This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Head and Neck Loading Conditions over a Decade of IIHS Rear Impact Seat Testing
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 2, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Rear-end impacts are the most common crash scenario in the United States. Although automated vehicle (AV) technologies, such as frontal crash warning (FCW) and automatic emergency braking (AEB), are mitigating and preventing rear-end impacts, the technology is only gradually being introduced and currently has only limited effectiveness. Accordingly, there is a need to evaluate the current state of passive safety technologies, including the performance of seatbacks and head restraints. The objective of this study was to examine trends in head and neck loading during rear impact testing in new vehicle models over the prior decade. Data from 601 simulated rear impact sled tests (model years 2004 to 2018) conducted as a part of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) Vehicle Seat/Head Restraint Evaluation Protocol were obtained. This dynamic evaluation involves a simulated rear-end crash using a Biofidelic Rear Impact (BioRID IIg) ATD positioned in the seat attached to a crash simulation sled and accelerated to represent a rear crash with a delta-V of approximately 15.6 kph (15.6 ± 0.26 kph). Head and neck injury metrics were calculated for all tests to evaluate trends in the test ATD responses across model years. Reductions in HIC 15, Nij, and upper neck tensile forces were observed across all model years. Nkm, upper neck flexion moments, extension moments, and shear forces were found to show little or no change by model year. Reductions in time to initial contact with the head restraint were observed and likely contributed to reduced head accelerations and neck tensile forces. Given the anticipated persistence of rear-end impacts and potential changes to the vehicle interior layout with improving AV technology, the data should be considered by designers, researchers, and evaluators looking to project future crash and injury rates in rear-end impacts.
CitationScanlon, J., Isaacs, J., and Garman, C., "Head and Neck Loading Conditions over a Decade of IIHS Rear Impact Seat Testing," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1227, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-1227.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- Najm, W.G. et al., Analysis of Light Vehicle Crashes and Pre-Crash Scenarios Based on the 2000 General Estimates System (United States: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2003).
- Kusano, K.D. and Gabler, H.C., “Comprehensive Target Populations for Current Active Safety Systems Using National Crash Databases,” Traffic Injury Prevention 15(7):753-761, 2013.
- NHTSA, “Traffic Safety Facts 2016: A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System (DOT HS 812554),” U. DOT, Editor, Washington, DC, 2016.
- Imler, S.M., Heller, M., Raasch, C., Watson, H. et al., “The Effect of Rear Impact Collision Delta-V and Restraint Status on Injury Outcome,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0524, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0524.
- IIHS, “Neck Injury: Topic Overview,” Available from: https://www.iihs.org/iihs/topics/t/neck-injury/topicoverview.
- NHTSA, FMVSS Standard No. 202a Final Rule (49 CFR 571.202a), US Department of Transportation, Editor.
- Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine, The Abbreviated Injury Scale: 2015 Revision (Chicago, IL: AAAM, 2015).
- American Medical Association, Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment Fourth Edition (AMA Press, 1993).
- Organization, W.H., “International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (10th rev),” Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
- Farmer, C.M., Wells, J.K., and Lund, A.K.J.T.i.p., “Effects of Head Restraint and Seat Redesign on Neck Injury Risk in Rear-End Crashes,” 4(2):83-90, 2003.
- Kahane, C.J., “An Evaluation of Head Restraints. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 202 (Report No. DOT-HS-806-108),” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Washington, DC, 1982.
- Walz, M.C., “The Effectiveness of Head Restraints in Light Trucks (Report No. DOT HS-809-247),” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Washington, DC, 2001.
- NHTSA, FMVSS Standard No. 202a (49 CFR 571.202a), US Department of Transportation, Editor.
- Trempel, R.E., Zuby, D.S., and Edwards, M.A.J.T.i.p., “IIHS Head Restraint Ratings and Insurance Injury Claim Rates,” 17(6):590-596, 2016.
- Edwards, M. et al., “Improved Seat and Head Restraint Evaluations,” in Proceedings of the 19th ESV Technical Conference, Citeseer, 2005.
- Zuby, D.S., Lund, A.K.J.J.o.o., and e. medicine, “Preventing Minor Neck Injuries in Rear Crashes-Forty Years of Progress,” 52(4):428-433, 2010.
- Lundell, B., Jakobsson, L., Alfredsson, B., Jernström, C. et al., “Guidelines for and the Design of a Car Seat Concept for Improved Protection against Neck Injuries in Rear End Car Impacts,” SAE Technical Paper 980301, 1998, doi:10.4271/980301.
- Davidsson, J. and Kullgren, A., “Evaluation of Seat Performance Criteria for Future Rear-End Impact Testing,” 2013.
- Jakobsson, L., Isaksson-Hellman, I., and Lindman, M.J.T.i.p., “WHIPS (Volvo Cars' Whiplash Protection System)-The Development and Real-World Performance,” 9(6):600-605, 2008.
- Sekizuka, M., “Seat Designs for Whiplash Injury Lessening,” in Proc. 16th Int. Techn. Conf. on ESV, Windsor, Canada, 1998.
- Wiklund, K. and Larsson, H., “Saab Active Head Restraint (SAHR)-Seat Design to Reduce the Risk of Neck Injuries in Rear Impacts,” SAE Technical Paper 980297, 1998, doi:10.4271/980297.
- “Vehicle Seat/Head Restraint Evaluation Protocol Dynamic Criteria (Version IV),” IIHS, Ruckersville, VA, 2016.
- Mercedes-Benz USA, “2016 S-Class Operator's Manual,” Daimler AG, Stuttgart, Germany, 2015.
- Toyota Motor Corporation, “2015 Lexus NX 200t Owner's Manual,” 2014.
- Volvo Car Corporation, “2016 Volvo XC90 Owner's Manual,” Volvo Car Corporation, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2015.
- Cicchino, J.B., “Effectiveness of Forward Collision Warning and Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems in Reducing Front-to-Rear Crash Rates,” Accident Analysis & Prevention 99:142-152, 2017.
- Gordon, T. et al., “Advanced Crash Avoidance Technologies (ACAT) Program-Final Report of the Volvo-Ford-UMTRI Project: Safety Impact Methodology for Lane Departure Warning-Method Development and Estimation of Benefits,” Department of Transportation, 2010.
- Anderson, R. et al., “Potential Benefits of Forward Collision Avoidance Technology,” Injury 44(15):24, 2012.
- Kusano, K.D. and Gabler, H.C., “Safety Benefits of Forward Collision Warning, Brake Assist, and Autonomous Braking Systems in Rear-End Collisions,” Intelligent Transportation Systems, IEEE Transactions on 13(4):1546-1555, 2012.
- Kusano, K.D. and Gabler, H.C., “Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems,” Traffic Injury Prevention 16(sup2):S109-S114, 2015.
- Grover, C. et al., “Automated Emergency Brake Systems: Technical Requirements, Costs and Benefits (TRL Published Project Report PPR 227),” Crowthorne, Transportation Research Library, 2008.
- Scanlon, J.M., Kusano, K.D., and Gabler, H.C., “Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders,” Traffic Injury Prevention 16(sup2):S182-S189, 2015.
- Scanlon, J.M., Kusano, K.D., and Gabler, H.C., “Influence of Roadway Characteristics on Potential Safety Benefits of Lane Departure Warning and Prevention Systems in the US Vehicle Fleet,” in Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, 2016.
- Scanlon, J.M., Sherony, R., and Gabler, H.C., “Models of Driver Acceleration Behavior Prior to Real-World Intersection Crashes,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems PP(99): 1-13, 2017.
- Harrington, R.J. et al., “The Role of Infrastructure in an Automated Vehicle Future,” . In: The Bridge. (Washington, DC, National Academy of Engineers, 2018), 48-55.
- Scanlon, J.M., “Evaluating the Potential of an Intersection Driver Assistance System to Prevent US Intersection Crashes,” Virginia Tech., 2017.
- Jorlöv, S., Bohman K., and Larsson A.. “Seating Positions and Activities in Highly Automated Cars-A Qualitative Study of Future Automated Driving Scenarios,” in International Research Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, 2017.
- Jin, X. et al., Occupant Kinematics and Biomechanics with Rotatable Seat in Autonomous Vehicle Collision: A Preliminary Concept and Strategy.
- Gayzik, F., Koya, B., and Davis, M., “A Preliminary Study of Human Model Head and Neck Response to Frontal Loading in Nontraditional Occupant Seating Configurations,” Traffic Injury Prevention 19(sup1):S183-S186, 2018.
- SAE, “J211-1 Instrumentation for Impact Test-Part 1-Electronic Instrumentation,” SAE International, 2007.
- NHTSA, FMVSS Standard No. 208 (49 CFR 571.208), US Department of Transportation, Editor.
- Schmitt, K.-U. et al., “Nkm-A Proposal for a Neck Protection Criterion for Low-Speed Rear-End Impacts,” Traffic Injury Prevention 3(2), 2002.
- Goldsmith, W. and Ommaya, A.K., “Head and Neck Injury Criteria and Tolerance Levels,” The Biomechanics of Impact Trauma 149-187, 1984.
- Mertz, H.J. and Patrick, L.M., “Strength and Response of the Human Neck*,” SAE Technical Paper 710855, 1971, doi:10.4271/710855.
- Funk, J.R. et al., “Validation of Concussion Risk Curves for Collegiate Football Players Derived from HITS Data,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering 40(1):79-89, 2012.
- Schmitt, K.-U., Muser, M.H., and Niederer, P., “A New Neck Injury Criterion Candidate for Rear-End Collisions Taking into Account Shear Forces and Bending Moments,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-06-0175, 2001.
- R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015).
- Fox, J. et al., “Package ‘Car’: Companion to Applied Regression,” . In: Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (2012).
- Fox, J. and Monette, G., An R and S-Plus Companion to Applied Regression (Sage, 2002).
- Lenth, R.V. and Hervé, M., “lsmeans: Least-Squares Means. R Package Version,” 2:20-23, 2015.
- Hell, W. et al., Biomechanics of Cervical Spine Injuries in Rear End Car Impacts: Influence of Car Seats and Possible Evaluation Criteria. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2002. 3(2): 127-140.
- Kaneko, N., Wakamatsu, M., Fukushima, M., and Ogawa, S., “Study of BioRID II Sled Testing and MADYMO Simulation to Seek the Optimized Seat Characteristics to Reduce Whiplash Injury,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0336, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-0336.
- Muser, M., Walz, F., and Zellmer, H., “Biomechanical Significance of the Rebound Phase in Low Speed Rear End Impacts,” in Proc. IRCOBI Conf., 2000.
- Viano, D.C., “Seat Design Principles to Reduce Neck Injuries in Rear Impacts,” Traffic Injury Prevention 9(6):552-560, 2008.
- Munoz, D. et al., “A Study of Current Neck Injury Criteria Used for Whiplash Analysis Proposal of a New Criterion Involving Upper and Lower Neck Load Cells,” in Proceedings of the 19th Experimental Safety Vehicles Conference, 2005.
- Kleinberger, M. et al., “Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems,” NHTSA Docket 4405, 9, 1998.
- Eppinger, R. et al., “Supplement: Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Restraint Systems-II,” Natinal Highway Transport Safety Administration, 2003.
- Kullgren, A. et al., “Validation of Neck Injury Criteria Using Reconstructed Real-Life Rear-End Crashes with Recorded Crash Pulses,” in Proc. 18th ESV Conf., 2003.
- Prasad, P., Kim, A., Weerappuli, D., Roberts, V. et al., “Relationships between Passenger Car Seat Back Strength and Occupant Injury Severity in Rear End Collisions: Field and Laboratory Studies,” SAE Technical Paper 973343, 1997, doi:10.4271/973343.
- Yang, K.H., Begeman, P., Muser, M., Niederer, P. et al., “On the Role of Cervical Facet Joints in Rear End Impact Neck Injury Mechanisms,” SAE Technical Paper 970497, 1997, doi:10.4271/970497.
- Siegmund, G.P. et al., “The Anatomy and Biomechanics of Acute and Chronic Whiplash Injury,” Traffic Injury Prevention 10(2):101-112, 2009.
- Deng, B. et al., “Testing Shear Hypothesis of Whiplash Injury Using Experimental and Analytical Approaches,” . In: Yoganandan N., Pintar F., editors. Frontiers in Whiplash Trauma. (Amsterdam, IOS Press, 2000).
- Winkelstein, B.A. et al., “The Cervical Facet Capsule and Its Role in Whiplash Injury: A Biomechanical Investigation,” Spine 25(10):1238-1246, 2000.
- Siegmund, G.P. et al., “Mechanical Evidence of Cervical Facet Capsule Injury during Whiplash: A Cadaveric Study Using Combined Shear, Compression, and Extension Loading,” Spine 26(19):2095-2101, 2001.