.X. , “Method of Measuring Transmission Paths,” Journal of Sound and Vibration 74(3):321-330, 1981.
- Moorhouse, A.T., Elliott, A.S., and Evans, T.A. , “In Situ Measurement of the Blocked Force of Structure-Borne Sound Sources,” Journal of Sound and Vibration 325(4-5):679-685, 2009.
- Meggitt, J., Elliott, A., and Moorhouse, A. , “A Covariance Based Framework for the Propagation of Uncertainty Through Inverse Problems with an Application to Force Identification,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process, 2018.
- Meggitt, J.W.R., Moorhouse, A.T., and Elliott, A.S. , “On the Problem of Describing the Coupling Interface Between Sub-structures: An Experimental Test for ‘Completeness’,” . In: Dynamics of Coupled Structures. Vol. 4. (Cham, Springer, 2018), 171-182.
- Allemang, R.J. , “The Modal Assurance Criterion-Twenty Years of Use and Abuse,” Sound and Vibration 37(8):14-23, 2003.
- Meggitt, J.W.R., Elliott, A.S., Moorhouse, A.T., Clot, A., et al. , “Development of a Hybrid FE-SEA-Experimental Model: Experimental Subsystem Characterisation,” in NOVEM Noise Vib. - Emerg. Methods, Ibiza, 2018.
- Clot, A.R.S.L., Meggitt, J.W.R., Elliott, A.S., and Moorhouse A.T. , “Development of a Hybrid FE-SEA-Experimental Model: Theoretical Formulation,” in NOVEM Noise Vib. - Emerg. Methods, Ibiza, 2018.
- Meggitt, J.W.R. , “On the Treatment of Uncertainty in Experimentally Measured Frequency Response Functions,” Metrologia 55(6):806, 2018.
- Meggitt, J.W.R. and Moorhouse, A.T. , “A Combined Framework for the Propagation of Uncertainty in Transfer Path Analysis,” in preparation.
- Meggitt, J.W.R. Moorhouse A.T. , A Covariance Based Framework for the Propagation of Correlated Uncertainty in Frequency Based Dynamic Sub-Structuring,” Submitted to Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 2019.
- Hjorunges, A. , Complex-Valued Matrix Derivatives First Edition (Cambridge University Press, 2011).