This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Numerical Simulation and Flame Analysis of Combustion and Knock in a DISI Optically Accessible Research Engine
- Salvatore Iaccarino - Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia ,
- Sebastiano Breda - Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia ,
- Alessandro D'Adamo - Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia ,
- Stefano Fontanesi - Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia ,
- Adrian Irimescu - Istituto Motori CNR ,
- Simona Merola - Istituto Motori CNR
ISSN: 1946-3936, e-ISSN: 1946-3944
Published March 28, 2017 by SAE International in United States
Citation: Iaccarino, S., Breda, S., D'Adamo, A., Fontanesi, S. et al., "Numerical Simulation and Flame Analysis of Combustion and Knock in a DISI Optically Accessible Research Engine," SAE Int. J. Engines 10(2):576-592, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0555.
The increasing limitations in engine emissions and fuel consumption have led researchers to the need to accurately predict combustion and related events in gasoline engines. In particular, knock is one of the most limiting factors for modern SI units, severely hindering thermal efficiency improvements. Modern CFD simulations are becoming an affordable instrument to support experimental practice from the early design to the detailed calibration stage. To this aim, combustion and knock models in RANS formalism provide good time-to-solution trade-off allowing to simulate mean flame front propagation and flame brush geometry, as well as “ensemble average” knock tendency in end-gases. Still, the level of confidence in the use of CFD tools strongly relies on the possibility to validate models and methodologies against experimental measurements.
In the paper, two sets of cycle-resolved flame visualizations are available from a single-cylinder 400 cm3 direct-injection spark-ignition (DISI) unit with optical access. The engine is operated at two spark timings, ranging from knock-safe to light-knock conditions.
On this basis, a numerical analysis is carried out to reproduce flame kernel growth and propagation using the well-known ECFM-3Z combustion model for all the operating conditions. CFD results are compared in terms of enflamed volume and flame morphology against cycle averaged experimental data. In addition, average knock is simulated by means of the in-house built UniMORE Knock Model  in terms of knock onset location and phasing.
The agreement between predicted and measured position of the flame front and knock inception location for the two different operating conditions confirms the validity of the adopted models and proves their predictive capability for engine design and optimization.