This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Estimation of Pelvis Injuries and Head Impact Time using Different Pedestrian Human FE Models
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 1, 2014 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
A logistic regression analysis of accident cases in the NASS-PCDS (National Automotive Sampling System-Pedestrian Crash Data Study) database clearly shows that pedestrian pelvis injuries tend to be complex and depend on various factors such as the impact speed, the ratio of the pedestrian height to that of the bonnet leading edge (BLE) of the striking vehicle, and the gender and age of the pedestrian. Adult female models (50th %ile female AF50: 161 cm and 61 kg; 5th %ile female AF05: 154 cm and 50 kg) were developed by morphing the JAMA 50th %ile male AM50 and substituting the pelvis of the GHBMC AM50 model. The fine-meshed pelvis model thus obtained is capable of predicting pelvis fractures. Simulations conducted with these models indicate that the characteristics of pelvis injury patterns in male and female pedestrians are influenced by the hip/BLE height ratio and to some extent by the pelvis bone shape. A previously developed six-year-old (6YO) child pedestrian model and the newly developed models were used to estimate the head impact time (HIT) for a typical SUV fitted with an active pop-up hood system. The results indicate that instead of the 6YO child pedestrian, an AF05 pedestrian is the target pedestrian percentile for satisfying the Euro-NCAP test protocol requirements for SUVs. A female human body model with a pelvis fracture option showed a longer HIT than that of the pelvis model without a fracture option. The results of numerical simulations coincided well with the results of the statistical analysis.
CitationPal, C., Okabe, T., Vimalathithan, K., Manoharan, J. et al., "Estimation of Pelvis Injuries and Head Impact Time using Different Pedestrian Human FE Models," SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0522, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0522.
- Altair, Commercial software Hyper-works 10.1.
- Borg, E., “Innovative Bonnet Active Actuator (B2A) for Pedestrian Protection,” ESV22, 2011, Paper Number: 11-0113.
- Demetriades, D., Murray J., Sinz B., et al. “Epidemiology of major trauma and trauma deaths in Los Angeles County,” Journal Am Coll. Surgery 1998; 187: 373-83.
- GHBMC, http://www.ghbmc.com/
- Guillemot, H., Besnault, B., Robin, S., Got, C. et al., “Pelvic Injuries in Side Impact Collisions: A Field Accident Analysis and Dynamic Tests on Isolated Pelvic Bones,” SAE Technical Paper 973322, 1997, doi:10.4271/973322.
- Park Gwansik, et al., “Comparison of Kinematics of GHBMC to PMHS on the Side Impact Condition,” IRCOBI Conference 2013, IRC-13-41, pp. 368-379.
- Henrik G. et al., “Bone Loss and Bone Size after Menopause,” The New England Journal of Medicine July 24, 2003, Vol. 349 No.4.
- Inomata, Y., et.al., “Development of the pop-up Engine Hood for Pedestrian Head Protection,” ESV21, 2009, Paper Number 09-0067.
- Martin Jean-Louis, Lardy Audrey, Laumon Bernard, “Pedestrian Injury Patterns According to Car and Casualty Characteristics in France,” Vol. 55, Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine October, 2011.
- Kawabe, Y., Asai, T., Murakami, D., Pal, C. et al., “Different Factors Influencing Post-crash Pedestrian Kinematics,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 5(1):214-230, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0271.
- Klinich, K. D., et al., “Biomechanics of Pedestrian Injuries Related to Lower Extremity Injury Assessment Tools: A Review of the Literature and Analysis of Pedestrian Crash Database,” UMTRI-2003-25, Sept. 2003.
- Longhitano, D., Henary, B., Bhalla, K., Ivarsson, J. et al., “Influence of Vehicle Body Type on Pedestrian Injury Distribution,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1876, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-1876.
- Lopez-Valdes, F. J., Lau Sabrina, Riley Patrick, Lamp John, Kent Richard, “The Biomechanics of the Pediatric and Adult Human Thoracic Spine,” 55th AAAM Annual Conf. Annals of Advances in Automotive Medicine, Oct. 3-5, 2011.
- Ikeda Miwako, et al., “Development of An Advanced Finite Element Model for A Pedestrian Pelvis,” ESV22, 2011, Paper Number 11-0009.
- Mizuno, Y., “Summary of IHRA Pedestrian Safety WG Activities,” ESV 19, No. 138, 2005.
- Murakami, D., et al., “Analysis of pedestrian kinematics and injury mechanism in real world accidents”, F2012-F03-010 FISITA 2012.
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Traffic Safety Facts 2010, http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov.
- Okamoto, Y., et al., “Pedestrian Head Impact Conditions Depending on the Vehicle Front Shape and Its Construction - Full Model Simulation, Traffic Injury Prevention,” 4: pp. 74-82, 2003.
- Pal, C., Okabe, T., et al., “Human FE Model to Estimate Head Contact Time for Pedestrian Protection Requirements,” ESV 2013, Paper Number 13-0376.
- Peng RY., Bongard FS., “Pedestrian versus motor vehicle accidents: an analysis of 5,000 patients,” Journal of American College of Surgeons 1999; 189:343-8.
- People Size 2008, http://www.openerg.com/psz/anthropometry_data.html.
- Rowe SA, et al., “Pelvic ring fractures: implication of vehicle design, crash type, and occupant characteristics,” Surgery 2004; 136: 842-47.
- Salo Z., Beek M., Whyne C.M., “Evaluation of mesh morphing and mapping techniques in patient specific modeling of the human pelvis,” International Journal Numerical Method Biomedical Engineering, 2013 Jan; 29(1):104-13.
- Salzar, R.S., Genovese, D., Bass, C.R., Bolton, R., Guillemot, H., Damon, A.M. and Crandall, J.R., “Load Path Distribution within the Pelvic Structure under Lateral Loading,” International Crashworthiness Conference, 14(1): 99-110, 2008.
- Sato, F., et al., “Validation of Segmental Motion Properties of a Human Lumbar Finite Element Model,” JARI Journal, Dec. 2012.
- Serre, T., et al., “Child pedestrian anthropometry: evaluation of potential impact points during a crash,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 42, Issue 6, 2010.
- Somso, www.holtanatomical.com/somso-models.
- Stapleton PP, Strong VE, Freeman TA, et al., “Gender affects macrophage cytokine and prostaglandin E2production and PGE2receptor expression after trauma,” Journal of Surgery Res. 2004; 122: 1-7.
- Starnes, M. J., et al., “Automobile Versus Pedestrian Injuries: Does Gender Matter?,” The Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 6, pp. 617-22, 2011.
- Subit, Kerrigan, Crandall, Fukuyama, Yamazaki, Kamiji, Yasuki, “Pedestrian-vehicle interaction: kinematics and injury analysis of four full scale tests,” International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury, 2008.
- Sugimoto, and Yamazaki, “First Results from the JAMA Human Body Model Project,” Conference on the Enhanced Safety Vehicle, 2005, paper number 05-0291.
- Takayama S., et al., “The Clarification of Individual Injury Mechanism Difference in Pedestrian FE Model Utilizing Cadaver Scaling and Posturing Techniques,” ESV22, No.11-0414, 2011.
- Untario, C. D., et al., “A finite Element Model of the Pelvis and Lower Limb for Automotive Impact Applications,” 12th International LSDYNA conference, 13:507-518, 2012.
- Matsui, Y., Schroeder, G., and Bosch, U., “Injury Pattern and Response of Human Thigh under Lateral Loading Simulating Car-Pedestrian Impact,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1603, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-1603.
- Han Yong, et al., “Effects of Vehicle Impact Velocity, Vehicle Front-End Shapes on Pedestrian Injury Risk,” Traffic Injury Prevention, 13:507-518, 2012.