This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Estimation of Pelvis Injuries and Head Impact Time using Different Pedestrian Human FE Models
Technical Paper
2014-01-0522
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
A logistic regression analysis of accident cases in the NASS-PCDS (National Automotive Sampling System-Pedestrian Crash Data Study) database clearly shows that pedestrian pelvis injuries tend to be complex and depend on various factors such as the impact speed, the ratio of the pedestrian height to that of the bonnet leading edge (BLE) of the striking vehicle, and the gender and age of the pedestrian. Adult female models (50th %ile female AF50: 161 cm and 61 kg; 5th %ile female AF05: 154 cm and 50 kg) were developed by morphing the JAMA 50th %ile male AM50 and substituting the pelvis of the GHBMC AM50 model. The fine-meshed pelvis model thus obtained is capable of predicting pelvis fractures. Simulations conducted with these models indicate that the characteristics of pelvis injury patterns in male and female pedestrians are influenced by the hip/BLE height ratio and to some extent by the pelvis bone shape. A previously developed six-year-old (6YO) child pedestrian model and the newly developed models were used to estimate the head impact time (HIT) for a typical SUV fitted with an active pop-up hood system. The results indicate that instead of the 6YO child pedestrian, an AF05 pedestrian is the target pedestrian percentile for satisfying the Euro-NCAP test protocol requirements for SUVs. A female human body model with a pelvis fracture option showed a longer HIT than that of the pelvis model without a fracture option. The results of numerical simulations coincided well with the results of the statistical analysis.
Recommended Content
Technical Paper | Definition and Development of A Crash Dummy Head |
Technical Paper | Occupant Restraint Design for Commercial Go-Karts |
Authors
Citation
Pal, C., Okabe, T., Vimalathithan, K., Manoharan, J. et al., "Estimation of Pelvis Injuries and Head Impact Time using Different Pedestrian Human FE Models," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0522, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0522.Also In
References
- Altair Commercial software Hyper-works 10.1
- Borg , E. Innovative Bonnet Active Actuator (B2A) for Pedestrian Protection ESV22, 2011, Paper Number: 11-0113
- Demetriades , D. , Murray J. , Sinz B. et al. Epidemiology of major trauma and trauma deaths in Los Angeles County Journal Am Coll. Surgery 1998 187 373 83
- EuroNCAP http://www.euroncap.com/files/Euro-NCAPPedestrian-Protocol-v7.1.1---0-c573c763-8670-44fb-86ae-c43f19641b2f.pdf
- GHBMC http://www.ghbmc.com/
- Guillemot , H. , Besnault , B. , Robin , S. , Got , C. et al. Pelvic Injuries in Side Impact Collisions: A Field Accident Analysis and Dynamic Tests on Isolated Pelvic Bones SAE Technical Paper 973322 1997 10.4271/973322
- Park Gwansik et al. Comparison of Kinematics of GHBMC to PMHS on the Side Impact Condition IRCOBI Conference 2013, IRC-13-41 368 379
- Henrik G. et al. Bone Loss and Bone Size after Menopause The New England Journal of Medicine July 24 2003 349 4
- Inomata , Y. , et.al. Development of the pop-up Engine Hood for Pedestrian Head Protection ESV21, 2009, Paper Number 09-0067
- Martin Jean-Louis , Lardy Audrey , Laumon Bernard Pedestrian Injury Patterns According to Car and Casualty Characteristics in France 55 Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine October 2011
- Kawabe , Y. , Asai , T. , Murakami , D. , Pal , C. et al. Different Factors Influencing Post-crash Pedestrian Kinematics SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 5 1 214 230 2012 10.4271/2012-01-0271
- Klinich , K. D. et al. Biomechanics of Pedestrian Injuries Related to Lower Extremity Injury Assessment Tools: A Review of the Literature and Analysis of Pedestrian Crash Database UMTRI-2003-25 Sept. 2003
- Longhitano , D. , Henary , B. , Bhalla , K. , Ivarsson , J. et al. Influence of Vehicle Body Type on Pedestrian Injury Distribution SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1876 2005 10.4271/2005-01-1876
- Lopez-Valdes , F. J. , Lau Sabrina , Riley Patrick , Lamp John , Kent Richard The Biomechanics of the Pediatric and Adult Human Thoracic Spine 55th AAAM Annual Conf. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine Oct. 3-5 2011
- Ikeda Miwako et al. Development of An Advanced Finite Element Model for A Pedestrian Pelvis ESV22, 2011, Paper Number 11-0009
- Mizuno , Y. Summary of IHRA Pedestrian Safety WG Activities ESV 19 138 2005
- Murakami , D. , et al. Analysis of pedestrian kinematics and injury mechanism in real world accidents F2012-F03-010 FISITA 2012
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Traffic Safety Facts 2010 http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov
- Okamoto , Y. , et al. Pedestrian Head Impact Conditions Depending on the Vehicle Front Shape and Its Construction - Full Model Simulation, Traffic Injury Prevention 4 74 82 2003
- Pal , C. , Okabe , T. , et al. Human FE Model to Estimate Head Contact Time for Pedestrian Protection Requirements ESV 2013, Paper Number 13-0376
- Peng RY. , Bongard FS. Pedestrian versus motor vehicle accidents: an analysis of 5,000 patients Journal of American College of Surgeons 1999 189 343 8
- People Size 2008 http://www.openerg.com/psz/anthropometry_data.html
- Rowe SA et al. Pelvic ring fractures: implication of vehicle design, crash type, and occupant characteristics Surgery 2004 136 842 47
- Salo Z. , Beek M. , Whyne C.M. Evaluation of mesh morphing and mapping techniques in patient specific modeling of the human pelvis International Journal Numerical Method Biomedical Engineering 2013 Jan 29 1 104 13
- Salzar , R.S. , Genovese , D. , Bass , C.R. , Bolton , R. , Guillemot , H. , Damon , A.M. and Crandall , J.R. Load Path Distribution within the Pelvic Structure under Lateral Loading International Crashworthiness Conference 14 1 99 110 2008
- Sato , F. , et al. Validation of Segmental Motion Properties of a Human Lumbar Finite Element Model JARI Journal Dec. 2012
- Serre , T. , et al. Child pedestrian anthropometry: evaluation of potential impact points during a crash Accident Analysis and Prevention 42 6 2010
- Somso www.holtanatomical.com/somso-models
- Stapleton PP , Strong VE , Freeman TA et al. Gender affects macrophage cytokine and prostaglandin E2production and PGE2receptor expression after trauma Journal of Surgery 2004 122 1 7
- Starnes , M. J. et al. Automobile Versus Pedestrian Injuries: Does Gender Matter? The Journal of Emergency Medicine 40 6 617 22 2011
- Subit , Kerrigan , Crandall , Fukuyama , Yamazaki , Kamiji , Yasuki Pedestrian-vehicle interaction: kinematics and injury analysis of four full scale tests International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury 2008
- Sugimoto , and Yamazaki First Results from the JAMA Human Body Model Project Enhanced Safety Vehicle 2005 05-0291.
- Takayama S. et al. The Clarification of Individual Injury Mechanism Difference in Pedestrian FE Model Utilizing Cadaver Scaling and Posturing Techniques ESV22, No.11-0414 2011
- Untario , C. D. et al. A finite Element Model of the Pelvis and Lower Limb for Automotive Impact Applications 12 th International LSDYNA conference 13 507 518 2012
- Matsui , Y. , Schroeder , G. , and Bosch , U. Injury Pattern and Response of Human Thigh under Lateral Loading Simulating Car-Pedestrian Impact SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1603 2004 10.4271/2004-01-1603
- Han Yong et al. Effects of Vehicle Impact Velocity, Vehicle Front-End Shapes on Pedestrian Injury Risk Traffic Injury Prevention 13 507 518 2012