This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Octane-on-Demand as an Enabler for Highly Efficient Spark Ignition Engines and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Improvement
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2015 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
This paper explores the potential for reducing transport-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by introducing high-efficiency spark-ignition engines with a dual-fuel injection system to customize the octane of the fuels based on real-time engine requirements. It is assumed that a vehicle was equipped with two fuel tanks and two injection systems; one port fuel injection and one direct injection line separately. Each tank carried low octane and high octane fuel so that real-time octane blending was occurred in the combustion chamber when needed (Octane On-Demand: OOD). A refinery naphtha was selected for low octane fuel (RON=61), because of its similarity to gasoline properties but a less processed, easier to produce without changing a refinery configuration. Three oxygenates were used for high octane knock-resistant fuels in a direct injection line: methanol, MTBE, and ETBE. Single cylinder engine tests were conducted to obtain a specific fuel consumption map and an optimum octane map in each dual fuel combination. Tank-to-wheel vehicle fuel consumption was estimated using a vehicle simulation tool under four driving cycles (FTP city and highway, WLTP, and US06), to cover a wide range of driving circumstances. For the vehicle with a naturally aspirated 4-cylinder engine, total dual fuel consumption were improved over baseline gasoline single fuel up to 4% reduction in mass with all driving cycles except for US06. More importantly, only less than 15% oxygenate was required for those three cycles. As a result, blending RON was only in the range of 66∼73, significantly below current gasoline octane levels in the market. A Well-to-Wheels (W-t-W) GHG emissions assessment was conducted to estimate the overall emissions benefits of the dual fuel system. W-t-W carbon intensity was reduced up to 18% relative to the single gasoline fuel system when crude naphtha is used as a low octane fuel. However, if a pathway for naphtha and oxygenate are chosen different than petroleum source, for example, natural gas feed Fischer-Tropsch naphtha and coal base methanol, GHG emissions are worse than baseline case. When the dual fuel system was combined with downsized boosted engine technology, synergic benefit was obtained maximum 30% W-t-W CO2eq reduction (15% from downsizing, 10% from mitigating knock via a high octane component and 5% from minimizing octane upgrade process in the refinery). Therefore, a suggested OOD system can be a potential mobility solution for a future fuel and engine system. It not only provides a desirable high octane quality fuel for a high boost and high compression ratio engine, but also mitigates a revolutionary change in the refinery with a low octane naphtha fuel.
CitationChang, J., Viollet, Y., Alzubail, A., Abdul-Manan, A. et al., "Octane-on-Demand as an Enabler for Highly Efficient Spark Ignition Engines and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Improvement," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1264, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1264.
- Anderson J., DiCicco D., Ginder J., Kramer U., Leone T., Raney-Pablo H. and Wallington T., “High Octane Number Ethanol-Gasoline Blends: Quantifying the Potential Benefits in the United States”, Fuel, vol. 97, pp. 585-594, 2012
- WWFC, “World Wide Fuels Charter. Fifth Edition. September 2013”, World Wide Fuels Charter, 2013
- Chow, E., Heywood, J., and Speth, R., “Benefits of a Higher Octane Standard Gasoline for the U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1961, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1961.
- Partridge, R., Weissman, W., Ueda, T., Iwashita, Y. et al., “Onboard Gasoline Separation for Improved Vehicle Efficiency,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 7(2):366-378, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1200.
- Ikoma, T., Abe, S., Sonoda, Y., Suzuki, H. et al., “Development of V-6 3.5-liter Engine Adopting New Direct Injection System,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1259, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-1259.
- Liu H., Wang Z., Wang J., “Methanol-gasoline DFSI (Dual-Fuel Spark Ignition) Combustion with Dual-Injection for Engine Knock Suppression”, Energy 73 (2014) p686-693
- Ogawa H., Miyamoto N., Kaneko N., Ando H., “Combustion Control and Operating Range Expansion in an Homogenous Charge Compression Ignition Engine with Direct In-Cylinder Injection of Reaction Inhibitors”, International Journal of Engine Research 2005 6:341
- Windsor H., “One Car - Two Gas Tanks”, Popular Mechanics, p.116, July 1948
- Daniel, R., Wang, C., Xu, H., Tian, G. et al., “Dual-Injection as a Knock Mitigation Strategy Using Pure Ethanol and Methanol,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5(2):772-784, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1152.
- JEC, “Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Powertrains in the European Context - Version 4”, European Union, Luxembourg, 2013
- Andress D., Nguyen T. D. and Das S., “Reducing GHG emissions in the United States's transportation sector”, Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 15, pp. 117-136, 2011
- Elgowainy A., Rousseau A., Wang M., Ruth M., Andress D., Ward J., Joseck F., Nguyen T. and Das S., “Cost of ownership and well-to-wheels carbon emissions/oil use of alternative fuels and advanced light-duty vehicle technologies”, Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 17, pp. 626-641, 2013.
- ADvanced VehIcle SimulatOR (ADVISOR), Vehicle Simulation Model that is developed by National Renewable Energy Lab in USA, http://sourceforge.net/projects/adv-vehicle-sim/files/ADVISOR/
- The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Usein Transportation Model (GREET) by Argonne National Lab in USA, https://greet.es.anl.gov/
- Chang, J., Viollet, Y., Amer, A., and Kalghatgi, G., “Fuel Economy Potential of Partially Premixed Compression Ignition (PPCI) Combustion with Naphtha Fuel,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-2701, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-2701.
- Yang C. and Jackson R.. “China's Growing Methanol Economy And Its Implications For Energy And The Environment”, Energy Policy, 41 (2012), 878-994
- Viollet, Y., Abdullah, M., alhajhouje, A., and Chang, J., “Characterization of High Efficiency Octane-On-Demand Fuels Requirement in a Modern Spark Ignition Engine with Dual Injection System,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1265, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1265.
- Foong, T., Morganti, K., Brear, M., da Silva, G. et al., “The Effect of Charge Cooling on the RON of Ethanol/Gasoline Blends,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 6(1):34-43, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0886.
- Anderson, J., Leone, T., Shelby, M., Wallington, T. et al., “Octane Numbers of Ethanol-Gasoline Blends: Measurements and Novel Estimation Method from Molar Composition,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1274, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1274.
- de Menezes E. W., and Cataluña R., “Optimization of the ETBE(ethyl tert-butyl ether) Production Process”, Fuel Processing Technology, Volume 89, Issue 11, Pages 1148-1152
- “Well-to-Tank Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Transportation Fuels - North American Analysis”, Argonne National Lab, Volume 3, June 2011 http://www.transportation.anl.gov/pdfs/TA/165.pdf
- Blumberg K. O., Walsh M. P., Pera C., “Low-Sulfur Gasoline &Diesel: The Key to Lower Vehicle Emissions”, May 2003, International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT)
- Kalghatgi G. T., Bradley D., “Pre-ignition and Super-knock in Turbocharged Spark Ignition Engine”, 2012 International Journal of Engine Research 13(4) 399-414
- Hamilton, L., Rostedt, M., Caton, P., and Cowart, J., “Pre-Ignition Characteristics of Ethanol and E85 in a Spark Ignition Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 1(1):145-154, 2009, doi:10.4271/2008-01-0321.
- Bromberg L., Cohn D.R., “Heavy Duty Vehicles Using Clean, High Efficiency Alcohol Engines”, Plasma Science and Fusion Center (PSFC) report - MITPSFC/JA-10-43
- Blumberg, P., Bromberg, L., Kang, H., and Tai, C., “Simulation of High Efficiency Heavy Duty SI Engines UsingDirect Injection of Alcohol for Knock Avoidance,” SAE Int. J. Engines 1(1):1186-1195, 2009, doi:10.4271/2008-01-2447.
- Turner J.W.G., Pearson R.J., Dekker E., Iosefa B., Dolan G. A., Johansson K., and ac Bergstorm K., “Evolution of Alcohol Fuel Blends Towards A Sustainable Transport Energy Economy”, 2012 MIT Energy Initiative Symposium- ‘Prospects for Bi-Fuel and Flex-Fuel Light Duty Vehicles’
- Kuzuoka, K., Kurotani, T., Chishima, H., and Kudo, H., “Study of High-Compression-Ratio Engine Combined with an Ethanol-Gasoline Fuel Separation System,” SAE Int. J. Engines 7(4):1773-1780, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2614.