Try Mobilus Beta
Search tips
 This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.

Design and Flight Test of a Primary Flight Display Combined Vision System

Journal Article
2011-01-2525
ISSN: 1946-3855, e-ISSN: 1946-3901
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-2525
Published October 18, 2011 by SAE International in United States
Design and Flight Test of a Primary Flight Display Combined Vision System
Sector:
Citation: Ververs, P., He, G., Suddreth, J., Odgers, R. et al., "Design and Flight Test of a Primary Flight Display Combined Vision System," SAE Int. J. Aerosp. 4(2):738-750, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-2525.
Language: English

References

  1. Federal Aviation Administration March 2011 NextGen Implementation Plan Washington DC FAA
  2. Todd, J. R. Hester, R. B. Summers, L.G. 1992 Seeing through weather: Enhanced/Synthetic Vision Systems for commercial transports Proceedings of the IEEE/AIAA 11 th Digital Avionics Systems Conference 503 508
  3. Gulfstream scores double first as Federal Aviation Administration certifies EVS II and synthetic vision-primary flight display http://www.gulfstream.com/news/releases/2008/012808.htm February 20 2010
  4. Theunissen, E. Roefs, F. Rademaker, R.M. Etherington, T.J. 2004 Integration of Information in Synthetic Vision Displays: Why, to what Extent, and How? IEEE A&E Systems Magazine 19 7 19 24
  5. He, G. Feyereisen, T. Gannon, A. Wilson, B. Schmitt, J. Wyatt, S. Engels, J. 2005 Flight Tests of Advanced 3D-PFD with Commercial Flat-Panel Avionics Displays and EGPWS System Proceedings of SPIE 5802 177 184
  6. He, G. Feyereisen, T. Conner, K. Wyatt, S. Engels, J. Gannon, A. Wilson, B. 2007 EGPWS on Synthetic Vision Primary Flight Display Proceedings of SPIE 6559
  7. Arthur, J.J. Prinzel, L.J. Kramer, L.J. Bailey, R.E. Parrish, R. 2003 CFIT prevention using synthetic vision Verly, J.G. Proceedings of SPIE 5081
  8. Ververs, P. M. Rye, J. Reusser, T. Feyereisen, T. Misiak, C. 2003 Advancing the primary flight display Proceedings of the Twelfth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology Columbus, Ohio The Ohio State University
  9. Alexander, A. L. Wickens, C. D. Hardy, T. J. 2005 Synthetic vision systems: the effects of guidance symbology, display size, and field of view Human Factors 47 4 693 707
  10. Arthur, J.J. Kramer, L.J. Bailey, R.E. 2005 Flight test comparison between enhanced vision (FLIR) and synthetic vision systems Verly, J.G. Proceedings of SPIE 5802 25 36
  11. Fischer, E. Haines, R. F. Price, T. A. 1980 Cognitive issues in head-up display (NASA Technical Paper 1711) Moffett Field, CA NASA Ames Research Center
  12. Fadden, S. Ververs, P. M. Wickens, C. D. 1998 Costs and benefits of head-up display use: A meta-analytic approach Proceedings of the 42 nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Santa Monica, CA Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  13. Newman, R. L. 1995 Head-up displays: Designing the way ahead Brookfield, VT Ashgate
  14. Weintraub, D. J. Ensing, M. J. 1992 Human factors issues in head-up display design: The book of HUD (CSERIAC State of the Art Report 92-2) Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH Crew Station Ergonomics Information Analysis Center
  15. Fadden, S. Wickens, C. Ververs, P. “Costs and Benefits of Head Up Displays: An Attention Perspective and a Meta Analysis,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-5542 2000 10.4271/2000-01-5542
  16. Kramer, L.J. Bailey, R.E. Ellis, K.E. Norman, M. Williams, S. P. Arthur, J. J. Shelton, K. J. Prinzel, L.J. 2011 Enhanced and synthetic vision for terminal maneuvering area NextGen operations Güell, J.J. Bernier, K.L. Proceedings of SPIE, Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2011 8024
  17. Wickens, C. D. Ververs, P.M. Fadden, S. 2004 Head-up displays Harris, D. Human factors for civil flight deck design Aldershot, Hampshire Ashgate
  18. Bailey, R.E. Kramer, L.J. Williams, S.P. 2010 Enhanced vision for all-weather operations under NextGen Güell, J.J. Bernier, K.L. Proceedings of SPIE , Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2010
  19. Wickens, C.D. Long, J. 1995 Object vs. space-base models of visual attention: Implications for the use of head-up display Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1 179 194
  20. Mackworth, N. H. 1976 Stimulus density limits the useful field of view Monty, R. A. Senders, J. W. Eye movements and psychological processes New York John Wiley & Sons 307 321
  21. Schons, V. W. Wickens, C. D. 1993 Visual separation and information access in aircraft display layout (Technical Report ARL-93-7/NASA-AI-93-1) Savoy, IL University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory
  22. Ververs, P. M. Wickens, C. D. 1998 Head-up Displays: Effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance International Journal of Aviation Psychology 8 4 377 403
  23. Doherty, S.M. Wickens, C.D. 2000 An analysis of the immersed perspective flight path display benefit: Benefits of preview, prediction, and frame of reference (ARL-00-5/NASA-00-1) Savoy, IL University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory
  24. Woods, D. D. 1984 Visual momentum: A concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 21 229 244
  25. Wickens, C. D. 1993 Cognitive factors in display design Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 83 4 179 201
  26. Previc, F. H. Ercoline, W. R. 1999 The “outside-in” attitude display concept revisited International Journal of Aviation Psychology 9 4 377 401
  27. Korn, B.R. Biella, M. Lenz, H. 2008 Operational landing credit with EVS head down display: Crew procedure and human factors evaluation Güell, J. Uijt de Haag, M. Enhanced and Synthetic Vision. Proceedings of SPIE 6957
  28. Theunissen, E. Roefs, F.D. Koeners, G.J.M. Rademaker, R.D. Etherington, T.J. 2004 Integration of imaging sensor data into a synthetic vision display Proceedings of 23 rd Digital Systems Conference Salt Lake City, UT October 24 28 2004
  29. Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 90-106, Enhanced Flight Vision Systems. AC-90-106 June 2 2010
  30. Minimum Aviation System Performance Standards (MASPS) for Enhanced Vision Systems, Synthetic Vision Systems, Combined Vision Systems and Enhanced Flight Vision Systems RTCA Inc. Washington, DC Sept 2010
  31. Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular: Criteria for Approval of Category III Weather Minima for Takeoff, Landing, and Rollout July 13 1999
  32. Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular 120-29A, Criteria for approval of Category I and Category II weather minima for Approach August 12 2002
  33. Hart, S. G. Staveland, L. E. 1988 Development of NASA TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research Hancock, P. A. Mashkati, N. Human mental workload 139 183 North-Holland Elsevier

Cited By

Recommended Content

Aerospace Standard Flight Compartment Glare
Technical Paper Enhanced Vision System Option on Future Aircraft
Technical Paper Human Factors Flight Test Evaluation of an Airport Surface Display with Indications & Alerts (SURF IA)