This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Fuel and Engine Effects on Rich-Combustion Products as an Enabler of In-Cylinder Reforming
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 2, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Onboard reforming has been proposed as a strategy for improving spark-ignited (SI) engine efficiency through knock reduction, dilution limit extension, improved thermodynamic gas properties, and thermochemical exhaust enthalpy recuperation. One approach to onboard fuel reforming is to combust fuel in the engine cylinder under rich conditions, producing a hydrogen-rich reformate gas--which can subsequently be recirculated into the engine. Hydrogen is the preferred product in this process due to its high flame speed and knock resistance, compared with other reformate constituents.
In this work, the effects of engine operation, fuel composition and water injection were evaluated for their effect on reformate gas composition produced under rich combustion conditions. Engine parameters, including intake pressure, intake temperature, combustion phasing, and valve timing all had no significant impact on hydrogen yield at a given equivalence ratio. Fuel effects on hydrogen yield were more significant--with methanol producing 75% more hydrogen than toluene at the same equivalence ratio. The greater hydrogen yield was due to greater hydrogen content of the fuel, although the benefit was shown to be partially offset by lower hydrogen selectivity and conversion. Production of smoke limited the minimum relative air-fuel ratio of some fuels contributing to reduced hydrogen yields. Upstream water injection was shown to boost hydrogen production by 10-60% (rel.) at the expense of carbon monoxide due to steam reforming reactions and Le Chatlier’s principle in the water gas shift reaction. Toluene exhibited the greatest relative improvement in hydrogen yield due to the lower exhaust water concentrations in the absence of water injection. In the presence of water injection, hydrogen production in some cases exceeded fuel hydrogen content indicating the presence of water gas shift and steam reforming chemistry occurring.
Using the speciated exhaust data, a correlation was developed using measured exhaust hydrogen content to predict hydrogen concentration from carbon monoxide and relative air-fuel ratio. The correlation developed improves upon previous correlations by explicitly including the hydrogen content of the fuel, and thus allowing more accurate prediction. Lastly, the energy balance was calculated under rich combustion conditions from the indicated power and chemical potential energy of the reformate. The energy balance analysis suggests that in-cylinder reforming is a net endothermic process, with some exhaust heat being converted into chemical potential energy.
Overall, it was concluded that in-cylinder reforming can be used to produce practical quantities of reformate to improve SI engine performance. This work showed the potential for optimized fuels to improve in-cylinder reforming processes, in conjunction with water injection, to produce a hydrogen-rich reformate gas without parasitic losses.
CitationVoice, A. and Costanzo, V., "Fuel and Engine Effects on Rich-Combustion Products as an Enabler of In-Cylinder Reforming," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1144, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-1144.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 9]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 10]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 11]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 12]|
- Szybist, J.P., Wagnon, S.W., Splitter, D., Pitz, W.J. et al., “The Reduced Effectiveness of EGR to Mitigate Knock at High Loads in Boosted SI Engines,” SAE Int. J. Engines 10(5):2305-2318, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-24-0061.
- Han, T., Lavoie, G., Wooldridge, M., and Boehman, A., “Effect of Syngas (H2/CO) on SI Engine Knock under Boosted EGR and Lean Conditions,” SAE Int. J. Engines 10(3):959-969, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0670.
- Tully, E.J. and Heywood, J.B., “Lean-Burn Characteristics of a Gasoline Engine Enriched with Hydrogen Plasmatron Fuel Reformer,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0630, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-0630.
- Green, J.B., Domingo, N., Storey, J.M.E., Wagner, R.M. et al., “Experimental Evaluation of SI Engine Operation Supplemented by Hydrogen Rich Gas from a Compact Plasma Boosted Reformer,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-2206, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-2206.
- Stone, R., Zhao, H., and Zhou, L., “Analysis of Combustion and Particulate Emissions when Hydrogen is Aspirated into a Gasoline Direct Injection Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0580, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-0580.
- D'Andrea, T., Henshaw, P.F., and Ting, D.S.K., “The Addition of Hydrogen to a Gasoline-Fuelled SI Engine,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 29(14):1541-1552, 2004.
- Glassman, I., Combustion (San Diego, Calif: Academic Press, 1996).
- Guibet, J.-C. and Faure-Birchem, E., Fuels and Engines: Technology, Energy, Environment (Paris: Éditions Technip, 1999).
- American Society for Testing, M., American Petroleum, I., and Research, P., “Knocking Characteristics of Pure Hydrocarbons Developed under American Petroleum Institute Research Project 45,” 1958,
- Gerty, M.D. and Heywood, J.B., “An Investigation of Gasoline Engine Knock Limited Performance and the Effects of Hydrogen Enhancement,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0228, 2006, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0228.
- Marsh, D.K. and Voice, A.K., “Quantification of Knock Benefits from Reformate and Cooled Exhaust Gas Recirculation Using a Livengood-Wu Approach with Detailed Chemical Kinetics,” International Journal of Engine Research 18(7):717-731, 2016.
- Guo, H. and Neill, W.S., “The Effect of Hydrogen Addition on Combustion and Emission Characteristics of an n-Heptane Fuelled HCCI Engine,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38(26):11429-11437, 2013.
- Alger, T., Walls, M., Chadwell, C., Joo, S. et al., “The Interaction between Fuel Anti-Knock Index and Reformation Ratio in an Engine Equipped with Dedicated EGR,” SAE Int. J. Engines 9(2):786-795, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0712.
- Chakravarthy, V.K., Daw, C.S., Pihl, J.A., and Conklin, J.C., “Study of the Theoretical Potential of Thermochemical Exhaust Heat Recuperation for Internal Combustion Engines,” Energy & Fuels 24(3):1529-1537, 2010.
- Engineering ToolBox, “Ratios of Specific Heat of Gases,” 2003.
- Pfefferle, W.C., Smith, L.L., and Castaldi, M.J., Method and Apparatus for a Fuel-Rich Catalytic Reactor (United States: Precision Combustion Inc, 2002).
- Kirwan, J.E., Quader, A.A., and Grieve, M.J., “Advanced Engine Management Using On-Board Gasoline Partial Oxidation Reforming for Meeting Super-ULEV (SULEV) Emissions Standards,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-2927, 1999, doi:10.4271/1999-01-2927.
- Chang, Y., Szybist, J.P., Pihl, J.A., and Brookshear, D.W., “Catalytic EGR-Loop Reforming for High Efficiency in a Stoichiometric SI Engine through TCR and Dilution Limit Extension. 1. Catalyst Performance and Fuel Effects,” Energy and Fuels, pp. Medium: ED; Size: 2245-2256, 2017.
- Chang, Y., Szybist, J.P., Pihl, J.A., and Brookshear, D.W., “Catalytic Exhaust Gas Recirculation-Loop Reforming for High Efficiency in a Stoichiometric Spark-Ignited Engine through Thermochemical Recuperation and Dilution Limit Extension, Part 2: Engine Performance,” Energy and Fuels, pp. Medium: ED; Size: 2257-2266, 2018.
- Fennell, D., Herreros, J., and Tsolakis, A., “Improving Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) Engine Efficiency and Emissions with Hydrogen from Exhaust Gas Fuel Reforming,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39(10):5153-5162, 2014.
- Ashur, M.M., Elghawi, U., and Wyszynski, M.L., “An Integrated System of Gasoline Reformer and Three Way Converter for On-Board Hydrogen Production,” Solar Energy and Sustainable Development 2(1):38-47, 2012.
- Ashida, K., Maeda, H., Araki, T., Hoshino, M. et al., “Study of an On-board Fuel Reformer and Hydrogen-Added EGR Combustion in a Gasoline Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 8(2):358-366, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0902.
- Kopasz, J.P., Ahmed, S., Krumpelt, M., and Devlin, P., “Challenges in Reforming Gasoline: All Components are Not Created Equal,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-1915, 2001, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-1915.
- Brookshear, D.W., Pihl, J.A., and Szybist, J.P., “Catalytic Steam and Partial Oxidation Reforming of Liquid Fuels for Application in Improving the Efficiency of Internal Combustion Engines,” Energy & Fuels 32(2):2267-2281, 2018.
- Jones, M.R. and Wyszynski, M.L., “Exhaust-Gas Reforming of Hydrocarbon Fuels,” SAE Technical Paper 931096, 1993, doi:10.4271/931096.
- Chadwell, C., Alger, T., Zuehl, J., and Gukelberger, R., “A Demonstration of Dedicated EGR on a 2.0 L GDI Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines 7(1):434-447, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1190.
- Alger, T., Gukelberger, R., and Gingrich, J., “Impact of EGR Quality on the Total Inert Dilution Ratio,” SAE International Journal of Engines 9(2):796-806, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0713.
- Gukelberger, R., Robertson, D., Alger, T., Almaraz, S. et al., “Alternative Fuel Testing on a Port Fuel Injected LPL EGR and D-EGR® Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-2170, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-2170.
- Gukelberger, R., Gingrich, J., Alger, T., Almaraz, S. et al., “LPL EGR and D-EGR® Engine Concept Comparison Part 1: Part Load Operation,” SAE In. J. Engines 8(2):570-582, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0783.
- Gukelberger, R., Gingrich, J., Alger, T., and Almaraz, S., “LPL EGR and D-EGR® Engine Concept Comparison Part 2: High Load Operation,” SAE Int. J. Engines 8(2):547-556, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0781.
- Szybist, J.P., Steeper, R.R., Splitter, D., Kalaskar, V.B. et al., “Negative Valve Overlap Reforming Chemistry in Low-Oxygen Environments,” SAE Int. J. Engines 7(1):418-433, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1188.
- Newkirk, M.S. and Abel, J.L., “The Boston Reformed Fuel Car,” SAE Technical Paper 720670, 1972, doi:10.4271/720670.
- Nguyen, D.-K., Sileghem, L., and Verhelst, S., “Exploring the Potential of Reformed-Exhaust Gas Recirculation (R-EGR) for Increased Efficiency of Methanol Fueled SI Engines,” Fuel 236:778-791, 2019.
- Risberg, P., Johansson, D., Andrae, J., Kalghatgi, G. et al., “The Influence of NO on the Combustion Phasing in an HCCI Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0416, 2006, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-0416.
- Heywood, J.B., Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998)  ©1988.