This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Commercial Viability Study for LPG as Alternative Mass Transportation Fuel
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2015 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG, is a byproduct of both natural gas processing and crude oil refining. As a chemical, propane (C3H8) is a nontoxic, colorless, and virtually odorless hydrocarbon. It is economical to store and transport in liquefied form.
Due its availability and adoptability as engine fuel, propane is quickly becoming one of the viable alternatives fueling 17 million vehicles worldwide. So far, there are about 270,000 propane fueled vehicles in the U. S. This number represents about 1.6 percent of the world propane fueled vehicles.
In this paper, a commercial viability a multi-year cost study of captive fleet buses is conducted for LPG as alternative mass transportation fuel in comparison with gasoline and diesel. The study is based on more than four million of recorded mass transportation service miles. To address some of the key issues in LPG utilization as an alternative fuel for mass transportation some of the key issues such as safety, environmental issues, fueling infrastructure, and fleet vehicle contents are discussed.
CitationMcLean, L. and El-Sayed, M., "Commercial Viability Study for LPG as Alternative Mass Transportation Fuel," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1679, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1679.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
- El-Sayed M. , Byrley Don , Urbanik Wes , Selis Aaron , Kreft Jared , Li Tianao , and Ng Kah Aik Experimental Study for Propane Injection in Gasoline Engines International Mechanical Engineering Congress November 2014
- Poulton , M.L. 1994 Alternative fuels for road vehicles Computational Mechanics Publications Southampton
- Sher , E. 1998 Handbook of air pollution from internal combustion engines Academic Press New York
- Tanaka , M. , Warashina M. , Itano Y. , Tsujimoto Y and Wakamatsu S. 2001 Effects of super-light-duty gasoline and LPG-fueled cars on 16 ambient hydrocarbons at roadsides in Japan Chemosphere-Global Change Sci. 3 199 207
- Beer , T. , Grant B. , Williams D. and Watson H. 2002 Fuel-cycle greenhouse gas emissions from alternative fuels in Australian heavy vehicles Atmos. Environ. 36 753 63
- Johnson , E. 2003 LPG: A secure, cleaner transport fuel? A policy recommendation for Europe Energy Policy 31 1573 1577
- Bayraktar , H. and Durgun O. 2005 Investigating the effects of LPG on spark ignition on engine performance Energy Conversion and Management 46 2317 2333
- Mohamad , T. I. , Jermy , M. , Vuorenskoski , A. K. , and Harrison , M 2012 The Effects of Propane and Gasoline Sprays Structures from Automotive Fuel Injectors under Various Fuel and Ambient Pressures on Engine Performance World Applied Sciences Journal 18 3 396 403
- Yamin , J.A. and Badran O.O. 2002 Analytical study to minimize the heat losses from a propane powered 4-stroke spark ignition engine Renewable Energy 27 463 478
- Watson , H.C. and Milkins E.E. 1982 Comparison and optimization of emission efficiency and power of five automotive fuels in one engine International J. Vehicle Design 3 463 476
- Caton , J. , McDermott , M. , and Chona , R. Development of a Dedicated LPG-Fueled Spark-Ignition Engine and Vehicle for the 1996 Propane Vehicle Challenge SAE Technical Paper 972692 1997 10.4271/972692
- Energetics 2007 Propane Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A comparative Analysis Propane Education and Research Council
- El-Sayed , M. and Hintz , J. Duty Cycle Data Acquisition for Developing Mass Transit Hybrid Power Trains SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1310 2010 10.4271/2010-01-1310