This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Application of Multi-Objective Optimization Techniques for Improved Emissions and Fuel Economy over Transient Manoeuvres
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 02, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
This paper presents a novel approach to augment existing engine calibrations to deliver improved engine performance during a transient, through the application of multi-objective optimization techniques to the calibration of the Variable Valve Timing (VVT) system of a 1.0 litre gasoline engine. Current mature calibration approaches for the VVT system are predominantly based on steady state techniques which fail to consider the engine dynamic behaviour in real world driving, which is heavily transient.
In this study the total integrated fuel consumption and engine-out NOx emissions over a 2-minute segment of the transient Worldwide Light-duty Test Cycle are minimised in a constrained multi-objective optimisation framework to achieve an updated calibration for the VVT control. The cycle segment was identified as an area with high NOx emissions. The optimisation framework was developed around a Mean Value Engine Model (MVEM) with representative engine controls which was validated against an engine tested on a dynamometer. The aim of this study was to demonstrate a practical benefit without having to significantly change the existing engine control strategy. Offline optimization with the MVEM model allows exploitation of workstation computational performance to effectively explore the calibration space, reducing both time and investment in engine testing.
The initial simulation optimization results show a strong dominance of both fuel and NOx objectives with a potential reduction in fuel consumption and engine out NOX emissions of up to 5% and 18% respectively compared to the original steady-state based VVT calibration. Engine experimental results have confirmed that NOX emissions can be significantly reduced without any significant detriment to fuel economy over this 2min transient.
- Samuel David Le Corre - Loughborough University
- Byron Mason - Loughborough University
- Thomas Steffen - Loughborough University
- Edward Winward - Loughborough University
- Zhijia Yang - Loughborough University
- Thomas Childs - Loughborough University
- Mark Cary - Ford Motor Co Ltd
- Robert Lygoe - Ford Motor Co Ltd
CitationLe Corre, S., Mason, B., Steffen, T., Winward, E. et al., "Application of Multi-Objective Optimization Techniques for Improved Emissions and Fuel Economy over Transient Manoeuvres," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1177, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-1177.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
- Leone, T.G., Christenson, E.J., and Stein, R.A., “Comparison of Variable Camshaft Timing Strategies at Part Load,” SAE Technical Paper 960584, 1996, doi:10.4271/960584.
- Parvate-Patil, G.B., Hong, H., and Gordon, B., “An Assessment of Intake and Exhaust Philosophies for Variable Valve Timing,” 724, 2003.
- Stein R.A., Galietti K.M., and Leone T.G., “Dual Equal VCT-A Variable Camshaft Timing Strategy for Improved Fuel Economy and Emissions,” in International Congress & Exposition, 1995.
- Kramer, U. and Phlips, P., “Phasing Strategy for an Engine with Twin Variable Cam Timing,” 2002(724):1-11, 2012.
- Saunders, R.J. and Abul-Wahab, E.A., “Variable Valve Closure Timing for Load Control and the Otto Atkinson Cycle Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 890677, 1989, doi:10.4271/890677.
- Dresner, T. and Barkan, P., “A Review of Variable Valve Timing Benefits and Modes of Operation,” in 1989 Conference and Exposition on Future Transportation Technology, 1989.
- Duckworth, R.F. and Barker, L., “A Comparative Study of Variable Camshaft Phasing and Port Throttling for Performance and Emissions,” in International Congress & Exposition, 1996.
- Francqueville, L. and Michel, J.-B., “On the Effects of EGR on Spark-Ignited Gasoline Combustion at High Load,” SAE Int. J. Engines 7(4):1808-1823, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2628.
- Ahmadi, M., “Intake, Exhaust and Valve Timing Design Using Single and Multi- Objective Genetic Algorithm,” in 8th International Conference on Engines for Automobiles, 2007.
- Wu, B., Prucka, R.G., Filipi, Z.S., Kramer, D.M. et al., “Cam-Phasing Optimization Using Artificial Neural Networks as Surrogate Models - Fuel Consumption and NOx Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1512, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-1512.
- D’Errico, G. and Cerri, T., “Application of Derivative-Free Search Algorithms for Performance Optimization of Spark Ignition Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0354, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-0354.
- Ye, Z., Washko, F., and Lai, M.-C., “Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Fuel Economy for PFI Engine with VVT-VCR,” in Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 2004, Vol. 1, 364-369.
- Ericsson, G. and Angstrom, H., “Optimizing the Transient of an SI-Engine Equipped with Variable Cam Timing and Variable Turbine,” SAE Int. J. Engines 3(1):903-915, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1233.
- Flärdh, O., Ericsson, G., Klingborg, E., and Mårtensson, J., “Optimal Air Path Control during Load Transients on a Spark Ignited Engine with Variable Geometry Turbine and Variable Valve Timing,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 22(1):83-93, 2014.
- Kolmanovsky, I., Siverguina, I., and Lygoe, B., “Optimization of Powertrain Operating Policy for Feasibility Assessment and Calibration: Stochastic Dynamic Programming Approach,” Proc. 2002 Am. Control Conf. (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301) 2(i):1425-1430, 2002.
- Fang, K., Li, Z., Ostrowski, K., Shenton, A.T. et al., “Optimal-Behavior-Based Dynamic Calibration of the Automotive Diesel Engine,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 24(3):979-991, 2016.
- Isermann, R. and Sequenz, H., “Model-Based Development of Combustion-Engine Control and Optimal Calibration for Driving Cycles: General Procedure and Application,” IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(11):633-640, 2016.
- Pourkhesalian, A.M., Shamekhi, A.H., and Salimi, F., “NOx Control Using Variable Exhaust Valve Timing and Duration,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1204, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-1204.
- Atashkari, K., Nariman-Zadeh, N., Gölcü, M., Khalkhali, A., and Jamali, A., “Modelling and Multi-Objective Optimization of a Variable Valve-Timing Spark-Ignition Engine Using Polynomial Neural Networks and Evolutionary Algorithms,” Energy Convers. Manag. 48(3):1029-1041, 2007.
- Hiroyasu, T., Miki, M., Kim, M., Watanabe, S. et al., “Reduction of Heavy Duty Diesel Engine Emission and Fuel Economy with Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm and Phenomenological Model,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0531, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-0531.
- Senecal, P.K. and Reitz, R.D., “Simultaneous Reduction of Engine Emissions and Fuel Consumption Using Genetic Algorithms and Multi-Dimensional Spray and Combustion Modeling,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1890, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-1890.
- Boehme, T.J., Rothschuh, M., Frank, B., Schultalbers, M. et al., “Multi-Objective Optimal Design of Parallel Plug-In Hybrid Powertrain Configurations with Respect to Fuel Consumption and Driving Performance,” SAE Int. J. Altern. Powertrains 3(2):176-192, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1158.
- Ranogajec, V., Čorić, M., Deur, J., and Ivanović, V., “Multi-objective Parameter Optimization of Automatic Transmission Shift Control Profiles,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1164, 2018, doi:10.4271/2018-01-1164.
- Schaal, P., Cary, M., Souflas, I., and Mason, B., SI Engine Airpath: A Model Builders Guide (2014).
- Guzzella, L. and Onder, C., Introduction to Modeling and Control of Internal Combustion Engine Systems (Springer Science & Business Media, 2009).
- Cary, M., Mason, B.A., and Schaal, P., “Application of Linearised Hierarchical Models to Indicated Torque Modelling for a Turbocharged Engine,” Int. J. Powertrains In press(4):1-17, 2016.
- Engine Control and Monitoring (ECM), “NOx 5210,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.ecm-co.com/product.asp?5210. [Accessed: 08-Oct-2018].